Early years · Childminder inspection (EIF, requirements met)
Childminder EY395757
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
25 Apr 2017
- Inspectors verified
Lorraine Sparey
- Early years verified
Good
- Leadership and management verified
Inadequate
- Outcomes verified
Requires improvement
- Overall effectiveness verified
Inadequate
- Personal development, behaviour and welfare verified
Inadequate
- Previous overall verified
Good
- Teaching, learning and assessment verified
Requires improvement
- Name on report verified
Childminder Report
- URN verified
EY395757
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.
- OverallInadequate
- Early yearsGood
- Leadership and managementInadequate
- OutcomesRequires improvement
- Personal development, behaviour and welfareInadequate
- Teaching, learning and assessmentRequires improvement
5% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Inadequate (17,905 inspections).
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type graded Inadequate.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- The quality of teaching is too variable. p.3
- The childminder plans suitable activities and outings in the mornings which children enjoy. p.3
- At other times of the day, children are not effectively supported to learn. p.3
- When children lead their own play, the childminder’s assistants do not effectively engage with them or support them to make good progress. p.3
- Weaknesses in assessment mean that assistants do not have an accurate understanding of what children need to learn next. p.3
- For example, while children enjoy playing in a sandpit an assistant reminds them to be careful with the sand and praises them when they are. p.3
- However, she does not use the opportunity to move their learning on by, for example, introducing mathematical language and concepts despite them being capable of this. p.3
- Children make steady progress in their learning. p.3
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Safeguarding2
“Safeguarding is ineffective.” p.3Wellbeing & mental health2
“Children's safety and well-being are compromised.” p.1
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 5
- Words of findings
- 694
- shorter than usual (typical 886)
- Reading level
- Fairly hard
- Flesch 52, typical 47
- Average sentence
- 16 words
- Next steps
- 8
- typical 7
- Hedged sentences
- 14%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Inspection date
Previous inspection date 25 April 2017 16 July 2015
p.1
This inspection: Inadequate 4
Effectiveness of the leadership and management Inadequate 4
p.1
This inspection: Inadequate 4
Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Requires improvement Personal development, behaviour and welfare Inadequate 4
p.1
This inspection: Inadequate 4
Outcomes for children Requires improvement
p.1
This provision is inadequate
Children's safety and well-being are compromised. The childminder leaves assistants in sole charge of children knowing that these do not hold a current paediatric first aid certificate. The quality of teaching is inconsistent. While at times the childminder and her assistants support children's learning well, too frequently they fail to use opportunities to extend learning. The childminder has attempted some routes to support professional development for herself and her assistants. However, her efforts have not sufficiently tackled the weaknesses in teaching. Assessment is not secure enough because for some children it does not accurately reflect their current levels of achievement.
p.1
It has the following strengths
Children have warm and trusting relationships with the childminder and her assistants. They are confident to approach adults for help and reassurance. The environment is welcoming and children know they can choose from the good range of resources available promoting their independence.
p.1
What the setting needs to do to improve further
To meet the requirements of the early years foundation stage the provider must:
p.2
Due Date
ensure that any assistant who is left in sole charge of children holds a current paediatric first aid certificate 01/05/2017
p.2
Due Date
improve the quality of teaching and assessment so all children experience consistently good teaching and are sufficiently challenged in their learning 29/05/2017
p.2
Due Date
improve the support of assistants so that they receive support, coaching and training to improve the quality of their practice. 29/05/2017
p.2
Inspection activities
The inspector completed the joint observation with the childminder and discussed the findings. The inspector observed and spoke to the childminder, her assistants and the children at appropriate times. The inspector reviewed documentation including children's online learning records, the childminder's self-evaluation and certificates of training. The inspector spoke to some parents to gain their views about the provision. The inspector completed a tour of the premises with the childminder.
p.2
Effectiveness of the leadership and management is inadequate
Safeguarding is ineffective. The childminder has not taken sufficient steps to promote children’s safety and well-being. This is because she has not ensured that those left in sole charge of children are suitably qualified in first aid. Nevertheless, the childminder and her assistants have a good understanding of child protection and the appropriate procedures to follow in the event of a concern. The childminder is confident to liaise with other agencies to support children's welfare. She has some methods to monitor her provision including the educational programmes. However, she does not reflect on practice sufficiently to enable her to identify key areas to develop. While the childminder meets regularly with her assistants, she does not use these opportunities to support improvement in the quality of teaching.
p.3
Quality of teaching, learning and assessment requires improvement
The quality of teaching is too variable. The childminder plans suitable activities and outings in the mornings which children enjoy. At other times of the day, children are not effectively supported to learn. When children lead their own play, the childminder’s assistants do not effectively engage with them or support them to make good progress. Weaknesses in assessment mean that assistants do not have an accurate understanding of what children need to learn next. For example, while children enjoy playing in a sandpit an assistant reminds them to be careful with the sand and praises them when they are. However, she does not use the opportunity to move their learning on by, for example, introducing mathematical language and concepts despite them being capable of this.
p.3
Personal development, behaviour and welfare are inadequate
Children’s welfare is put at risk because they are not always cared for by someone who is able to respond appropriately in the event of an accident. However, they are learning to keep themselves safe. For example, the childminder and her assistants teach the children how to use the climbing frame and seesaw safely. Children behave well and they are encouraged to share and take turns. Younger children who find it difficult to share are supported well. The childminder gets down to their level and encourages them to wait for their turn. Children show high levels of confidence as they move freely between the indoor and outdoor areas. They learn about people who are less fortunate than themselves as, for example, they take part in a walk to raise money for local charities.
p.3
Outcomes for children require improvement
Children make steady progress in their learning. Although they are motivated they are not always fully supported to learn as much as they can. This is because adults do not consistently help children to make the progress they are capable of. Children enjoy the wide variety of activities outside the home including finding fossils on a local beach. They learn skills they need for when they go to school. For example, they can independently put on their coats and shoes when going outside.
p.3
Setting details
Unique reference number EY395757 Local authority Poole Inspection number 1097026 Type of provision Childminder Day care type Childminder Registers Early Years Register, Compulsory Childcare Register, Voluntary Childcare Register Age range of children 0 - 8 Total number of places 9 Number of children on roll 18
p.4
Name of registered person
Date of previous inspection 16 July 2015
p.4
Telephone number
The childminder registered in 2009. She is registered to childmind from a private house in Poole, Dorset, where she works with three assistants. The childminder offers care all day from Monday to Friday. She is accredited to receive funding for the provision of free early years education for children aged two, three and four years old. The childminder is qualified to level 3 in childcare and education.
p.4
Telephone number
This inspection was carried out by Ofsted under sections 49 and 50 of the Childcare Act 2006 on the quality and standards of provision that is registered on the Early Years Register. The registered person must ensure that this provision complies with the statutory framework for children’s learning, development and care, known as the early years foundation stage.
p.4
Telephone number
procedures set out in the guidance ‘Complaints procedure: raising concerns and making complaints about Ofsted’, which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.gov.uk/government/organisations/ofsted. If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk. achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, work-based learning and skills training, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection.
p.4
Telephone number
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk. You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/, write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .
p.5
Telephone number
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our website for news, information and updates at www.ofsted.gov.uk/user.
p.5
Telephone number
T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/government/organisations/ofsted
p.5
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion