Other · Ofsted letter
Setting
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection datesingle source
19 May 2017
- Inspectorssingle source
Dom Cook
- Postcode verified
OX10 9AG
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
Reads more warmly than most reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- You are successfully raising staff expectations of what pupils can achieve, inspiring leaders’ strong determination to improve pupils’ outcomes still further. p.2
- Your recent definition of the school’s policy on teaching sets high expectations for teachers. p.2
- In the early years, children’s ‘busy books’ show clearly the good progress some pupils are now making in developing their early writing skills. p.2
- School leaders receive valuable mentoring from the headteacher of an outstanding school within the trust. p.3
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No strong criticism found.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 3
- Words of findings
- 804
- about usual (typical 963)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 42, typical 48
- Average sentence
- 18 words
- Next steps
- 1
- typical 2
- Hedged sentences
- 7%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Store Street Manchester M1 2WD T 0300 123 4234 www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.1
Nicola Hughes Headteacher St John’s Primary School St John’s Road Wallingford Oxfordshire OX10 9AG
p.1
School
Following my visit to your school on 19 May 2017, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to report the inspection findings. Thank you for the help you gave me and for the time you made available to discuss the actions you are taking to improve the school since the most recent section 5 inspection.
p.1
School
The visit was the first monitoring inspection since the school was judged to require improvement following the section 5 inspection in March 2016. It was carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005.
p.1
School
Senior leaders, governors and the trust are taking effective action to tackle the areas requiring improvement identified at the recent section 5 inspection in order to become a good school.
p.1
School
The school should take further action to:
p.1
School
ensure that challenge in learning is well matched to pupils’ needs.
p.1
Evidence
During the inspection, I met with the headteacher and the assistant headteacher, subject leaders, the early years foundation stage leader, a representative of the trust and two governors, including the chair of governors. I visited classrooms during teaching time and looked at pupils’ work. I examined a range of documents, including governors’ minutes, and evaluated the school’s action plan. I checked the school’s single central record of checks on staff and reviewed school information on pupils’ progress, the effectiveness of teaching and learning and pupils’ attendance.
p.1
Main findings
You are successfully raising staff expectations of what pupils can achieve, inspiring leaders’ strong determination to improve pupils’ outcomes still further. Consequently, leaders place a firm and appropriate emphasis on improving teaching. Your recent definition of the school’s policy on teaching sets high expectations for teachers. Furthermore, this is helpfully linked to the areas for improvement identified by the section 5 inspection.
p.2
Main findings
You are providing regular relevant training opportunities for staff as part of a well- planned professional development programme. Teaching is improving because, as part of this, teachers have their own personalised plan for improvement linked to helpful targets and detailed feedback from senior leaders. Leaders’ regular monitoring of teaching and learning is ensuring that they are better aware of where strengths and weaknesses in classroom provision lie. This allows leaders to quickly provide additional coaching and mentoring for staff, accelerating the improvement sought. Furthermore, leaders are steadily adapting the curriculum. This is beginning to enhance teachers’ opportunities to challenge and engage pupils more effectively.
p.2
Main findings
Teachers are making increasingly effective use of questions to challenge pupils and check their progress in lessons. However, the impact of this is not yet consistent across the school. Some activities set by teachers still prove too difficult and, as a result, some pupils lose their concentration. More remains to be done to ensure that appropriately challenging learning activities are well matched to pupils’ individual needs.
p.2
Main findings
Teachers’ use of learning time is improving. Lessons start promptly, are paced appropriately and make good use of all learning opportunities. Leaders’ review of the school timetable has ensured the best use of time across the school day. As a result, pupils’ books show work of an improving quantity and quality. In the early years, children’s ‘busy books’ show clearly the good progress some pupils are now making in developing their early writing skills.
p.2
Main findings
Governors show determination in taking action to improve their effectiveness. They have undertaken recent helpful training to strengthen their ability to scrutinise pupils’ progress information more effectively. Governors are becoming increasingly adept at using this developing knowledge to challenge school leaders well. This was evident in their recent strong questioning of school leaders about the progress of different groups of pupils. As a result, governors have an increasingly accurate understanding of the school’s effectiveness and are therefore better able to hold leaders to account for the school’s improvement.
p.2
Main findings
Leaders’ action plans set out clearly how they are addressing each area of school improvement. Importantly, these plans also include appropriate timescales and state where responsibility for both delivering improvement and monitoring the success of actions taken lies. As a result, leaders and governors are clear about their roles and responsibilities, and how the success of their actions will be measured.
p.2
External support
The trust is providing significant, effective support to the school. School leaders receive valuable mentoring from the headteacher of an outstanding school within the trust. This expertise is bringing much-needed rigour to the school’s action plans and leaders’ actions. Helpful opportunities for staff to learn ‘best practice’ in regular trust-wide training days are clearly supporting the current improvements in teaching.
p.3
External support
I am copying this letter to the chair of the governing body, the regional schools commissioner and the director of children’s services for Oxfordshire. This letter will be published on the Ofsted website.
p.3
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion