Schools & FE · School inspection (CIF)
Paget High School
Summary
Bianka Zemke (lead), David Hermitt, Julie Griffiths, Sara Arkle
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
10 May 2017
- Inspectors verified
Bianka Zemke, David Hermitt, Julie Griffiths, Sara Arkle
- 16 to 19 study programmes verified
Good
- Leadership and management verified
Requires improvement
- Outcomes verified
Requires improvement
- Overall effectiveness verified
Requires improvement
- Personal development, behaviour and welfare verified
Requires improvement
- Previous overall verified
Requires improvement
- Teaching, learning and assessment verified
Requires improvement
- Postcode verified
DE14 3DR
- Name on report verified
Paget High School
- URN verified
124392
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2015.
- OverallRequires improvement
- 16 to 19 study programmesGood
- Leadership and managementRequires improvement
- OutcomesRequires improvement
- Personal development, behaviour and welfareRequires improvement
- Teaching, learning and assessmentRequires improvement
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type graded Requires improvement.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- In some lessons, pupils respond with low-level disruption because lessons are not well planned, teachers lack expertise in behaviour management or do not consistently apply the school’s behaviour for learning policy. p.6
- Teachers do not have consistently high expectations of what pupils can achieve and the quality of teaching varies widely across subjects. p.1
- Teachers’ assessments in key stage 3 do not effectively identify when pupils are falling behind with their work. p.1
- Senior leaders have tackled several weaknesses from the previous inspection report but the pace of improvement has been slower than it needed to be. p.1
- Leaders’ efforts to overcome these weaknesses are not having a quick impact. p.1
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Improve teaching, so that pupils, especially disadvantaged pupils, make consistently good progress, by ensuring that all teachers: – have high expectations of the quantity and quality of work that pupils should produce – consistently apply the school’s ‘non-negotiables’ policy to improve the quality of learning for all pupils. p.2
- Improve behaviour so that the number of fixed-term exclusions and internal isolations reduce by ensuring that all staff: – have high expectations of pupils’ behaviour – consistently apply the school’s behaviour policy. p.2
- An external review of governance should be undertaken in order to assess how this aspect of leadership may be improved. p.2
- An external review of the school’s use of the pupil premium funding should be undertaken in order to assess how this aspect of leadership may be improved. p.2
- Leaders’ implementation of improvement strategies has been too slow since the last inspection. p.3
- The quality of teaching has improved but, other than in the sixth form, it varies too much. p.3
- Consequently, pupils’ progress, especially that of disadvantaged pupils, is not improving fast enough. p.3
- Leaders have introduced several initiatives to bring about improvement. p.3
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 12
- Words of findings
- 3,306
- about usual (typical 3064)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 46, typical 47
- Average sentence
- 16 words
- Next steps
- 8
- typical 8
- Hedged sentences
- 9%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Paget High School Burton Road, Branston, Burton-on-Trent, Staffordshire DE14 3DR
p.1
Overall effectiveness Requires improvement
p.1
Effectiveness of leadership and management Requires improvement
p.1
Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Requires improvement
p.1
Personal development, behaviour and welfare Requires improvement
p.1
Outcomes for pupils Requires improvement
p.1
Overall effectiveness at previous inspection Requires improvement
p.1
Summary of key findings for parents and pupils
This is a school that requires improvement
p.1
Summary of key findings for parents and pupils
Senior leaders have tackled several weaknesses from the previous inspection report but the pace of improvement has been slower than it needed to be. Disadvantaged pupils’ progress, although improving, is not sustained in some subjects, including English and mathematics. Leaders do not carry out sufficient evaluation on the impact of pupil premium funding. Senior leaders’ evaluation of their actions to bring about improvement lacks precision and does not focus enough on pupils’ achievement. Teachers’ assessments in key stage 3 do not effectively identify when pupils are falling behind with their work. Consequently, leaders and teachers cannot quickly intervene to support pupils. Teachers do not have consistently high expectations of what pupils can achieve and the quality of teaching varies widely across subjects. As a result, groups of pupils are not achieving as well as they should. Pupils have low basic skills in literacy and
p.1
Summary of key findings for parents and pupils
numeracy. Leaders’ efforts to overcome these weaknesses are not having a quick impact. Governors do not have a good enough understanding of the school’s published performance data. There are some weaknesses in how they hold leaders to account, partly because governors rely too heavily on leaders to interpret it for them. Teachers’ expectations of pupils’ behaviour are not consistently high. Too often, pupils, especially disadvantaged boys, have been excluded from school life.
p.1
Summary of key findings for parents and pupils
Senior leaders have created an inclusive school where every pupil is valued. Leaders have designed a very well-balanced and broad curriculum in which pupils follow appropriate courses for their ability range. Pupils feel safe and are safe in school. They are well cared for and appreciate the support that adults give them when they need it. The sixth form is good. Strong teaching and excellent attitudes to learning have resulted in good outcomes for pupils. The school farm contributes significantly towards the broadening of the school’s curriculum. It offers pastoral support, extra- curricular activities and provides enterprise opportunities for all pupils.
p.1
What does the school need to do to improve further?
Improve teaching, so that pupils, especially disadvantaged pupils, make consistently good progress, by ensuring that all teachers: – have high expectations of the quantity and quality of work that pupils should produce – consistently apply the school’s ‘non-negotiables’ policy to improve the quality of learning for all pupils. Strengthen leadership by ensuring that: – leaders swiftly and effectively evaluate improvement strategies to check the impact they are having on pupils’ outcomes – leaders make better use of the school’s system to track pupils’ achievement to identify where interventions and additional support are needed – leaders evaluate the impact of pupil premium funding on pupils’ achievement – governors are trained to understand externally published information about pupils’ attainment and progress so that they are able to hold leaders to account for the school’s performance – there is a school-wide, consistently applied strategy for improving pupils’ literacy
p.2
What does the school need to do to improve further?
and numeracy skills. Improve behaviour so that the number of fixed-term exclusions and internal isolations reduce by ensuring that all staff: – have high expectations of pupils’ behaviour – consistently apply the school’s behaviour policy.
p.2
What does the school need to do to improve further?
An external review of governance should be undertaken in order to assess how this aspect of leadership may be improved.
p.2
What does the school need to do to improve further?
An external review of the school’s use of the pupil premium funding should be undertaken in order to assess how this aspect of leadership may be improved.
p.2
Effectiveness of leadership and management Requires improvement
Leaders’ implementation of improvement strategies has been too slow since the last inspection. The quality of teaching has improved but, other than in the sixth form, it varies too much. Consequently, pupils’ progress, especially that of disadvantaged pupils, is not improving fast enough. Leaders have introduced several initiatives to bring about improvement. The ‘non- negotiables’ policy, for example, sets out minimum expectations for staff and pupils. While this policy is beginning to have some impact on improving the quality of teaching, learning and assessment it has been too recently introduced to have had a sustained impact on the development of pupils’ skills, knowledge and understanding. School leaders do not effectively analyse the impact of their actions on pupils’ outcomes. This means they are not in a position to put timely interventions in place to support pupils who are at risk of falling behind. As a result, the support and
p.3
Effectiveness of leadership and management Requires improvement
interventions that have been provided are not enabling pupils’ good learning. Leaders’ evaluation of the effectiveness of the pupil premium funding and Year 7 catch- up funding lacks precision and detail. Leaders are not always able to identify which strategies are having a positive impact on pupils’ achievement and which are not. Leaders’ approach to checking pupils’ achievement in Years 7 to 10 has not been effective enough. Teachers’ assessments do not enable leaders to spot when pupils or groups of pupils are falling behind with their work. As a result, some pupils are not given the help they need to catch up. Leaders are fully aware of this problem and are now planning a new approach. Tracking of pupils’ learning is more effective in Year 11. Here, regular assessments are compared with GCSE target grades and careful moderation helps teachers to give accurate information about pupils’ progress.
p.3
Effectiveness of leadership and management Requires improvement
Senior leaders have a clear vision and drive for the school. They know their school well and have high aspirations for the standard of education they provide. The impact of leadership in the sixth form is good. The leadership of teaching now has a number of strengths. Leaders provide targeted training and support for teachers because they know where teaching is strong and where it needs improvement. Recruiting high-quality teachers has proved challenging in recent years, resulting in shortfalls in some subjects. This has led to inconsistencies in teaching which have a negative impact on pupils’ learning and behaviour. Leaders have recognised this and have acted accordingly. The school is now set to be fully staffed for the new academic year in September 2017. Middle leaders form a hardworking and committed group of professionals. They are now fully engaged in the school’s improvement drive and play a vital role in the
p.3
Effectiveness of leadership and management Requires improvement
implementation of the ‘non-negotiables’ policy across the school. Middle leaders have an accurate picture of the quality of teaching and learning within their subjects. The curriculum is broad, balanced and designed effectively to support pupils’ learning. Extra-curricular activities include numerous sporting activities, the Duke of Edinburgh’s Award and the school farm. All pupils speak very highly of the many activities on offer at the farm. These activities range from enterprise activities to well-being support for pupils whose circumstances make them vulnerable. All pupils have the opportunity to take an active role in the running of a real business. These activities complement the curriculum very well and allow pupils to broaden their learning considerably.
p.3
Governance of the school
The governing body does not hold school leaders to account well. Governors do not have enough understanding for themselves about pupils’ outcomes and changes to national assessment systems. They overly rely on leaders to interpret information about the school’s performance for the governing body. Consequently, governors have not been effective enough in challenging leaders about low outcomes, especially for disadvantaged pupils. Governance has several strengths. Governors are proud of the school and play a very active part in school life. They visit the school regularly as link governors and understand many day-to-day issues. For example, governors were able to highlight the strengths and weaknesses of different subjects within the school and when they have a clear understanding of the information they are presented with, they influence improvements. The governing body discharges its statutory duties with diligence. For example,
p.4
Governance of the school
governors carefully monitor the school’s budget, they check that safeguarding arrangements are robust and ensure that performance management focuses on improving the quality of teaching.
p.4
Safeguarding
The arrangements for safeguarding are effective. School leaders have ensured that all statutory safeguarding duties, including recruitment checks, policies and training, are in place. They keep accurate records and liaise well with other agencies as and when required. Leaders have successfully created a culture throughout the school of keeping pupils safe. Staff understand the school’s detailed policies and procedures, and their responsibility to keep pupils safe. Members of staff receive regular training and updates about safeguarding and, as a result, they are confident to make referrals if they have any concerns. Leaders deal with all such referrals speedily and appropriately. All pupils who spoke with inspectors, and those who completed the online questionnaire, confirm they feel safe in school. The large majority of parents who completed the Parent View questionnaire also confirmed their child feels safe in school.
p.4
Safeguarding
Pupils have a secure understanding of how to keep themselves and others safe. They understand the risks surrounding online safety and social media. Pupils who spoke with inspectors about some poor behaviour in lessons were clear that the low-level nature of the disruption means that it does not make them feel unsafe.
p.4
Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Requires improvement
The quality of teaching and learning varies between year groups. It is weaker in key stage 3, but stronger in key stage 4 and the sixth form. Consequently pupils, and especially disadvantaged pupils, make slower progress than they should in several subjects. In some lessons teachers do not consistently expect pupils to work hard and do their best. The quality of work in pupils’ books varies too much. Pieces of work are sometimes incomplete or poorly presented. Teachers do not routinely challenge poor work. Not all teachers consistently apply the ‘non-negotiables’ policy in lessons, which includes high expectations of pupils’ behaviour and achievement. As a result, some pupils’ attitudes to learning are negative. They become disengaged in their studies and display off-task behaviour. The assessment of pupils’ learning in key stage 3 is not effective. It does not allow teachers to identify early enough when pupils are falling behind in their work. This
p.5
Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Requires improvement
results in interventions not being timely enough for pupils to catch up. Leaders have recognised this and are now planning a new approach to evaluating the learning of all pupils in key stage 3. Weaknesses in pupils’ literacy are not being tackled consistently enough. Successful teaching of literacy skills in some lessons results in improved spelling and punctuation in pupils’ work. Where teaching is weaker, pupils’ literacy skills remain low and show no signs of improving. Some teaching is characterised by skilful questioning, high expectations and work that is well matched to the needs of pupils. For example, in a computing lesson the teacher’s high expectations of what pupils are able to achieve led to almost all pupils making strong progress. Similarly, relationships between teachers and pupils are strong in some classes. They lead to effective learning and good progress. Pupils in these classes display a positive
p.5
Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Requires improvement
learning ethos and attitudes towards their studies. This was seen in several lessons by inspectors, including in science and computing. Teaching in the sixth form is consistently good. Teachers use their secure subject knowledge to plan engaging and challenging activities that are well matched to students’ abilities. Excellent relationships mean that teachers give students high-quality feedback and guidance. Positive attitudes to learning mean that students act on their teachers’ guidance and make good progress.
p.5
Personal development and welfare
The school’s work to promote pupils’ personal development and welfare is good. Governors, staff, parents and pupils share the headteacher’s vision for a school in which pupils ‘experience an inclusive and caring school, striving in partnership with the community to become resilient learners with high aspirations and levels of achievement’. Pupils feel safe because teachers and other adults provide care and support, especially to those who need it most. The majority of parents who responded to Ofsted’s Parent View agreed that their children are happy and well looked after in school. The inclusive and caring ethos of the school is a strength. Pupils feel valued and the majority who completed the online survey said that they are encouraged to respect others’ differences. This ethos permeates the school and was evident during the inspection. Inspectors saw and met with courteous and friendly pupils.
p.5
Personal development and welfare
Pupils understand different types of bullying and they know what to do if they experience any. Pupils told inspectors that bullying is rare in the school and they expressed confidence in adults to deal swiftly and effectively with any that occurs. Several pupils told inspectors how much they appreciated the support from members of staff when they experienced difficulties. Parents, pupils and staff are unanimous in their praise for the pastoral care the school provides. Pupils know who to talk to if they need help, support or have concerns. Parents who responded on Parent View commented on the high-quality pastoral provision of the school. The very small number of pupils who study full time or for part of the week at an off- site provider achieve well because teachers give them high levels of support, both when they are in school and when they are attending their alternative provider. School staff regularly visit pupils at their vocational placements to ensure that they are safe.
p.6
Personal development and welfare
The personal development of these pupils is good.
p.6
Behaviour
The behaviour of pupils requires improvement. The number of pupils who have been excluded for a fixed term or internally isolated remains high, particularly for disadvantaged boys. The school farm is now beginning to have a positive impact on behaviour. Pupils who display challenging behaviour have intervention sessions at the farm to improve their engagement in learning. Records show that pupils are now reintegrating into their classes because of the interventions taking place at the farm. In some lessons, pupils respond with low-level disruption because lessons are not well planned, teachers lack expertise in behaviour management or do not consistently apply the school’s behaviour for learning policy. For example, in some lessons during the inspection, pupils talked while the teacher was speaking, shouted out or were not attentive. In a few lessons, some pupils did little work or work of poor quality.
p.6
Behaviour
A small minority of pupils lack self-discipline. Teachers do not apply the school’s behaviour policy consistently with these pupils. As a result, pupils are unclear about the expectations staff have of them. In conversation with inspectors, pupils said that ‘not all teachers deal with bad behaviour in the same way’. Pupils who completed the online survey said that behaviour is not dealt with fairly by some staff. Behaviour around school between lessons, at break and at lunchtime is good. The school is calm and orderly. Pupils are sensible and courteous to each other and to adults. Attendance is in line with the national average. The attendance of disadvantaged pupils, which has been low for several years, improved last year and further improvement is evident this year. Consequently, differences between attendance of disadvantaged pupils and that of others are diminishing. Pupils who attend alternative provision full time or for part of the week attend regularly
p.6
Behaviour
and their placements help them to re-engage with education. Several received temporary exclusions last year, contributing to the school’s high exclusion figures.
p.7
Outcomes for pupils Requires improvement
Although pupils make average progress overall from their low starting points, the progress of disadvantaged pupils remains below that of pupils nationally in several subjects, including English and mathematics. Over recent years and up to 2015, disadvantaged pupils’ progress had declined significantly and differences between their outcomes and those of other pupils nationally had grown. However, GCSE results in 2016 indicate that leaders have stemmed this decline. Disadvantaged pupils’ progress has risen and differences, although still existing, are now beginning to narrow. The use of pupil premium funding has not had the desired effect on disadvantaged pupils’ progress. This is because the evaluation is not focused enough upon the impact of spending on pupils’ achievement. Many pupils have weak basic literacy and numeracy skills when they join the school. A school-wide programme to improve literacy levels has recently been introduced.
p.7
Outcomes for pupils Requires improvement
Inconsistent application of the school’s literacy strategy, however, means that progress has been slower than it might have been. There is no programme to tackle pupils’ weak numeracy skills beyond mathematics lessons and consequently these are not improving quickly enough. GCSE results for 2016 show that pupils made good progress in several subjects including art and design, personal finance and health and social care. Pupils made weak progress in English, mathematics, German and history. Standards in science have improved, although they still fall below the national average. Leaders have recognised the major shortfalls in science and restructured the curriculum. As a result, teaching has now improved and pupils are making better progress. Pupils who have special educational needs and/or disabilities made good progress in 2016 as they left Year 11, and better progress than their peers in some subjects. Extra
p.7
Outcomes for pupils Requires improvement
help from specialised teaching assistants supports pupils in lessons and enables them to tackle tasks, even when classroom teaching is weaker. Personalised support helps pupils to catch up with their work. The school’s careers advice and guidance scheme offers a range of advice to pupils in key stage 4 about appropriate sixth-form options and apprenticeships. The programme is effective and prepares pupils well for life beyond secondary school. Pupils are complimentary about the advice and support they receive. Standards in the sixth form have improved, from a low base, over the past two years. Results in all subjects are at least in line with national figures. Boys and girls achieve similar standards and the progress of disadvantaged students is similar to that of other students nationally. The proportion of students achieving the very top A-level grades, remains below national figures however.
p.7
16 to 19 study programmes Good
The sixth form has grown in popularity within the community and, as a result, has rising numbers of students. It offers sixth-form experiences to students who were unsuccessful in other colleges and gives them the opportunity to gain access to higher education. Students are very complimentary about the school and the fact that some students are able to complete three-year courses. The sixth form is well led and has many strengths. All requirements of the 16 to 19 study programmes are met. Leaders understand its few weaknesses and have effective plans in place to secure further improvement. High expectations, excellent relationships and strong teaching have resulted in positive outcomes. The curriculum in the sixth form is broad and balanced. It offers a range of level 2 and 3 courses in academic and vocational subjects. It is the only sixth-form provider to offer such courses within the local area. As a result, many students join the sixth form
p.8
16 to 19 study programmes Good
from a range of other secondary schools. Students have access to a broad and appropriate range of activities that supplement their academic studies. For example, students are heavily involved in the running and upkeep of the school farm and are encouraged to undertake a work experience placement that is closely matched to their future career aspirations. High-quality careers education enables students to make informed choices about their futures. Almost all students who completed their courses in 2016 moved into higher education, employment or apprenticeship. A number of students have been successful in securing places at prestigious universities across the country. All learners who start the sixth form without a GCSE grade C or above in English or mathematics are required to follow a course to improve their results. Success rates on these courses are poor, however. This is because students are entered for the
p.8
16 to 19 study programmes Good
qualifications before they are ready. Leaders are aware that this is the weakest aspect of the sixth form. Students are very proud of and complimentary about their sixth form. They are articulate and mature, and conduct themselves in an exemplary fashion. Attendance in the sixth form is slightly below that in the rest of the school, however. Leaders are aware of this and are taking steps to tackle the issue.
p.8
School details
This inspection of the school was carried out under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.
p.9
School details
Gender of pupils in 16 to 19 study programmes Mixed
p.9
School details
Of which, number on roll in 16 to 19 study programmes Appropriate authority The governing body
p.9
School details
Email address office@paget.staffs.sch.uk
p.9
School details
Date of previous inspection 24–25 June 2015
p.9
Information about this school
The school does meet requirements on the publication of information about governance on its website. The school is an average-sized secondary school. The proportion of pupils who are from minority ethnic backgrounds is above average, the largest group being of Pakistani heritage. The proportion who speak English as an additional language is above average. The proportion of pupils who have special educational needs and/or disabilities is below average. The proportion of disadvantaged pupils is average. Full- or part-time off-site alternative provision is currently provided for a small number of pupils in Years 9 to 11 at the Burton PRU–Short Stay School (which is a pupil referral unit) and Curzon Street Business Centre for vocational courses such as motor mechanics and bricklaying. The school meets the government’s current floor standards, which set the minimum expectations for students’ attainment and progress in English and mathematics by the
p.9
Information about this school
end of Year 11. The school runs a farm and an orchard, including a falconry, on the school site. These provide opportunities and support for pupils and students from the local schools.
p.10
Information about this inspection
Inspectors observed teaching and learning in lessons across subjects, and observed some lessons with a senior leader. They observed pupils’ behaviour between lessons and at breaktime and lunchtime. Inspectors evaluated the work in pupils’ books and folders in lessons across a range of subjects and year groups. They listened to pupils of different abilities read. Inspectors held meetings with governors, senior and middle leaders, and teachers, including those that are newly qualified. The views of parents were considered through the 36 responses to Parent View, Ofsted’s online questionnaire, as well as the 28 free-text comments parents provided. Inspectors considered 70 responses to Ofsted’s online questionnaire for staff. Pupils met with inspectors in four separate focus groups. Inspectors had numerous informal discussions with pupils. Inspectors also considered pupils’ views from their responses to Ofsted’s online questionnaire for pupils.
p.11
Information about this inspection
Inspectors reviewed a wide range of documentation. This included: the school’s self- evaluation and action plans; minutes of meetings of the governing body; school policies; information about pupils’ attainment and progress, behaviour, attendance and the quality of teaching, learning and assessment. Inspectors visited ‘The School Farm’ and the on-site isolation hub.
p.11
Inspection team
Bianka Zemke, lead inspector Ofsted Inspector
p.11
Inspection team
David Hermitt Ofsted Inspector guidance ‘Raising concerns and making a complaint about Ofsted’, which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.gov.uk/government/publications/complaints-about-ofsted . If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.11
Inspection team
In the report, ‘disadvantaged pupils’ refers to those pupils who attract government pupil premium funding: pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years and pupils in care or who left care through adoption or another formal route. www.gov.uk/pupil-premium-information-for-schools-and- alternative-provision-settings .
p.12
Inspection team
You can use Parent View to give Ofsted your opinion on your child’s school. Ofsted will use the information parents and carers provide when deciding which schools to inspect and when and as part of the inspection.
p.12
Inspection team
You can also use Parent View to find out what other parents and carers think about schools in England. You can visit www.parentview.ofsted.gov.uk , or look for the link on the main Ofsted website: www.gov.uk/government/organisations/ofsted .
p.12
Inspection team
achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.
p.12
Inspection team
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.12
Inspection team
You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open- government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .
p.12
Inspection team
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .
p.12
Inspection team
T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.12
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion