Early years · Early years inspection (CIF)
Cambridge Children's Centre
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Group verified
Cambridge Nursery School Governing Body
- Group reference verified
RP903556
- Inspection date verified
6 Jun 2017
- Inspectors verified
Val Aspinall
- Early years verified
Good
- Leadership and management verified
Requires improvement
- Outcomes verified
Requires improvement
- Overall effectiveness verified
Requires improvement
- Personal development, behaviour and welfare verified
Requires improvement
- Previous overall verified
Good
- Teaching, learning and assessment verified
Requires improvement
- Postcode verified
L20 9LQ
- Name on report verified
Cambridge Children's Centre
- URN verified
EY339800
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.
- OverallRequires improvement
- Early yearsGood
- Leadership and managementRequires improvement
- OutcomesRequires improvement
- Personal development, behaviour and welfareRequires improvement
- Teaching, learning and assessmentRequires improvement
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type graded Requires improvement.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No strong criticism found.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Staff do not have a robust understanding of medication procedures. p.1
- They do not always obtain parental permission and do not maintain written records, as required. p.1
- The required progress check for children between the ages of two and three years is not always completed. p.1
- Children who speak English as an additional language are not encouraged to continue to develop their home language to support their overall learning. p.1
- Arrangements to monitor and support staff do not focus sharply on improving the effectiveness of their teaching. p.1
- The manager completes some evaluation of practice but this is not robust enough to identify all areas that require improvement. p.1
- Parents have many opportunities to be involved in their child's learning. p.1
- For example, staff plan stay-and-play activities and specialist sessions. p.1
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Teaching & assessment7
“Teaching during established routines is strong.” p.1Wellbeing & mental health3
“Staff know how to recognise and refer children whose well-being may be at risk.” p.3
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 5
- Words of findings
- 763
- about usual (typical 773)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 46, typical 48
- Average sentence
- 16 words
- Next steps
- 8
- typical 8
- Hedged sentences
- 8%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Cambridge Children's Centre Cambridge Road, Bootle, Merseyside, L20 9LQ
p.1
Inspection date
Previous inspection date 6 June 2017 25 March 2014
p.1
3
Effectiveness of the leadership and management Requires improvement Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Requires improvement Personal development, behaviour and welfare Requires improvement Outcomes for children Requires improvement
p.1
This provision requires improvement. It is not yet good because:
Staff do not have a robust understanding of medication procedures. They do not always obtain parental permission and do not maintain written records, as required. The required progress check for children between the ages of two and three years is not always completed. Children who speak English as an additional language are not encouraged to continue to develop their home language to support their overall learning. Arrangements to monitor and support staff do not focus sharply on improving the effectiveness of their teaching. The manager completes some evaluation of practice but this is not robust enough to identify all areas that require improvement.
p.1
It has the following strengths
Parents have many opportunities to be involved in their child's learning. For example, staff plan stay-and-play activities and specialist sessions. Effective partnerships with the children's centre team, and other agencies help children who have special educational needs and/or disabilities to make consistent progress. Teaching during established routines is strong. Staff focus well on supporting children's ability to speak and listen, and their physical coordination, to support future writing skills. Children enjoy their time at the nursery and develop their social skills and they make friends.
p.1
What the setting needs to do to improve further
To meet the requirements of the early years foundation stage the provider must:
p.2
Due Date
ensure that written permission is obtained from parents to administer specific medication and keep a written record each time medication is administered to a child 30/06/2017
p.2
Due Date
complete the progress check for all children aged between two and three years and provide parents with a short written summary of their child's development 30/06/2017
p.2
Due Date
improve the opportunities for children who speak English as an additional language to use their home language. 30/06/2017
p.2
Due Date
To further improve the quality of the early years provision the provider should:
p.2
Due Date
develop further the monitoring of staff practice to target support more precisely to raise the quality of teaching to a consistently good level make better use of ongoing self-evaluation to identify were improvements are required.
p.2
Inspection activities
The inspector observed the quality of teaching during activities indoors and outdoors and assessed the impact on children's learning. The inspector had a tour of the premises and spoke with staff and children during the inspection. The inspector completed a joint observation with the manager. The inspector held a meeting with the manager. She looked at relevant documentation and evidence of the suitability of staff working in the setting. The inspector spoke to several parents during the inspection and took account of their views provided in written feedback.
p.2
Effectiveness of the leadership and management requires improvement
Overall, the manager and her experienced team understand the requirements they must meet. However, some staff are not clear that a specific teething gel they provide is a medicine. This means they do not follow the established procedure of gaining written permission from parents to administer it, or appropriately record when it has been given. In this instance the risk posed is minimal as, on previous occasions, parents have been informed verbally that their child has had the same medicine with no ill effect. Staff have opportunities to attend additional training to develop their knowledge in specific areas of learning. However, the manager does not focus her support on helping individual staff to improve their teaching. Recruitment processes are thorough and rigorous monitoring helps to ensure the environment is safe and secure. Safeguarding is effective. Staff know how to recognise and refer children whose well-being may be at risk.
p.3
Quality of teaching, learning and assessment requires improvement
The requirement to assess the progress of two-year-old children is not consistently implemented. This means that children who may require extra support are not swiftly identified. The quality of teaching is variable. Staff deliver planned group activities well but are less effective in targeting teaching to reflect what individual children need to learn next. Staff reinforce mathematical ideas well, for example, as children mix pretend potions. Children enjoy exploring their developing language, such as when they recall phrases from a favourite story as they play. Babies join in action rhymes. Toddlers are encouraged to think about what items are hidden in a bag or to make marks in soap suds with brushes. Overall, children progress well from their starting points. However, staff are less effective in promoting children's home languages to strengthen their learning.
p.3
Personal development, behaviour and welfare require improvement
Weaknesses in procedures to administer medicine means that children's well-being is not promoted to the highest standard. However, overall, efforts to support children's emotional well-being are successful. Staff begin to get to know children on home visits and continue to build attachments through flexible settling-in processes. Great thought has gone into successfully organising space and routines to ensure children feel secure, particularly children who have special educational needs and/or disabilities. Children have good appetites for the healthy food on offer and confidently serve themselves. They play out in the fresh air in all weathers, putting on their own boots and wet weather clothing.
p.3
Outcomes for children require improvement
Overall, children develop positive attributes to learning and are generally ready for their move to school. Pre-school children confidently share their thoughts and are independent in their self-care. All children behave well, listen to staff and cooperate with each other.
p.3
Setting details
Unique reference number EY339800 Local authority Sefton Inspection number 1088008 Type of provision Full-time provision Day care type Childcare - Non-Domestic Registers Early Years Register Age range of children 0 - 4 Total number of places 73 Number of children on roll 121 Name of registered person Cambridge Nursery School Governing Body
p.4
reference number
Date of previous inspection 25 March 2014 Telephone number 0151 282 5467
p.4
reference number
Cambridge Children's Centre registered in 2007. The nursery is located in Bootle, Merseyside and employs 25 members of childcare staff. Of these, two hold early years professional status, one holds a PGCE and 18 staff are qualified from level 3 to level 6. The nursery opens Monday to Friday all year round. Sessions are from 8am until 6pm. The nursery receiving funding to provide free early education for two-, three- and four-year- old children.
p.4
reference number
This inspection was carried out by Ofsted under sections 49 and 50 of the Childcare Act 2006 on the quality and standards of provision that is registered on the Early Years Register. The registered person must ensure that this provision complies with the statutory framework for children’s learning, development and care, known as the early years foundation stage.
p.4
reference number
procedures set out in the guidance ‘Complaints procedure: raising concerns and making complaints about Ofsted’, which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.gov.uk/government/organisations/ofsted. If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk. achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, work-based learning and skills training, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection.
p.4
reference number
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk. You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/, write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .
p.5
reference number
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our website for news, information and updates at www.ofsted.gov.uk/user.
p.5
reference number
T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/government/organisations/ofsted
p.5
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion