Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (CIF)

All Saints' CofE Primary School NW2

Inspected 27 Jan 2017 · URN 101315

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

Requires improvement

Carmen Rodney (lead), David Boyle (lead), Raj Mehta

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    27 Jan 2017

  • Inspectors verified

    Carmen Rodney, David Boyle, Raj Mehta

  • Early years verified

    Good

  • Leadership and management verified

    Good

  • Outcomes verified

    Requires improvement

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Requires improvement

  • Personal development, behaviour and welfare verified

    Good

  • Previous overall verified

    Good

  • Teaching, learning and assessment verified

    Requires improvement

  • Postcode verified

    NW2 2TH

  • Name on report verified

    All Saints’ CofE Primary School NW2

  • URN verified

    101315

Page 1 of 13
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.

  • OverallRequires improvement
  • Early yearsGood
  • Leadership and managementGood
  • OutcomesRequires improvement
  • Personal development, behaviour and welfareGood
  • Teaching, learning and assessmentRequires improvement

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+28Mostly positivemore positive than 77% of reports of this type graded Requires improvement
OutstandingGoodRIInadequate

In line with other reports of this type graded Requires improvement.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiserapid progressmake good progresseffectivehigh expectationshigh qualityclearaccuratelystrengths
Criticismrequires improvementweaknessesconcernsbelownot consistentlyunacceptablenot alwaysdeclining

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improveLeadershipSafeguardingAbout the inspection positive critical
  • Findings720w+20
  • Leadership985w+30
  • Safeguarding265w−10
  • What needs to improve1495w+40

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
13
Words of findings
3,384
about usual (typical 3064)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 48, typical 47
Average sentence
15 words
Next steps
8
typical 8
Hedged sentences
6%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 17%Leadership 24%Safeguarding 6%What needs to improve 36%About the inspection 17%

Full report text

All Saints’ CofE Primary School NW2 Cricklewood Lane, Childs Hill, London NW2 2TH

p.1

Overall effectiveness Requires improvement

p.1

Effectiveness of leadership and management Good

p.1

Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Requires improvement

p.1

Personal development, behaviour and welfare Good

p.1

Outcomes for pupils Requires improvement

p.1

Overall effectiveness at previous inspection Good

p.1

Summary of key findings for parents and pupils

This is a school that requires improvement

p.1

Summary of key findings for parents and pupils

 Attainment is below the standard expected nationally in phonics, and particularly in reading and writing in key stages 1 and 2. Pupils achieve better outcomes in mathematics.  Different groups of pupils, including disadvantaged pupils, those with special educational needs and/or disabilities, as well as the most able, made sound progress in 2016.  The 2016 national writing tests show low- attaining pupils made slow progress across key stage 2.  Disadvantaged middle-attaining pupils did not all attain the standard expected nationally in writing and mathematics.  Boys in all year groups make much slower progress in reading and writing than girls.  Teaching requires improvement to ensure that all groups make rapid progress over time.  The school’s systems for assessing pupils are developing well.

p.1

Summary of key findings for parents and pupils

 Senior leaders, staff and governors have an accurate understanding of the school’s work. There is a sharp focus on monitoring teaching and learning.  Checks that leaders make on pupils’ progress are thorough. Changes are leading to pupils making better progress.  The reconstituted governing body provides clear strategic direction and challenge. It maintains a steadfast approach to the school becoming more effective.  The early years provision is good. As a result, children make good progress from below average starting points.  Safeguarding is effective, and pupils’ personal development and behaviour are good. Attendance is above average. Relationships within this diverse setting are very good.  Provision for pupils who have special educational needs and/or disabilities, and new arrivals learning English, is good.  The culture of promoting British values and pupils’ spiritual, moral and social development

p.1

What does the school need to do to improve further?

 Ensure that teaching is of a high quality that enables pupils to make rapid progress.  Build on the recent changes in using assessment accurately to ensure that: – teachers plan work that meets the needs of different groups of pupils – teachers provide challenging tasks to help pupils attain high standards in reading, writing and mathematics.  Increase the proportion of pupils that attain and exceed the standard expected nationally by: − building on the strategies to accelerate pupils’ progress in reading, writing and mathematics.

p.2

Effectiveness of leadership and management Good

 Although the overall effectiveness of the school has fallen from good to requires improvement, the quality of leadership and management remains good. In spite of leaders’ best efforts to manage the challenges of recruiting and retaining high-quality staff in a costly area, the staff turnover has been high. This, combined with changes in the demographics of the area, and the intake and mobility of pupils, mean that the school’s performance has not been sustained.  Now that staffing is more secure, leaders are able to focus more on improving pupils’ progress, instead of constantly recruiting experienced teachers. Stability has enabled leaders to maintain their focus on improving the quality of education, and providing much-needed pastoral care for pupils with specific needs.  Staff have readily accepted the leadership team’s ambitions and high expectations in relation to all aspects of the school’s work. Together, they have developed and made

p.3

Effectiveness of leadership and management Good

important changes to the curriculum, assessment systems and planning to ensure that pupils can make better progress. Staff are committed to the school and morale is high.  Leaders, including governors and staff, have a good understanding of the school’s strengths and weaknesses. They recognise that most pupils who join the school other than at the usual times do not begin with skills typical for their age. As a result, there is increased focus on developing pupils’ competencies, particularly in reading and writing. This has led to pupils demonstrating better skills when interpreting complex vocabulary and questions. Pupils are now better placed to give accurate and more in-depth responses in the national tests.  Systems for assessing and tracking pupils’ progress against the new assessment criteria are developing well. Regular tests and the use of internal and external moderation provide the school with in-depth evaluation and scrutiny of pupils’ work. The middle

p.3

Effectiveness of leadership and management Good

leaders are central to the school’s development; they review work, and provide teachers with specific priorities for improvement. Their support is helping teachers to improve their teaching and address weaknesses in pupils’ learning quickly.  Systems for checking teachers’ work are thorough. Senior leaders regularly check the quality of teaching and learning and hold staff to account for pupils’ progress. Leaders provide regular advice, support and training. Feedback is used well to focus teachers’ attention on areas of their work that require strengthening, prior to them being reassessed. When improvements are not made quickly, swift action is taken. The school’s professional development programme, which is focused on developing high- quality teaching, has led to teachers using newly acquired skills to improve their planning and teaching well.  The curriculum is broad, balanced and provides depth. The choice of curriculum model

p.3

Effectiveness of leadership and management Good

ensures that pupils, in particular boys, are stimulated and engaged in their learning. Meaningful links are made across subjects, and provide pupils with plenty of opportunities to develop a range of writing skills. Pupils benefit from a wide range of enrichment activities and clubs, both inside and outside of the school.  The promotion of pupils’ spiritual, social, moral and cultural understanding is a strength of the school’s work, as is its development of British values. The school, as a diverse community, prepares pupils very well for life in modern Britain. Pupils respect each other’s cultural and religious heritage. They learn about the importance of friendship, tolerance, rights and responsibilities when living and working with people from different backgrounds to themselves.  The school ensures that the special educational needs funding is used effectively to employ staff and provide additional resources to improve learning. Staff provide good

p.3

Effectiveness of leadership and management Good

support for pupils to develop basic reading and mathematical skills. Careful and specialist support, combined with planning, help this group of pupils to achieve their targets in reading, writing and mathematics. For example, in the 2016 national tests, they made average progress in reading and mathematics; it was slower in writing. Current tracking information shows that they are meeting their target.  The additional funding for disadvantaged pupils is used well to improve attendance from below the national average to being in line with it. However, while the funding is used for a range of strategies to develop learning, good academic achievement is not consistently realised each year.  The sports premium funding has increased pupils’ participation in sporting activities and enabled all to have equal access to events regardless of their sporting ability. The school’s work with the local sports network provides talented pupils with opportunities

p.4

Effectiveness of leadership and management Good

to develop their potential. The school has successfully assisted a few pupils to achieve recognition locally and nationally.

p.4

Governance of the school

 The reconstituted governing body is clear about the strengths and weaknesses of the school. Governors have worked closely with the London Diocesan Board for Schools to commission a review of their work. As a result, they have increased their skills and plans to hold the school to account for its effectiveness.  They have a clear handle on pupils’ performance and the steps needed to improve further. Governors challenge leaders about the outcomes for different groups of pupils, and records of minutes show a thorough and urgent approach for the school to move forward quickly.  Under the leadership of the new chair, members calculate their plans and do not readily accept information from the school. Governors are rigorous when they check on how well leaders are developing identified priorities. Governors commission user- friendly analyses of pupil outcomes. These provide them with information that they

p.4

Governance of the school

understand and can use to challenge senior leaders about pupils’ performance. For example, they challenge leaders about the progress of disadvantaged pupils and the most able. This ensures that all groups have an equal chance to succeed.  Governors act as critical friends when questioning leaders about the quality of teaching and the impact on outcomes. Additionally, they provide strategic direction and use first-hand evidence to inform key priorities.  Governors ensure that all statutory requirements are met in relation to safeguarding and equality of opportunity.

p.4

Safeguarding

 The arrangements for safeguarding are effective.  The school has robust systems in place to secure the well-being of pupils, including those in the early years provision. Inspection evidence confirms that when concerns arise, leaders deal with them thoroughly. For example, in 2016, when concerns were raised about safeguarding arrangements linked to pupils leaving the school, measures were taken immediately, and leaders commissioned an audit. The review confirmed that safeguarding arrangements are effective. The audit led to the leadership team reviewing and strengthening risk assessments, particularly in relation to vulnerable pupils. Other minor adjustments included improving supervision in the playground.  The school diligently carries out investigative checks of all staff before employment, and all checks meet requirements.  The school is up to date with recent statutory guidance such as ‘Keeping Children Safe

p.5

Safeguarding

in Education’, September 2016. As a result, staff know the steps to take if there are safeguarding concerns in relation to pupils or a member of staff.  Training is comprehensive and covers all of the key priorities in relation to child sexual exploitation, children missing education, safer recruitment and the ‘Prevent’ duty. Senior leaders ensure that they review these safeguarding matters regularly and provide updates. Designated staff undertake appropriate training. They ensure that safeguarding information is prominently displayed around the school for pupils should they need to talk to someone about their concerns.  The school curriculum provides pupils with good coverage on how to stay safe. Organised workshops that include drama and visiting speakers, increase pupils’ awareness of how to keep safe online, and protect themselves from abuse.

p.5

Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Requires improvement

 The school still has more work to do to ensure that teaching is of a consistently high quality for pupils to make rapid progress. This is to enable pupils to meet the demands of a more challenging curriculum and national tests.  Leaders have done much to raise expectations of what pupils can achieve, and evidence indicates that pupils are now making better progress. These are linked to teachers’ good classroom management and pupils’ positive attitudes to learning.  During whole class teaching, not all teaching assistants work well with pupils. This affects the quality of support and help that pupils need to make better progress.  Pupils routinely take part in self-assessment, which helps them to identify how well they understand the skills they are learning. They adopt a mature approach when discussing their work. However, teachers do not habitually reinforce editing, drafting and proofreading to develop pupils’ writing skills. As a result, pupils do not readily

p.5

Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Requires improvement

identify errors in their work until they receive feedback.  Teachers are not always consistent in checking that different groups of pupils have a good grasp of specific skills before moving on to the next stage of learning.  Teachers have good subject knowledge and understanding of the age groups that they teach. Work is linked to the needs of different ability groups, with opportunities for them to work through a range of challenging tasks.  Teachers now use assessment information more accurately to identify gaps in pupils’ learning, and plan activities to address misconceptions. For example, the teaching of mathematics is successful primarily because teachers regularly test pupils’ knowledge and quickly deal with misconceptions. This contributes to pupils making better progress in mathematics.  Teachers make sure that there are good opportunities for pupils to practise their writing and reading skills. For example, pupils carry out research assignments and

p.5

Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Requires improvement

show that they can collate materials from different sources accurately. Furthermore, weekly focused writing in the ‘writers workshop’ across the school, and the ‘read and tell’ approach in Year 1, have begun to make a difference to pupils’ writing. Teachers support pupils well to write at length and structure their work. There is good emphasis on pupils using a cursive style and writing clearly. Evidence shows that the quality of pupils’ written work is much improved but there is more to do in relation to spelling, and using technical skills accurately.  Teachers adeptly reinforce skills taught and ensure that pupils recognise, understand and apply them accurately. Clear and recorded learning objectives help pupils to know that they can do the work. Evidence of self-assessment contributes to pupils knowing how well they have learned.  Small group intervention work during whole-class teaching is used well to consolidate

p.6

Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Requires improvement

pupils’ learning and address misconceptions. Pupils who are behind quickly catch up with their classmates, and the most able begin to complete challenging work well.  Homework is set regularly and themed work helps pupils to develop research skills and read frequently. Pupils show sheer gusto when set challenges. However, several parents and pupils complained that teachers do not all give feedback on their homework to help pupils improve their research skills.  Teachers make a huge contribution to pupils’ learning when they assess how well they understand the skills taught, and use short intensive question and answer sessions to recap on previous learning. Pupils are encouraged to think deeply about their work and take responsibility for their learning. This was seen in the Year 5 mathematics lesson, where pupils successfully worked on converting and simplifying fractions.

p.6

Personal development and welfare

 The school’s work to promote pupils’ personal development and welfare is good.  Characteristically, pupils show respect for each other and good manners. Pupils say they are happy and enjoy their school; they are proud about being a part of the diverse school community. Pupils who took part in the Ofsted survey confirmed this shared view.  Pupils feel safe in the school. They noted that staff are always visible, and look out for them. Pupils spoke confidently about the range of protective measures throughout the school day and identified changes made to keep them safe. They are clear about reporting concerns and are confident that they can turn to an adult if they have any. Pupils are aware of potential risks associated with being online and using technology inappropriately. Older pupils in Years 5 and 6 have benefited from attending organised workshops to increase their understanding of knowing how to protect themselves from

p.6

Personal development and welfare

abuse and exploitation.  Pupils care for each other and develop trusting relationships with each other. Relationships are as strong with adults, who they also trust.  The school provides opportunities for pupils to exercise responsibility as anti-bullying ambassadors, Eco and school councillors and sports leaders. Pupils are very much aware of the responsibilities of representing others.  Pupils are able to highlight what it means to stay healthy through the work covered in sports activities, physical education and in the wider curriculum.  Pupils say that bullying is rare at the school and if it does occur staff deal with it swiftly. Records confirm that this is the case.

p.7

Behaviour

 The behaviour of pupils is good.  Pupils concentrate well in lessons and unacceptable behaviour is rare. Pupils and parents who took part in school surveys and the Ofsted online survey confirmed that pupils are well behaved. Behaviour is occasionally impeccable and is linked to pupils’ very good attitudes to their learning. They are keen to learn and concentrate well. They demonstrate good self-discipline.  The school’s ethos and culture mean that exclusions are uncommon. The school is a tight-knit community, where pupils feel welcomed and know that they can delve into the life and spirit of the school without fear of feeling as an outsider.  The school has worked hard to improve attendance, which is now above average. This rise is an improvement on the previous year when it was average.

p.7

Outcomes for pupils Requires improvement

 Although pupils achieved average standards in the 2016 national tests in mathematics at the end of key stage 2, overall, they were below the standard expected nationally in reading and writing. The distance between their achievement in reading and writing and that expected nationally is wide. At key stage 1, whereas standards were slightly better than those expected nationally in mathematics, they were below in reading and writing. Standards in science are not significantly different from the national average. The good standards identified at the last inspection have not been consistently sustained.  Pupils’ rates of progress have not been rapid enough for the majority of pupils from different groups to reach greater depth at key stage 1. At key stage 2, based on pupils’ starting points, few of the most able attained the high standard expected in reading, writing and mathematics. Progress is therefore not good.

p.7

Outcomes for pupils Requires improvement

 Standards achieved in phonics at the end of Year 1 are below average, and there has been a declining trend, particularly for boys, over the last two academic years. The school provides good support for pupils who do not do well in Year 1. This enables most of them to catch up with their peers and reach the standard expected by the end of Year 2. The present Year 1 cohort is expected to achieve better outcomes based on the intensive support and attention to developing reading skills across the school.  Progress is not consistently good enough for the most able pupils. In 2016, their progress was significantly below expectations in reading. Currently, they are making better progress in all areas of their work. For example, these pupils organise their ideas clearly into well-linked paragraphs and use a wide vocabulary to emphasise meaning. This was seen in their research and biographical work on William Shakespeare.

p.7

Outcomes for pupils Requires improvement

 The most able disadvantaged pupils make similar progress to the national average. However, middle-attaining disadvantaged pupils do not all attain as well as they should. The distance between them and the national average is wide in mathematics and writing. Current evidence suggests that they are making better progress. This is linked to the rich curriculum and various support provided through the pupil premium funding.  The few low-attaining pupils made better progress than their peers in reading and mathematics. However, writing was significantly lower than the standard expected nationally for this group. The funding for one-to-one support and a learning mentor contributes to this group making better progress this academic year in all areas of their work.  The school has extensive expertise in supporting pupils who join speaking little or no English. Additionally, some of these pupils speak English fluently but do not have a

p.8

Outcomes for pupils Requires improvement

wide vocabulary or a good understanding of complex terminology. The induction and support provided help them to access learning, and make similar progress to their classmates.

p.8

Early years provision Good

 Children enter Reception with skills below those typically expected for their age group. Children have better skills in physical development but there are weaknesses in their communication, literacy and language. Nevertheless, by the end of Reception, most make good progress in all areas of the early years curriculum because the quality of teaching and learning are purposeful and stimulating.  Good-quality teaching and high expectations of what children can achieve ensure that children achieve well each year. Disadvantaged children achieve expected standards as other children nationally. Teachers use the initial assessment information of children’s skills well to match work and to support their learning. As a result, children make good progress in all areas of learning.  Learning is creative and enjoyable, and children are inspired to begin writing early. Children use their phonics skills to segment and blend letters when they read and

p.8

Early years provision Good

write, as seen during the inspection. For example, children worked jointly with the teacher to make up and write simple sentences that were dictated. Although tired, they all decided to practice writing more sentences independently.  Children love reading and dive into the library sessions to search for, and ‘read’ books of interest. During these sessions, they seek out adults to read to them. Otherwise, they turn the pages of a favourite text, recite lines they are familiar with and make predictions by looking at the pictures. Additionally, they imitate reading quietly. The visit to the library is an enjoyable event.  Relationships are good and children play well together within this setting, where cultural diversity is a strength.  Systems for children to make the transition from Nursery to Reception, and then to key stage 1, are well planned. The attention given to using the same staff to move on with

p.8

Early years provision Good

the children helps them to settle well, and adapt to more demanding work quickly.  Children thrive in the early years. It is an enabling environment that is led well, and where staff have an accurate view about its effectiveness.

p.9

School details

This inspection was carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005. The inspection was also deemed a section 5 inspection under the same Act.

p.10

School details

Appropriate authority The governing body

p.10

School details

Email address head@aspnw2.barnetmail.net

p.10

School details

Date of previous inspection 7–8 March 2012

p.10

Information about this school

 All Saints CofE Primary is much smaller than an average-sized primary school.  Pupils come from a diverse range of backgrounds.  The proportion of disadvantaged pupils is well above average.  The proportion of pupils who have special educational needs and/or disabilities is above average.  The school meets requirements on the publication of specified information on its website.  The school meets the government’s current floor standards, which set the minimum expectations for pupils’ attainment and progress in reading, writing and mathematics at the end of Year 6.  The school does not work with an alternative educational provider.  Since the previous inspection, the school has had a high staff turnover.

p.10

Information about this inspection

 The inspectors observed teaching and learning in nine lessons, seven jointly with the headteacher and senior leaders. The inspectors also undertook 12 short visits to lessons to observe a range of learning activities.  Meetings were held with senior and middle leaders with specific responsibilities. A discussion took place with the representative of the local authority.  The inspectors considered 38 responses to the online questionnaire, Parent View. They spoke with a few parents who wanted to share their views about the school’s work when dropping off their children at school on the second day of the inspection. A meeting was held with members of the parent teachers association on day three of the inspection. The inspection team also took into account 20 questionnaires completed by pupils and 16 by staff.  The inspectors observed the school’s work and checked a range of documentation. This included: policies; the school’s self-evaluation of its work and development plan;

p.12

Information about this inspection

records of pupils’ progress; extra-curricular activities; external reviews of the school’s work; records relating to pupils’ behaviour, attendance and systems for safeguarding pupils’ welfare.

p.12

Inspection team

Carmen Rodney, lead inspector Her Majesty’s Inspector

p.12

Inspection team

David Boyle, lead inspector Ofsted Inspector guidance ‘Raising concerns and making a complaint about Ofsted’, which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.gov.uk/government/publications/complaints-about-ofsted . If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.12

Inspection team

In the report, ‘disadvantaged pupils’ refers to those pupils who attract government pupil premium funding: pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years and pupils in care or who left care through adoption or another formal route. www.gov.uk/pupil-premium-information-for-schools-and- alternative-provision-settings .

p.13

Inspection team

You can use Parent View to give Ofsted your opinion on your child’s school. Ofsted will use the information parents and carers provide when deciding which schools to inspect and when and as part of the inspection.

p.13

Inspection team

You can also use Parent View to find out what other parents and carers think about schools in England. You can visit www.parentview.ofsted.gov.uk , or look for the link on the main Ofsted website: www.gov.uk/government/organisations/ofsted .

p.13

Inspection team

achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.

p.13

Inspection team

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.13

Inspection team

You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open- government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.13

Inspection team

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.13

Inspection team

T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.13

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion