Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted letter

Setting

Inspected 24 Apr 2017 · published 16 May 2017

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Sheila Iwaskow

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection datesingle source

    24 Apr 2017

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Sheila Iwaskow

  • Postcode verified

    CH1 6EP

Page 1 of 4
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+35Positivemore positive than 69% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseeffectivestrongclearconsistentlyclearlyswiftlysecureaccurately
Criticisminsufficientlimited

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

Findings positive critical

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
4
Words of findings
1,321
longer than usual (typical 963)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 50, typical 48
Average sentence
18 words
Next steps
3
typical 2
Hedged sentences
7%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 100%

Full report text

Store Street Manchester M1 2WD T 0300 123 4234 www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.1

Mrs Donna Prenton Saughall All Saints Church of England Primary School Church Road Saughall Chester Cheshire CH1 6EP

p.1

Church of England Primary School

Following my visit to your school on 24 April 2017, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to report the inspection findings. Thank you for the help you gave me and for the time you made available to discuss the actions you are taking to improve the school since the most recent section 5 inspection.

p.1

Church of England Primary School

The visit was the first monitoring inspection since the school was judged to require improvement following the section 5 inspection in March 2016. It was carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005.

p.1

Church of England Primary School

Senior leaders and governors are taking effective action to tackle the areas requiring improvement identified at the recent section 5 inspection in order to become a good school.

p.1

Church of England Primary School

The school should take further action to:

p.1

Church of England Primary School

 ensure that teachers have opportunities to observe best practice at other local schools  continue to develop the role of middle leaders of non-core subjects, such as history and geography, so that they have a greater impact on teaching, learning and assessment  ensure that the website is compliant with the information that must be published and that it is checked on a regular basis to ensure that it remains so  continue to develop the role of the governing body so that it offers the highest level of challenge to the school.

p.1

Evidence

During the inspection, I held meetings and discussions with you, the deputy headteacher, middle leaders, governors and pupils to discuss the actions taken since the last inspection. A telephone call was also held with a representative from the local authority to ascertain their views on how well the school is addressing the areas for improvement identified at the last inspection. The school’s development plan was evaluated, alongside other documentation that you provided. Together we looked at examples of pupils’ work and undertook a learning walk to observe teaching and learning in key stages 1 and 2.

p.2

Context

There have been a significant number of staff changes since the last inspection. An assistant headteacher has been seconded from another school to support senior leaders in raising the profile of mathematics. This placement ends in July 2017.

p.2

Main findings

Although disappointed with the outcome of the last inspection, you and senior leaders wasted no time in putting together an action plan to address the areas for improvement highlighted at the last inspection. The development plan is coherent and identifies a wide range of practical strategies to improve practice across the school, most notably in mathematics. Milestones are realistic and linked to specific outcomes for pupils. Lines of accountability are clear and actions are regularly monitored, reviewed and often achieved.

p.2

Main findings

Middle leaders now take an active part in monitoring the quality of teaching across the school, alongside you and your deputy headteacher. The quality of teaching is monitored closely through formal lesson observations, work scrutiny, planning reviews and learning walks. You recognise that any feedback given to teachers after formal lesson observations and looking at pupils’ work should focus sharply and succinctly on the progress that different groups of pupils are making. Any actions set for teachers to improve the quality of teaching are now followed up swiftly. Such good practice ensures that teachers are now held more accountable in helping to raise standards across the school.

p.2

Main findings

Since the last inspection considerable emphasis has been put on developing staff’s use of questioning. Staff have observed each other’s practice and have received coaching and training. However, staff do not have opportunities to observe best practice at other schools within the locality to develop further their use of questioning and other aspects of their teaching. As we toured the school I observed some teachers using questioning which probed and deepened pupils’ understanding. Pupils also told me that the questions that teachers now ask them encourage them to think hard. As a result of the last inspection findings, there has been a strong focus on developing pupils’ problem-solving, reasoning and numeracy skills. Significant changes have been made. In addition to staff training, pupils are now streamed for mathematics, which ensures that activities are pitched at the correct level to drive forward pupils’ learning. Booster classes are now available to support the most able

p.2

Main findings

pupils in developing their mathematical skills to a higher standard. Parents have attended workshops to give them an understanding of how to develop their children’s mathematical skills at home. Looking at a sample of pupils’ books, it is clear that the school is tackling this issue with vigour. Pupils now have frequent opportunities to solve problems. Older pupils develop their reasoning skills by recording, in their workbooks, the strategies they have used to solve problems. Younger pupils verbally tell their teacher how they have worked out their answers.

p.3

Main findings

The marking policy has been revised and a review of pupils’ books shows that it is now consistently followed by all teaching staff. Pupils also confirm that this is the case. They described how their work is marked ‘quickly’ and next steps and challenges are set to extend and deepen their learning.

p.3

Main findings

Subject leaders of English and mathematics have a firm grasp of their subjects. They have a secure understanding of the quality of teaching and the progress that different groups of pupils make as they move through the school. We both agree that the role of the leaders of other subjects is not as well developed.

p.3

Main findings

A common understanding of standards and progress is now a central aspect of the school’s work with regard to English and mathematics. Such effective practice ensures that staff now have a clearer understanding of year group objectives and expectations. Consequently, teachers are now more able to use assessments accurately to plan tasks which challenge pupils of different abilities.

p.3

Main findings

A review of governance has taken place and an action plan developed to address the issues raised. Governors have undertaken additional training and as a result, the level of challenge they offer to the school is rising. They are clearly committed to driving forward improvement and hold you in high regard. You recognise the importance of developing their roles further so that they hold the school and its senior leaders to account with even more rigour.

p.3

Main findings

The school website is bright and easy to navigate. However, the information provided does not meet current guidelines. There is insufficient detail regarding the curriculum. The special educational needs report is not updated annually and does not evaluate the effectiveness of the provision provided. Furthermore, there is no information on how the pupil premium funding for this academic year is being spent.

p.3

Main findings

Although not identified as areas for improvement at the last inspection, it was noted that pupils’ appreciation of other cultures was not well promoted and their understanding of British values was limited. Both of these issues have been addressed. Pupils told me that they celebrate a varied range of cultural festivals and have developed links with a school in Uganda. Examples of their writing clearly show that pupils now have a good understanding of British values. In fact, during my discussions with a group of pupils they shared their views, most eloquently, on the reasons why the Prime Minister has called a general election.

p.3

External support

The school is receiving good support from the local authority. Training and support have been provided to help staff develop their teaching skills, particularly in English and mathematics. The local authority has also provided support and guidance with moderation and in monitoring the quality of teaching. This support has been pivotal in moving the school forward.

p.4

External support

I am copying this letter to the chair of the governing body, the director of education for the Diocese of Chester, the regional schools commissioner and the director of children’s services for Cheshire West and Chester. This letter will be published on the Ofsted website.

p.4

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion