Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (CIF)

Moorside Primary School & Nursery

Inspected 18 May 2017 · URN 121427

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    18 May 2017

  • Inspectors verified

    Phil Scott

  • Leadership and management verified

    Good

  • Outcomes verified

    Good

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Good

  • Personal development, behaviour and welfare verified

    Good

  • Previous overall verified

    Requires improvement

  • Teaching, learning and assessment verified

    Good

  • Postcode verified

    HG4 1SU

  • Name on report verified

    Moorside Junior School

  • URN verified

    121427

Page 1 of 11
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.

  • OverallGood
  • Leadership and managementGood
  • OutcomesGood
  • Personal development, behaviour and welfareGood
  • Teaching, learning and assessmentGood

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+60Positivemore positive than 28% of reports of this type graded Good
OutstandingGoodRIInadequate

In line with other reports of this type graded Good.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praisestrongexcellenteffectivelypositivehigh expectationsvery wellhigh-qualityeffective
Criticismweaknessesdisruptionnot yetat risknot consistentlyrequires improvementnot alwaysconcern

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improveLeadershipSafeguardingAbout the inspection positive critical
  • Findings1321w+54
  • Leadership755w+62
  • Safeguarding138w+58
  • What needs to improve83w+50

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
11
Words of findings
2,247
shorter than usual (typical 2966)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 43, typical 48
Average sentence
18 words
Next steps
1
typical 2
Hedged sentences
12%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 44%Leadership 25%Safeguarding 5%What needs to improve 3%About the inspection 23%

Full report text

Moorside Junior School Harrogate Road, Ripon, North Yorkshire HG4 1SU

p.1

Effectiveness of leadership and management Good

p.1

Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Good

p.1

Personal development, behaviour and welfare Good

p.1

Overall effectiveness at previous inspection Requires improvement

p.1

Summary of key findings for parents and pupils

 The skilful and resolute leadership of the executive headteacher and deputy headteacher and the hard work of the whole school team have transformed learning since the school was previously inspected.  The school has continued to improve because senior leaders and governors have tackled previous weaknesses with rigour and determination.  Leaders’ and governors’ continuing ambition to eradicate underperformance in every area of school life and to provide the best experiences for all pupils is translated into action. This means that the school is continuing to quickly improve.  The school benefits from a highly positive culture, in which the school values of caring, sharing, learning and growing are promoted and valued.  Pupils have access to an exciting curriculum that allows them to learn about and appreciate their local heritage and culture and is enhanced by a variety of specialists visiting school and trips and visits out of school.

p.1

Summary of key findings for parents and pupils

 As a result of good teaching, pupils learn quickly and can apply their skills across all subjects. Current pupils are now making strong progress in their learning.  Teachers have high expectations of what pupils can achieve, including the quality of pupils’ handwriting and presentation, which is rapidly improving.  Leaders’ planned and agreed actions to further improve teaching are not yet consistently implemented in every class.  Occasionally, the pace of learning slows in some lessons, and pupils lose concentration. Work set for groups of pupils to complete independently usually matches their needs and abilities, but not always.  The behaviour of pupils is good. They have respect and care for each other and display excellent manners.  Pupils have excellent attitudes to learning, work well together and are motivated to succeed. Most take great pride in their work.

p.1

What does the school needs to do to improve further?

 Strengthen the quality of teaching so that all pupils make rapid and sustained progress and reach the highest standards of which they are capable by: – ensuring that the pace of learning always allows pupils to be consistently engaged in lessons and maintain their concentration – ensuring that work set for pupils to complete independently is always closely matched to their needs and abilities – checking that agreed whole-school initiatives and actions to further improve teaching are implemented consistently in every class.

p.2

Effectiveness of leadership and management Good

 The executive headteacher and the deputy headteacher have been unwavering in their determination to secure an excellent standard of education for pupils in the school. Alongside governors and senior leaders, they have worked tirelessly and successfully to eliminate underperformance, improve the quality of teaching and accelerate the rates of progress that pupils make in their learning.  The school has worked hard to implement an accurate system for tracking pupils’ progress in learning across school and the standards they reach. Evidence from the school’s system, matched by work in pupils’ books, clearly shows that progress in all subjects is strong from pupils’ individual starting points on entry to the school.  Teachers work well together, are supportive of each other and appreciate the collegiate approach taken to school improvement. They benefit from sharing good practice and accessing high-quality professional development opportunities. Teachers’ performance

p.3

Effectiveness of leadership and management Good

management is rigorous and successfully drives forward further improvements in teaching across the school.  Leaders and governors have an accurate view of what the school does well, and what it needs to do to be even more successful. Procedures to monitor and evaluate the quality of the school’s performance through checking the quality of teaching are planned carefully, incisive and detailed, involving all leaders and governors.  Leaders’ plans for further improvements reflect a clear view of the school’s strengths and weaknesses. The school improvement plan is comprehensive and detailed, with targets closely aligned to the progress that pupils make in their learning. However, agreed actions and initiatives to further improve teaching are not yet consistently implemented in every class.  The school’s curriculum is rich and balanced, and it is regularly reviewed to ensure that it meets pupils’ needs and interests. It is closely linked to the local culture and

p.3

Effectiveness of leadership and management Good

heritage, and is enriched by a range of trips and visits, as well as other outdoor learning opportunities. Creative use is made of visiting specialists, especially in physical education and art. Displays of pupils’ artwork are stunning. The curriculum enables pupils to consolidate and extend their basic skills in reading and mathematics, and especially in writing.  The curriculum is supported well by a range of after-school activities during the school year, such as art, dance, computing, sports clubs and model building. Special focus events over the year enhance pupils’ learning, such as science weeks, European day of languages or a street party for the Queen’s 90th birthday. As a result of this exciting curriculum and a strong school ethos, pupils’ spiritual, moral, social and cultural development is good. In lessons and assemblies, the promotion of British values, such as democracy and the rule of law, prepare pupils well for life in modern Britain.

p.3

Effectiveness of leadership and management Good

 Leaders have managed pupil premium effectively to provide a range of targeted support for disadvantaged pupils to remove any barriers to learning, such as providing them with a ‘learning champion’ to support their work in school. The positive impact of these actions is seen through the good progress made by the small numbers of disadvantaged pupils across school, including the most able disadvantaged.  The physical education and sports funding has been used well. Sports coaches have delivered lessons in school and delivered after-school sports clubs. Professional development has been provided to staff, such as in teaching dance, and there has been an increased participation in local schools’ competitions. The school’s sports leader has effectively addressed pupils’ levels of fitness through special events, such as ‘skip to be fit’, and including an after-school session for parents.  Pupils who have special educational needs and/or disabilities are supported well. Their

p.3

Effectiveness of leadership and management Good

individual needs are identified early, and their progress, which is largely good, is tracked accurately. Each pupil has an individualised ‘my plan’ to support their needs and development. Consequently, the special educational needs funding is used effectively by leaders.

p.4

Governance of the school

 Governors are earnest and forthright about school improvement and bring a range of appropriate professional skills and experience to the school. The governors rigorously challenge and investigate the actions of leaders, while also offering good support. They have played an important role in driving forward school improvements and eradicating weaknesses.  Leaders are held to account for the quality of teaching, learning and assessment, as well as for the quality of outcomes for pupils seen in statutory tests and school data. They have an accurate and incisive view of the school’s strengths and weaknesses from first-hand experience, participating in monitoring activities alongside senior leaders. Governors are passionate to see all pupils fulfil their true potential.

p.4

Safeguarding

 The arrangements for safeguarding are effective.  The school has a tangible ethos that is positive and caring, putting the welfare and well-being of each pupil at the heart of all that it does. This is clearly seen in the friendly, happy and confident manner of the pupils in Moorside Junior School.  Policies, procedures and records are of high quality and up to date. Summary records of concern are comprehensive and detail timescales and actions. All staff are appropriately trained and have access to well-written policies and guidance. As a result, they have a secure understanding of their individual responsibilities for safeguarding.  The long-established culture of keeping pupils safe remains evident. Leaders ensure that a mind-set of safeguarding is embedded among all staff and leave no stone unturned in their duty to keep pupils safe.

p.4

Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Good

 The quality of teaching has improved since the previous inspection. The impact of teaching on learning, including in reading, writing and mathematics, is reflected in the strong progress that pupils now make in each year group.  Lessons are usually lively and interesting, capturing pupils’ imagination and engagement. For example, pupils in Year 6 were captivated by a short musical video clip and thoughtfully discussed aspects of body language that demonstrated determination and how to portray tension.  Teachers use good subject knowledge and structure learning effectively. In the Year 4 and 5 class, pupils reflected the teacher’s use of technical vocabulary when writing the description of a setting, referring to relative clauses and noun phrases and using hyphens and dashes.  The pace of learning in lessons allows pupils to be engaged and maintain their concentration and application in tasks. Teachers have high expectations of pupils’

p.5

Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Good

behaviour and stick closely to the school’s behaviour policy. Occasional low-level disruption, often resulting from a slower pace in learning, is addressed quickly and effectively.  Work is usually pitched well according to pupils’ abilities, including for the most able pupils. In the Year 5 class, most-able pupils were challenged, in their writing about a character, to write in the first person and include an internal monologue of the character’s perceptions. On rare occasions, work for pupils to complete independently is not well matched to their needs and abilities.  In mathematics, basic skills of number and calculation are taught daily and consolidated regularly. All areas of the mathematics curriculum are taught thoroughly, such as in Year 5 when pupils were finding the size of five equal angles around a point and calculating the size of missing angles on a straight line, as part of their topic on

p.5

Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Good

measurement.  Pupils write often and extensively, usually linking work to the topic that they are studying, such as in the Year 3 and 4 class when pupils enjoyed learning to write a newspaper article about the execution of Anne Boleyn, as part of their topic on the Tudors.  Minor inconsistencies remain in the extent to which some teachers implement agreed whole-school actions and initiatives relating to teaching, for example in the agreed way in which teachers model work for pupils. These are quickly being resolved.

p.5

Personal development and welfare

 The school’s work to promote pupils’ personal development and welfare is good. Pupils show respect and care for each other. They value their classmates’ opinions and work happily and cooperatively in lessons. Pupils’ attitudes to learning are very positive, and most are very keen to succeed and to always produce their very best work.  Pupils appreciate the positive school environment. Displays are bright and attractive and support learning very well. The gargoyle masks created by pupils typify the high- quality artwork on display around school.  Pupils reported that they feel safe at all times, including online. Pupils’ spiritual, moral, social and cultural awareness is very good and supports their strong personal development well. Other cultures are promoted effectively, and pupils appreciate learning a few words of other languages, such as Polish.

p.5

Behaviour

 The behaviour of pupils is good. The strong relationships in school and high levels of trust between adults and pupils ensure that most pupils conduct themselves well in lessons and around school. Pupils are polite and friendly to each other and to visitors. Playtimes are usually harmonious occasions when pupils play happily together and enjoy the small equipment provided. Older pupils take turns to act as ‘play leaders’ for younger pupils.  Pupils enjoy their learning, and most work conscientiously. Incidents of low-level disruption are rare, occurring mainly as a result of pupils losing concentration and engagement in lessons when the pace of learning slows. The very few incidents of misbehaviour are deftly addressed, using the school’s behaviour systems involving red and yellow cards.  Pupils clearly enjoy school. This is demonstrated by their rates of attendance being higher than those found nationally are.

p.6

Outcomes for pupils Good

 Progress and attainment have improved since the previous inspection. Evidence from the high-quality work in pupils’ books, matched by detailed information from the school’s current tracking system, shows unequivocally that current pupils are making strong progress in reading, writing and mathematics from their individual starting points in Moorside Junior School.  Progress measures across key stage 2 in writing, as presented in statutory assessment 2016 data, do not paint a clear picture of pupils’ actual progress. The school has demonstrative evidence that this cohort of pupils made solid progress from their individual starting points.  Progress is continuing to accelerate across key stage 2. Most pupils’ strong progress from their individual starting points means that a much larger proportion of pupils are now working at standards expected for their age.  The progress of the current most-able and most-able disadvantaged pupils matches

p.6

Outcomes for pupils Good

that of their classmates and is continuing to accelerate. In the most recent statutory Year 6 assessments, the proportion that attained a high score in reading and mathematics exceeded that found nationally, and the proportion working at greater depth in writing was in line. The school supports the achievement of its most-able pupils very well.  As a result of the effective and strategic use of the pupil premium funding, disadvantaged pupils in each year group make good progress in English and mathematics and achieve well, although there are small variations in each cohort across school. The small number of disadvantaged pupils in every year group prevents any reliable statistical comparisons to national data.  The school is quick to identify any pupils who may be at risk of falling behind. Staff make effective provision for these pupils through activities that are well matched to their individual needs and abilities. This includes pupils who have special educational

p.6

Outcomes for pupils Good

needs and/or disabilities. When needed, individual support plans are in place, with challenging targets. As a result, the progress made by these pupils is largely good from their individual starting points.

p.7

School details

This inspection of the school was carried out under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.

p.8

School details

Appropriate authority The governing body

p.8

School details

Website www.moorside-jun.n-yorks.sch.uk/

p.8

School details

Email address admin@moorside-jun.n-yorks.sch.uk

p.8

School details

Date of previous inspection 6 ─ 7 May 2015

p.8

Information about this school

 The school meets requirements on the publication of specified information on its website.  Moorside Junior School is smaller than the average-sized primary school.  The proportion of pupils known to be eligible for support through the pupil premium is below the national average.  The vast majority of pupils are of White British heritage and speak English as their first language.  The proportion of pupils who have special educational needs and/or disabilities is below average.  The school meets the current floor standard, which is the government’s minimum expectation for attainment and progress in English and mathematics at the end of Year 6.  The school meets the Department for Education’s definition of a coasting school, based on Key Stage [2/4] academic performance results in 2014, 2015 and 2016.  The school has experienced a number of changes to staffing since the previous inspection.

p.8

Information about this inspection

 The inspector observed learning in lessons. Most lessons were observed jointly with either the executive headteacher or the deputy headteacher. In addition, the inspector, alongside the deputy headteacher, reviewed a sample of pupils’ work.  The inspector held meetings with the executive headteacher and deputy headteacher, members of the governing body and other members of the teaching staff. He also held meetings with a group of pupils and two representatives from the local authority.  The inspector viewed a range of documents, including information on pupils’ achievements over time, the school’s data on recent and current progress and achievement of pupils and the school’s view on how well it is doing. The inspector also reviewed the school improvement plan, documents relating to safeguarding and records of behaviour and attendance.  The inspector took account of the 32 parental responses to the online questionnaire

p.10

Information about this inspection

and to the school’s own recent questionnaire for parents, and to the seven responses to the questionnaire for staff. The school’s website was also scrutinised.

p.10

Inspection team

Phil Scott, lead inspector Ofsted inspector guidance ‘Raising concerns and making a complaint about Ofsted’, which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.gov.uk/government/publications/complaints-about-ofsted . If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.10

Inspection team

In the report, ‘disadvantaged pupils’ refers to those pupils who attract government pupil premium funding: pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years and pupils in care or who left care through adoption or another formal route. www.gov.uk/pupil-premium-information-for-schools-and- alternative-provision-settings .

p.11

Inspection team

You can use Parent View to give Ofsted your opinion on your child’s school. Ofsted will use the information parents and carers provide when deciding which schools to inspect and when and as part of the inspection.

p.11

Inspection team

You can also use Parent View to find out what other parents and carers think about schools in England. You can visit www.parentview.ofsted.gov.uk , or look for the link on the main Ofsted website: www.gov.uk/government/organisations/ofsted .

p.11

Inspection team

achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.

p.11

Inspection team

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.11

Inspection team

You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open- government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.11

Inspection team

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.11

Inspection team

T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.11

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion