Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Early years · Childminder inspection (EIF, requirements met)

Childminder 133322

Inspected 24 Apr 2017 · URN 133322

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

Inadequate

Sarah Holley

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    24 Apr 2017

  • Inspectors verified

    Sarah Holley

  • Early years verified

    Good

  • Leadership and management verified

    Inadequate

  • Outcomes verified

    Inadequate

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Inadequate

  • Personal development, behaviour and welfare verified

    Inadequate

  • Previous overall verified

    Good

  • Teaching, learning and assessment verified

    Inadequate

  • Name on report verified

    Childminder Report

  • URN verified

    133322

Page 1 of 5
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.

  • OverallInadequate
  • Early yearsGood
  • Leadership and managementInadequate
  • OutcomesInadequate
  • Personal development, behaviour and welfareInadequate
  • Teaching, learning and assessmentInadequate

5% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Inadequate (17,905 inspections).

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

−37Criticalmore positive than 58% of reports of this type graded Inadequate
OutstandingGoodMetRINot metInadequate

In line with other reports of this type graded Inadequate.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseeffectiveenjoymake good progressaccuratepolitedelayssafesecure
Criticismbreachespoornot effectiveconcernsweakweaknessesfailedinsufficient

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improveLeadership positive critical
  • Findings462w−36
  • Leadership129w−50
  • What needs to improve121w−6

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
5
Words of findings
701
shorter than usual (typical 886)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 49, typical 47
Average sentence
17 words
Next steps
4
typical 7
Hedged sentences
0%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 40%Leadership 11%What needs to improve 10%About the inspection 39%

Full report text

Inspection date

Previous inspection date 24 April 2017 24 April 2015

p.1

This inspection: Inadequate 4

Effectiveness of the leadership and management Inadequate 4

p.1

This inspection: Inadequate 4

Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Inadequate 4

p.1

This inspection: Inadequate 4

Personal development, behaviour and welfare Inadequate 4

p.1

This provision is inadequate

 The childminder does not make effective use of her assessments and what she knows about children to plan activities that motivate children to learn or that provide sufficient challenge to their learning. Children do not make adequate progress.  The childminder does not use effective teaching strategies to help children develop their communication skills, particularly with children who are making less than expected progress in this area.  The childminder does not provide parents with accurate information about their children's progress. When completing the required progress checks for children aged between two and three years old she does not accurately highlight any delays in children's development.  Self-evaluation is weak. The childminder does not identify weaknesses in her teaching, or breaches in requirements of the early years foundation stage.

p.1

It has the following strengths

 The childminder ensures her home is safe and secure.  Children are comfortable in the care of the childminder and they are familiar with the daily routines.  The childminder meets children's physical needs well and provides daily opportunities for fresh air, energetic play and rest.

p.1

What the setting needs to do to improve further

To meet the requirements of the early years foundation stage the provider must:

p.2

Due Date

 improve understanding and practice around use of observations and assessments to plan and provide challenging activities that interest children, motivate them to learn and help them make good progress 01/06/2017

p.2

Due Date

 deliver effective teaching and support to enable children to develop their speaking and listening skills 01/06/2017

p.2

Due Date

 provide parents with accurate information about their child's progress, including the required written summary when their child is aged between two and three years old. 01/06/2017

p.2

Due Date

To further improve the quality of the early years provision the provider should:

p.2

Due Date

 make effective use of self-evaluation to identify and address weaknesses, including breaches of requirements, to improve outcomes for children.

p.2

Inspection activities

 The inspector observed the childminder and children in the childminder's home and discussed an activity with the childminder.  The inspector took account of the views of parents.  The inspector spoke to the childminder about her understanding of safeguarding, child protection and first aid.  The inspector spoke with the childminder about the learning that was taking place.  The inspector sampled documentation, including policies and children's records.

p.2

Effectiveness of the leadership and management is inadequate

The childminder does not reflect on her practice to identify weaknesses, and she has not maintained her good practice since the last inspection. For example, she has not identified the weaknesses in the overall quality of her teaching. Parents do not receive accurate information about their children's progress, which has a negative impact on their ability to help learning at home or seek further support. For example, the childminder does not use the progress checks for children aged between two and three years to share any concerns about individual children's progress. She has failed to keep her skills and knowledge up to date. Safeguarding is effective. The childminder understands her responsibility to protect children and knows what steps she must take if she has concerns about a child's welfare.

p.3

Quality of teaching, learning and assessment is inadequate

The childminder has a poor understanding of the progress that children should be making. This hinders her ability to make accurate judgements about each child's development. She is not effective at supporting children's emerging communication skills. For example, she asks children lots of questions but gives them insufficient time to answer. She does not plan activities well. For example, she does not talk with children about what they are going to be doing before starting a sticking and gluing activity, and children quickly lose interest. She does not help children to settle and concentrate before reading a story to them and, again, children choose to move away.

p.3

Personal development, behaviour and welfare are inadequate

The poor quality of learning experiences for children has a negative impact on their ability to develop into independent and inquisitive learners, and on the childminder's ability to fully promote their well-being and personal development. However, the childminder is kind to the children and helps them settle well in her care. Children enjoy playing in her garden and tasting different fruits. They enjoy learning how to put on their own shoes and coats. They behave in typical fashion for their age and are polite to visitors. Children begin to find out about similarities and differences between themselves and each other.

p.3

Outcomes for children are inadequate

Not all children make adequate progress in their learning, including those children who need extra help to develop their speaking and listening skills. Children do not have enough opportunities to share their thoughts and think about what they might like to say. Children do not gain a positive view of learning as something that is challenging and exciting. The childminder does not prepare them well for their future learning.

p.3

Setting details

Unique reference number 133322 Local authority Oxfordshire Inspection number 1089464 Type of provision Childminder Day care type Childminder Registers Early Years Register, Compulsory Childcare Register, Voluntary Childcare Register Age range of children 1 - 2 Total number of places 6 Number of children on roll 4

p.4

Name of registered person

Date of previous inspection 24 April 2015

p.4

Telephone number

The childminder registered in 1995. She lives in Abingdon, Oxfordshire and provides care all day, Monday to Friday, throughout the year.

p.4

Telephone number

This inspection was carried out by Ofsted under sections 49 and 50 of the Childcare Act 2006 on the quality and standards of provision that is registered on the Early Years Register. The registered person must ensure that this provision complies with the statutory framework for children’s learning, development and care, known as the early years foundation stage.

p.4

Telephone number

procedures set out in the guidance ‘Complaints procedure: raising concerns and making complaints about Ofsted’, which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.gov.uk/government/organisations/ofsted. If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk. achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, work-based learning and skills training, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection.

p.4

Telephone number

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk. You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/, write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.5

Telephone number

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our website for news, information and updates at www.ofsted.gov.uk/user.

p.5

Telephone number

T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/government/organisations/ofsted

p.5

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion