Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Early years · Early years inspection (CIF)

Albert House Day Nursery

Inspected 31 May 2017 · published 20 Jun 2017 · URN 511401

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Group verified

    Lisa Michelle Rigby

  • Group reference verified

    RP902975

  • Inspection date verified

    31 May 2017

  • Inspectors verified

    Scott Thomas-White

  • Early years verified

    Good

  • Leadership and management verified

    Good

  • Outcomes verified

    Good

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Good

  • Personal development, behaviour and welfare verified

    Good

  • Previous overall verified

    Good

  • Teaching, learning and assessment verified

    Good

  • Postcode verified

    ST4 2JD

  • Name on report verified

    Albert House Day Nursery

  • URN verified

    511401

Page 1 of 5
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2015.

  • OverallGood
  • Early yearsGood
  • Leadership and managementGood
  • OutcomesGood
  • Personal development, behaviour and welfareGood
  • Teaching, learning and assessmentGood

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+40Positivemore positive than 8% of reports of this type graded Good
OutstandingGoodMetRINot metInadequate

Reads more critically than most reports of this type graded Good.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseeffectivelymake good progressconsistentlyeffectivepositivekeenenjoyimproving
Criticismconcernsgapsnot yetnot effective

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improveLeadership positive critical
  • Findings558w+43
  • Leadership107w+9
  • What needs to improve92w+33

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
5
Words of findings
747
about usual (typical 703)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 54, typical 50
Average sentence
14 words
Next steps
3
typical 2
Hedged sentences
4%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 43%Leadership 8%What needs to improve 7%About the inspection 42%

Full report text

Albert House Day Nursery Albert House, 192 Manor Street, Stoke-on-Trent, Staffordshire, ST4 2JD

p.1

Inspection date

Previous inspection date 31 May 2017 31 March 2015

p.1

This inspection: Good 2

Effectiveness of the leadership and management Good 2

p.1

This inspection: Good 2

Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Good 2

p.1

This inspection: Good 2

Personal development, behaviour and welfare Good 2

p.1

This provision is good

 Staff work with teachers from the local school to develop their teaching skills. For example, they are developing their knowledge of teaching to help children to link letters and sounds.  The provider and manager continually develop the nursery. They have extended learning for those children who prefer to learn outside. For instance, including equipment for children to be imaginative and understand how to care for living things.  The provider is constantly improving resources and each room is highly stimulating for children. The learning environments are of a high standard.  Staff quickly identify children who have special educational needs and/or disabilities. They work effectively with other professionals to support these children to help them close gaps in their learning swiftly over time.

p.1

It is not yet outstanding because:

 The manager's evaluation of staff practice is not yet effective enough to help raise the quality of their teaching to the highest possible level.  When children move rooms, or change key persons, new key persons do not fully consider the information about children's prior learning in their planning. Sometimes, activities are not highly challenging for all children.  Staff do not encourage parents to share information about children's knowledge and skills from home when they first start to help them plan effectively from the start.

p.1

What the setting needs to do to improve further

To further improve the quality of the early years provision the provider should:

p.2

What the setting needs to do to improve further

 build on the evaluation of staff practice to help tackle any minor variations in the quality of their teaching to help raise to a consistently high standard  strengthen the arrangements for when children change rooms or key person, to help new key persons plan highly challenging activities that reflects children's learning styles  encourage parents to share more-detailed information about children's capabilities when they first start and use this information to better inform planning from the outset.

p.2

Inspection activities

 The inspector observed the quality of teaching during activities indoors and outdoors, and assessed the impact this has on children's learning.  The inspector spoke with staff and children during the inspection.  The inspector completed a joint observation with the nursery manager.  The inspector held a meeting with the nursery manager and spoke to the provider. He looked at relevant documentation and evidence of the suitability of staff working in the nursery.  The inspector spoke to parents during the inspection and took account of their views.

p.2

Effectiveness of the leadership and management is good

Safeguarding is effective. Managers and staff have a good knowledge of safeguarding procedures, including how to report concerns about the welfare of children. Managers vet staff before they start working at the nursery to help check their suitability. Managers encourage staff training, which has a positive impact on their teaching. For example, staff in the baby room have recently attended a course about babies. They have used the knowledge gained from the course to enhance the range of sensory activities for babies. They have also changed the key-person system to help ensure where possible they carry out their own key children's care routines, such as nappy changing.

p.3

Quality of teaching, learning and assessment is good

Staff's ongoing assessment of children are good. They provide innovative activities that build on children's interests. In pre-school, staff support children to develop their physical skills. For example, children use mops and water to make marks on the floor outside. They also use water sprayers and learn how to squeeze the mechanism together to make water come out. Staff teach children mathematical concepts, such as size, weight and quantity. Children compare different size sticks, weigh different quantities of sticks and predict how many sticks they have before counting them. Staff's interaction is good. They regularly talk to children, ask them questions and give them time to respond.

p.3

Personal development, behaviour and welfare are good

Staff take the time to talk to parents about their children. Together, they promote good continuity for children between home and nursery. Staff support children's independence and promote their healthy lifestyles in different ways. For example, children wash their hands before snacks, serve themselves lunch and talk about different vegetables and how they grow. Children's behaviour is good. Staff encourage children of all ages to share popular toys, particularly babies. Children are independent and have high levels of confidence. For instance, pre-school children put on their shoes and babies come into nursery, say hello to their friends and staff, and quickly start playing with others.

p.3

Outcomes for children are good

Children make good progress and learn some of the skills they need for school or the next stage in learning. Toddlers learn early writing skills. For example, outside they grasp chalks and make marks on an easel. They are keen learners and enjoy mixing sand using different tools, and chasing after bubbles. Babies develop good communication and language skills. For instance, they listen to different words that staff repeat from books and make noises. Babies also make sounds using instruments. Pre-school children have a keen interest in books and concentrate as they sit and listen to stories. Children who the nursery receives additional funding for are developing good physical and creativity skills.

p.3

Setting details

Unique reference number 511401 Local authority Stoke on Trent Inspection number 1091194 Type of provision Full-time provision Day care type Childcare - Non-Domestic Registers Early Years Register, Compulsory Childcare Register, Voluntary Childcare Register Age range of children 0 - 4 Total number of places 42 Number of children on roll 55 Name of registered person Lisa Michelle Rigby

p.4

reference number

Date of previous inspection 31 March 2015 Telephone number 01782 844377

p.4

reference number

Albert House Day Nursery registered in 1999. It is located in the Fenton area of Stoke-on- Trent. The nursery employs nine members of childcare staff. Of these, all hold an appropriate early years qualification at level 2, 3 or 5. The nursery opens from Monday to Friday, all year round, except for bank holidays and one week at Christmas. Sessions are from 7.30am until 5.45pm. The nursery receives funding to provide free early education for two-, three- and four-year-old children.

p.4

reference number

This inspection was carried out by Ofsted under sections 49 and 50 of the Childcare Act 2006 on the quality and standards of provision that is registered on the Early Years Register. The registered person must ensure that this provision complies with the statutory framework for children’s learning, development and care, known as the early years foundation stage.

p.4

reference number

procedures set out in the guidance ‘Complaints procedure: raising concerns and making complaints about Ofsted’, which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.gov.uk/government/organisations/ofsted. If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk. achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, work-based learning and skills training, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection.

p.4

reference number

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk. You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/, write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.5

reference number

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our website for news, information and updates at www.ofsted.gov.uk/user.

p.5

reference number

T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/government/organisations/ofsted

p.5

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion