Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · Short school inspection

Peter Hills with St Mary's and St Paul's CofE Primary School

Inspected 25 Apr 2017 · published 25 May 2017 · URN 100837

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection datesingle source

    25 Apr 2017

  • Inspectorssingle source

    David Robinson

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Good

  • Postcode verified

    SE16 5ED

  • Name on report verified

    Peter Hills with St Mary’s and St Paul’s CofE Primary School

Page 1 of 4
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2013.

  • OverallGood

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+55Positivemore positive than 28% of reports of this type graded Good
OutstandingGood

In line with other reports of this type graded Good.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praisestrongeffectiveeffectivelyimprovingclearrobustrapid progresshigh quality
Criticismconcernsabsencevariation

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improveAbout the inspection positive critical
  • Findings1051w+58
  • What needs to improve87w−20

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
4
Words of findings
1,129
shorter than usual (typical 1483)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 44, typical 50
Average sentence
18 words
Next steps
2
typical 2
Hedged sentences
3%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 86%What needs to improve 7%About the inspection 7%

Full report text

Store Street Manchester M1 2WD T 0300 123 4234 www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.1

Ms Pia Longman Headteacher Peter Hills with St Mary’s and St Paul’s CofE Primary School 2 Beatson Walk Rotherhithe London SE16 5ED

p.1

School

Following my visit to the school on 25 April 2017, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to report the inspection findings. The visit was the first short inspection carried out since the school was judged to be good in May 2013.

p.1

School

The leadership team has maintained the good quality of education in the school since the last inspection.

p.1

School

Prior to your arrival in January 2016, the school had been through a period of turbulence without the stability of a substantive headteacher. Since taking up post, you accurately identified the key areas for improvement and acted decisively, taking effective measures to address them.

p.1

School

You have created a new leadership structure within the school and appointed new leaders and teachers. Together you are implementing positive and effective change, which is having a demonstrable impact on pupils’ progress. This is particularly true in phonics where progress for pupils currently at the school is improving rapidly. Although some groups of pupils still have ground to make up, the actions you have taken this year are having a significant impact on accelerating their progress further. Improving the consistency of the level of challenge for mathematics is an area where further work is required. You have clear plans in place on how leaders will address this.

p.1

School

You are effectively addressing the areas for improvement identified at the time of the previous inspection. The inspection report recommended that leaders improve the quality of teaching and raise standards in writing. You have been proactive and uncompromising in your approach to improving the quality of teaching. This has resulted in many pupils making accelerated progress in a number of subjects. Pupils’ books demonstrate standards of writing that are largely at or above age-related expectations. Leaders have worked effectively with the local authority, using its expertise to enhance improvements in the quality of teaching and in standards of writing. Parents and carers reinforce the significant improvements in the quality of teaching and learning since your appointment.

p.1

School

The leadership team has ensured that all safeguarding arrangements are fit for purpose and records are detailed and of high quality. There is a strong culture of safeguarding at the school. Leaders have ensured that all members of staff and governors are regularly trained in different aspects of safeguarding. A number of leaders and staff members within the school have completed higher-level training. This supports the work of the designated safeguarding lead and adds additional capacity to the school’s ability to respond to concerns. Robust systems and procedures are in place that ensure that statutory checks are completed for adults working within the school. Members of staff know exactly how to respond and report concerns at a school level and to external agencies. Their knowledge around aspects of safeguarding such as female genital mutilation is secure. They articulate a clear message that everybody in the school is responsible for safeguarding.

p.2

School

Pupils understand how to keep safe online. They clearly articulate the behaviours they should adhere to in order to minimise dangers to themselves in the digital world. Younger pupils are clear that they must tell an adult if they are concerned about what they see online. Pupils understand the importance of not sharing personal information online, and possess age-appropriate knowledge to help minimise risks in the digital world. As a result of the strong pastoral care offered by staff, pupils are consistent in reporting how safe they feel. Pupils, parents and carers agree that staff listen to concerns and take the appropriate action.

p.2

Inspection findings

 Leaders correctly identified that standards in phonics needed to improve in Year 1 and for those pupils who are disadvantaged. The approach to teaching phonics implemented by leaders has resulted in pupils from Reception through to Year 2 making rapid progress. Disadvantaged pupils in Year 2 who did not meet the expected standard for phonics in Year 1 are now on track to do so by the end of the year. A high proportion of disadvantaged pupils in Year 1 and Year 2 now demonstrate good phonics skills when reading. They show strong focus and determination when reading challenging texts. Pupils elicit a genuine enthusiasm for reading both for pleasure and for learning.  Leaders acknowledge the need to further support pupils in key stage 2 who did not meet the expected standard in phonics at key stage 1, and plans to address this are in place.  In May 2015, governors took the decision to appoint a community liaison leader

p.2

Inspection findings

as a means of reducing absence levels. Leaders have worked collaboratively to effectively address attendance issues. They have introduced robust systems to monitor attendance and have established productive relationships with a range of external agencies. They deploy effective, targeted support to key families with attendance concerns. This is appropriately balanced by leaders reinforcing the responsibilities parents and carers have when it comes to good attendance. Pupils have responded positively to the range of incentives leaders have established for good attendance. Governors regularly monitor the attendance of key groups and hold leaders to account on required improvements. Attendance figures for the current academic year to date show a significant improvement in the attendance of all pupils including those who have special educational needs and/or disabilities. Leaders know that they must maintain this improving trend in

p.3

Inspection findings

attendance.  Following the 2016 results, leaders correctly identified the need to improve attainment in mathematics for disadvantaged pupils at the end of key stage 2. Training for staff, coupled with a sharp focus from leaders on improving teaching, has resulted in disadvantaged pupils making accelerated progress in mathematics this year. Evidence in pupils’ books supports the school’s assessment information showing the rapid improvements disadvantaged pupils have made. More disadvantaged pupils are now working at the expected age- related standard with an increasing number working at the higher standard. However, the level of challenge in mathematics still shows some variation between year groups. Leaders acknowledge that pupils must be consistently and regularly challenged by activities, and have regular opportunities to apply a range of mathematical skills. They have clear and focused plans in place to

p.3

Next steps for the school

Leaders and governors should ensure that:

p.3

Next steps for the school

 pupils are challenged in mathematics through activities that require them to apply a range of mathematical skills and knowledge  absence levels are reduced still further by embedding the systems and procedures recently put in place.

p.3

Next steps for the school

I am copying this letter to the chair of the governing body, the director of education for the Diocese of Southwark, the regional schools commissioner and the director of children’s services for Southwark. This letter will be published on the Ofsted website. Yours sincerely

p.3

Information about the inspection

The inspector undertook visits to lessons and listened to pupils read. He spoke with groups of pupils and staff. He also reviewed school assessment information. A scrutiny of pupils’ books and observations in lessons were carried out alongside the headteacher and/or the assistant headteachers. Meetings were held with subject leaders, governors and a representative from the local authority. A range of documentation was scrutinised, including information about outcomes for groups of pupils, policy documentation and information about attendance and safeguarding.

p.4

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion