Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School monitoring visit

Setting

Inspected 4 May 2017

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Nick Whittaker

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection datesingle source

    4 May 2017

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Nick Whittaker

  • Postcode verified

    LS10 2JU

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+4Mixedmore positive than 35% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praisestrongpositivehigh-qualitysecureclearwell supportedeffectiveimproving
Criticismweaknessesweaknessseriouspersistent absencenot effectiveabsence

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionLeadership positive critical
  • Findings195w0
  • Leadership772w+4

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
967
shorter than usual (typical 1570)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 44, typical 47
Average sentence
22 words
Next steps
3
typical 8
Hedged sentences
4%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 20%Leadership 77%About the inspection 3%

Full report text

Store Street Manchester M1 2WD T 0300 123 4234 www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.1

Mr Graham Moffatt Principal South Leeds Academy Old Run Road Leeds West Yorkshire LS10 2JU

p.1

Serious weaknesses first monitoring inspection of South Leeds Academy

Following my visit to your school on 4 May 2017, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to confirm the outcome and inspection findings. Thank you for the help you gave during the inspection and for the time you made available to discuss the actions that have been taken since the school’s most recent section 5 inspection.

p.1

Serious weaknesses first monitoring inspection of South Leeds Academy

The inspection was the first monitoring inspection since the school was judged to have serious weaknesses in December 2016. It was carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005.

p.1

Evidence

During this inspection, I met with you, senior and middle leaders, two representatives from the education advisory board (EAB), the school’s governing body, two representatives from Delta Academies Trust, a representative from Cockburn Multi-Academy Trust and a group of Year 11 pupils. I visited classrooms with senior leaders, spoke to pupils and looked at the work in their books. I evaluated the academy trust’s statement of action and the school’s action plan.

p.1

Context

Since the last inspection, an associate vice-principal has joined the school’s senior leadership team. The school is currently sponsored by Delta Academies Trust and Cockburn Multi-Academy Trust is the school’s proposed new sponsor.

p.1

The quality of leadership and management at the academy

You know exactly what needs to be done to tackle the key weaknesses identified at the school’s last section 5 inspection and you are taking decisive action to secure the much needed improvement. Your action plan provides a strong starting point because it focuses sharply on each of the areas for improvement, has clear timescales and includes measurable step-by-step targets for all actions. Importantly, the plan makes it clear who is responsible for tackling each weakness and it specifies how senior leaders, members of the EAB and the academy trust will check whether the actions being taken are having the necessary impact.

p.2

The quality of leadership and management at the academy

You have secured the strong support of staff and there is a shared determination to improve the quality of teaching, learning and assessment. Senior and middle leaders are providing valuable training and support for teachers. They are well supported by the academy trust’s subject directors who give them helpful advice and guidance. Systems for monitoring teachers’ practice are developing. However, middle leaders do not have a sharp enough focus on the impact of teaching on pupils’ learning and progress, especially the most able pupils and those who are disadvantaged. This limits the effectiveness of the school’s drive to rapidly improve outcomes for these key groups of pupils.

p.2

The quality of leadership and management at the academy

Although overall attendance is improving steadily as a result of the actions you and your staff are taking, you are not doing enough to improve the attendance of disadvantaged pupils. Levels of absence and persistent absence for disadvantaged pupils remain unacceptably high and your actions do not have the necessary urgency and intensity. Importantly, however, changes to the behaviour policy and consequences system and improvements in teaching, learning and assessment are having a positive impact on pupils’ personal development, behaviour and welfare. Indeed, the Year 11 pupils I spoke to were unequivocally positive about the difference these changes have made since the last inspection.

p.2

The quality of leadership and management at the academy

You are keeping a close eye on the implementation of your action plan and its impact on pupils’ learning and progress, especially those in Year 11. Much has been done to make sure that teachers are assessing pupils’ work accurately. As a result, you have a clearer picture of how well Year 11 pupils are doing and you know, week by week, which pupils need additional help and support to achieve their target GCSE grades. You are now using this approach to check whether Year 10 pupils are on track and identify those who need additional help or support. In contrast, your approach to supporting Year 7 pupils who need extra help to catch up in English and mathematics is less well targeted and effective.

p.2

The quality of leadership and management at the academy

The EAB receives detailed information and reports about the implementation of your action plan from you, other senior and middle leaders and the academy trust’s subject directors. Members of the EAB are better informed about the school’s performance and the effectiveness and impact of the actions you are taking. As a result, they are challenging you and holding you to account more robustly. Rightly, the academy trust has given careful consideration to the school’s future leadership and governance. It has been proposed that the school will move to a new sponsor, Cockburn Multi-Academy Trust. The chief executives of the current and proposed academy trusts are already working closely together. There is a demonstrable commitment from both trusts to provide the continued high-quality support needed to secure and sustain rapid improvement at South Leeds Academy.

p.2

The quality of leadership and management at the academy

An external review of the school’s use of the pupil premium was commissioned last term. You recently received the report from this review and the recommendations add helpfully to your understanding of what needs to be done to increase the impact of this additional funding on outcomes for disadvantaged pupils. An external review of governance has been commissioned and will take place later this term. This is appropriately timed, considering the proposal for the school to move to a new sponsor. Crucially, however, those responsible for the school’s leadership and governance must make sure that the actions they take in response to this review add further impetus and urgency to the school’s drive for improvement.

p.3

The quality of leadership and management at the academy

Following the monitoring inspection, the following judgements were made:

p.3

The quality of leadership and management at the academy

Leaders and managers are taking effective actions towards the removal of the serious weaknesses designation.

p.3

The quality of leadership and management at the academy

The school’s action plan is fit for purpose.

p.3

The quality of leadership and management at the academy

The academy trust’s statement of action is fit for purpose.

p.3

The quality of leadership and management at the academy

I am copying this letter to the chair of the education advisory board, the chair of the board of Delta Academies Trust, the regional schools commissioner and the director of children’s services for Leeds. This letter will be published on the Ofsted website.

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion