Early years · Childminder inspection (EIF, requirements met)
Childminder in Manchester
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
12 May 2017
- Inspectors verified
Layla Davies
- Early years verified
Inadequate
- Leadership and management verified
Inadequate
- Outcomes verified
Requires improvement
- Overall effectiveness verified
Inadequate
- Personal development, behaviour and welfare verified
Inadequate
- Previous overall verified
Inadequate
- Teaching, learning and assessment verified
Requires improvement
- Name on report verified
Childminder Report
- URN verified
EY245483
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2016.
- OverallInadequate
- Early yearsInadequate
- Leadership and managementInadequate
- OutcomesRequires improvement
- Personal development, behaviour and welfareInadequate
- Teaching, learning and assessmentRequires improvement
5% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Inadequate (17,905 inspections).
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type graded Inadequate.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- She has failed to ensure Ofsted has the appropriate information to process the required suitability checks for all adults living in the home. p.1
- The arrangements for safeguarding are not effective. p.3
- The childminder has failed to address actions raised at the last inspection. p.3
- She has not identified and addressed the weaknesses found. p.3
- Children's overall safety is compromised as all adults living in the home have not been appropriately vetted. p.3
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- The childminder completes regular observations and assessments of children's progress. p.3
- However, these are not consistently shared with parents to provide continuity in children's learning. p.3
- Furthermore, parents are not encouraged to share detailed information about children's skills on entry. p.3
- The well-qualified childminder uses her knowledge to plan some activities to enthuse and motivate children to learn. p.3
- However, she does not always use what she knows about children's interests to help them to engage in activities in areas where they make less progress. p.3
- For example, boys do not make good progress in writing because the childminder mainly provides worksheets and sit-down activities to promote this area of learning. p.3
- Children make some progress in readiness for learning in school. p.3
- They learn to use technology for a purpose and skilfully use devices to research information online. p.3
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Behaviour2
“Children behave well.” p.1
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 5
- Words of findings
- 795
- about usual (typical 886)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 47, typical 47
- Average sentence
- 15 words
- Next steps
- 8
- typical 7
- Hedged sentences
- 6%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Inspection date
Previous inspection date 12 May 2017 31 October 2016
p.1
This inspection: Inadequate 4
Effectiveness of the leadership and management Inadequate 4
p.1
This inspection: Inadequate 4
Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Requires improvement Personal development, behaviour and welfare Inadequate 4
p.1
This inspection: Inadequate 4
Outcomes for children Requires improvement
p.1
This provision is inadequate
The childminder has not addressed actions from her previous inspection. She has failed to ensure Ofsted has the appropriate information to process the required suitability checks for all adults living in the home. Parents are not encouraged to share information about what children can do, to help establish their starting points in learning. The childminder does not keep parents informed about children's progress. The childminder does not make good use of what she knows about children's individual interests to help to motivate them to engage in activities that they prefer less. The childminder does not have a plan for her own professional development to help ensure that the quality of the provision improves. The childminder does not use robust reflection and self-evaluation to identify where improvements can be made. As a result, she has not identified the weaknesses in her practice, in order to drive forward improvement.
p.1
It has the following strengths
Children develop secure attachments with the friendly and welcoming childminder. They play happily and enjoy their time with her. Children behave well. The childminder helps to support children's physical health and well-being. They have daily opportunities for active play outdoors, go on regular outings and eat healthy meals.
p.1
What the setting needs to do to improve further
To meet the requirements of the early years foundation stage and the Childcare Register the provider must:
p.2
Due Date
provide Ofsted with the required information to enable it to complete suitability and vetting checks on any person aged 16 years or over living on the premises 31/05/2017
p.2
Due Date
improve partnership working with parents; exchange information about children's learning and development from the start and ensure they are kept consistently informed about children's progress. 31/05/2017
p.2
Due Date
To further improve the quality of the early years provision the provider should:
p.2
Due Date
make greater use of what is known about children's interests to enhance their motivation to participate in activities that they prefer less develop a plan for professional development to help raise the quality of teaching to a consistently good level improve the rigour of reflection on the provision to identify and address any weaknesses and drive forward continuous improvement.
p.2
Inspection activities
The inspector observed the quality of teaching and assessed the impact this has on children's learning. The inspector carried out an evaluation of teaching with the childminder. The inspector looked at relevant documentation, such as policies and procedures, reviewed the childminder's self-evaluation and checked evidence of her suitability and the suitability of all adults who live on the premises. The inspector took account of the views of parents through written documentation provided prior to inspection. The inspector spoke to children at appropriate times during the inspection.
p.2
Effectiveness of the leadership and management is inadequate
The arrangements for safeguarding are not effective. The childminder has failed to address actions raised at the last inspection. She has not ensured that Ofsted has been provided with the required information to process suitability checks for all adults who live in the home. This means that children's safety and welfare cannot be assured. However, the childminder does have a secure understanding of child protection procedures. She keeps her child protection training updated and knows what steps to take should she have concerns about a child. The childminder does not evaluate her practice effectively. She has not identified and addressed the weaknesses found. The childminder attends mandatory training and meets with other local childminders to keep herself updated and informed. However, she has not developed a targeted programme for her professional development to help raise the quality of practice to a good level. The childminder
p.3
Effectiveness of the leadership and management is inadequate
exchanges information with teachers. This helps to provide consistency for older children who attend school.
p.3
Quality of teaching, learning and assessment requires improvement
The childminder completes regular observations and assessments of children's progress. However, these are not consistently shared with parents to provide continuity in children's learning. Furthermore, parents are not encouraged to share detailed information about children's skills on entry. The well-qualified childminder uses her knowledge to plan some activities to enthuse and motivate children to learn. However, she does not always use what she knows about children's interests to help them to engage in activities in areas where they make less progress. For example, boys do not make good progress in writing because the childminder mainly provides worksheets and sit-down activities to promote this area of learning. This fails to captivate them.
p.3
Personal development, behaviour and welfare are inadequate
Children's overall safety is compromised as all adults living in the home have not been appropriately vetted. However, the childminder does supervise children well and completes regular risk assessments of the premises. This helps her to identify and minimise any risks to children. During flexible settling-in visits the childminder gathers information about children's likes and routines from home. This helps them to settle well. Children make choices from a range of good quality toys. This contributes towards their independence and ability to make decisions. The childminder teaches children about road safety on the daily walk to take older children to school.
p.3
Outcomes for children require improvement
Children make some progress in readiness for learning in school. They learn to use technology for a purpose and skilfully use devices to research information online. All children, including children who speak English as an additional language, develop good speaking skills. They confidently use descriptive language and engage in animated discussions with the childminder. Children play and explore with ice. They enthusiastically describe the texture and feel of the ice as it melts and confidently name arctic animals.
p.3
Setting details
Unique reference number EY245483 Local authority Manchester Inspection number 1078005 Type of provision Childminder Day care type Childminder Registers Early Years Register, Compulsory Childcare Register, Voluntary Childcare Register Age range of children 1 - 8 Total number of places 6 Number of children on roll 4
p.4
Name of registered person
Date of previous inspection 31 October 2016
p.4
Telephone number
The childminder registered in 2003 and lives in Openshaw. She operates all year round, from 8am to 5pm, Monday to Friday, except for bank holidays and family holidays. The childminder holds an appropriate qualification at level 3.
p.4
Telephone number
This inspection was carried out by Ofsted under sections 49 and 50 of the Childcare Act 2006 on the quality and standards of provision that is registered on the Early Years Register. The registered person must ensure that this provision complies with the statutory framework for children’s learning, development and care, known as the early years foundation stage.
p.4
Telephone number
procedures set out in the guidance ‘Complaints procedure: raising concerns and making complaints about Ofsted’, which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.gov.uk/government/organisations/ofsted. If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk. achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, work-based learning and skills training, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection.
p.4
Telephone number
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk. You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/, write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .
p.5
Telephone number
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our website for news, information and updates at www.ofsted.gov.uk/user.
p.5
Telephone number
T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/government/organisations/ofsted
p.5
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion