Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · Short school inspection

Isbourne Valley School

Inspected 4 Apr 2017 · published 9 May 2017 · URN 135437

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection datesingle source

    4 Apr 2017

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Sarah O’Donnell

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Good

  • Postcode verified

    GL54 5PF

  • Name on report verified

    Isbourne Valley School

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2013.

  • OverallGood

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+86Very positivemore positive than 91% of reports of this type graded Good
OutstandingGood

Reads more warmly than most reports of this type graded Good.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseclearstrongstronglyvery wellsafeeffectivewell ledmake good progress
Criticismconcernsconcern

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improveAbout the inspection positive critical
  • Findings967w+86
  • What needs to improve73w0

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
1,030
shorter than usual (typical 1483)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 59, typical 50
Average sentence
18 words
Next steps
2
typical 2
Hedged sentences
10%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 83%What needs to improve 6%About the inspection 10%

Full report text

Store Street Manchester M1 2WD T 0300 123 4234 www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.1

Mr Justin Godding Headteacher Isbourne Valley School Didbrook Cheltenham Gloucestershire GL54 5PF

p.1

Short inspection of Isbourne Valley School

Following my visit to the school on 4 April 2017, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to report the inspection findings. The visit was the first short inspection carried out since the school was judged to be good in June 2013.

p.1

Short inspection of Isbourne Valley School

The school’s leaders have maintained the good quality of education in the school. Since the last inspection, there have been significant changes to this small school, including locating the school on one site and your appointment as headteacher. As headteacher, you demonstrate a very clear commitment to improving the outcomes that pupils achieve. You have successfully built an ethos for the school that staff and governors share. Teachers and support staff feel strongly that they are part of a team and that their contributions are listened to and valued. While raising expectations of teachers, you have ensured that the support and challenge you provide for them means they are keen to continue to improve their practice. Teachers know they will be held to account for the progress pupils make, but they also know that you will support them in undertaking new initiatives. You have open lines of communication with parents and an evident commitment to ensuring that

p.1

Short inspection of Isbourne Valley School

their children achieve the best. This means that parents are sure any concerns will be listened to and firmly believe the school is well led and managed.

p.1

Short inspection of Isbourne Valley School

School staff know the pupils in their care and their families very well. Leaders, including governors, have ensured that all safeguarding arrangements are fit for purpose and records are detailed and up to date. Regular training means that staff and governors know what is expected of them. They are very clear that safeguarding is everyone’s responsibility. Safeguarding is central to the role of the governing body and they monitor carefully the school’s work to keep pupils safe. The school’s systems make sure new staff are recruited safely and the induction process places emphasis on the strong culture of safeguarding which the school promotes.

p.1

Short inspection of Isbourne Valley School

Pupils overwhelmingly say they feel safe in school. They are very clear that they know who to talk to if they have a worry or concern and that adults will help them. Parents very strongly agree that their children are happy, safe and well looked after in school. Pupils have a clear understanding of bullying and say this does not happen often. The vast majority of parents agree. The school’s curriculum helps pupils learn how to keep themselves safe when using new technologies such as the internet. Pupils talked about practical examples of the steps they can take to keep themselves safe online.

p.2

Inspection findings

 My first line of enquiry was to check how leaders are ensuring effective provision for writing in the school. In the most recent Year 6 tests, pupils made slightly less progress in writing than pupils nationally, although their progress in reading was much higher than the national level. Leaders have increased the expectations of what is required in writing with the result that standards of handwriting, spelling, punctuation and grammar have improved rapidly, particularly in key stage 2. Pupils, including boys, disadvantaged pupils and the most able, are keen to write. During the inspection, pupils talked to me with enthusiasm and pride about their writing. For example, some shared with me the impact of their editing in response to their teacher’s careful feedback on how to improve their work.  My second line of enquiry was to check what the school is doing to ensure effective provision for pupils in key stage 1. As headteacher you have made

p.2

Inspection findings

changes to the organisation and structure of the large key stage 1 and Reception class. You have been clear in increasing the expectations placed on pupils and adults. This means that the learning pupils receive in key stage 1 is better matched to their needs. You know that improvements are still needed in aspects of pupils’ written work such as spelling and handwriting and have put in place skilful support from the leader for English. Pupils’ work shows that they are now catching up in these areas. In the early years, children are acquiring the skills they need in early reading, writing and mathematics to make a sound start to the learning they will meet in Year 1. For example, children in the Reception Year can use their phonics skills to write simple sentences.  Next, I looked at how governors and leaders managed the transition from a leadership partnership with the local secondary school. Governors provide a

p.2

Inspection findings

strong strategic direction for the school. They have a clear view of the school’s strengths and areas for further development. They have not shied away from taking some difficult decisions that have put the school on a sound financial and educational footing for the future. They challenge the standards pupils achieve and monitor and gather information for themselves during their visits to the school. Governors have ensured that the funding for disadvantaged pupils has been well spent. Disadvantaged pupils, including those currently in the school, make good progress, sometimes achieving better than other pupils nationally by the end of key stage 2, particularly in reading and mathematics. Parents are firmly of the view that their children are well taught and making good progress. They say you have ‘gathered everyone together’ with your open, fair and firm manner.  Finally, I looked at the impact of leaders’ work to maintain pupils’ high

p.2

Inspection findings

attendance. The attendance of pupils continues to be above that of pupils nationally. The attendance of pupils who have been absent the most is improving so that their attendance is now close to that of all pupils.

p.3

Next steps for the school

Leaders and those responsible for governance should ensure that:

p.3

Next steps for the school

 the improvements in pupils’ writing continue so that more can write at the highest level  pupils can use their writing skills to write at length in different curriculum subjects.

p.3

Next steps for the school

I am copying this letter to the chair of the governing body, the regional schools commissioner and the director of children’s services for Gloucestershire. This letter will be published on the Ofsted website.

p.3

Information about the inspection

I met with you and we talked about developments in the school since the last inspection. I looked at safeguarding records and tested out your recruitment and vetting procedures. I held discussions with governors, including the chair of governors. I talked to teachers and support staff. Together, we visited lessons and carried out a learning walk across the school. I observed pupils during breaktime and lunchtime. I met with a group of pupils to talk about their life at school and heard a group of pupils read. I considered the 24 responses to Ofsted’s online survey, ‘Parent View’, and the 22 comments submitted. I met with parents as they arrived at the school, and received a letter from a parent.

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion