Schools & FE · Independent school inspection
Gurukula - The Hare Krishna Primary School
Summary
John Daniell (lead), Cindy Impey
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
15 Mar 2017
- Inspectors verified
Cindy Impey, John Daniell
- Postcode verified
WD25 8EZ
- Name on report verified
Bhaktivedanta Manor School
- URN verified
117654
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
Reads more critically than most reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- independent school standards are met consistently; – fulfil their responsibilities effectively so that the independent school standards are met consistently; and – actively promote the well-being of pupils (paragraphs 34(1), 34(1)(a), 34(1)(b) and 34(1)(c)). p.7
- – fulfil their responsibilities effectively so that the independent school standards are met consistently (paragraphs 34(1), 34(1)(a) and 34(1)(b)). p.6
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Therefore, an additional paragraph for the independent school standard relating to leaders and managers actively promoting the well-being of pupils is not met because of the out-of-date safeguarding policy, the lack of any information about fire safety and because the school has not carried out all of the required vetting checks of staff. p.5
- Systems to assess pupils’ progress were weak, and were not being used to analyse the performance of different groups of pupils or to inform teachers’ planning. p.1
- Leaders and governors have not acted with sufficient urgency in addressing the weaknesses in the assessment of pupils’ progress. p.1
- While most of the vetting checks of staff have been carried out, the proprietor has failed to carry out the prohibition from teaching checks. p.3
- The standard in this paragraph is not met. p.3
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- The school does not meet the requirements of the schedule to the Education (Independent School Standards) Regulations 2014 (‘the independent school standards’) and associated requirements that were checked during this inspection. p.6
- This included the standards and requirements that the school was judged to not comply with at the previous inspection. p.6
- Not all of the standards and associated requirements were checked during this inspection. p.6
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 11
- Words of findings
- 2,485
- longer than usual (typical 1813)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 48, typical 49
- Average sentence
- 20 words
- Next steps
- 3
- typical 8
- Hedged sentences
- 7%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
School progress monitoring inspection report
p.1
Dharam Marg, Hilfield Lane, Aldenham, Watford, Hertfordshire WD25 8EZ Inspection dates 15 March 2017
p.1
Main inspection findings
Part 1. Quality of education provided Paragraphs 3, 3(a), 3(d) and 3(g) The previous inspection on 13–15 September 2016 found that teaching and assessment did not challenge pupils to make good progress from their individual starting points. The most able pupils often started work at the same level as others. Pupils who have special educational needs and/or disabilities were not supported well enough for their academic needs. Systems to assess pupils’ progress were weak, and were not being used to analyse the performance of different groups of pupils or to inform teachers’ planning. The school’s action plan stated that the proprietor would monitor teachers’ lesson plans on a weekly basis. The plan also stated that the school would review and revise the arrangements for continuing professional development of staff, including skills to assess pupils’ work thoroughly and accurately. The plan stated that most-able pupils would be
p.1
Main inspection findings
identified so that appropriate interventions could be implemented. The plan included proposals to implement a new tracking system to monitor pupils’ progress. Inspectors were not provided with evidence to show that teachers’ lesson plans are monitored on a weekly basis. Inspectors’ visits to lessons and scrutiny of a large number of books covering all year groups, subjects and pupils of different abilities show that teaching does not meet the needs of different groups of pupils in order to ensure that they make good progress from their different starting points. Visits to lessons and scrutiny of pupils’ books show that work set for some of the most able pupils is not sufficiently challenging. Some members of staff have attended relevant training courses, including in the use of assessment without levels and looking at the achievements for different groups of pupils in key stage 2. However, there is insufficient evidence to show that this training has had
p.1
Main inspection findings
any impact. The school’s leaders have not yet implemented systems to establish pupils’ different starting points. As yet, no system is in place to assess pupils’ progress. Minutes of a meeting of the governors’ curriculum committee held on 7 March 2017 show that the school was discussing the possibility of purchasing a commercial assessment system or using a paper-based approach. Leaders and governors have not acted with sufficient urgency in addressing the weaknesses in the assessment of pupils’ progress. This independent school standard is not met. This independent school standard is not likely to be met if the Department for Education (DfE) decides to approve the implementation of the material change. Part 3. Welfare, health and safety of pupils Paragraphs 7, 7(a) and 7(b) Inspectors were requested to consider the school’s compliance with this independent school standard with regard to its request for a material change to increase the number
p.1
Main inspection findings
of pupils on roll from 30 to 60. The school does not have an up-to-date safeguarding policy published on its website. The policy on the website was last reviewed in March 2016. The published policy does not make reference to the latest guidance, ‘Keeping Children Safe in Education’ (September 2016). Although the school produced an annex document relating to the latest guidance, as well as evidence that most staff had received and read part one of ‘Keeping Children Safe in Education’ (September 2016), the published policy does not provide sufficient up-to-date guidance and information for staff, parents and others. The school has not carried out all of the necessary vetting checks of its teaching staff. No prohibition from teaching checks have been carried out. The school was unable to provide any documentation to demonstrate its compliance with the Regulatory Reform (Fire Safety) Order 2005. This independent school standard is not met.
p.2
Main inspection findings
This independent school standard is not likely to be met if the DfE decides to approve the implementation of the material change. Paragraph 11 Inspectors were requested to consider the school’s compliance with this independent school standard with regard to its request for a material change to increase the number of pupils on roll from 30 to 60. The school has an appropriate health and safety policy and monitors its implementation effectively. This independent school standard is met. This independent school standard is likely to be met if the DfE decides to approve the implementation of the material change. Paragraph 12 Inspectors were requested to consider the school’s compliance with this independent school standard with regard to its request for a material change to increase the number of pupils on roll from 30 to 60. The school was unable to provide any documentation to demonstrate its compliance with
p.2
Main inspection findings
the Regulatory Reform (Fire Safety) Order 2005. The headteacher stated that all of the relevant documentation had been taken off site. Hence, inspectors were unable to confirm compliance with this paragraph. This independent school standard is not met. This independent school standard is not likely to be met if the DfE decides to approve the implementation of the material change. Paragraph 14 Inspectors were requested to consider the school’s compliance with this independent school standard with regard to its request for a material change to increase the number of pupils on roll from 30 to 60. There are sufficient staff available to supervise the proposed number of 60 pupils. There are currently 53 pupils on roll. Inspectors observed pupils being effectively supervised in lessons, as they moved around the school and while at play. This independent school standard is met. This independent school standard is likely to be met if the DfE decides to approve the
p.2
Main inspection findings
implementation of the material change. Paragraphs 16, 16(a) and 16(b) Inspectors were requested to consider the school’s compliance with this independent school standard with regard to its request for a material change to increase the number of pupils on roll from 30 to 60. The school has appropriate risk assessments in place for all on-site activities as well as activities that take place off site. Potential risks are assessed, with appropriate actions to be taken should any incident occur. This independent school standard is met. This independent school standard is likely to be met if the DfE decides to approve the implementation of the material change. Part 4. Suitability of staff, supply staff, and proprietors Paragraphs 18(2) and 18(2)(b) Inspectors were requested to consider the school’s compliance with this independent school standard with regard to its request for a material change to increase the number
p.3
Main inspection findings
of pupils on roll from 30 to 60. While most of the vetting checks of staff have been carried out, the proprietor has failed to carry out the prohibition from teaching checks. The standard in this paragraph is not met. This independent school standard is not likely to be met if the DfE decides to approve the implementation of the material change. Paragraphs 21(1), 21(3), 21(3)(a), 21(3)(a)(iii), 21(3)(a)(iv) and 21(3)(b) While the single central register of recruitment checks records that most of the checks have taken place, it does not record checks of relevant qualifications or that a prohibition from teaching check has taken place. The standard in this paragraph is not met. This independent school standard is not likely to be met if the DfE decides to approve the implementation of the material change. Part 5. Premises of and accommodation at schools Paragraphs 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28 and 29
p.3
Main inspection findings
Inspectors were requested to consider the school’s compliance with these independent school standards with regard to its request for a material change to increase the number of pupils on roll from 30 to 60. There are currently 53 pupils on roll, using the school’s premises and accommodation. Apart from the independent school standard contained in paragraphs 28(1) and 28(1)(c) (detailed below), all other independent school standards are met and are likely to be met if the DfE decides to approve the implementation of the material change. As at the time of the previous inspection: suitable toilet and washing facilities are provided suitable facilities are provided for medical needs the school premises and accommodation are maintained to a suitable standard the acoustic and lighting conditions are suitable suitable outdoor space is available for pupils to play outside and for physical education.
p.4
Main inspection findings
Paragraphs 28(1) and 28(1)(c) The proprietor has not ensured that drinking water has been labelled as such. This independent school standard is not met. This independent school standard is not likely to be met if the DfE decides to approve the implementation of the material change. Part 8. Quality of leadership in and management of schools Paragraphs 34(1), 34(1)(a), 34(1)(b) and 34(1)(c) The previous inspection on 13–15 September 2016 found that monitoring and evaluation by senior staff and the governing body were not rigorous enough in order to improve teaching or to raise pupils’ outcomes. The roles of the governing body, the special educational needs coordinator and the subject leaders were not well developed. The school did not meet two of the independent school standards because pupils did not make good progress. In its action plan, the proprietor stated that governance would be strengthened by
p.4
Main inspection findings
revising governors’ roles and responsibilities. The plan also stated that a special educational needs coordinator would be appointed. The plan stated that subject leadership would be strengthened by focusing the work on raising standards in subject leaders’ subjects. The plan stated that curriculum policies would be updated. The proprietor also stated that good-quality training would be provided to improve teaching. The governing body has been restructured with a new chair of the governing body, appointed in January 2017. Including the chair, seven members of the governing body are new appointments. Meetings of some of the committees have taken place. Discussions with the chair of the governing body indicate that he is aware of the school’s weaknesses and what actions require to be taken. However, progress in implementing the actions in the action plan has been slow to date. No teachers have had training in meeting the needs of pupils who have special
p.4
Main inspection findings
educational needs and/or disabilities. Curriculum policies have not yet been updated. No work has taken place in developing subject leadership. Inspectors’ visits to lessons and scrutiny of work in pupils’ books do not suggest that the quality of teaching has improved sufficiently to raise pupils’ outcomes. As well as the two unmet standards checked on in this progress monitoring inspection, inspectors found additional standards that are now unmet. Although the action plan submitted by the school was judged to be acceptable, the proprietor has not implemented the actions with enough urgency. In addition to checks for this independent school standard relevant to this monitoring inspection, this standard was also considered as part of the school’s request for a material change to increase the registered number on roll from 30 pupils to 60. Not all of the independent school standards relating to the school’s arrangements for the welfare,
p.5
Main inspection findings
health and safety of pupils are met. Therefore, an additional paragraph for the independent school standard relating to leaders and managers actively promoting the well-being of pupils is not met because of the out-of-date safeguarding policy, the lack of any information about fire safety and because the school has not carried out all of the required vetting checks of staff. This independent school standard is not met. This independent school standard is not likely to be met if the DfE decides to approve the implementation of the material change.
p.5
Compliance with regulatory requirements
The school does not meet the requirements of the schedule to the Education (Independent School Standards) Regulations 2014 (‘the independent school standards’) and associated requirements that were checked during this inspection. This included the standards and requirements that the school was judged to not comply with at the previous inspection. Not all of the standards and associated requirements were checked during this inspection.
p.6
The school does not meet the following independent school standards
Standards that were not met at the previous inspection and remain unmet at this inspection The proprietor must ensure that the teaching at the school: – enables pupils to acquire new knowledge and make good progress according to their ability so that they increase their understanding and develop their skills in the subjects taught; – shows a good understanding of the aptitudes, needs and prior attainment of the pupils and ensures that these are taken into account in the planning of lessons; and – demonstrates that a framework is in place to assess pupils’ work regularly and thoroughly and uses information from that assessment to plan teaching so that pupils can progress (paragraphs 3, 3(a), 3(d) and 3(g)). The proprietor must ensure that those persons with leadership and management responsibilities at the school: – demonstrate good skills and knowledge appropriate to their role so that the independent school standards are met consistently; and
p.6
The school does not meet the following independent school standards
– fulfil their responsibilities effectively so that the independent school standards are met consistently (paragraphs 34(1), 34(1)(a) and 34(1)(b)). Standards that were met at the previous inspection, but are now judged to not be met at this inspection The proprietor must ensure that arrangements are made to safeguard and promote the welfare of pupils at the school; and such arrangements have regard to any guidance issued by the Secretary of State (paragraphs 7, 7(a) and 7(b)). The proprietor must ensure compliance with the Regulatory Reform (Fire Safety) Order 2005 (paragraph 12). The proprietor must ensure that no such person caries out work, or intends to carry out work, at the school in contravention of a prohibition order, or any direction made under section 128 of the 2008 Act or section 142 of the 2002 Act, or any disqualification, prohibition or restriction which takes effect as if contained in either such direction
p.6
The school does not meet the following independent school standards
(paragraphs 18(2) and 18(2)(b)). The proprietor must keep a register that shows such of the information referred to in sub- paragraphs (3) to (7) as is applicable to the school in question. In relation to each member of staff appointed on or after 1st May 2007, whether:
p.6
The school does not meet the following independent school standards
– a check was made to establish whether each staff member is subject to any direction made under section 128 of the 2008 Act or section 142 of the 2002 Act or any disqualification, prohibition or restriction which takes effect as if contained in such a direction; – checks were made to ensure, where appropriate, that each member of staff had the relevant qualifications; and – a check was made to establish whether each staff member is subject to a prohibition order or an interim prohibition order, including the date on which such check was completed (paragraphs 21(1), 21(3), 21(3)(a), 21(3)(a)(iii), 21(3)(a)(iv) and 21(3)(b)). The proprietor must ensure that cold water supplies that are suitable for drinking water are clearly marked as such (paragraphs 28(1) and 28(1)(c)). The proprietor must ensure that those persons with leadership and management responsibilities at the school: – demonstrate good skills and knowledge appropriate to their role so that the
p.6
The school does not meet the following independent school standards
independent school standards are met consistently; – fulfil their responsibilities effectively so that the independent school standards are met consistently; and – actively promote the well-being of pupils (paragraphs 34(1), 34(1)(a), 34(1)(b) and 34(1)(c)).
p.7
School details
This inspection was carried out under section 109(1) and (2) of the Education and Skills Act 2008, the purpose of which is to advise the Secretary of State for Education about the school’s suitability for continued registration as an independent school.
p.8
School details
Gender of pupils in the sixth form Mixed
p.8
School details
Proprietor ISKCON (International Society for Krishna Consciousness) Chair Mr Kartik Khandwala
p.8
School details
Headteacher Mrs Wendy Harrison (also known as Padma Dasi) Annual fees (day pupils) £1,400
p.8
School details
Website http://school.bhaktivedantamanor.co.uk
p.8
School details
Date of previous standard inspection 13–15 September 2016
p.8
Information about this school
The school is registered as a school with a religious character and a Hindu ethos. The school occupies part of the large site of the Hare Krishna temple at Bhaktivedanta Manor. Most pupils are from families practising the Hindu faith. At the September 2016 standard inspection, the school’s overall effectiveness was judged as requires improvement and two of the independent school standards were not met. The school is registered to admit a maximum of 30 pupils. There are 53 pupils currently on the school roll. The registered age range is four to 11 years. Pupils currently at the school are aged four to rising 12 years. In March 2016, Ofsted conducted a material change inspection at the request of the Department for Education (DfE). This was to consider the proprietor’s request to increase the number of registered pupils from 30 to 60 because, for the past four years, the school had admitted twice the number of pupils it is permitted to admit. At the time of that
p.8
Information about this school
inspection, the school was found to be unlikely to meet the independent school standards relating to the school’s arrangements for safeguarding pupils, the recording of sanctions and the suitability of staff and proprietors. The proprietorial body also owns and runs an early years provision on the same site as the school. The Manor Pre-School (URN 130503) is registered with Ofsted and is inspected separately. The school and the pre-school are run separately, although some members of the governing body are governors of the pre-school and the school.
p.9
Information about this inspection
This inspection was carried out at the request of the registration authority for independent schools. The purpose of the inspection was to monitor the progress the school has made in meeting the independent school standards and other requirements that it was judged to not comply with at its previous inspection. Inspectors met with the headteacher. They visited every class to observe pupils’ learning. Documentation about safeguarding, including the school’s single register of recruitment checks of staff, was scrutinised. The school’s policies on safeguarding and health and safety were also seen. A search for statutory information made available on the school’s website was undertaken. Inspectors also scrutinised the work in pupils’ books from all year groups and across a range of subjects. The DfE asked inspectors to consider the proprietor’s request for a material change to the school’s registration: to extend the number of pupils in the school from 30 to 60.
p.10
Information about this inspection
Inspectors were asked to consider the school’s compliance with part 3 (paragraphs 7, 11, 12, 14 and 16), part 4, part 5 and part 8 of the independent school standards.
p.10
Inspection team
John Daniell, lead inspector Her Majesty’s Inspector
p.10
Inspection team
Cindy Impey Her Majesty’s Inspector guidance ‘Raising concerns and making a complaint about Ofsted’, which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.gov.uk/government/publications/complaints-about-ofsted . If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.10
Inspection team
Parent View You can use Parent View to give Ofsted your opinion on your child’s school. Ofsted will use the information parents and carers provide when deciding which schools to inspect and when and as part of the inspection.
p.11
Inspection team
You can also use Parent View to find out what other parents and carers think about schools in England. You can visitwww.parentview.ofsted.gov.uk, or look for the link on the main Ofsted website: www.gov.uk/government/organisations/ofsted .
p.11
Inspection team
achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection.
p.11
Inspection team
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk . You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open- government-licence , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .
p.11
Inspection team
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .
p.11
Inspection team
T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.ofsted.gov.uk
p.11
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion