Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · Short school inspection

Southwick Community Primary School

Inspected 21 Mar 2017 · published 3 May 2017 · URN 108769

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection datesingle source

    21 Mar 2017

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Philip Scott

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Good

  • Postcode verified

    SR5 2JX

  • Name on report verified

    Southwick Community Primary School

Page 1 of 5
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2008.

  • OverallGood

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+62Positivemore positive than 40% of reports of this type graded Good
OutstandingGood

In line with other reports of this type graded Good.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseexcellentvery wellhigh-qualityeffectivelystrongthrivestrengthsskilled
Criticismnot good enoughpoorpersistently absentdisruptionconcernconcernsnot yetbelow

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improveAbout the inspection positive critical
  • Findings1365w+64
  • What needs to improve108w0

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
5
Words of findings
1,460
about usual (typical 1483)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 45, typical 50
Average sentence
19 words
Next steps
2
typical 2
Hedged sentences
8%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 85%What needs to improve 7%About the inspection 8%

Full report text

Store Street Manchester M1 2WD T 0300 123 4234 www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.1

Mr Christian Robson Headteacher Southwick Community Primary School Shakespeare Street Southwick Sunderland Tyne and Wear SR5 2JX

p.1

Short inspection of Southwick Community Primary School

Following my visit to the school on 21 March 2017, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to report the inspection findings. The visit was the first short inspection carried out since the school was judged to be good in October 2012.

p.1

Short inspection of Southwick Community Primary School

The leadership team has maintained the good quality of education in the school since the last inspection. Working alongside a talented deputy headteacher and supported well by a dedicated and determined governing body, your skilful leadership has brought about recent improvements to teaching and learning. There is a tangible drive and sense of urgency to provide high-quality opportunities which allow pupils to thrive within the school’s caring and supportive environment. You have identified and evaluated the school’s strengths and current priorities, and detail further actions to address these priorities in the comprehensive and perceptive school development plan.

p.1

Short inspection of Southwick Community Primary School

Your appointment has brought a steady hand during recent changes in leadership, minimising any potential disruption. Improvement in the quality of teaching, learning and assessment is now accelerating the rates of progress of current pupils across the school, quickly. You, governors and other school leaders keep a close eye on the quality of teaching. Phase leaders are empowered to take full responsibility for their area of school, which has brought a fresh focus and energy to improving provision. You acknowledge that the many whole-school initiatives and strategies to further improve teaching are not yet impacting fully on published outcomes for pupils in key stage 1 and the early years. You are continuing to drive improvement in these areas effectively.

p.1

Short inspection of Southwick Community Primary School

Pupils’ excellent attitudes to learning and good relationships with adults remain key strengths of your inclusive school. Pupils develop good citizenship skills, being keen to take on responsibilities through roles such as ‘class monitor’, being a member of the school council or a house captain. They take great pride in the well-ordered school environment both inside and outside, benefiting from high-quality displays in classes and shared areas. Pupils’ behaviour in class and around school remains good. You recognise that despite your best endeavours, the attendance rates of some pupils are still not good enough.

p.1

Short inspection of Southwick Community Primary School

At the previous inspection, leaders were asked to improve the quality of teaching so that it was of a consistently high standard across school. This has been tackled with resolve. Teachers plan work that is pitched well to challenge and stretch pupils of different abilities, including the most able pupils. The most able disadvantaged pupils also achieve very well, and their progress and attainment exceeded those of other pupils nationally in last summer’s key stage 2 tests. Teachers ask searching questions that require pupils to think carefully and justify their answers.

p.2

Short inspection of Southwick Community Primary School

Pupils show good levels of independence in lessons, work enthusiastically and cooperatively with their classmates to share ideas and discuss their understanding. Older pupils are skilled at assessing their own and others’ work against agreed criteria.

p.2

Short inspection of Southwick Community Primary School

In your role as designated safeguarding leader, you ensure that policies, procedures and records are of high quality and up to date. Summary records of incidents of concern, no matter how small, are meticulously kept using the new online system. The recent safeguarding audit by an external consultant highlights the school’s strength in this area, and its determination to leave no stone unturned in its duty to keep pupils safe.

p.2

Short inspection of Southwick Community Primary School

There are very few records of incidents of poor behaviour or alleged bullying, and the pupils with whom I spoke stated categorically that no bullying happens at Southwick Community Primary. They trust their teachers implicitly to keep them safe and solve any problems or concerns.

p.2

Short inspection of Southwick Community Primary School

All staff are appropriately trained and have access to well-written policies and guidance. As a result, they have a secure understanding of their individual responsibilities for safeguarding. Pupils are very knowledgeable about bullying and e-safety. They understand how to avoid situations that may prove dangerous when not at school, including accessing social media.

p.2

Short inspection of Southwick Community Primary School

The long-established culture of keeping pupils safe and putting them at the heart of the friendly and inclusive school community remains very evident. The personal development and welfare of all pupils are key areas of focus for the school, supported well by the work of the inclusion officer and the school counselling service.

p.2

Inspection findings

 Since your appointment, you have taken determined and rigorous actions to improve the quality of teaching and accelerate the progress of current pupils. This follows the disappointing outcomes of pupils’ 2016 key stage 1 national assessments in reading and writing. Work seen in pupils’ books during the inspection, and analysis of the school’s tracking data, demonstrate strong progress for nearly all pupils in reading, writing and mathematics. It is too early to see the full impact of actions to improve teaching on published outcomes for pupils in the early years and key stage 1.  Improvements in the quality of teaching have already impacted very positively on outcomes for pupils at the end of key stage 2. Results from the 2016 assessments show that progress in reading and mathematics is significantly above average for all pupils, including disadvantaged pupils. Pupils also attained very highly in the reading assessment.

p.3

Inspection findings

 Effective support from local authority officers and purposeful partnership working with your local cluster of primary schools has provided good-quality professional development opportunities for staff.  Governors are skilled in their roles and determined to become even more effective. A recent audit of governors’ skills has led to the recruitment of new governors. This has brought a range of new professional skills to the school, such as those in human resources and performance management. Governors know the school very well and the journey it has taken to reach this point. They have individual links to key areas of school. Governors take nothing at face value, questioning and challenging school leaders very effectively.  Children are now making a good start in their learning in the early years. They are making increasingly rapid progress from starting points below those expected for their age when they begin Nursery. The proportion of children reaching a

p.3

Inspection findings

good level of development by the end of Reception is improving each year, but remains below that seen nationally. You acknowledge that expectations of what children can achieve in reading and writing in Nursery and Reception could have been higher in the past.  Children in the early years play and learn happily together. Their behaviour is excellent and they show independence and good manners. Children are now getting off to a good start in reading. The systematic and rigorous teaching of phonics starts in Reception and continues across key stage 1. Some pupils in Years 1 and 2 read well to the inspector and were able to build and blend unknown words.  Teachers pitch work well to match pupils’ abilities, including for the most able pupils. Pupils in Year 6 were working in pairs to assess a finished piece of writing to practise their editing skills. They checked for use of the third person, the correct tense, and evidence of different sentence types, structures and openers

p.3

Inspection findings

 Pupils are provided with many opportunities to use their developing English skills in extended writing activities, such as Year 2 pupils comparing Southwick with the Arctic. Pupils in Year 5 identified the structures and features of a sonnet as part of their work on William Shakespeare. They used strong imagery and personification to improve their own sonnet effectively.  Work in pupils’ books is of a much improved standard since the start of the year, and is extremely well presented with neatly formed, legible, joined handwriting. Pupils are proud of how much they have improved.  The school has many strategies to encourage and celebrate pupils’ regular and punctual attendance. These include the work undertaken by the inclusion officer, and a range of class and individual prizes. However, you recognise that currently these are having minimal impact on improving the attendance of a large group of

p.3

Inspection findings

pupils, including disadvantaged pupils, some of whom are still regularly and persistently absent.

p.4

Next steps for the school

Leaders and governors should ensure that:

p.4

Next steps for the school

 agreed initiatives and actions to improve the quality of teaching impacts positively on published outcomes for pupils in key stage 1 and the early years  their expectation of what children can achieve in the early years is high, especially in reading and writing  the rates of attendance for all pupils improve quickly and the proportion of pupils who are persistently absent falls, particularly for disadvantaged pupils.

p.4

Next steps for the school

I am copying this letter to the chair of the governing body, the regional schools commissioner and the director of children’s services for Sunderland. This letter will be published on the Ofsted website.

p.4

Information about the inspection

During the inspection, I met with you, the deputy headteacher and the inclusion officer. You and I visited lessons in key stages 1 and 2, and I visited the Reception class with the deputy headteacher. I met with the chair, and other members of the governing body. I spoke to pupils about their work and their views of the school. I listened to some pupils read and looked in pupils’ workbooks when in lessons. I met with a representative of the local education authority. A range of documents were considered relating to safeguarding, performance management, governors’ meetings and external evaluations of the school. I examined the school’s self- evaluation, the school development plan and tracking of current pupils’ progress. I also scrutinised pupils’ recent achievement in statutory assessments and the school’s website.

p.4

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion