Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted letter

Setting

Inspected 12 May 2017 · published 26 May 2017

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Sara Morgan

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection datesingle source

    12 May 2017

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Sara Morgan

  • Postcode verified

    RM3 0TH

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+80Very positivemore positive than 95% of reports of this type

Reads more warmly than most reports of this type.

Praiseeffectiveimprovedclearrigoroussuccessfulhappyenjoyrobust
Criticismconcerns

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

Findings positive critical

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
875
about usual (typical 963)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 46, typical 48
Average sentence
16 words
Next steps
1
typical 2
Hedged sentences
2%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 100%

Full report text

Store Street Manchester M1 2WD T 0300 123 4234 www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.1

Ms Alison Dowding Harold Wood Primary School Recreation Avenue Harold Wood Romford Essex RM3 0TH

p.1

Primary School

Following my visit to your school on 12 May 2017, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to report the inspection findings. Thank you for the help you gave me and for the time you made available to discuss the actions you are taking to improve the school since the most recent section 5 inspection.

p.1

Primary School

The visit was the first monitoring inspection since the school was judged to require improvement following the section 5 inspection in July 2016. It was carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005.

p.1

Primary School

Senior leaders and governors are taking effective action to tackle the areas requiring improvement identified at the recent section 5 inspection in order to become a good school.

p.1

Primary School

The school should take further action to:

p.1

Primary School

 continue to refine the school’s assessment system to support teachers to assess pupils’ progress in the wider curriculum subjects.

p.1

Evidence

During the inspection, meetings were held with the headteacher, other senior leaders, pupils, the governing body, the headteacher from the partner school arrangement and a representative of the local authority to discuss the actions taken since the last inspection. The school improvement and action plans were evaluated. I looked at learning in a number of classes with you and both deputy headteachers. I observed playtimes and lunchtime. I also checked the safeguarding records and procedures.

p.1

Context

Since the previous inspection, the school has expanded. There are three forms of entry from Reception to Year 3 and two forms in Years 4, 5 and 6.

p.2

Main findings

You, your school leaders and governors have been proactive in addressing the areas identified at the last inspection. Despite the disappointing judgement, you quickly rallied the school community and kept staff morale high. Consequently, there is a renewed sense of purpose across the school. This has ensured that pupils’ quality of education has remained a priority. The honest evaluation of the school’s performance has meant that you were swift to put plans in place to strengthen the safeguarding procedures. This has resulted in an effective team approach to gathering information in order to ensure pupils’ safety. The safeguarding posters to inform pupils, staff and any visitor around the school are informative and demonstrate that safeguarding is everybody’s priority. You have sharpened up the procedure for clear and timely recording of any concerns. This has further improved the school’s safeguarding systems. The training for the growing number of

p.2

Main findings

volunteers is as rigorous as staff’s recent updates on government guidelines.

p.2

Main findings

You have ensured that pupils develop a clear understanding of how the school celebrates the diverse community. The refined school curriculum has resulted in the successful promotion of pupils’ spiritual, moral, social and cultural development. They eagerly explain the school’s ‘REACH’ (respect, equality, achievement, curiosity and happiness) values. They know how they help: as a pupil said, ‘it gives you a sense of what you need in life’. The way the pupils demonstrate these values is evident across the school. At breaktimes, they play together in a harmonious and happy environment. They enjoy playing with a variety of friends and say that this is typical of how behaviour is at Harold Wood.

p.2

Main findings

Middle leaders have further developed their roles to improve pupils’ progress. They have been encouraged to challenge underperformance and offer support to teachers following their regular monitoring procedures. Middle leaders are held to account through the robust performance management systems. Access to high- quality professional development has ensured that middle leaders make an impact on pupils’ standards across their subjects and year groups. For example, recent phonics training has improved the number of pupils reaching the expected standards in the last assessment to well above the national average. Middle leaders regularly present reports on their subjects for governors. This enables the governors to challenge the information. This effective system adds to their professional development as leaders. Leaders agree that they are continuing work to enable the school’s assessment system to fully support teachers to measure pupils’ progress in

p.2

Main findings

You, alongside your able group of governors, have kept the confidence of parents since the last inspection. A growing number of parents are volunteering in school. Parents now run the school library effectively. The drive to widen cultural understanding has meant that more parents visit the school to share their own cultural heritage. This gives another dimension to the pupils’ deepening appreciation of the value of ‘respect’.

p.2

External support

Your partnership work with a local school has enabled the school to grow in confidence in the way leaders present the improvements made since the last inspection. The positive relationships have enabled you and your team to demonstrate rapid gains in addressing the areas identified in the last inspection. The reviews and audits from this support system and the local authority have provided senior leaders, including governors, with valuable opportunities to moderate their judgements. This has resulted in the school demonstrating a zeal for continuing school improvement.

p.3

External support

I am copying this letter to the chair of the governing body, the regional schools commissioner and the director of children’s services for Havering. This letter will be published on the Ofsted website.

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion