Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · Short school inspection

Brent Start Adult Education Service

Inspected — · published 14 Jun 2017 · URN 53106

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Richard Pemble

  • Overall effectivenesssingle source

    Good

  • Postcode verified

    NW10 8DY

  • Name on report verified

    Brent Adult and Community Education Service (known as Brent Start)

Page 1 of 4
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.

  • OverallGood

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+53Positivemore positive than 24% of reports of this type graded Good
OutstandingGood

In line with other reports of this type graded Good.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseeffectivelypositiveimprovedvery wellrapid progressvery highgood progressskilled
Criticismnot rapid progressnot alwaysnot clearnot precise

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improveAbout the inspection positive critical
  • Findings1074w+49
  • What needs to improve118w+56

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
4
Words of findings
1,181
shorter than usual (typical 1483)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 42, typical 50
Average sentence
23 words
Next steps
2
typical 2
Hedged sentences
14%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 83%What needs to improve 9%About the inspection 7%

Full report text

Store Street Manchester M1 2WD T 0300 123 4234 www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.1

Mr Mark Rhodes Quality Manager Brent Adult and Community Education Service 1 Morland Gardens Stonebridge London NW10 8DY

p.1

as Brent Start)

Following the short inspection on 21 and 22 March 2017, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to report the inspection findings. The inspection was the first short inspection carried out since the provider was judged to be good in March 2012.

p.1

as Brent Start)

You and your team have continued to work effectively to improve the quality of teaching, learning and assessment, ensuring that a high and increasing proportion of learners achieve their qualifications and/or personal learning goals each year. A very high proportion of learners either move on to positive destinations, which include courses at a higher level and employment, or report significant gains in their confidence, self-esteem, literacy, numeracy or parenting skills.

p.1

as Brent Start)

In the few subjects such as business, where managers have been unable to improve the quality of the provision, they have taken the decision to remove these courses and, using their good range of partnerships, ensure that learners are able to enrol onto these courses with other providers.

p.1

as Brent Start)

Leaders and managers are aware of what needs to be improved within the provision and their plans for improvement are well developed and appropriate. In most cases, their actions are having a positive impact on learners’ experience.

p.1

as Brent Start)

Managers ensure that teachers are trained in safeguarding and know the signs and indicators that a learner may be in danger or in need of help. Teachers are good at spotting these signs and referring learners to designated safeguarding staff for help and guidance. The designated safeguarding lead manager (DSL) for the service has a very thorough understanding of the potential issues and challenges to learners’ safety and well-being that they may encounter locally. He uses this understanding effectively to ensure that staff are kept well informed.

p.1

as Brent Start)

Where safeguarding incidents do occur, the DSL investigates and records these thoroughly, using external agencies and support services well to ensure that learners get the help, guidance and support they need.

p.2

as Brent Start)

When recruiting new teachers and support staff to the service, managers follow appropriate procedures to ensure that applicants are suitable people to work with adult learners, and are skilled and qualified to teach their subject.

p.2

as Brent Start)

Recent training for staff on how to keep learners safe from the dangers of extremism and radicalisation has been effective. Consequently, learners are able to identify well how they can keep themselves and their families safe from these dangers.

p.2

Inspection findings

 Most learners on courses which lead to qualifications are making at least good progress towards achieving these. Learners are very confident about how achieving their qualifications will help improve their chances of getting a job, either on completion of their current course or after completing a further course at a higher level. For example, learners studying for functional skills mathematics at level 2 were able to describe the importance of gaining this qualification to help them get jobs as teaching assistants or as volunteers for a local charity which supports children with their English and mathematics development.  Most teaching, learning and assessment help learners to develop skills and knowledge for their subject well. Teachers teach lessons that learners find interesting and motivating, and they have high rates of attendance at lessons as a result. Teachers use a wide range of methods to enable learners to develop

p.2

Inspection findings

further. Most teachers check how much learners have learned in lessons and plan future lessons using this information effectively. Learners, such as those on level 1 courses in early years, produce high standards of work. However, learners, particularly those on non-vocational courses, do not use the online and paper- based resources available to them well enough outside of lessons to improve their rate of progress.  Managers have used the lesson observation process effectively to ensure that teachers continue to improve their skills and make lessons productive and motivating for learners. However, a minority of teachers are not clear how to make the improvements identified by observers, who do not give further guidance or set actions for teachers.  Teachers give learners very good oral feedback on their work and skills development, making it clear how they can improve further. Teachers assess learners’ written work accurately, but the most able learners do not always know

p.2

Inspection findings

well enough how to make the improvements they need to, as teachers do not give them sufficiently precise feedback. Consequently, they do not always make the rapid progress of which they are capable.  Most learners on courses that do not lead to qualifications achieve their course objectives and personal learning goals. They make substantial improvements to their skills in English, mathematics or for work, such as confidence and timekeeping, or they improve their parenting skills. However, a small minority of learners do not make more rapid progress as teachers do not review learners’ progress frequently enough during their course. Female learners on English for speakers of other languages (ESOL) courses use their improved skills in speaking English to improve the quality of their daily lives, such as being able to telephone their doctor’s surgery to make an appointment.  Learners understand British values very well. Teachers use their training in these

p.3

Inspection findings

values very effectively in the classroom to help learners develop their understanding. Learners, from a very diverse range of backgrounds and cultures, exhibit the British values of tolerance and respect in lessons; they work together in group tasks, show respect for each other’s opinions and discuss differing views and opinions with confidence. For example, following a discussion about the role of parliament in law-making in Britain, ESOL learners were able to talk about how much better they understood recent news articles about the role of parliament in British life.  Leaders have worked effectively to ensure that the courses offered by the service meet the needs of the local communities and the skills needs of local employers. Managers work well with council officers, local community groups, housing associations and local colleges and training providers to ensure that the courses offered are relevant to local needs, provide learners with opportunities to move

p.3

Inspection findings

on to more substantial learning and are offered in a range of venues to enable learners to attend easily. Managers collect and analyse data on learners’ destinations when they leave and several months later to evaluate the impact and effectiveness of the provision.

p.3

Next steps for the provider

Leaders and those responsible for governance should ensure that:

p.3

Next steps for the provider

 teachers review learners’ progress towards achieving their learning goals and personal development targets frequently during the course and at the end  a small minority of teachers, particularly those who teach on courses that do not lead to qualifications, receive further training and coaching to enable them to plan and teach lessons, and provide feedback that enables learners to make the full and rapid progress of which they are capable  managers, following their observations of lessons, make it clear how teachers can make further improvements to their practice. I am copying this letter to the Skills Funding Agency. This letter will be published on the Ofsted website.

p.3

Information about the inspection

The inspection was carried out by two of Her Majesty’s Inspectors and three Ofsted Inspectors. We were assisted by the quality manager as nominee. We visited three main sites and several community venues to observe teaching, learning and assessments and to look at learners’ work. We met with learners, governors, senior leaders, managers and teachers. We reviewed key documents, including the service’s most recent self-assessment report and development plans and documents related to safeguarding. We also analysed data on the performance of learners currently on programmes and considered the views of learners, staff and leaders.

p.4

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion