Schools & FE · School inspection (CIF)
St Wilfrid's Catholic Academy
Summary
Jonathan Keay (lead), Jane Moore, Jayne Thorpe, Lesley Else
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
17 May 2017
- Inspectors verified
Jane Moore, Jayne Thorpe, Jonathan Keay, Lesley Else
- Early years verified
Good
- Leadership and management verified
Good
- Outcomes verified
Good
- Overall effectiveness verified
Good
- Personal development, behaviour and welfare verified
Good
- Teaching, learning and assessment verified
Good
- Postcode verified
ST6 6EE
- Name on report verified
St Wilfrid’s Catholic Primary School
- URN verified
140151
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.
- OverallGood
- Early yearsGood
- Leadership and managementGood
- OutcomesGood
- Personal development, behaviour and welfareGood
- Teaching, learning and assessmentGood
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type graded Good.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- They make rapid progress as a result of highly effective leadership and stimulating activities. p.1
- The early years is well led by a highly effective leader. p.7
- Leaders and governors are ambitious people and have high expectations. p.1
- They provide teachers with high-quality training, which results in strong progress for pupils. p.1
- Leaders carefully monitor the impact of training and staff now have a much larger portfolio of teaching skills as a result of excellent support. p.4
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Improve leadership and management by making sure that: – middle leaders are provided with greater opportunities to monitor the effectiveness of teaching and learning across the school – governors receive further support to develop their analysis and scrutiny of the progress made by different groups of pupils. p.2
- Strengthen teaching, learning and assessment further by ensuring that: – the best teaching practice is shared more widely – support staff are provided with further training to increase the impact they have on learning. p.2
- Support pupils to exhibit impeccable conduct at all times of the school day. p.2
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 12
- Words of findings
- 3,141
- about usual (typical 2966)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 49, typical 48
- Average sentence
- 14 words
- Next steps
- 3
- typical 2
- Hedged sentences
- 5%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
St Wilfrid’s Catholic Primary School Queen’s Avenue, Tunstall, Stoke-on-Trent, Staffordshire ST6 6EE
p.1
Effectiveness of leadership and management Good
p.1
Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Good
p.1
Personal development, behaviour and welfare Good
p.1
Overall effectiveness at previous inspection Not previously inspected
p.1
Summary of key findings for parents and pupils
Leaders and governors are ambitious people and have high expectations. They have responded swiftly to any areas of weakness and have an accurate view of the school’s effectiveness. The new principal and senior leaders are focused on improving teaching. They provide teachers with high-quality training, which results in strong progress for pupils. The local authority, and the Newman Catholic Collegiate, are key partners in the school’s improvement journey. The collaborative approach of schools within the collegiate, and the support of the local authority, is effective and well established. Middle leaders are developing in their roles but are not given sufficient time to evaluate the effectiveness of teaching across the school. Governors effectively hold leaders to account and are dedicated people. They use assessment information to effectively track pupils’ attainment. Governors require further support to develop their analysis of pupils’
p.1
Summary of key findings for parents and pupils
progress, particularly that of different groups. Teachers are enthusiastic and committed. They have excellent relationships with pupils. Effective teaching is resulting in strong rates of pupils’ progress in almost all year groups and in a wide range of subjects. While the vast majority of teaching is effective, there is some variation in practice in early years and lower key stage 2. There is also some variation in the quality of questioning and intervention from support staff. Support from leaders is addressing these areas but is not yet embedded. Teachers’ questioning and feedback in lessons is of a high quality. Close attention is paid to helping pupils identify what they are doing well and what they need to improve next. This is contributing to strong rates of progress. The behaviour and conduct of pupils in lessons is very strong. Pupils are highly respectful and very courteous. They want to do their best and
p.1
Summary of key findings for parents and pupils
are proud of their school. Pupils’ behaviour and conduct at lunchtime is not as strong as that found in lessons. Pupils’ play at lunchtime can lack structure. As a result, pupils are not kept as engaged, or as well supported, as they are in class. The promotion of pupils’ spiritual, moral, social and cultural development is a key strength of the school. Children get off to a great start in the school’s early years foundation stage. They make rapid progress as a result of highly effective leadership and stimulating activities.
p.1
What does the school need to do to improve further?
Improve leadership and management by making sure that: – middle leaders are provided with greater opportunities to monitor the effectiveness of teaching and learning across the school – governors receive further support to develop their analysis and scrutiny of the progress made by different groups of pupils. Strengthen teaching, learning and assessment further by ensuring that: – the best teaching practice is shared more widely – support staff are provided with further training to increase the impact they have on learning. Support pupils to exhibit impeccable conduct at all times of the school day.
p.2
Effectiveness of leadership and management Good
Leaders and governors are ambitious, honest and frank. They have accurately evaluated the effectiveness of their school and recognise where further improvements are required. They are not afraid to tackle any under-performance. Leaders have been quick to establish additional support and training in response to any identified areas for development. This has included a very rapid and effective response to a dip in pupils’ achievement in reading at the end of key stage 2 in 2016. The new principal has high expectations. He has accurately assessed the school’s effectiveness in a short space of time. The principal has forged a strong group of senior leaders who share his ambition and enthusiasm. St Wilfrid’s is very proud of its Catholic ethos. Leaders actively promote pupils’ spiritual, moral, social and cultural development. Pupils are well supported pastorally and academically. One pupil proudly commented, ‘We all treat everyone with respect and
p.3
Effectiveness of leadership and management Good
kindness.’ Parents that inspectors spoke to are very happy with the standard of education at the school. Many parents expressed how pleased they are with the school’s ‘open door’ policy and the effectiveness of communication. Senior leaders, in partnership with the Newman Catholic Collegiate, have established training programmes to develop the roles of middle leaders. Middle leaders have welcomed this support and have considerable capacity. They are focused on driving improvements in their respective areas of responsibility. However, they have not yet been provided with sufficient opportunities to monitor the quality of teaching and learning across the school. As a result, their ability to effect change and drive forward standards at a whole-school level is not fully embedded. The curriculum is well organised. Pupils have wide ranging opportunities to learn both in and outside of school. The majority of pupils’ topics books show very strong rates of
p.3
Effectiveness of leadership and management Good
progress. This is a result of effective planning and participation in activities that inspire and engage pupils. Pupils speak with enthusiasm and excitement about the trips that they go on. Many older pupils are busy practising their language skills ahead of an impending visit to France next month. Pupil premium funding is used effectively to support disadvantaged pupils. Though disadvantaged pupils did not make the same strong progress as their peers or other pupils nationally at the end of key stage 2 in 2016, this is not the picture across the school for those currently on roll. The school’s assessment information and work in books shows that progress is strong. Pupils are provided with additional support if they fall behind and governors track attainment carefully. The school’s pupil premium strategy carefully identifies the barriers faced by disadvantaged pupils. Leaders make considered decisions about expenditure based on research and prior outcomes.
p.3
Effectiveness of leadership and management Good
Special educational needs funding is well used to support pupils’ needs. The special needs leader has significantly developed this aspect of the school’s work. ‘Passports’ are written for pupils that include well-written developmental targets. Targets are written and reviewed by parents and teachers on a termly basis. Pupils who have special educational needs and/or disabilities are supported well in class and their books demonstrate strong progress. The effective use of the physical education (PE) and sport premium funding is a considerable strength of the school. St Wilfrid’s works in partnership with other schools within the collegiate to pool resources and provide pupils with the best possible sporting opportunities. As a result of strong and dedicated leadership, and detailed record-keeping, pupils make significant gains in their fitness levels. Pupils’ participation in after-school clubs and competitions has doubled in the last three years. Teachers
p.3
Effectiveness of leadership and management Good
have also received focused training and support to improve their delivery of PE. Leaders carefully monitor the impact of training and staff now have a much larger portfolio of teaching skills as a result of excellent support. The impact of external support has been key to the school’s improvement journey in recent years. Though the school is an academy, it has maintained a purposeful and productive partnership with the local authority. The local authority has brokered and commissioned additional expertise to support the school in its self-evaluation, and drive forward improvements in teaching. The wider work of the Newman Catholic Collegiate is also central to school improvement. The school is proud to be a member of the collegiate. The combined capacity of leadership and curriculum expertise across the schools has strengthened provision at St Wilfrid’s. For example, leaders and teachers work together to moderate
p.4
Effectiveness of leadership and management Good
their judgements about pupils’ learning. This improves the accuracy of teachers’ judgements and ensures that planning offers a consistently high level of challenge for pupils.
p.4
Governance of the school
Governors are ambitious people who are very proud to serve their local community. Governors: – hold leaders to account for standards across the school – have established additional groups and working parties to constantly review and refine approaches to safeguarding – understand their roles and are committed to continual improvement – carefully track pupils’ attainment and make checks to see how well pupils are performing compared to national expectations – do not yet analyse, or compare in sufficient detail, the progress of different groups of pupils.
p.4
Safeguarding
The arrangements for safeguarding are effective. The school constantly reviews its safeguarding systems to ensure that they are robust and respond to the needs of pupils. Pupils’ records are highly detailed. Any concerns are swiftly acted upon. Records demonstrate that the school works closely with parents to address any concerns. Training is robust and teachers that inspectors spoke to are very clear about their responsibilities. Leaders take account of any local or city wide issues and provide training to staff to help them identify potential indicators of abuse. Training has included a focus on specific aspects of abuse including female genital mutilation and child sexual exploitation. Staff are also highly alert to the risk factors associated with what child protection professionals refer to as the ‘toxic trio’ (domestic violence, mental ill-health and drug, and alcohol misuse).
p.4
Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Good
Teachers are dedicated and enjoy working at St Wilfrid’s. Those that spoke to inspectors say that they feel very well supported. Teachers say that leaders listen carefully to any training requests they have. Staff meetings are planned around their discussions. Teachers and leaders have established a culture of learning. Teachers’ planning is strong. Teachers use assessment information to plan sequences of learning that support pupils’ to develop their knowledge, skills and understanding. This is particularly evident in pupils’ English and mathematics books. Pupils make strong rates of progress from their different starting points. In a Year 6 mathematics lesson, inspectors observed pupils tackling a range of complex problems. The teacher had skilfully designed the lesson to offer a high level of challenge and pupils were engrossed in their learning. Effective planning is a feature of teachers’ practice across the school. During the
p.5
Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Good
inspection, children in early years were enthralled by the appearance of a giant beanstalk in their classroom. Children were able to describe the adventures of ‘Jack’ with detail and were excited to explore an array of pots and magic beans. Activities like this are typical of everyday practice. The quality of teachers’ questioning and feedback makes a significant contribution to learning. Pupils are frequently challenged to explain their thinking and elaborate upon their responses in lessons. Relationships between teachers and pupils are very strong. In the vast majority of lessons, pupils are focused on their learning and respond very positively to support from adults. The teaching of phonics is strong. Inspectors heard pupils read from Year 1 and found that teachers’ judgements about pupils’ abilities were highly accurate. Teachers help pupils foster a love of reading. As a result of high quality teaching, pupils are able to
p.5
Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Good
decode many complex words by the end of Year 1. Parents that inspectors spoke to feel that homework is set at an appropriate level and supports the overall development of learning. Parents also feel well informed about the progress that pupils are making. Though teaching is good, there is some variation in practice in early years and lower key stage 2. In these phases of the school, leaders have been quick to offer additional support. However, improvements are not yet embedded and the quality of teachers’ questioning and explanations requires further development. In lower key stage 2, pupils’ books evidence that they are progressing in their learning but this is not as rapid as that found in other year groups. Teachers do share their skills and learn from one another, but there is scope for the best practice to be shared more widely. The impact of support staff varies across the school. While strong in some respects,
p.5
Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Good
the questioning skills of some staff are not fully developed. On some occasions, staff are not quick enough to intervene in learning or offer the right level of challenge and support to pupils.
p.6
Personal development and welfare
The school’s work to promote pupils’ personal development and welfare is good. Pupils are confident and self-assured. They are able to describe their learning clearly and are provided with high-quality feedback from teachers. Pupils have an excellent awareness of safety. All pupils that inspectors spoke to say that they feel safe. Older pupils enjoy the ‘bikeability’ skills course in Year 5. Pupils are also very proud to take on additional responsibilities. Each year, pupils in Year 6 are invited to write to teachers stating why they may want to hold the position of head girl and head boy. Similarly, pupils also hold positions of house captain and sports stars. Pupils are very proud of the funds they raise for different charities, including CAFOD (the Catholic international development charity in England and Wales). Pupils have a good understanding of fundamental British values and enjoy opportunities to celebrate and share their different faiths. Pupils described to inspectors
p.6
Personal development and welfare
how they make slide presentations about their different faiths to explain important times of the year and festivals. Pupils attend a wide range of extra-curricular activities. These include booster sessions, dance clubs (which is currently themed on breakdancing), and different sporting clubs. Incidents of bullying are extremely rare at St Wilfrid’s. Pupils say that they have complete confidence in teachers and say that any problems are dealt with quickly.
p.6
Behaviour
The behaviour of pupils is good. Pupils are very courteous and demonstrated a very high degree of hospitality to inspectors during the inspection. This is typical of pupils’ day-to-day behaviour. Pupils treat one another with kindness and know the school’s behaviour management systems very well. They are keen to do the right thing and earn rewards. In 2016, whole-school attendance levels were above national but were low for disadvantaged pupils. The school’s work has improved attendance for disadvantaged pupils which is now above average. Behaviour at lunchtimes is not as strong as that found in lessons. Leaders have identified this as an area for improvement and plans are in place to offer more activities and structure. Currently, pupils are not provided with sufficient support to help them exhibit the much stronger behaviours that are always present in lessons.
p.6
Outcomes for pupils Good
Outcomes across the school have been consistently high, or improving, with the exception of reading in 2016 in key stage 2. The school has responded effectively to this weakness. The school’s own assessment information and work in books shows that pupils’ progress is consistently strong in almost all year groups. Where it is not strong, it is improving rapidly. The good level of development in early years has risen over the last three years and is now above national. Children make at least typical rates of progress in the early years. Some children, particularly those in the nursery, make accelerated progress. This is a result of high-quality teaching. The proportion of pupils passing the Year 1 phonics screening check has been consistently above national levels for the last three years. Phonics is well taught in the school. There is very little variation in outcomes between groups of pupils in phonics.
p.7
Outcomes for pupils Good
By the end of key stage 1, the vast majority of pupils reach expected levels in reading, writing and mathematics. In 2016, girl’s achievement was higher than that of boys. This has been identified by leaders and the attainment of groups of pupils is closely tracked on a termly basis. Pupils’ books show that progress from the start of this academic year is strong. Year 6 disadvantaged pupils underachieved in 2016. The school has analysed these outcomes carefully and has responded with appropriate and effective action. As a result, progress for current pupils on roll is strong across the school. Work in pupils’ books does not show any variation between different groups of pupils. Disadvantaged pupils receive a significant amount of additional support to help them overcome any barriers to learning. Pupils who have special educational needs and/or disabilities are well supported. As a result of well written ‘passports’ and effective support in class, this group of pupils
p.7
Outcomes for pupils Good
make strong progress. Most-able pupils, including those that are disadvantaged, receive consistent and strong levels of challenge in lessons. Teachers’ incisive feedback and planning ensures that pupils master specific topics and move onto new learning at the right time. Though progress is strong across a wide range of subjects, there is some variation in topic work. This is noticeable in some aspects of the curriculum in key stage 1 and lower key stage 2. Pupils’ books evidence rapid improvement over the last term and leaders are committed to sustaining these better outcomes.
p.7
Early years provision Good
The early years is well led by a highly effective leader. Children make at least typical rates of progress from their often low starting points. The good level of development has risen year-on-year and children are ready for the transition into Year 1 by the time they leave Reception. In 2016, the good level of development rose above national levels, prior to this, outcomes had not been as high and were sometimes quite low for boys. Leaders have made changes to the setting and environment to ensure that the needs of boys are more closely met. Leaders recognise that these improvement must now be sustained. The learning environment in early years has developed considerably. There are a vast array of different activities and resources for children to choose from. This helps develop children’s independence and encourages them to make their own choices about the way they do things. Additional funding is used effectively to identify any early needs that children may
p.7
Early years provision Good
have. This includes screening for any speech and language needs. The number of disadvantaged pupils can vary from year-to-year in early years. This group of pupils are well supported and make good progress from their starting points. Parents are kept well informed about children’s progress. Parents regularly contribute ‘treasured moments’ information to children’s assessment files. These ‘treasured moments’ capture and celebrate children’s special achievements at home. Parents that inspectors spoke to are very happy with the early years and the updates they receive from staff. During the inspection, children were exploring the fairy tale ‘Jack and the beanstalk’. As well as staring with awe and wonder at the sudden arrival of a beanstalk in their classroom, children were busy counting, sorting and planting an array of seeds and beans. Activities are routinely stimulating and exciting. Teachers’ effective planning
p.8
Early years provision Good
supports strong progress. Though the quality of teaching is resulting in at least typical progress over time, practice is not consistently strong across the provision. Adults’ questioning skills, and the timeliness of their intervention in learning, are variable. As a result, on occasion, some children are not focused on the different tasks and activities in the classroom. This is more evident in Reception. Practice in Nursery is further established and is having a greater impact on children’s learning. Welfare requirements are met and children are safe. Children exhibit good behaviour and cooperate with one another very well. They are also inquisitive. During the inspection, children were keen to engage with inspectors and share their learning.
p.8
School details
This inspection was carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005. The inspection was also deemed a section 5 inspection under the same Act.
p.9
School details
Appropriate authority The Newman Catholic Collegiate
p.9
School details
Email address office@stwilfridsnewman.co.uk
p.9
School details
Date of previous inspection Not previously inspected
p.9
Information about this school
The school meets requirements on the publication of specified information on its website. The school complies with Department for Education guidance on what academies should publish. In 2010 the predecessor school was judged as outstanding. The school became an academy in September 2013. Prior to 2017, the school was led by an executive principal who also led St Peter’s Catholic Academy. The two schools also share the same governing body. The governance structure remains in place but both schools have now recruited their own principals. In January 2017, a new principal was appointed to lead St Wilfrid’s. The school is a member of the Newman Catholic Collegiate. This is a group of nine schools. The school is larger than the average primary. The proportion of pupils from ethnic minority backgrounds and those who speak English as an additional language is average. The number of pupils known to be eligible for free school meals is slightly lower than
p.9
Information about this school
average. The school’s deprivation indicator is well above average. The proportion of pupils who have special educational needs and/or disabilities for whom the school provides support is average. The proportion of pupils with a statement of special educational needs or an education, health and care plan is in line with the national average. The school meets the government’s current floor standards, which set the minimum expectations for pupils’ attainment and progress by the end of Year 6. There is little mobility within the school. Very few pupils join ‘in year’. The majority of pupils stay at the school throughout their primary years.
p.10
Information about this inspection
The inspection was carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005 following a risk assessment of the school. The lead inspector met with the principal and other leaders on the first day of the inspection to set out key lines of enquiry. Key lines of enquiry focused specifically on pupils’ achievement. The inspection was deemed a section 5 inspection, as the lead inspector had insufficient evidence to confirm that the outstanding judgement from the predecessor school had been maintained. Inspectors observed 23 lessons or part lessons. Some lessons were observed jointly with the principal. Inspectors scrutinised pupils’ books during observations. Inspectors also took account of pupils’ progress in topic work during a separate scrutiny. The principal joined the lead inspector during this inspection activity. Meetings were held with the leaders of the following areas: early years, literacy,
p.11
Information about this inspection
history, PE, assessment and attendance. The lead inspector held a meeting with governors including the chair of the governing body and the school’s consultant headteacher. The lead inspector met with the Stoke-on-Trent’s strategic manager for pupil achievement. Inspectors scrutinised a range of school documentation including: the single central record, child protection files, monitoring files, self-evaluation, improvement plans, risk assessments, assessment information, attendance information and minutes of governing body minutes. Inspectors met with parents at the start of both days, and took account of the 183 responses from the school’s own questionnaire, which was conducted in the previous term. Inspectors spoke to pupils throughout both days. The lead inspector met with a group of teachers on day 2 of the inspection.
p.11
Inspection team
Jonathan Keay, lead inspector Her Majesty’s Inspector
p.11
Inspection team
Jayne Thorpe Ofsted Inspector guidance ‘Raising concerns and making a complaint about Ofsted’, which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.gov.uk/government/publications/complaints-about-ofsted . If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.11
Inspection team
In the report, ‘disadvantaged pupils’ refers to those pupils who attract government pupil premium funding: pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years and pupils in care or who left care through adoption or another formal route. www.gov.uk/pupil-premium-information-for-schools-and- alternative-provision-settings .
p.12
Inspection team
You can use Parent View to give Ofsted your opinion on your child’s school. Ofsted will use the information parents and carers provide when deciding which schools to inspect and when and as part of the inspection.
p.12
Inspection team
You can also use Parent View to find out what other parents and carers think about schools in England. You can visit www.parentview.ofsted.gov.uk , or look for the link on the main Ofsted website: www.gov.uk/government/organisations/ofsted .
p.12
Inspection team
achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.
p.12
Inspection team
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.12
Inspection team
You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open- government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .
p.12
Inspection team
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .
p.12
Inspection team
T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.12
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion