Schools & FE · Short school inspection
St Bernard's Catholic Primary School, Preston
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection datesingle source
11 May 2017
- Inspectorssingle source
Ahmed Marikar
- Overall effectiveness verified
Good
- Postcode verified
PR2 1RP
- Name on report verified
St Bernard’s Catholic Primary School, Preston
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.
- OverallGood
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type graded Good.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Progress & outcomes10
“has identified that pupils are making good progress in writing.” p.3Parents & families7
“Parents are happy with the school.” p.2
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 4
- Words of findings
- 1,268
- about usual (typical 1483)
- Reading level
- Fairly hard
- Flesch 57, typical 50
- Average sentence
- 16 words
- Next steps
- 2
- typical 2
- Hedged sentences
- 9%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Store Street Manchester M1 2WD T 0300 123 4234 www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.1
Mrs Mia Barlow Headteacher St Bernard’s Catholic Primary School, Preston Victoria Park Avenue Lea Preston Lancashire PR2 1RP
p.1
Short inspection of St Bernard’s Catholic Primary School, Preston
Following my visit to the school on 11 May 2017, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to report the inspection findings. The visit was the first short inspection carried out since the school was judged to be good in September 2012.
p.1
Short inspection of St Bernard’s Catholic Primary School, Preston
The leadership team has maintained the good quality of education in the school since the last inspection.
p.1
Short inspection of St Bernard’s Catholic Primary School, Preston
You have developed a strong ethos where the school’s Catholic values are at the heart of everyone’s work. You, your staff and governors are ambitious for pupils and have established an inclusive community where people are highly valued.
p.1
Short inspection of St Bernard’s Catholic Primary School, Preston
At the previous inspection, the inspectors asked you to provide more opportunities for parents to help their children improve their skills in both reading and writing. You have done this well. You actively involve parents in their children’s learning by providing reading sessions for them to read with their children. Also, staff have led reading and writing information sessions for parents. The use of the school app to let parents know what their children will be learning each week has led to greater parental involvement in their children’s learning.
p.1
Short inspection of St Bernard’s Catholic Primary School, Preston
You were also asked to provide greater challenge for the most able pupils in key stage 2, especially in English. In response to this, you have raised expectations for the most able pupils and you hold focused meetings to discuss their progress. Leaders have helped staff to improve their questioning skills. In some classes, the most able pupils have the opportunity to discuss and analyse the structure of complex writing. This helps them to ensure that their own writing is clear and well organised. However, there is still some work to do to ensure that the most able are consistently challenged to achieve greater depth in their learning. Pupils are proud of their school and feel valued and well supported. As one pupil commented: ‘Teachers are kind and helpful. Lessons are challenging and fun.’ Pupils behave well in lessons, at breaktimes and around the school. Relationships between staff and pupils are very positive.
p.1
Short inspection of St Bernard’s Catholic Primary School, Preston
The very large majority of staff who responded to Ofsted’s online survey are proud to work in the school and have trust and confidence in leaders. Staff appreciate the training that they receive to improve their classroom practice.
p.2
Short inspection of St Bernard’s Catholic Primary School, Preston
The overwhelming majority of parents and carers who responded to Ofsted’s online questionnaire, Parent View, appreciate that you are approachable and that you know the pupils well. Parents are happy with the school. One parent commented, ‘My children are supported very well. There is a great family atmosphere.’ Many of the parents praised the school in their written comments, for example, ‘It’s an amazing school, where everyone is welcomed and valued.’
p.2
Short inspection of St Bernard’s Catholic Primary School, Preston
You have developed a strong team of middle leaders. They carefully track the progress of pupils and ensure that pupils who do not make sufficient progress are supported well. Middle leaders have a clear grasp of what the school needs to do to improve and they are taking an active role in bringing about the key improvements.
p.2
Short inspection of St Bernard’s Catholic Primary School, Preston
Governors are very committed to the school and have a wide range of skills and expertise. They undertake training and visit the school regularly to ensure that they have a good understanding of what is working well and what could be improved further. Governors challenge leaders well on the actions that they are taking to bring about further improvement.
p.2
Short inspection of St Bernard’s Catholic Primary School, Preston
Leaders have ensured that safeguarding arrangements are fit for purpose. Records are detailed and of high quality. You have created a culture in which safeguarding is seen as highly important. Recruitment procedures follow the latest statutory guidance.
p.2
Short inspection of St Bernard’s Catholic Primary School, Preston
All staff have completed training in safeguarding. They receive frequent updates and have read the most recent government guidelines. Staff know what to do if they have a concern about a pupil. Governors have close oversight of safeguarding practices and challenge leaders effectively on safeguarding issues.
p.2
Short inspection of St Bernard’s Catholic Primary School, Preston
Pupils say that they feel safe and well looked after in school. They report that bullying is rare and that staff act quickly to resolve any issues. Pupils know whom they can talk to for help, support and guidance.
p.2
Inspection findings
A key line of enquiry for this inspection related to the progress that pupils make in writing in key stages 1 and 2. You and your team have evaluated the performance of the 2016 cohort carefully. You realised that weaknesses in pupils’ spelling, grammar and their use of vocabulary held pupils back last year. You have tackled this identified weakness well. You have introduced a range of appropriate and effective strategies to improve pupils’ progress. For example, you have improved ongoing training for staff and strengthened the moderation of pupils’ work. You have also enhanced and developed the range of interventions to support pupils who may have fallen behind. Added to this, you and your team have provided more ‘boy-friendly’ texts to engage boys in their learning. Teachers are providing pupils with more opportunities for extended writing. There is a strong focus from teachers on ensuring that pupils are accurate in their spelling and punctuation. Your analysis
p.2
Inspection findings
has identified that pupils are making good progress in writing. My review of pupils’ books confirms this is true. However, some of the most able pupils are not working at greater depth. This is because they are not sufficiently challenged. A further line of enquiry related to the progress of disadvantaged pupils in reading and writing at key stage 2. You had already identified that these pupils did not make rapid enough progress last year. My review of your data, my scrutiny of pupils’ work and my discussions with pupils indicate that disadvantaged pupils now make the same progress as others nationally. The pupil premium funding is used effectively to provide extra teaching sessions to help these pupils catch up. Across the school, you have introduced more-challenging texts which require pupils, including disadvantaged pupils, to apply their comprehension skills. For example, during the inspection, Year 6 pupils were captivated by the class study
p.3
Inspection findings
of the book ‘The boy in the striped pyjamas’. Pupils discussed what the author was trying to convey and articulated their opinions well. Pupils in Year 2 and Year 6 read well. They enjoy reading and are able to decode and pronounce unfamiliar words. Pupils say that they have access to a greater range of books, which captures their interest. You encourage reading by giving out awards and celebrating World Book Day. My final line of enquiry was related to attendance. Pupils enjoy coming to school and this is shown by their above-average attendance. You have put in place more robust systems to monitor and follow up pupil absence. The impact of this is that the attendance of disadvantaged pupils and pupils who have special educational needs and/or disabilities has risen. Attendance rates for both of these groups are now above the national average, with a reduction in those who are regularly absent from school.
p.3
Next steps for the school
Leaders and those responsible for governance should ensure that:
p.3
Next steps for the school
there is a continued focus on sustaining improvement to pupils’ achievement in writing they provide greater challenge for the most able pupils to reach the highest standards of which they are capable. I am copying this letter to the chair of the governing body, the director of education for the Diocese of Lancaster, the regional schools commissioner and the director of children’s services for Lancashire. This letter will be published on the Ofsted website.
p.3
Information about the inspection
During the inspection I had meetings with you, the deputy headteacher, middle leaders and five governors. I met with eight pupils from key stage 2 and spoke to others during breaktimes. I visited all classes with you, where I observed teaching and learning, looked at pupils’ work and spoke to pupils. I also observed reading in the nurture room and heard pupils read from Year 2 and Year 6. We carried out a detailed work scrutiny of pupils’ writing across the school. I spoke with parents as they dropped their children off at school. I took account of 32 responses to Parent View, the Ofsted online questionnaire, including 32 free-text responses. I also considered the views of 32 staff and 40 pupils through Ofsted’s online questionnaires. I looked at information about pupils’ progress and at your self- evaluation and action planning. I evaluated safeguarding procedures, including policies to keep children safe, records of training, safeguarding checks and
p.4
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion