Schools & FE · School inspection (CIF)
Barlow Church of England Voluntary Controlled Primary School
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
16 Mar 2017
- Inspectors verified
Alan Chaffey
- Early years verified
Good
- Leadership and management verified
Requires improvement
- Outcomes verified
Requires improvement
- Overall effectiveness verified
Requires improvement
- Personal development, behaviour and welfare verified
Good
- Previous overall verified
Good
- Teaching, learning and assessment verified
Requires improvement
- Postcode verified
YO8 8ES
- Name on report verified
Barlow Church of England Voluntary Controlled Primary School
- URN verified
121548
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2012.
- OverallRequires improvement
- Early yearsGood
- Leadership and managementRequires improvement
- OutcomesRequires improvement
- Personal development, behaviour and welfareGood
- Teaching, learning and assessmentRequires improvement
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type graded Requires improvement.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Suitable records are kept of any concerns raised, and pupils who may be at risk are referred to social services. p.4
- Standards in writing have declined and too few p.1
- Pupils’ work is often poorly presented and too readily accepted. p.1
- Staff and governors are fully aware of their safeguarding duties and are appropriately trained, including how to identify ways that pupils may be at risk from extremist views. p.4
- Although generally pupils take a pride in their work, some pupils’ work is untidy and poorly presented. 15–16 March 2017 p.5
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Improve leadership and management by ensuring that: – the role of subject leaders for English and mathematics is developed further so that underperformance is challenged and teachers are held to account – the curriculum is broad, balanced and meets pupils’ needs. 15–16 March 2017 p.2
- Over time, leadership has lacked capacity and rigour. p.3
- Weaker aspects of the school’s performance have not been tackled well enough. p.3
- The recent arrival of an acting headteacher and strong support from the local authority have brought some stability, clear direction and noticeable improvement to the school. p.3
- However, it is too soon to see the impact of this on teaching and pupils’ achievement. p.3
- Leaders have not improved the quality of teaching over time so that it is at least good. p.3
- Leaders’ checks on teaching have not been regular or sufficiently focused on its impact on pupils’ progress. p.3
- Subject leaders for English and mathematics are aware of the need to improve teaching and learning in these subjects. p.3
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Progress & outcomes33
“good progress because they quickly gain a secure knowledge of phonics.” p.5Reading & phonics12
“good progress because they quickly gain a secure knowledge of phonics.” p.5Behaviour10
“Pupils behave very well.” p.1
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 11
- Words of findings
- 2,363
- shorter than usual (typical 3064)
- Reading level
- Fairly hard
- Flesch 50, typical 47
- Average sentence
- 15 words
- Next steps
- 8
- typical 8
- Hedged sentences
- 8%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Barlow Church of England Voluntary Controlled Primary School Park Road, Barlow, Selby, North Yorkshire YO8 8ES
p.1
Overall effectiveness Requires improvement
p.1
Effectiveness of leadership and management Requires improvement
p.1
Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Requires improvement
p.1
Personal development, behaviour and welfare Good
p.1
Outcomes for pupils Requires improvement
p.1
Overall effectiveness at previous inspection Good
p.1
Summary of key findings for parents and pupils
This is a school that requires improvement
p.1
Summary of key findings for parents and pupils
Over time, leaders have not ensured that the curriculum meets the needs of pupils. As a result, standards have declined since the school was last inspected. Leaders’ monitoring of teaching and learning has not been rigorous enough in identifying the key areas for improvement. Leaders do not place enough emphasis on aspects of teaching that will swiftly improve pupils’ progress. Governors have not challenged leaders rigorously enough about the progress pupils make. Teachers do not plan lessons effectively to meet the needs of the most able pupils. Consequently, these pupils do not make the progress of which they are capable. Teachers’ expectations are too low. Pupils’ work is often poorly presented and too readily accepted. Teaching in mathematics does not provide sufficient opportunities for pupils to deepen their mathematical understanding through problem-solving. Standards in writing have declined and too few
p.1
Summary of key findings for parents and pupils
pupils achieve higher standards. Pupils are not given the chance to reinforce their key writing skills in different subjects. Too often pupils spell common everyday words incorrectly and do not use basic punctuation accurately in their writing.
p.1
Summary of key findings for parents and pupils
The early years provision is good. As a result of good teaching, children make good progress. Pupils behave very well. Pupils are confident and happy. Attendance has been consistently above average since the last inspection. 15–16 March 2017
p.1
What does the school need to do to improve further?
Improve the quality of teaching in key stage 1 and key stage 2 so that pupils make faster progress by: – raising the expectations of what pupils can achieve – setting work that is sufficiently challenging, especially for the most able – providing opportunities for pupils to develop writing skills in subjects other than English – pupils applying their calculation skills to investigate and solve more complicated problems in mathematics – ensuring that pupils spell everyday words correctly and use punctuation in their writing accurately – insisting that the presentation of pupils’ work is consistently of a high standard. Improve leadership and management by ensuring that: – the role of subject leaders for English and mathematics is developed further so that underperformance is challenged and teachers are held to account – the curriculum is broad, balanced and meets pupils’ needs. 15–16 March 2017
p.2
Effectiveness of leadership and management Requires improvement
Over time, leadership has lacked capacity and rigour. Weaker aspects of the school’s performance have not been tackled well enough. As a result, standards have declined. The recent arrival of an acting headteacher and strong support from the local authority have brought some stability, clear direction and noticeable improvement to the school. However, it is too soon to see the impact of this on teaching and pupils’ achievement. Leaders have not improved the quality of teaching over time so that it is at least good. Leaders’ checks on teaching have not been regular or sufficiently focused on its impact on pupils’ progress. Subject leaders for English and mathematics are aware of the need to improve teaching and learning in these subjects. However, they are new to their roles and, as yet, they have not been given appropriate support or sufficient opportunities to effectively address the changes that need to be made.
p.3
Effectiveness of leadership and management Requires improvement
Current leaders, including governors, are well aware of the need to improve pupils’ outcomes and the quality of teaching. Plans are in place to improve teaching and accelerate pupils’ progress. However, these plans are not sharp enough and do not present sufficient challenge to raise standards. Curriculum plans are detailed, showing appropriate breadth and balance. Subjects are taught through topics and pupils’ learning is enhanced by school visits, such as the one to a sculpture park to support their work in art. However, inspection evidence shows that curriculum plans are sometimes not consistently followed. This has not been addressed by school leaders. This has contributed to disruption in learning and to pupils not completing work to a high standard. Teachers now have challenging targets linked to improving pupils’ achievement. Good links with local schools are providing opportunities for teachers to meet with colleagues
p.3
Effectiveness of leadership and management Requires improvement
to compare standards. More recently, teachers have had access to good-quality training in teaching mathematics and English and in special educational needs. Leaders have established a community where pupils develop into caring, responsible citizens, based on strong Christian values such as forgiveness, courage and truthfulness. Pupils learn about other faiths and to be tolerant and respectful of difference. Pupils have developed a good understanding of British values, such as democracy and the rule of law. The very small amount of funding the school receives to support disadvantaged pupils is used effectively. This funding is used to provide additional support for targeted pupils. The physical education and sport premium is used well. As a result, more pupils are participating in sport and competing in tournaments and events with other schools. Effective use of funding results in well targeted support for pupils who have special
p.3
Effectiveness of leadership and management Requires improvement
educational needs and/or disabilities. This enables this group of pupils to make the progress expected of them. 15–16 March 2017 The school has gone through a period of disruption that has affected leadership, teaching and pupils’ outcomes. Strong and effective support from the local authority and the STAR Teaching School Alliance has brought stability to the school, and early indications are that this is beginning to have a positive impact.
p.3
Governance of the school
Governors are starting to provide effective challenge. They know their school well and know the issues they face regarding pupils’ progress and teaching and leadership. They have stood by the school during a very turbulent time and show a determination to make the changes needed to rapidly improve the school’s performance. New additions to the governing body and changes in responsibilities have added expertise, rigour and challenge. They have received, and are continuing to receive, good support and training from the local authority. The school’s website does not meet requirements because of insufficient information about the curriculum.
p.4
Safeguarding
The arrangements for safeguarding are effective. Leaders have made sure that all safeguarding arrangements are fit for purpose. Staff and governors are fully aware of their safeguarding duties and are appropriately trained, including how to identify ways that pupils may be at risk from extremist views. Staff know what to do if they have concerns. Suitable records are kept of any concerns raised, and pupils who may be at risk are referred to social services. Leaders work well with outside agencies and parents to ensure that pupils are safe and free from harm. The school’s record of staff and visitor checks is kept effectively and meets requirements.
p.4
Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Requires improvement
Teaching, learning and assessment are not consistently good. This is seen in both key stages 1 and 2, where pupils do not make sufficiently strong progress, especially in mathematics and writing. Teaching regularly lacks challenge and teachers do not have high enough expectations of what pupils can achieve. Too often work is too easy or not covered in sufficient depth, and pupils do not have enough opportunities to work at the highest standards. As a result, attainment is below what is expected for many pupils. The most able pupils are not sufficiently challenged. Teaching does not consistently build on what pupils can do, know and understand. Pupils have too few opportunities to deepen and extend their thinking. Pupils’ written work shows that there are not enough occasions when they write at length, especially in subjects other than English. This means that pupils do not have 15–16 March 2017
p.4
Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Requires improvement
the chance to develop and extend their writing skills and their progress is slower than it should be. Too often learning activities for mathematics do not present enough challenge, and learning time is lost because pupils are completing calculation work that is too easy and sometimes unnecessary. Opportunities for pupils to apply their arithmetic skills to more complex problem-solving activities are too infrequent. Teachers do not insist on high standards of presentation. Consequently, pupils’ work is frequently untidy and poorly presented. There are very positive relationships in classes between adults and pupils, and between pupils and their peers. This leads to a positive culture for learning and a calm learning environment. The support from teaching assistants is valuable. These adults work very effectively with targeted pupils and help them to move on successfully in their learning. Phonics teaching in Reception and Year 1 is effective. Currently, pupils are making
p.5
Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Requires improvement
good progress because they quickly gain a secure knowledge of phonics.
p.5
Personal development and welfare
The school’s work to promote pupils’ personal development and welfare is good Pupils confirm that they feel safe and that teachers deal with any concerns that pupils may have. Pupils know how to keep themselves safe in a range of situations, including when using a computer. The older pupils were very keen to tell the inspector about the presentation on e-safety which they produced on computer and subsequently presented to younger pupils in the school. Pupils know about the different kinds of bullying, including cyber bullying. They are confident that if any bullying does arise, they can trust the staff to sort it out. The school’s seven core Christian values are at the heart of all relationships and pupils are very happy at school. One pupil commented that the school ‘feels like one big happy family’. Older pupils in the school act as play leaders during breaktimes. These pupils engage younger pupils in a range of activities and help keep them safe from harm.
p.5
Personal development and welfare
Pupils have the opportunity to participate in active sport, especially during the school day. However, several of the older pupils said that opportunities to participate in after- school clubs have become limited. Although generally pupils take a pride in their work, some pupils’ work is untidy and poorly presented. 15–16 March 2017
p.5
Behaviour
The behaviour of pupils is good. Behaviour in lessons and attitudes to learning are typically good. In lessons, pupils are mostly engaged in what they are learning. Just occasionally, when learning slows, a minority of pupils can lose concentration, but this does not hinder the learning of others. Outside the classrooms, pupils’ behaviour is good. Around the school, in the dining room and on the playground, pupils are also well behaved. School records shows that this is consistently the case. The school has positive relationships with parents and, on the whole, parents feel that their children are safe and happy and believe that staff are approachable and caring. Attendance has been consistently higher than the national average and remains so. Pupils are rarely absent and they arrive to school each morning on time.
p.6
Outcomes for pupils Requires improvement
Prior to 2016, outcomes were above average at key stages 1 and 2 for reading, writing and mathematics. In 2016, they declined significantly to below that seen nationally, especially for reading and writing. As a result, pupils left Year 6 in 2016 ill-prepared for their next stage of education. Because of slow progress, very few pupils, including the most able pupils, reach a greater depth of learning in reading, writing and mathematics. No pupils reached the highest standard in Year 2 and Year 6 for writing in 2016, and too few achieved the higher standard for reading and mathematics. The school’s assessment information indicates that current pupils are making more rapid progress than previously. However, rates of progress seen in pupils’ books are still too variable and remain less than good. This is especially the case in key stage 2 for writing and mathematics, and particularly for those pupils who are most able.
p.6
Outcomes for pupils Requires improvement
The proportion of pupils achieving the expected standard for English grammar, punctuation and spelling in 2016 was above average, and pupils’ writing currently shows that they often use a range of grammar techniques correctly. However, too frequently pupils spell common everyday words incorrectly and do not consistently use basic punctuation accurately. Progress in subjects other than English and mathematics varies. It is better in some classes than others. Pupils are not given enough opportunities to develop their writing skills in these subjects. The majority of pupils who have special educational needs and/or disabilities make the progress expected of them in reading, writing and mathematics. These pupils are supported well during lessons. The proportion of pupils that meet the expected standard in phonics by the end of Year 1 is below the national average. The proportion that reach the expected standard in
p.6
Outcomes for pupils Requires improvement
Year 2 is above the national average. School leaders judge the teaching of phonics to 15–16 March 2017 have improved and the inspector noted strong teaching of phonics during the inspection. Less-able pupils who read to the inspector successfully used their phonics skills to read unfamiliar words. Most-able readers read with fluency and confidence. The very small number of disadvantaged pupils in the school are making similar progress as their peers.
p.6
Early years provision Good
Children enter the Reception class with skills and abilities that are broadly typical for their age. As a result of good teaching, they make good progress, especially in reading and writing. The proportion of children reaching a good level of development has improved and is now just above the national average. The early years is well led and managed. The early years leader has a good knowledge of the children and the progress they make. She is knowledgeable and aspirational for all children, which means that they make a positive start to their time in school. Parents are involved in their children’s progress and achievements through an online system. This is appreciated by parents, who feel well informed. Teaching in the early years is good because all adults have high expectations of what children can achieve. Interesting activities are well planned and closely matched to children’s needs. The outdoor area provides good opportunities to enhance further the
p.7
Early years provision Good
learning indoors. Children’s behaviour is good. Well-established classroom routines and effective support from additional adults have helped children develop good learning behaviours. Children work and play cooperatively. The culture of safeguarding is secure in the early years. Children feel safe and staff know how to support children if there are concerns about safety and welfare. 15–16 March 2017
p.7
School details
This inspection was carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005. The inspection was also deemed a section 5 inspection under the same Act.
p.8
School details
Appropriate authority The governing body
p.8
School details
Email address admin@barlow.n-yorks.sch.uk
p.8
School details
Date of previous inspection 13 December 2012
p.8
Information about this school
The school does not meet requirements on the publication of information about the curriculum on its website. The school is considerably smaller than the average-sized primary school. The proportion of disadvantaged pupils is well below average. The proportion of pupils who have special educational needs and/or disabilities is above the national average. All pupils are of White British heritage. Because of the small number of pupils, reporting on whether the school meets the floor targets or not does not apply. 15–16 March 2017 The school currently has a temporary acting headteacher brokered by the local authority through The STAR Teaching School Alliance. 15–16 March 2017
p.8
Information about this inspection
The inspector, accompanied by the acting headteacher, observed learning in all classes in the school. Meetings were held with pupils, the acting headteacher, subject leaders and three members of the governing body. The inspector also held several meetings with a representative from the local authority. The inspector observed pupils moving around the school outside lessons, including on the playground during breaks and in the dining hall. The inspector listened to pupils read. A number of documents were scrutinised, including the school’s view of its own performance, school improvement plans and documents relating to attendance and safeguarding. The inspector took account of the 23 free text opinions from parents and the 26 responses to Ofsted’s online questionnaire, Parent View. The inspector also took account of the four online questionnaires completed by members of the school staff. The inspector spoke informally with parents at the end of the school day.
p.10
Information about this inspection
The headteacher was not present in the school during the inspection.
p.10
Inspection team
Alan Chaffey, lead inspector Ofsted Inspector 15–16 March 2017 guidance ‘Raising concerns and making a complaint about Ofsted’, which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.gov.uk/government/publications/complaints-about-ofsted . If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.10
Inspection team
In the report, ‘disadvantaged pupils’ refers to those pupils who attract government pupil premium funding: pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years and pupils in care or who left care through adoption or another formal route. www.gov.uk/pupil-premium-information-for-schools-and- alternative-provision-settings .
p.11
Inspection team
You can use Parent View to give Ofsted your opinion on your child’s school. Ofsted will use the information parents and carers provide when deciding which schools to inspect and when and as part of the inspection.
p.11
Inspection team
You can also use Parent View to find out what other parents and carers think about schools in England. You can visit www.parentview.ofsted.gov.uk , or look for the link on the main Ofsted website: www.gov.uk/government/organisations/ofsted .
p.11
Inspection team
achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.
p.11
Inspection team
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.11
Inspection team
You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open- government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .
p.11
Inspection team
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .
p.11
Inspection team
T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.11
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion