Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · Short school inspection

South Stoke Primary School

Inspected 28 Mar 2017 · published 4 May 2017 · URN 123039

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection datesingle source

    28 Mar 2017

  • Inspectorssingle source

    James McVeigh

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Good

  • Postcode verified

    RG8 0JS

  • Name on report verified

    South Stoke Primary School

Page 1 of 4
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2006.

  • OverallGood

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+73Very positivemore positive than 67% of reports of this type graded Good
OutstandingGood

In line with other reports of this type graded Good.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiserapid progresseffectivestronghappysuccessfullydelightfeel safeimproved
Criticismconcernabsencegapsvariablebelow

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improveAbout the inspection positive critical
  • Findings1121w+73
  • What needs to improve74w+33

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
4
Words of findings
1,188
about usual (typical 1483)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 51, typical 50
Average sentence
16 words
Next steps
2
typical 2
Hedged sentences
7%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 86%What needs to improve 6%About the inspection 8%

Full report text

Store Street Manchester M1 2WD T 0300 123 4234 www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.1

Miss Amanda Rogers Headteacher South Stoke Primary School The Street South Stoke Reading Berkshire RG8 0JS

p.1

Short inspection of South Stoke Primary School

Following my visit to the school on 28 March 2017, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to report the inspection findings. The visit was the first short inspection carried out since the school was judged to be good in June 2013.

p.1

Short inspection of South Stoke Primary School

The leadership team has maintained the good quality of education in the school since the last inspection. You know your school and its pupils well. You have established a strong team spirit among staff and a shared determination to do the very best for pupils at your school. Governors have an accurate knowledge and understanding of what the school does well and what could be even better. The chair of the governing body visits frequently to gather first-hand information about leaders’ work and support them as a critical friend.

p.1

Short inspection of South Stoke Primary School

It was a delight to meet your pupils. They like their school and teachers, and get along well with each other. Pupils know nearly everybody else in their very small school. They say they feel safe and happy in the family-like atmosphere and have an adult they can turn to if they are ever worried or upset. Pupils are happy to talk about their work and can explain how their teachers help them. During my visit, we saw pupils fruitfully engaged in activities and enjoying the challenging tasks they were given. They persevered well, and we saw some pupils working cooperatively to solve problems successfully in mathematics. Pupils who have special educational needs and/or disabilities are supported well to develop their skills and understanding rapidly.

p.1

Short inspection of South Stoke Primary School

At the time of the previous inspection, it was recommended that the school’s leaders made sure pupils made more rapid progress and that teaching improved further. You have acted successfully on these areas. For example, teachers make more effective use of their teaching assistants and pupils are given suitably challenging work. Teachers understand the barriers that some pupils have to learning, and provide them with effective support to overcome them. They liaise closely with teaching assistants to plan suitable activities and to check on pupils’ progress. Your insistence that teachers give meaningful feedback to pupils on their work is producing results. Teachers concentrate on what pupils need to do next to make progress. Pupils respond positively to teachers’ advice and say it is helping them to improve.

p.1

Short inspection of South Stoke Primary School

Historic information shows that in 2016 although Year 6 pupils made strong progress in reading and writing, they made less progress in mathematics, and none reached the higher standards in writing. You have ensured that teachers have up- to-date training in teaching aspects of writing and mathematics. By working with other local schools to look at and compare pupils’ written work, you have helped teachers understand the expected standards in writing and mathematics.

p.2

Short inspection of South Stoke Primary School

You have focused successfully on meeting the individual needs of pupils, improving teaching in writing and mathematics and ensuring that pupils attend more regularly. As a result, current pupils make much stronger progress in writing and mathematics than in the past. Attendance rates have increased noticeably, particularly for boys. However, this improving picture has not been sustained for enough time to eradicate all gaps between the attendance and performance of pupils in your school compared with other pupils nationally.

p.2

Short inspection of South Stoke Primary School

Parents are very positive about your school. In your own school’s questionnaire and on the online survey, Parent View, all parents who responded said they would recommend your school to other parents. As well as being pleased with the progress their children were making, many parents commented on how happy their children are at the school. This was summed up by one comment: ‘Watch them in the playground. I challenge you to find nicer, kinder, happier kids.’

p.2

Short inspection of South Stoke Primary School

Staff are well aware of their safeguarding responsibilities. Several parents commented that adults at the school take great care of their children. Staff know each pupil well and recognise changes, for example, in behaviour. Almost all staff have had paediatric first-aid training, which provides more than adequate cover to treat pupils’ minor injuries and respond quickly to medical emergencies.

p.2

Short inspection of South Stoke Primary School

School leaders ensure that all arrangements to safeguard pupils are effective and that detailed records are kept and stored securely. Staff are trained appropriately in keeping pupils safe. Adults know the policies and procedures to follow if they have a concern about a pupil. Health and safety guidelines are followed closely. For example, there are regular emergency evacuation practices, and comprehensive risk assessments are carried out for school trips.

p.2

Inspection findings

 During this inspection, I focused on how leaders ensure that current pupils, particularly the most able, make rapid progress in writing and mathematics, and how effectively pupils who have special educational needs and/or disabilities are supported. I also investigated the impact of the headteacher’s drive to improve attendance.  Pupils make rapid progress from their starting points in writing. They are given many opportunities to write extended pieces for a wide range of purposes. They develop a clear understanding of different styles of writing. Teachers assess the quality of their writing accurately and provide pupils with helpful feedback on how to improve their work. As a consequence, pupils know what they need to do next, and act upon this advice. Pupils’ handwriting shows clear development, although the quality of their spelling and punctuation is variable.  Work in pupils’ mathematics books shows clearly that they develop strong

p.3

Inspection findings

fluency, particularly in calculation. Teachers provide an effective range of activities to help pupils to develop their problem-solving and reasoning skills. Tasks are challenging and pupils are expected to use their mathematics in other subjects, such as measuring water displacement in science. Pupils’ thinking is stretched appropriately, including suitable challenge for the most able. However, we agreed that sometimes teachers do not move pupils on to even more challenging work as soon as they could.  You and your teaching team know your pupils well. You have clearly analysed the barriers that might restrict the progress of pupils who have special educational needs and/or disabilities, of whom there is a significant proportion in each class. Teachers make effective use of this knowledge to plan appropriate extra help for these pupils so that they make similar progress to their classmates.  You identified attendance as an area for improvement. You know that with a

p.3

Inspection findings

small school population, one pupil’s absence will greatly affect overall attendance figures. The steps you have taken, including warning parents of the impact of absence on pupils’ learning, have reduced absence rates. Although, currently, attendance is better this year than last, it remains below national figures.

p.3

Next steps for the school

Leaders and those responsible for governance should ensure that:

p.3

Next steps for the school

 the improvement in current pupils’ progress is sustained through consistently high levels of challenge  they continue the drive to improve pupils’ attendance so that it at least matches national figures.

p.3

Next steps for the school

I am copying this letter to the chair of the governing body, the regional schools commissioner and the director of children’s services for Oxfordshire. This letter will be published on the Ofsted website.

p.3

Information about the inspection

I met with you and the chair of the governing body. I also spoke to a representative of the local authority by telephone. I visited all classrooms with you to see pupils engaged in their learning. Together with subject leaders, I looked at pupils’ written work and the school’s information about pupils’ performance.

p.4

Information about the inspection

I examined school documents, including records about safeguarding, self-evaluation and governors’ visits. I spoke to pupils informally in class and around the school at breaktimes. I considered 24 responses to the online survey, Parent View, including 18 written comments. There were no responses to the staff or pupil surveys.

p.4

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion