Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · Short school inspection

Joseph Rowntree School

Inspected 9 May 2017 · published 25 May 2017 · URN 121711

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection datesingle source

    9 May 2017

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Tanya Stuart

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Good

  • Postcode verified

    YO32 4BZ

  • Name on report verified

    Joseph Rowntree School

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2012.

  • OverallGood

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+78Very positivemore positive than 78% of reports of this type graded Good
OutstandingGood

In line with other reports of this type graded Good.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseeffectivelyeffectivehighly effectivefeel safehigh qualityrobustsupportiveclear
Criticismconcerns

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improveAbout the inspection positive critical
  • Findings939w+77
  • What needs to improve102w+33

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
1,032
shorter than usual (typical 1483)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 50, typical 50
Average sentence
18 words
Next steps
2
typical 2
Hedged sentences
4%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 81%What needs to improve 9%About the inspection 10%

Full report text

Store Street Manchester M1 2WD T 0300 123 4234 www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.1

Mr Richard Crane Headteacher Joseph Rowntree School Haxby Road New Earswick York North Yorkshire YO32 4BZ

p.1

Short inspection of Joseph Rowntree School

Following my visit to the school on 9 May 2017 with Ofsted Inspector Elizabeth Cresswell, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to report the inspection findings. The visit was the first short inspection carried out since the school was judged to be good in November 2012.

p.1

Short inspection of Joseph Rowntree School

The leadership team has maintained the good quality of education in the school since the last inspection. You are determined that the school will provide the best possible education for all pupils. You have a clear vision about how this will be done, which includes developing pupils’ resilience and providing a wide range of non-academic opportunities, alongside ensuring that pupils are taught well in every lesson. This vision is shared by the governing body, middle leaders, senior leaders and staff. Since your appointment in 2013, you have focused relentlessly on improving the quality of teaching and ensuring that pupils in key stage 3 are fully prepared for the rigours of key stage 4. As a result, pupils are making better progress across the curriculum and differences between groups of pupils are diminishing rapidly. In addition, you have ensured that the sixth form has maintained the good quality of education it provided at the last inspection and this

p.1

Short inspection of Joseph Rowntree School

Middle leaders are reflective and work together well as a group. You have enabled them to support and challenge staff to ensure that teaching improves and pupils make even better progress.

p.1

Short inspection of Joseph Rowntree School

The governing body is fully involved in the school at a strategic level. Governing body meetings are focused and challenging, with questions asked and answers considered carefully. Governors are self-reflective and have put in place training to ensure that they keep up to date with changes in the education system. Safeguarding is effective.

p.1

Short inspection of Joseph Rowntree School

Safeguarding is highly effective. There are robust systems in place which ensure that pupils are kept safe and feel safe. You are not complacent about this, and regularly review and update the systems you have. All safeguarding arrangements are fit for purpose and records are detailed and of high quality. There is a comprehensive programme in place to enable pupils to learn about issues they may face, in both the real and virtual worlds. This programme is enhanced by visits from external organisations, such as the police.

p.2

Short inspection of Joseph Rowntree School

The pastoral support team has a range of experiences, which enable them to help and support pupils effectively. In addition, you have ensured that pupils have access to help for their mental health through the provision of a mental health nurse. As a result, pupils feel safe and know there is always someone they can talk to if they have an issue.

p.2

Short inspection of Joseph Rowntree School

A number of parents, via Parent View, raised concerns about bullying. The inspection team took these comments into account and considered them carefully. However, the inspection team found that bullying is very rare and, when it happens, it is dealt with highly effectively.

p.2

Inspection findings

 You did a comprehensive review of the GCSE results in 2016, focusing on the differences between the progress made in English and mathematics by pupils supported by the pupil premium funding and their peers nationally; the differences were bigger than would be expected. As a result, the pupil premium funding is being spent even more effectively, and pupils supported by this funding are receiving even more bespoke support, both in lessons and across the curriculum. For example, a group of pupils were taken on an outward bound and mathematics course which enabled them to consider the practical application of mathematics. Your comprehensive and detailed tracking system ensures that all staff know exactly how well pupils are doing. Differences are closing rapidly across both key stage 3 and key stage 4 as a result.  In both English and mathematics, extra staffing is used to ensure flexible setting. Inspectors saw this being used highly effectively in mathematics when a small

p.2

Inspection findings

group of pupils was given the opportunity to discuss mathematical concepts they found difficult in a supportive environment. Pupils mentioned that they found this support very useful. However, in some mathematics lessons, all pupils are given the same work to do. Often, this work is too easy for some pupils and too hard for others.  The attendance of pupils is above the national average. Much work is ongoing to ensure that all pupils, and especially those supported by the pupil premium and those who have special educational needs and/or disabilities, continue to improve their attendance. Comprehensive and effective professional development for staff means that they are able to deal with behaviour issues better and, as a result, the proportion of pupils who are being excluded has fallen significantly. Pupils say their lessons are rarely disrupted and, during the inspection, pupils behaved well both in lessons and around the school. Pupils are courteous to visitors and to

p.2

Inspection findings

each other. Pupils wear their school uniform well. However, you are fully aware that you need to continue to monitor the progress and attendance of all pupils, including those supported by the pupil premium and those who have special educational needs and/or disabilities to ensure that any dips in attendance and/or progress are dealt with quickly.  In many lessons, teaching assistants are used very effectively to support the learning of pupils. As a result, the progress these pupils make in lessons is equal to their peers. However, you have identified, and it was noted during the inspection, that not all teaching assistants support pupils in this way.

p.3

Next steps for the school

Leaders and those responsible for governance should ensure that:

p.3

Next steps for the school

 in mathematics, all pupils are given work which challenges them, regardless of their academic ability  all teaching assistants are used to ensure that they support the effective learning of pupils  they continue to focus on the progress and attendance of pupils supported by the pupil premium funding and those pupils who have special education needs and/or disabilities.

p.3

Next steps for the school

I am copying this letter to the chair of the governing body, the regional schools commissioner and the director of children’s services for York. This letter will be published on the Ofsted website.

p.3

Information about the inspection

During the inspection, inspectors met with senior leaders, middle leaders and a range of staff. An inspector met with a group of pupils and listened to a number of pupils read. Pupils were spoken to informally at social times. Lessons were visited with members of the senior leadership team to see the impact of strategies introduced. An inspector met with a group of governors, including the chair of governors. Documentation was scrutinised, including minutes from governors’ meetings, information about pupils’ progress, documents about teaching and learning, details of attendance and exclusions, and information about safeguarding. Inspectors also reviewed the 90 responses to Ofsted’s online questionnaire, Parent View, and the 43 responses to the staff questionnaire.

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion