Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · Short school inspection

Bangabandhu Primary School

Inspected 28 Mar 2017 · published 3 May 2017 · URN 100937

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection datesingle source

    28 Mar 2017

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Carolyn Dickinson

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Good

  • Postcode verified

    E2 0LB

  • Name on report verified

    Bangabandhu Primary School

Page 1 of 4
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2009.

  • OverallGood

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+30Mostly positivemore positive than 9% of reports of this type graded Good
OutstandingGood

Reads more critically than most reports of this type graded Good.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseeffectivehigh expectationsrapid progressimprovedaccuratestrongrobusthappy
Criticismconcernsweakpoorlowerbelowpersistent absencepersistently absentlow

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improveAbout the inspection positive critical
  • Findings869w+27
  • What needs to improve88w+33

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
4
Words of findings
951
shorter than usual (typical 1483)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 49, typical 50
Average sentence
18 words
Next steps
2
typical 2
Hedged sentences
7%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 79%What needs to improve 8%About the inspection 13%

Full report text

Store Street Manchester M1 2WD T 0300 123 4234 www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.1

Ms Marigold Palmer-Jones Acting Headteacher Bangabandhu Primary School Wessex Street Bethnal Green London E2 0LB

p.1

Short inspection of Bangabandhu Primary School

Following my visit to the school on 28 March 2017, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to report the inspection findings. The visit was the first short inspection carried out since the school was judged to be good in October 2011.

p.1

Short inspection of Bangabandhu Primary School

The leadership team has maintained the good quality of education in the school. Since becoming acting headteacher in January 2016, you have worked relentlessly to drive up the aspirations of pupils, staff and parents. In your pursuit of excellence, you are ably supported by your senior leadership team which shares your values and high ambitions for the pupils.

p.1

Short inspection of Bangabandhu Primary School

Leaders have an accurate view of the school’s performance. You have identified that standards of reading and writing at key stage 1 and in the early years need to improve. Current data indicates that more recent strategies introduced in lower years are beginning to prove effective, particularly in reading for the most able pupils. There remains a need to similarly improve standards in writing for all pupils at key stage 1.

p.1

Short inspection of Bangabandhu Primary School

Respect for and by everyone permeates all aspects of the school. As a result, pupils have a strong understanding of both their rights and responsibilities. Your ‘no excuses’ culture has resulted in high expectations of both your staff and pupils. Safeguarding is effective.

p.1

Short inspection of Bangabandhu Primary School

The school’s policies and procedures for safeguarding pupils’ well-being are robust. Records are detailed and accurate. There is clear communication with external agencies and files show that there is prompt follow-up on referrals. Regular staff training and updates have taken place. Leaders recently focused on the ‘Prevent’ duty, and their awareness of local risks is particularly effective in supporting more vulnerable pupils.

p.2

Short inspection of Bangabandhu Primary School

Pupils’ understanding of both their rights to respect and safety, as well as their responsibilities to others, ensure that they know how to report any concerns. Pupils, parents and staff consider this to be a safe, happy and welcoming school where bullying is rare, concerns are dealt with effectively and diversity is celebrated.

p.2

Inspection findings

 Standards in key stage 1 were weak last year, particularly in reading for the most able pupils. As a result, we chose this as our first line of enquiry. Leaders have successfully built a stronger reading culture in the lower school. They have done this by introducing additional time in the school day for reading and writing. Pupils now have individual time to read regularly with an adult in school. The tracking system introduced in September 2016 requires staff to have an in- depth knowledge of their pupils’ reading levels and progress. This close monitoring is leading to more rapid progress in reading.  Through the new reading scheme and reading records, parents now play a central role in their child’s reading development. Teachers monitor the reading records and work closely with parents to increase engagement. Current data suggests that pupils in Year 2 are now beginning to make improved progress in

p.2

Inspection findings

their reading, including in their comprehension. Leaders are aware that progress in writing is not fast enough, particularly for the most able pupils.  Our second line of enquiry focused on the early years foundation stage. In 2016, the proportion of children reaching a good level of development was below the national average. This was in contrast to 2014 and 2015 when more children achieved this standard than the national average.  A high number of children join the school who are not fluent in English. Despite this, observations carried out during the inspection in the Nursery and Reception found that children were very keen to demonstrate their learning through talk. The school has extended the attendance for all Nursery-age children from a half to a full day. Children proudly displayed their learning journals which show that their progress, from low starting points, is now accelerating. This is because of

p.2

Inspection findings

your focus on strengthening staff and parent partnership in children’s learning and development.

p.2

Inspection findings

 To maximise progress, all children have individual literacy and numeracy time with staff. The progress children make during these activities is assessed through a rigorous tracking system. Current school evidence shows a marked improvement in all areas for the Nursery-age children. This data has been externally moderated and school leaders are now able to present accurate information to governors.  Finally, we considered whether levels of attendance had improved for all pupils in the current year. In 2016, the attendance levels for all groups of pupils were below national averages. You explained that the school has a resourced provision for children with complex medical needs. Persistent absence of these children is understandably high.  Since September, school leaders have ensured that there is much better communication with parents. Poor attendance is systematically recorded on a daily basis. Parents of absent pupils are contacted within the first hour of the

p.2

Inspection findings

school day. For those pupils who are persistently absent, meticulous care is taken, both in school and through home visits, to ensure that they attend school whenever possible. Current data shows that overall attendance levels have now risen above national averages.

p.3

Next steps for the school

Leaders and governors should ensure that:

p.3

Next steps for the school

 key stage 1 pupils are supported to develop their reading and writing skills so that they make progress at least in line with national averages  teaching, learning and assessment consistently challenge the most able pupils to achieve the higher levels in reading, writing, mathematics and science.

p.3

Next steps for the school

I am copying this letter to the chair of the governing body, the regional schools commissioner and the director of children’s services for Tower Hamlets. This letter will be published on the Ofsted website.

p.3

Information about the inspection

During the inspection I carried out the following activities:

p.4

Information about the inspection

 I visited lessons to observe learning jointly with members of the school’s senior leadership team. While in lessons, I scrutinised pupils’ work and discussed pupils’ learning with them.  I listened to pupils read.  I held meetings with leaders, staff, pupils and governors in order to explore the key lines of enquiry and the progress made by the school since the last inspection.  I met with a representative from Tower Hamlets local authority.  I met with the primary lead from the Teach East London Teaching School Alliance.  I reviewed documentation including leaders’ evaluation of the school’s performance and plans for development, attendance information, and procedures and policies including those for attendance and safeguarding.  I considered the views of the 23 parents and one pupil who responded to Ofsted’s online surveys.

p.4

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion