Early years · Early years inspection (CIF)
Russell Hill Road Day Nursery
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Group verified
Natalie Anne Salawa
- Group reference verified
RP906736
- Inspection date verified
9 May 2017
- Inspectors verified
Rebecca Hurst
- Early years verified
Good
- Leadership and management verified
Inadequate
- Outcomes verified
Inadequate
- Overall effectiveness verified
Inadequate
- Personal development, behaviour and welfare verified
Inadequate
- Previous overall verified
Good
- Teaching, learning and assessment verified
Inadequate
- Postcode verified
CR8 2LD
- Name on report verified
Russell Hill Road Day Nursery
- URN verified
EY446987
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2015.
- OverallInadequate
- Early yearsGood
- Leadership and managementInadequate
- OutcomesInadequate
- Personal development, behaviour and welfareInadequate
- Teaching, learning and assessmentInadequate
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
Reads more critically than most reports of this type graded Inadequate.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Self-evaluation is ineffective and fails to identify weaknesses in practice and breaches of requirements. p.3
- She has failed to identify the weak practice or the breaches of requirements. p.1
- Weaknesses in the assessment process significantly impact on the outcomes for children and mean that their progress is not good enough. p.3
- Risk assessments are not used well enough and staff fail to identify risks to children. p.3
- The provider has failed to notify Ofsted of a change of manager. p.1
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- gain knowledge of the events that need to be notified to Ofsted 31/05/2017 p.2
- ensure staff-to-child ratios are met at all times 09/05/2017 p.2
- ensure that the premises are safe and that no unauthorised persons can enter 09/05/2017 p.2
- carry out risk assessments to identify aspects of the environment that need to be checked on a regular basis to ensure that children are safe and not exposed to risks 09/05/2017 p.2
- ensure staff are effectively deployed in order to meet the needs of the children 09/05/2017 p.2
- ensure staff practice is accurately reviewed to identify any support, coaching or training needs and raise the quality of teaching 31/05/2017 p.2
- ensure children's development is accurately assessed in order to provide activities that challenge and progress their learning and development 31/05/2017 p.2
- ensure there are enough resources to support children's learning and development. 31/05/2017 p.2
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Records & policies4
“The provider has failed to notify Ofsted of a change of manager.” p.1Safeguarding2
“Safeguarding is ineffective.” p.3Wellbeing & mental health2
“This helps to support their emotional well-being.” p.1
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 5
- Words of findings
- 856
- about usual (typical 907)
- Reading level
- Fairly hard
- Flesch 57, typical 48
- Average sentence
- 14 words
- Next steps
- 8
- typical 7
- Hedged sentences
- 5%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Russell Hill Road Day Nursery 45 Russell Hill Road, Purley, Surrey, CR8 2LD
p.1
Inspection date
Previous inspection date 9 May 2017 5 August 2015
p.1
This inspection: Inadequate 4
Effectiveness of the leadership and management Inadequate 4
p.1
This inspection: Inadequate 4
Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Inadequate 4
p.1
This inspection: Inadequate 4
Personal development, behaviour and welfare Inadequate 4
p.1
This provision is inadequate
The provider has failed to notify Ofsted of a change of manager. She has also failed to ensure that staff-to-child ratios are met at all times. The provider fails to deploy staff effectively in order to keep children safe and to meet their individual needs. The provider fails to ensure the safety of the children. The premises are not secure. Risk assessments are not effective. Resources are not assessed to make sure they are safe before children use them. Teaching is inconsistent. Staff do not accurately assess children's learning and development. It is unclear what progress, if any, the children are making. Staff also fail to provide meaningful interactions with the children to support their learning. The provider is unable to effectively evaluate the practice in the setting. She has failed to identify the weak practice or the breaches of requirements. The provider fails to provide enough resources to support children's learning and
p.1
It has the following strengths
Staff give babies cuddles of reassurance when they arrive and get up from their sleep. This helps to support their emotional well-being. Staff are consistent in their approach to behaviour management. They teach children the importance of turn taking. Children behave well.
p.1
What the setting needs to do to improve further
To meet the requirements of the early years foundation stage the provider must:
p.2
Due Date
gain knowledge of the events that need to be notified to Ofsted 31/05/2017 ensure staff-to-child ratios are met at all times 09/05/2017 ensure that the premises are safe and that no unauthorised persons can enter 09/05/2017
p.2
Due Date
carry out risk assessments to identify aspects of the environment that need to be checked on a regular basis to ensure that children are safe and not exposed to risks 09/05/2017
p.2
Due Date
ensure staff are effectively deployed in order to meet the needs of the children 09/05/2017
p.2
Due Date
ensure staff practice is accurately reviewed to identify any support, coaching or training needs and raise the quality of teaching 31/05/2017
p.2
Due Date
ensure children's development is accurately assessed in order to provide activities that challenge and progress their learning and development 31/05/2017
p.2
Due Date
ensure there are enough resources to support children's learning and development. 31/05/2017
p.2
Inspection activities
Ofsted carried out this inspection as a result of a risk assessment, following information it received about this provider. The inspector observed children in the main play areas and garden. The inspector spoke with the provider, staff and children at appropriate times during the inspection. The inspector took into account the views of the parents. The inspector looked at a sample of documents, including staff suitability, risk assessments and children's files.
p.2
Effectiveness of the leadership and management is inadequate
Safeguarding is ineffective. The provider has failed to notify Ofsted of a change of manager. Risk assessments are not used well enough and staff fail to identify risks to children. Resources are not fit for purpose, for example, children use broken chairs and cleaning materials are sometimes left within easy reach of children. The provider does not ensure the staff-to-child ratios are met or deploy staff to meet children's needs. For example, at lunchtime, two staff are left to care for 24 children. They are unable to provide the level of attention required and often ignore children’s needs. The premises are not safe and secure. The provider fails to ensure that parents and carers do not open the door to let others into the setting. This puts children's safety at risk as it does not prevent unauthorised persons from entering the premises. Self-evaluation is ineffective and fails to identify weaknesses in practice and breaches of requirements. The provider carries out
p.3
Effectiveness of the leadership and management is inadequate
checks, such as the Disclosure and Barring Service check and disqualification by association, to ensure staff are suitable to work with children. The manager and staff have an understanding of child protection procedures and know the action to take if they have any concerns regarding children's welfare.
p.3
Quality of teaching, learning and assessment is inadequate
The quality of teaching is inconsistent. Staff do not accurately check children's starting points. Although they carry out assessments and tracking of children’s learning, it is not a true reflection of the children's actual stages of development. This means that staff are not able to accurately assess the exact progress, if any, children are making. The provider does not effectively monitor children's files to ensure staff are planning and providing suitable activities to narrow any gaps in children's learning. Staff do not interact with the children to promote learning or foster enjoyment. For example, when children play outside, staff only interact to ask them to stop moving wood chips between play areas.
p.3
Personal development, behaviour and welfare are inadequate
Staff do not ensure children's safety or meet their individual needs. For example, at times staff ignore children who require extra support during meals or when they ask for a drink. In spite of this, children have a balanced diet. A cook prepares meals according to children's dietary requirements and they have plenty of food. Staff teach children the importance of handwashing, especially after visiting the animals on site. Children play in a clean setting. Staff adhere to hygiene practices and monitor children during their sleep. This helps to support children's health and well-being.
p.3
Outcomes for children are inadequate
Weaknesses in the assessment process significantly impact on the outcomes for children and mean that their progress is not good enough. Children do not always have meaningful interactions with staff, which hinders their learning. Although children enjoy their time at the nursery, the activities provided do not support their learning and development or provide them with the skills they need to prepare them in readiness for school. Babies do have opportunities to practise new skills, such as walking.
p.3
Setting details
Unique reference number EY446987 Local authority Croydon Inspection number 1097536 Type of provision Full-time provision Day care type Childcare - Non-Domestic Registers Early Years Register Age range of children 0 - 4 Total number of places 65 Number of children on roll 104 Name of registered person Natalie Anne Salawa
p.4
reference number
Date of previous inspection 5 August 2015 Telephone number 0208 660 8669
p.4
reference number
Russell Hill Road Day Nursery registered in 2012. The nursery is open from 7am to 7pm, Monday to Saturday, 51 weeks of the year and also offers an overnight service. The nursery receives funding to provide free early education for children aged two, three and four years. There are 13 staff who work at the setting. Of these, six hold appropriate early years qualifications at level 2 or 3. One holds level 5 and the manager holds a BA (Honours) Degree in Childcare and Education.
p.4
reference number
This inspection was carried out by Ofsted under sections 49 and 50 of the Childcare Act 2006 on the quality and standards of provision that is registered on the Early Years Register. The registered person must ensure that this provision complies with the statutory framework for children’s learning, development and care, known as the early years foundation stage.
p.4
reference number
procedures set out in the guidance ‘Complaints procedure: raising concerns and making complaints about Ofsted’, which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.gov.uk/government/organisations/ofsted. If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk. achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, work-based learning and skills training, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection.
p.4
reference number
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk. You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/, write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .
p.5
reference number
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our website for news, information and updates at www.ofsted.gov.uk/user.
p.5
reference number
T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/government/organisations/ofsted
p.5
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion