Other · Ofsted letter
Setting
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection datesingle source
24 Apr 2017
- Inspectorssingle source
Sheila Iwaskow
- Postcode verified
CH1 6EP
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No strong criticism found.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- ensure that the website is compliant with the information that must be published and that it is checked on a regular basis to ensure that it remains so p.1
- The school should take further action to: p.1
- You recognise that any feedback given to teachers after formal lesson observations and looking at pupils’ work should focus sharply and succinctly on the progress that different groups of pupils are making. p.2
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 4
- Words of findings
- 1,321
- longer than usual (typical 963)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 50, typical 48
- Average sentence
- 18 words
- Next steps
- 3
- typical 2
- Hedged sentences
- 7%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Store Street Manchester M1 2WD T 0300 123 4234 www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.1
Mrs Donna Prenton Saughall All Saints Church of England Primary School Church Road Saughall Chester Cheshire CH1 6EP
p.1
Church of England Primary School
Following my visit to your school on 24 April 2017, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to report the inspection findings. Thank you for the help you gave me and for the time you made available to discuss the actions you are taking to improve the school since the most recent section 5 inspection.
p.1
Church of England Primary School
The visit was the first monitoring inspection since the school was judged to require improvement following the section 5 inspection in March 2016. It was carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005.
p.1
Church of England Primary School
Senior leaders and governors are taking effective action to tackle the areas requiring improvement identified at the recent section 5 inspection in order to become a good school.
p.1
Church of England Primary School
The school should take further action to:
p.1
Church of England Primary School
ensure that teachers have opportunities to observe best practice at other local schools continue to develop the role of middle leaders of non-core subjects, such as history and geography, so that they have a greater impact on teaching, learning and assessment ensure that the website is compliant with the information that must be published and that it is checked on a regular basis to ensure that it remains so continue to develop the role of the governing body so that it offers the highest level of challenge to the school.
p.1
Evidence
During the inspection, I held meetings and discussions with you, the deputy headteacher, middle leaders, governors and pupils to discuss the actions taken since the last inspection. A telephone call was also held with a representative from the local authority to ascertain their views on how well the school is addressing the areas for improvement identified at the last inspection. The school’s development plan was evaluated, alongside other documentation that you provided. Together we looked at examples of pupils’ work and undertook a learning walk to observe teaching and learning in key stages 1 and 2.
p.2
Context
There have been a significant number of staff changes since the last inspection. An assistant headteacher has been seconded from another school to support senior leaders in raising the profile of mathematics. This placement ends in July 2017.
p.2
Main findings
Although disappointed with the outcome of the last inspection, you and senior leaders wasted no time in putting together an action plan to address the areas for improvement highlighted at the last inspection. The development plan is coherent and identifies a wide range of practical strategies to improve practice across the school, most notably in mathematics. Milestones are realistic and linked to specific outcomes for pupils. Lines of accountability are clear and actions are regularly monitored, reviewed and often achieved.
p.2
Main findings
Middle leaders now take an active part in monitoring the quality of teaching across the school, alongside you and your deputy headteacher. The quality of teaching is monitored closely through formal lesson observations, work scrutiny, planning reviews and learning walks. You recognise that any feedback given to teachers after formal lesson observations and looking at pupils’ work should focus sharply and succinctly on the progress that different groups of pupils are making. Any actions set for teachers to improve the quality of teaching are now followed up swiftly. Such good practice ensures that teachers are now held more accountable in helping to raise standards across the school.
p.2
Main findings
Since the last inspection considerable emphasis has been put on developing staff’s use of questioning. Staff have observed each other’s practice and have received coaching and training. However, staff do not have opportunities to observe best practice at other schools within the locality to develop further their use of questioning and other aspects of their teaching. As we toured the school I observed some teachers using questioning which probed and deepened pupils’ understanding. Pupils also told me that the questions that teachers now ask them encourage them to think hard. As a result of the last inspection findings, there has been a strong focus on developing pupils’ problem-solving, reasoning and numeracy skills. Significant changes have been made. In addition to staff training, pupils are now streamed for mathematics, which ensures that activities are pitched at the correct level to drive forward pupils’ learning. Booster classes are now available to support the most able
p.2
Main findings
pupils in developing their mathematical skills to a higher standard. Parents have attended workshops to give them an understanding of how to develop their children’s mathematical skills at home. Looking at a sample of pupils’ books, it is clear that the school is tackling this issue with vigour. Pupils now have frequent opportunities to solve problems. Older pupils develop their reasoning skills by recording, in their workbooks, the strategies they have used to solve problems. Younger pupils verbally tell their teacher how they have worked out their answers.
p.3
Main findings
The marking policy has been revised and a review of pupils’ books shows that it is now consistently followed by all teaching staff. Pupils also confirm that this is the case. They described how their work is marked ‘quickly’ and next steps and challenges are set to extend and deepen their learning.
p.3
Main findings
Subject leaders of English and mathematics have a firm grasp of their subjects. They have a secure understanding of the quality of teaching and the progress that different groups of pupils make as they move through the school. We both agree that the role of the leaders of other subjects is not as well developed.
p.3
Main findings
A common understanding of standards and progress is now a central aspect of the school’s work with regard to English and mathematics. Such effective practice ensures that staff now have a clearer understanding of year group objectives and expectations. Consequently, teachers are now more able to use assessments accurately to plan tasks which challenge pupils of different abilities.
p.3
Main findings
A review of governance has taken place and an action plan developed to address the issues raised. Governors have undertaken additional training and as a result, the level of challenge they offer to the school is rising. They are clearly committed to driving forward improvement and hold you in high regard. You recognise the importance of developing their roles further so that they hold the school and its senior leaders to account with even more rigour.
p.3
Main findings
The school website is bright and easy to navigate. However, the information provided does not meet current guidelines. There is insufficient detail regarding the curriculum. The special educational needs report is not updated annually and does not evaluate the effectiveness of the provision provided. Furthermore, there is no information on how the pupil premium funding for this academic year is being spent.
p.3
Main findings
Although not identified as areas for improvement at the last inspection, it was noted that pupils’ appreciation of other cultures was not well promoted and their understanding of British values was limited. Both of these issues have been addressed. Pupils told me that they celebrate a varied range of cultural festivals and have developed links with a school in Uganda. Examples of their writing clearly show that pupils now have a good understanding of British values. In fact, during my discussions with a group of pupils they shared their views, most eloquently, on the reasons why the Prime Minister has called a general election.
p.3
External support
The school is receiving good support from the local authority. Training and support have been provided to help staff develop their teaching skills, particularly in English and mathematics. The local authority has also provided support and guidance with moderation and in monitoring the quality of teaching. This support has been pivotal in moving the school forward.
p.4
External support
I am copying this letter to the chair of the governing body, the director of education for the Diocese of Chester, the regional schools commissioner and the director of children’s services for Cheshire West and Chester. This letter will be published on the Ofsted website.
p.4
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion