Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted letter

Setting

Inspected 27 Apr 2017 · published 17 May 2017

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Stephen McMullan

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection datesingle source

    27 Apr 2017

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Stephen McMullan

  • Postcode verified

    SK17 9LP

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+47Positivemore positive than 77% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseambitiouswell designedstrongeffectivesuccessfullyenthusiasmsuccessfulsecure
Criticismnot yetnot effectivelynot consistently

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

Findings positive critical

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Full report text

Store Street Manchester M1 2WD T 0300 123 4234 www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.1

Victoria Giliker Harpur Hill Primary School Trent Avenue Harpur Hill Buxton Derbyshire SK17 9LP

p.1

School

Following my visit to your school on 27 April 2017, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to report the inspection findings. Thank you for the help you gave me and for the time you made available to discuss the actions you are taking to improve the school since the most recent section 5 inspection.

p.1

School

The visit was the first monitoring inspection since the school was judged to require improvement following the section 5 inspection in September 2016. It was carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005.

p.1

School

At its section 5 inspection before the one that took place in September 2016, the school was also judged to require improvement.

p.1

School

Senior leaders and governors are taking effective action to tackle the areas requiring improvement identified at the last section 5 inspection in order to become a good school.

p.1

Evidence

During the inspection, meetings were held with you, other senior and subject leaders, members of the governing body and a representative of the local authority to discuss the actions taken since the last inspection.

p.1

Evidence

The school improvement plan was evaluated and, also, a number of documents relating to the school’s performance, the safeguarding of pupils and pupils’ progress tracking information were reviewed. Together with you, I visited all classrooms and looked at samples of pupils’ work.

p.1

Context

Since the last inspection, a number of teaching and non-teaching staff have left the school. It has not been possible to replace many of these positions immediately with permanent staff and this has resulted in some turbulence for a number of classes, particularly Years 3 and 4. A number of staff are currently on long-term sick leave. The school’s leadership team is now complete, with a number of leaders, such as those for special educational needs and/or disabilities and pupil premium, being new to post. An external review of the school’s use of the pupil premium funding was completed in December 2016.

p.2

Main findings

Senior leaders have acted quickly in response to the findings of the school’s last inspection. You have successfully shared your ambitious vision for the school and every pupil with governors, staff and other school leaders. The school’s plans for improvement are well designed to promote and prioritise the actions necessary for the school to improve further. There are clear lines of accountability and milestones by which leaders can be held accountable for their actions.

p.2

Main findings

The governing body has increased the level of accountability it expects from the school’s leaders. Senior and subject leaders are invited to governing body meetings to share information about their areas of responsibility and the performance of groups of pupils, such as those who are disadvantaged. Governors use these opportunities to gain a better understanding of the school’s performance and this is helping them to ask increasingly searching questions of school leaders.

p.2

Main findings

The senior and subject leaders’ enthusiasm and appetite for their roles are tangible. They have a shared sense of purpose and a firm grasp of the responsibilities that come with their position. You have been successful in delegating these responsibilities and the leaders feel increasingly empowered and trusted to use their professional knowledge and judgement to secure improvements. The school’s monitoring timetable is ensuring that the leaders check on the impact of classroom practice on pupils’ work at regular intervals.

p.2

Main findings

The school’s pupils’ progress tracking system is now well established. Leaders use this to hold teachers to account for the performance of every child. As a result of the external review of the school’s use of the pupil premium funding, the information on the outcomes of disadvantaged pupils is particularly detailed. Leaders use this information effectively to plan, and check on, any additional support these pupils may receive.

p.2

Main findings

Current information shows that, regardless of background or ability, the majority of this group of pupils are making at least, and often much more than, the progress expected of pupils their age in reading, writing and mathematics. However, this tracking is not yet used as effectively as it needs to be by teachers to inform the next steps in pupils’ learning.

p.2

Main findings

Work in books shows that pupils are increasingly having opportunities to use and apply their mathematical skills. In addition to mathematics lessons, pupils’ learning journals show good evidence of mathematical skills being used in subjects such as geography and science. Teachers are providing pupils with more opportunities in their mathematics lessons to explain what they are doing and why, and this is helping to develop their reasoning skills.

p.3

Main findings

Teachers give feedback to pupils in line with the school’s revised policy. Additionally, pupils are encouraged to review their own work and that of their peers to support and deepen their understanding. Teachers’ feedback does not yet consistently support the next steps in pupils’ learning as it is often descriptive rather than developmental. Where teachers set additional tasks, some of which are thought- provoking, pupils are not given the time they need to reflect upon and complete these regularly enough.

p.3

External support

The school remains a priority for the local authority and receives additional support from a local schools’ teaching alliance. This support has provided increased opportunities for leaders and teachers to visit other schools to view strong practice and moderate standards of pupils’ work. The school’s leaders speak highly of how this is helping to secure improvements at the school, as well as develop their teaching practice and that of their colleagues. In addition to brokering this support, the local authority has provided leaders with the financial and human resources expertise necessary to move the school forward at the brisk pace necessary to improve standards in the future.

p.3

External support

I am copying this letter to the chair of the governing body, the regional schools commissioner and the director of children’s services for Derbyshire. This letter will be published on the Ofsted website.

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion