Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted letter

Setting

Inspected 19 May 2017 · published 16 Jun 2017

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Dom Cook

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection datesingle source

    19 May 2017

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Dom Cook

  • Postcode verified

    OX10 9AG

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+73Very positivemore positive than 92% of reports of this type

Reads more warmly than most reports of this type.

Praiseeffectivestrongimprovinghigh expectationseffectivelyoutstandingclearlygood progress
Criticismweaknessesnot yetnot consistent

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

Findings positive critical

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
804
about usual (typical 963)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 42, typical 48
Average sentence
18 words
Next steps
1
typical 2
Hedged sentences
7%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 100%

Full report text

Store Street Manchester M1 2WD T 0300 123 4234 www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.1

Nicola Hughes Headteacher St John’s Primary School St John’s Road Wallingford Oxfordshire OX10 9AG

p.1

School

Following my visit to your school on 19 May 2017, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to report the inspection findings. Thank you for the help you gave me and for the time you made available to discuss the actions you are taking to improve the school since the most recent section 5 inspection.

p.1

School

The visit was the first monitoring inspection since the school was judged to require improvement following the section 5 inspection in March 2016. It was carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005.

p.1

School

Senior leaders, governors and the trust are taking effective action to tackle the areas requiring improvement identified at the recent section 5 inspection in order to become a good school.

p.1

School

The school should take further action to:

p.1

School

 ensure that challenge in learning is well matched to pupils’ needs.

p.1

Evidence

During the inspection, I met with the headteacher and the assistant headteacher, subject leaders, the early years foundation stage leader, a representative of the trust and two governors, including the chair of governors. I visited classrooms during teaching time and looked at pupils’ work. I examined a range of documents, including governors’ minutes, and evaluated the school’s action plan. I checked the school’s single central record of checks on staff and reviewed school information on pupils’ progress, the effectiveness of teaching and learning and pupils’ attendance.

p.1

Main findings

You are successfully raising staff expectations of what pupils can achieve, inspiring leaders’ strong determination to improve pupils’ outcomes still further. Consequently, leaders place a firm and appropriate emphasis on improving teaching. Your recent definition of the school’s policy on teaching sets high expectations for teachers. Furthermore, this is helpfully linked to the areas for improvement identified by the section 5 inspection.

p.2

Main findings

You are providing regular relevant training opportunities for staff as part of a well- planned professional development programme. Teaching is improving because, as part of this, teachers have their own personalised plan for improvement linked to helpful targets and detailed feedback from senior leaders. Leaders’ regular monitoring of teaching and learning is ensuring that they are better aware of where strengths and weaknesses in classroom provision lie. This allows leaders to quickly provide additional coaching and mentoring for staff, accelerating the improvement sought. Furthermore, leaders are steadily adapting the curriculum. This is beginning to enhance teachers’ opportunities to challenge and engage pupils more effectively.

p.2

Main findings

Teachers are making increasingly effective use of questions to challenge pupils and check their progress in lessons. However, the impact of this is not yet consistent across the school. Some activities set by teachers still prove too difficult and, as a result, some pupils lose their concentration. More remains to be done to ensure that appropriately challenging learning activities are well matched to pupils’ individual needs.

p.2

Main findings

Teachers’ use of learning time is improving. Lessons start promptly, are paced appropriately and make good use of all learning opportunities. Leaders’ review of the school timetable has ensured the best use of time across the school day. As a result, pupils’ books show work of an improving quantity and quality. In the early years, children’s ‘busy books’ show clearly the good progress some pupils are now making in developing their early writing skills.

p.2

Main findings

Governors show determination in taking action to improve their effectiveness. They have undertaken recent helpful training to strengthen their ability to scrutinise pupils’ progress information more effectively. Governors are becoming increasingly adept at using this developing knowledge to challenge school leaders well. This was evident in their recent strong questioning of school leaders about the progress of different groups of pupils. As a result, governors have an increasingly accurate understanding of the school’s effectiveness and are therefore better able to hold leaders to account for the school’s improvement.

p.2

Main findings

Leaders’ action plans set out clearly how they are addressing each area of school improvement. Importantly, these plans also include appropriate timescales and state where responsibility for both delivering improvement and monitoring the success of actions taken lies. As a result, leaders and governors are clear about their roles and responsibilities, and how the success of their actions will be measured.

p.2

External support

The trust is providing significant, effective support to the school. School leaders receive valuable mentoring from the headteacher of an outstanding school within the trust. This expertise is bringing much-needed rigour to the school’s action plans and leaders’ actions. Helpful opportunities for staff to learn ‘best practice’ in regular trust-wide training days are clearly supporting the current improvements in teaching.

p.3

External support

I am copying this letter to the chair of the governing body, the regional schools commissioner and the director of children’s services for Oxfordshire. This letter will be published on the Ofsted website.

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion