Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Group verified
Funland Pre-School Committee
- Group reference verified
RP517670
- Inspection date verified
12 May 2017
- Inspectors verified
Ben Parsons
- Early years verified
Good
- Leadership and management verified
Inadequate
- Outcomes verified
Good
- Overall effectiveness verified
Inadequate
- Personal development, behaviour and welfare verified
Inadequate
- Previous overall verified
Good
- Teaching, learning and assessment verified
Good
- Postcode verified
BN3 7LD
- Name on report verified
Funland Pre-School
- URN verified
130743
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.
- OverallInadequate
- Early yearsGood
- Leadership and managementInadequate
- OutcomesGood
- Personal development, behaviour and welfareInadequate
- Teaching, learning and assessmentGood
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type graded Inadequate.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Staff lack awareness of current legislation, such as the Prevent Dduty, which means children's safety and welfare are is compromised. p.3
- Self-evaluation is not used effectively to identify where there are breaches of the legal requirements. p.1
- The manager does not accurately evaluate the pre-school to help regularly identify and address areas of weakness. p.3
- Children's welfare and safety is are compromised. p.1
- The arrangements for safeguarding are not effective. p.3
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- ensure the practitioner with lead responsibility for safeguarding has a clear understanding of their role, to enable them to provide support, advice and guidance to staff on safeguarding issues, including any signs that children are at risk of being drawn into radicalisation. 15/06/2017 p.2
- make better use of self-evaluation to identify and address breaches in the legal requirements p.2
- build further on arrangements for comparing the progress made by different groups of children and checking that all groups receive the support they need to increase the potential for them to achieve at the highest possible levels p.2
- review and improve the routines of the day to make the most of opportunities to support children's learning. p.2
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Communication & language3
“They enjoy listening to stories and confidently talk about what might happen next.” p.3Behaviour2
“Children behave well.” p.3
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 5
- Words of findings
- 782
- about usual (typical 907)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 45, typical 48
- Average sentence
- 16 words
- Next steps
- 4
- typical 7
- Hedged sentences
- 8%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Funland Pre-School 38 Holmes Avenue, Hove, East Sussex, BN3 7LD
p.1
Inspection date
Previous inspection date 12 May 2017 8 May 2015
p.1
This inspection: Inadequate 4
Effectiveness of the leadership and management Inadequate 4
p.1
This inspection: Inadequate 4
Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Good 2
p.1
This inspection: Inadequate 4
Personal development, behaviour and welfare Inadequate 4
p.1
This provision is inadequate
Children's welfare and safety is are compromised. The lead safeguarding practitioner does not have an up-to-date knowledge of safeguarding issues, including awareness of the Prevent Dduty guidance. She has not provided staff with adequate training to understand all of the indicators of potential harm to children, for example, how to prevent children from being exposed to extreme and radical views. Self-evaluation is not used effectively to identify where there are breaches of the legal requirements. The manager does not effectively monitor and track different groups of children to help identify any gaps in their learning and help them make even better progress. At times, staff do not organise sessions in the most effective way, for example, to enable children to develop and extend their play without interruption.
p.1
It has the following strengths
Children have plenty of opportunities to be active and to explore, both indoors and outside. For example, children enjoy going on insect hunts in the garden and using the challenging climbing equipment. Staff regularly share information and ideas with parents and other professionals to help provide children with cohesive learning opportunities. For example, they work closely with local speech and language therapists and parents and implement effective support plans. All children make good progress from their starting points in learning.
p.1
What the setting needs to do to improve further
To meet the requirements of the early years foundation stage and the Childcare Register the provider must:
p.2
Due Date
ensure the practitioner with lead responsibility for safeguarding has a clear understanding of their role, to enable them to provide support, advice and guidance to staff on safeguarding issues, including any signs that children are at risk of being drawn into radicalisation. 15/06/2017
p.2
Due Date
To further improve the quality of the early years provision the provider should:
p.2
Due Date
make better use of self-evaluation to identify and address breaches in the legal requirements build further on arrangements for comparing the progress made by different groups of children and checking that all groups receive the support they need to increase the potential for them to achieve at the highest possible levels review and improve the routines of the day to make the most of opportunities to support children's learning.
p.2
Inspection activities
The inspector observed teaching practice and the impact this has on children's learning. The inspector held discussions with the manager, staff, children and parents. The inspector read some of the pre-school's documentation, including the safeguarding policy and procedures. The inspector sampled children's development information and records. The inspector completed a joint observation with the manager and discussed children's play, learning and progress.
p.2
Effectiveness of the leadership and management is inadequate
The arrangements for safeguarding are not effective. The manager who is the lead practitioner for safeguarding lacks awareness of her role and responsibilities to ensure the safety of vulnerable children. Systems in place to ensure all staff have an up-to-date knowledge of current safeguarding procedures are not effective. Staff do not know how to assess and address risks to children being drawn into radicalisation. Overall, the manager offers some support and coaching to staff, such as through supervision meetings. She discusses new ideas during staff meetings, such as adding further mathematic and literacy displays in the environment. The manager does not accurately evaluate the pre-school to help regularly identify and address areas of weakness. However, there have been some positive improvements to the provision. For example, they have introduced a new assessment system. This helps staff to check children's individual development closely and
p.3
Quality of teaching, learning and assessment is good
Staff use information gained from parents and their own observations to help build a detailed understanding of each child's individual learning styles. They provide engaging and interesting activities. For example, children enjoy riding scooters and bicycles through a role -play car wash. Staff ask if children want to fill up their vehicles with petrol and challenge children to recognise numbers as they pretend to pay, using a toy credit card reader. Staff build on children's recent experiences well. For example, they discuss their recent visit from the local fire engine and read stories about fire safety.
p.3
Personal development, behaviour and welfare are inadequate
Staff lack awareness of current legislation, such as the Prevent Dduty, which means children's safety and welfare are is compromised. Children behave well. They develop secure social skills and happily share. For instance, they independently pass bowls of fruit around the table during snack so they all have enough. Staff support children's healthy lifestyles. For example, they encourage children to eat a variety of nutritious food for snack and offer parents guidance on how to supply a nutritious packed lunch.
p.3
Outcomes for children are good
Children are well -motivated and enthusiastic about their learning. They are curious about the world around them. For example, they closely observe a snail, describing it as 'slimy' and 'slow'. Children confidently count and recognise numbers. They enjoy listening to stories and confidently talk about what might happen next. Children communicate well and express themselves with confidence. They proudly stand at the front of the group and talk about objects they have brought in from home. Children independently dress for going outside and quickly gain the skills needed for their future learning and for school.
p.3
Setting details
Unique reference number 130743 Local authority Brighton & Hove Inspection number 1089424 Type of provision Sessional provision Day care type Childcare - Non-Domestic Registers Early Years Register, Compulsory Childcare Register, Voluntary Childcare Register Age range of children 2 - 4 Total number of places 32 Number of children on roll 30 Name of registered person Funland Pre-School Committee
p.4
reference number
Date of previous inspection 8 May 2015 Telephone number 01273 821 377
p.4
reference number
Funland Pre-School registered in 1993. The pre-school is open between 9.15am and 3.15pm Monday and Tuesday and between 9.15am and 1.15pm Wednesday to Friday, during term time only. On Monday and Tuesday it runs from 9.15am to 3.15pm, and Wednesday to Friday from 9.15am until 1.15pm. The pre-school employs seven staff, of whom five hold appropriate early years qualifications at level 3 and two at level 2. The pre-school receives funding for the provision of free early education for children aged two, three and four years old.
p.4
reference number
This inspection was carried out by Ofsted under sections 49 and 50 of the Childcare Act 2006 on the quality and standards of provision that is registered on the Early Years Register. The registered person must ensure that this provision complies with the statutory framework for children’s learning, development and care, known as the early years foundation stage.
p.4
reference number
procedures set out in the guidance ‘Complaints procedure: raising concerns and making complaints about Ofsted’, which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.gov.uk/government/organisations/ofsted. If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk. achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, work-based learning and skills training, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection.
p.4
reference number
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk. You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/, write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .
p.5
reference number
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our website for news, information and updates at www.ofsted.gov.uk/user.
p.5
reference number
T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/government/organisations/ofsted
p.5
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion