Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · Short school inspection

Cranbrook Primary School

Inspected 28 Feb 2017 · published 25 Apr 2017 · URN 131625

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection datesingle source

    28 Feb 2017

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Tom Canning

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Good

  • Postcode verified

    IG1 3PS

  • Name on report verified

    Cranbrook Primary School

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2008.

  • OverallGood

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+65Positivemore positive than 47% of reports of this type graded Good
OutstandingGood

In line with other reports of this type graded Good.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praisestronghighly effectivefeel safeeffectivelywell ledhigh-qualityhigh qualitymake good progress
Criticismlowervariablelowmissedabsencepersistent absence

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improveAbout the inspection positive critical
  • Findings800w+69
  • What needs to improve93w−33

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
886
shorter than usual (typical 1483)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 55, typical 50
Average sentence
18 words
Next steps
2
typical 2
Hedged sentences
8%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 76%What needs to improve 9%About the inspection 15%

Full report text

Store Street Manchester M1 2WD T 0300 123 4234 www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.1

Ms Jas Leverton Headteacher Cranbrook Primary School The Drive Ilford Essex IG1 3PS

p.1

Short inspection of Cranbrook Primary School

Following my visit to the school on 28 February 2017 with Nick Turvey, Ofsted Inspector, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to report the inspection findings. The visit was the first short inspection carried out since the school was judged to be good in February 2012.

p.1

Short inspection of Cranbrook Primary School

Your highly effective leadership style has ensured that the school is well led and managed. You have a skill in developing future leaders, and this has given you success in strengthening outcomes since the last inspection. You have identified the appropriate key priorities for school development planning, and you have a strong emphasis on raising outcomes for all groups of learners.

p.1

Short inspection of Cranbrook Primary School

You work closely with senior and middle leaders to monitor and evaluate learning outcomes for all pupils. You and your senior leaders track pupils’ achievements very carefully. Provision is in place for any pupils who require additional support. Your school is part of successful partnerships with other settings, and you have strong capacity to offer support to other schools.

p.1

Short inspection of Cranbrook Primary School

Governors are fully involved in the life of the school and have worked closely alongside leaders to develop a curriculum that is both rich in creativity and diversity. Classrooms and corridors are filled with attractive displays, and pupils respond positively to the high-quality learning environment. Attitudes to learning are strong, and pupils display an undeniable sense of pride in their school. School council, travel ambassadors, peer mentors and the safety team all play a vital part in making children feel safe and listened to.

p.1

Short inspection of Cranbrook Primary School

On speaking to parents in the playground, it is clear that you have the support and confidence of the parents. Parents report that their children enjoy school and that they are kept well informed of their children’s progress. At the time of the last inspection, the inspection team recognised many of the strengths in the learning outcomes of pupils. The team identified a need for pupils to work independently on tasks. This has been addressed through implementation of the creative curriculum, as a result of which pupils are more able to take the initiative with their learning. Inspectors also reported on the need to practise phonics to improve reading and writing skills. Phonics is now an integral part of the reading curriculum and this is being taught well. Greater challenge for the most able pupils was reported on and, where this is securely in place for these pupils, outcomes are strong.

p.1

Short inspection of Cranbrook Primary School

Staff receive regular training about safeguarding in order to keep children safe. The school has responded well to local and national initiatives, and procedures are clear and effective. Leaders and governors have ensured that all arrangements are fit for purpose and records are detailed and of a high quality.

p.2

Short inspection of Cranbrook Primary School

Pupils report that they are happy and they feel safe. Pupils are confident that they are listened to and they know who to approach for support and advice.

p.2

Short inspection of Cranbrook Primary School

All checks for the recruitment of staff are in place. The designated safeguarding lead is well known to staff, and strong links are in place with external agencies to support referrals.

p.2

Inspection Findings

 To explore whether the school remains good, we agreed three key lines of enquiry. Evidence gathered demonstrates that leaders have acted effectively to maintain a good standard of education.  The first line of enquiry was to explore the rates of progress of disadvantaged pupils. Outcomes had been variable in different year groups and this was more so for some pupils in lower key stage 2. You have already put in place a number of measures to address this and it has been identified in your school development planning.  The second line of enquiry was to ensure that there is sufficient challenge in place for all pupils to make good progress. Challenge in the early years and key stage 1 is strong. Outcomes for some low attaining pupils and the most able in lower key stage 2 reflect that there are some missed learning opportunities. Challenge in upper key stage 2 is strong, and all groups of pupils are given time

p.2

Inspection Findings

to rehearse and practise key skills.  My final line of enquiry was about attendance. Absence and persistent absence were seen to be greater for particular groups of pupils than would be the case nationally. I met with leaders and with the educational welfare officer to look at records as to why pupils were absent. I am satisfied that the leaders are monitoring absences effectively, and that they have strategies in place to improve attendance.  Leaders work in close partnership with parents to ensure that work is sent home for pupils with ongoing medical absence.

p.2

Next steps for the school

Leaders and those responsible for governance should ensure that:

p.3

Next steps for the school

 teachers further increase the challenge and raise expectations in lower key stage 2 lessons to provide greater opportunities for extended writing for low attaining and most-able pupils  the application of key skills and reasoning in lower key stage 2 is consistent so that misconceptions are addressed within mathematics activities.

p.3

Next steps for the school

I am copying this letter to the chair of the governing body, the regional schools commissioner, and the director of children’s services for Redbridge. This letter will be published on the Ofsted website.

p.3

Ofsted Inspector

The inspection team carried out the following activities during the inspection:

p.3

Ofsted Inspector

 Meetings were held with: the headteacher and deputy headteachers; the designated safeguarding lead and school business manager; middle leaders; assessment leaders; with the chair of governors; and a representative from the local authority.  Inspectors met with parents informally in the playground before school and during the early years ‘drop in’.  Learning walks and short visits to some lessons took place with deputy headteachers.  A range of school documents, including safeguarding records and policies, were scrutinised.  A range of pupils’ books were seen during lessons, and a wide range of books were available to be seen from all year groups.  Pupils from Years 2 and 6 were heard reading.  Members of the school council, emissaries, junior travel ambassadors, peer mentors and the safety team were interviewed.  Scrutiny of online surveys completed by staff and pupils and the responses to Ofsted’s online questionnaire, Parent View.

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion