Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Early years · Early years inspection (CIF)

Tulip London

Inspected 4 May 2017 · URN EY483827

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

Requires improvement

Jenny Devine

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Group verified

    Tulip London Committee

  • Group reference verified

    RP527513

  • Inspection date verified

    4 May 2017

  • Inspectors verified

    Jenny Devine

  • Leadership and management verified

    Requires improvement

  • Outcomes verified

    Requires improvement

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Requires improvement

  • Personal development, behaviour and welfare verified

    Requires improvement

  • Teaching, learning and assessment verified

    Requires improvement

  • Postcode verified

    W5 2DS

  • Name on report verified

    Tulip London

  • URN verified

    EY483827

Page 1 of 5
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.

  • OverallRequires improvement
  • Leadership and managementRequires improvement
  • OutcomesRequires improvement
  • Personal development, behaviour and welfareRequires improvement
  • Teaching, learning and assessmentRequires improvement

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

−26Mixedmore positive than 9% of reports of this type graded Requires improvement
OutstandingGoodMetRINot metInadequate

Reads more critically than most reports of this type graded Requires improvement.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praisegood progresseffectiveenjoycaringeffectivelyaccuratelyhappykind
Criticismbreachweaknessesnot consistentlyat riskweaknessnot effectiveweakernot always

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improveAbout the inspection positive critical
  • Findings46w0
  • What needs to improve707w−26

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
5
Words of findings
714
about usual (typical 773)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 45, typical 48
Average sentence
17 words
Next steps
8
typical 8
Hedged sentences
12%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 4%What needs to improve 57%About the inspection 39%

Full report text

Tulip London Harvington School, 20 Castlebar Road, London, W5 2DS

p.1

Inspection date

Previous inspection date 4 May 2017 Not applicable

p.1

3

Effectiveness of the leadership and management Requires improvement Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Requires improvement Personal development, behaviour and welfare Requires improvement Outcomes for children Requires improvement

p.1

This provision requires improvement. It is not yet good because:

 Staff do not consistently obtain parents’ written permission to administer children's medication. However, this breach does not have a significant impact on children's overall welfare as staff discuss the details with parents and record when medication has been given. This is also a breach of the Childcare Register requirements.  Staff assessments and tracking of children's development are not precise enough to identify their next steps in learning and plan for their progression. This does not help all children make the good progress they should.  Staff miss some opportunities to ensure quieter children fully benefit from the group activities planned to help their learning.  The system for self-evaluation is not fully effective in identifying and addressing weaker areas of practice to improve outcomes for children.

p.1

It has the following strengths

 Staff are kind and caring. They value and respect all children. Clear expectations and boundaries help to ensure children's good behaviour.  Children are encouraged to lead healthy lifestyles, for example, through the provision of healthy snacks and drinks, and opportunities to play and exercise in the fresh air.  Staff share a range of information with parents to keep them informed about their children's learning and time at the pre-school.

p.1

What the setting needs to do to improve further

To meet the requirements of the early years foundation stage and the Childcare Register the provider must:

p.2

Due Date

 ensure that parents' written permission is obtained prior to staff administering medication to their child 01/06/2017

p.2

Due Date

 improve staff's knowledge of observation, assessment and monitoring processes, so they can use this information effectively to address each child's next steps in learning. 01/06/2017

p.2

Due Date

To further improve the quality of the early years provision the provider should:

p.2

Due Date

 focus more closely on encouraging children to actively participate in group activities  review the self-evaluation processes to accurately assess and address weaknesses in staff practice, to improve outcomes for children.

p.2

Inspection activities

 The inspector spent the majority of time observing children in the playroom, gym and garden.  The inspector sampled documentation, including children's records and staff suitability checks.  The inspector held discussions with the secretary/nursery officer, deputy and staff.  The inspector talked to a sample of parents to obtain their views on the pre-school.  The inspector had a discussion with the deputy about an activity completed.

p.2

Effectiveness of the leadership and management requires improvement

Safeguarding is effective. Staff have completed safeguarding training and they are aware of the procedures to follow if a child may be at risk of harm. Appropriate vetting procedures are in place to ensure staff are suitable to work with children. Staff follow an induction process to ensure they are aware of their roles and responsibilities. Staff receive supervision and complete some further training to help with their development. The management team have recently introduced a new system for assessment to improve the whole team's knowledge of this area. However, as this is in its infancy, it has not had an impact on staff skills to raise the quality of teaching.

p.3

Quality of teaching, learning and assessment requires improvement

Staff set up the play room with a range of activities to encourage children to play and learn. Children gain skills in becoming independent; for example, they make free choices about their play, enjoy imaginative play in the home corner and take part in painting activities. Staff relate well to children overall; for example, they ask questions, to encourage talking. However, the quality of teaching is not consistently good, for example, staff miss opportunities to ensure quieter children fully benefit during group times. In addition, although staff know their children overall well, they do not use observation and assessments accurately to track progress and identify the key areas of what each child needs to learn next. This leads to teaching and planning that is not always fully effective.

p.3

Personal development, behaviour and welfare require improvement

The key-person system is effective and this enables parents, children and staff to form close bonds. Parents comment that they are happy with the care their children receive. In addition, they are comfortable in knowing their children are learning Japanese and developing a cultural awareness of Japan. All children enjoy daily opportunities to develop their physical skills. For example, children roll, crawl and jump during a music and movement activity, developing their balance and body movements and learn to keep themselves fit. Although there is a weakness in leadership and management relating to medication documentation, this does not have a negative impact on children's welfare.

p.3

Outcomes for children require improvement

Children are generally motivated to learn and develop some skills in preparation for starting school. For example, they concentrate well during some activities, learn to share and take turns, and develop some independence skills. However, weaknesses in the assessment processes mean that children are not supported effectively enough to make the good progress of which they are capable.

p.3

Setting details

Unique reference number EY483827 Local authority Ealing Inspection number 1003945 Type of provision Full-time provision Day care type Childcare - Non-Domestic Registers Early Years Register, Compulsory Childcare Register, Voluntary Childcare Register Age range of children 3 - 5 Total number of places 14 Number of children on roll 24 Name of registered person Tulip London Committee

p.4

reference number

Date of previous inspection Not applicable Telephone number 07900 498 925

p.4

reference number

Tulip London registered in 2015 and operates from a classroom in Harvington Preparatory School in the London Borough of Ealing. The pre-school is open from 8.15am until 3.30pm Monday to Friday, during school term times. The pre-school employs nine staff, of whom six staff hold appropriate early years qualifications. The pre-school receives nursery education funding for three- and four-year-old children.

p.4

reference number

This inspection was carried out by Ofsted under sections 49 and 50 of the Childcare Act 2006 on the quality and standards of provision that is registered on the Early Years Register. The registered person must ensure that this provision complies with the statutory framework for children’s learning, development and care, known as the early years foundation stage.

p.4

reference number

procedures set out in the guidance ‘Complaints procedure: raising concerns and making complaints about Ofsted’, which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.gov.uk/government/organisations/ofsted. If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk. achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, work-based learning and skills training, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection.

p.4

reference number

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk. You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/, write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.5

reference number

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our website for news, information and updates at www.ofsted.gov.uk/user.

p.5

reference number

T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/government/organisations/ofsted

p.5

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion