Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · Short school inspection

The Leasingham St Andrew's Church of England Primary School

Inspected 22 Mar 2017 · published 25 Apr 2017 · URN 120528

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection datesingle source

    22 Mar 2017

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Sally Smith

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Good

  • Postcode verified

    NG34 8JS

  • Name on report verified

    The Leasingham St Andrew’s Church of England Primary School

Page 1 of 4
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2012.

  • OverallGood

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+79Very positivemore positive than 79% of reports of this type graded Good
OutstandingGood

In line with other reports of this type graded Good.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseconsistentlyconfidentstrengthsrapid progresseffectivepositiveclearhigh quality
Criticismnot consistentlyconcernspersistent absence

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improveAbout the inspection positive critical
  • Findings1269w+78
  • What needs to improve77w+33

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
4
Words of findings
1,337
about usual (typical 1483)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 50, typical 50
Average sentence
18 words
Next steps
2
typical 2
Hedged sentences
7%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 83%What needs to improve 5%About the inspection 12%

Full report text

Store Street Manchester M1 2WD T 0300 123 4234 www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.1

David Hodgson Headteacher The Leasingham St Andrew’s Church of England Primary School Lincoln Road Leasingham Sleaford Lincolnshire NG34 8JS

p.1

Primary School

Following my visit to the school on 22 March 2017, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to report the inspection findings. The visit was the first short inspection carried out since the school was judged to be good in April 2012.

p.1

Primary School

The leadership team has maintained the good quality of education in the school since the last inspection. Leaders and governors are aspirational for pupils and committed to the continued improvement of the school. You have a precise and accurate understanding of the school’s strengths and areas for improvement.

p.1

Primary School

Parents hold the school and its staff in high esteem. Many of the parents who I spoke with and who responded to Ofsted’s online questionnaire commented on the welcoming, family atmosphere that you have created at the school. They also value how approachable and accessible senior leaders and teachers are.

p.1

Primary School

You have maintained the significant strengths noted at the last inspection, particularly in terms of pupils’ behaviour. Pupils are happy, confident and proud of the school. You ensure that the school’s Christian values are reinforced through assemblies and lessons. You also provide regular opportunities for pupils to learn about other cultures and religions. Pupils have a good understanding of diversity and inclusion. They told me that everyone is accepted, and that the best thing about the school is that everyone is one big team who work together. Pupils were excited to share their favourite line from the school song with me: ‘everything we do, we do together hand in hand’.

p.1

Primary School

Leaders have addressed the areas for improvement identified at the time of the last inspection.

p.1

Primary School

You provide appropriate training for all staff linked to whole-school developments and additional coaching for staff who need it. We saw together that all staff are consistent in their application of school systems and policies. This is helping to improve the progress which pupils make during their time at the school.

p.2

Primary School

You have made developing pupils’ writing a whole-school priority and provided additional training for all staff. Teachers are now much more confident about the new, national writing standards and what pupils need to do to achieve them. They make sure that pupils have a clear understanding of the features of different types of writing and how to plan and organise their work. Teachers consistently emphasise the importance of using correct grammar to pupils; this is helping pupils to improve their writing. Teachers provide pupils with challenging texts that engage their interests and develop their ideas for writing. For example, Year 6 pupils studied Tolkien’s ‘The Hobbit’, before writing their own descriptive poems. One Year 6 pupil wrote, ‘a puff of smoke ascends into the air, taking the deserted spotlight of the twilight shadows’.

p.2

Primary School

Pupils’ progress at the end of key stage 2 has been consistently at least in line with national averages in reading, writing and mathematics. However, leaders acknowledge that the proportion of pupils who reach greater depth in writing and mathematics across the school needs to improve. Pupils’ books demonstrate that the most able pupils have not consistently been given the challenge needed to make the rapid progress of which they are capable, particularly in key stage 1. Teachers have recently started to plan more opportunities for suitable challenge for the most able pupils. We saw evidence of this together on inspection. For example, in a Year 2 lesson, the most able pupils looked at division, and then went on to explore the relationship between division and multiplication.

p.2

Primary School

The leadership team has ensured that safeguarding arrangements are fit for purpose and records are detailed and of high quality. You complete an annual safeguarding audit to check that safeguarding arrangements continue to be robust.

p.2

Primary School

All statutory checks on staff are carried out and recorded carefully. All staff receive regular and appropriate training and have a good understanding of their responsibilities to ensure children’s safety and well-being. The files you showed me indicate that staff make prompt referrals when they have any concerns. Leaders are tenacious in seeking external support when needed. Leaders, governors and staff undertake regular training relevant to child protection and safeguarding issues, such as the risks of extremism and domestic abuse.

p.2

Primary School

Pupils understand how to keep themselves safe. You have provided opportunities for them to learn about issues such as e-safety. Visitors, such as the police, also visit the school to remind pupils how to stay safe in the community. Pupils say bullying is rare, and if it does happen, they trust staff to deal with it quickly and effectively.

p.2

Inspection findings

 Since the last inspection, leaders have revised the mathematics curriculum and the school’s calculation policy, to provide pupils with more well-planned opportunities to develop their problem-solving and reasoning skills. Staff work with other local schools and within an East Midlands ‘mastery of mathematics’ group to share and learn from best practice. Staff encourage pupils to discuss and explain answers in mathematics through questions such as ‘prove it’ and ‘how do you know?’ This is helping pupils to have more confidence when facing mathematical problems independently.  The governing body provides leaders with effective support and challenge. Governors make sure that additional government funding is used to have a positive impact on pupils’ well-being and progress.  Leaders have ensured that there is an effective assessment and tracking system in place that provides you with a clear analysis of the progress and attainment of

p.3

Inspection findings

each pupil. Teachers have worked with other local schools to ensure that their assessments are accurate. Teachers use assessment information about pupils to plan learning that takes most pupils on from what they already know and can do. All pupils have learning journeys in mathematics and English which, alongside profiles, show recent examples of their work and what their next steps in learning are. Teachers share these regularly with parents, so that parents have a clear understanding of the progress that their child is making.  Teachers and pupils have positive relationships, and pupils willingly follow teacher’s instructions in lessons. Teachers plan lessons which hold pupils’ interest and capture their imagination. Classrooms are attractive; displays celebrate pupils’ work and provide them with helpful prompts and examples of how to make their work better. Pupils develop their key numeracy and literacy skills

p.3

Inspection findings

through the wider curriculum. They are encouraged to discuss and explain what they are learning to deepen their understanding. Staff support pupils to be resilient and have a go when they are faced with a new challenge. This is reinforced through posters on classroom doors such as, ‘this classroom is a mistake making, laughter sharing, independence building, and brain stretching sort of place.’ The pupils who I spoke with said that they enjoy learning and challenge.  Since the last inspection, children’s attainment in the early years and the proportion of pupils meeting the expected standard in the phonics screening check at the end of Year 1 have been consistently above the national average. Pupils are confident and enthusiastic readers and well prepared for key stage 1.  Pupils’ attendance has been above the national average for the last three years. However, persistent absence for pupils who have special educational needs

p.3

Inspection findings

and/or disabilities took a slight dip in 2016. This was mainly due to medical reasons and pupils who took holidays during term time. Leaders are taking all possible steps to maximise pupils’ attendance, and attendance this year is currently back in line with the national average.

p.3

Next steps for the school

Leaders and those responsible for governance should ensure that:

p.4

Next steps for the school

 all teachers consistently provide suitable challenge for the most able pupils, so that more pupils achieve greater depth in writing and mathematics across the school.

p.4

Next steps for the school

I am copying this letter to the chair of the governing body, the director of education for the Diocese of Lincoln, the regional schools commissioner and the director of children’s services for Lincolnshire. This letter will be published on the Ofsted website.

p.4

Information about the inspection

During the inspection, I met with you and shared my key lines of enquiry. I also met with senior leaders and representatives from the governing body, including the vice-chair of governors. I spoke with parents before school and met with a group of pupils in key stage 2 to talk about their school experience. You and I visited all classes and examined pupils’ workbooks, as well as talking to pupils, to evaluate the quality of their learning. We also looked at a sample of pupils’ writing and mathematics books from different year groups. In addition, I scrutinised the school’s safeguarding arrangements and records, including the school’s record of safeguarding recruitment checks on staff. I evaluated the school’s documentation in relation to pupils’ attainment and progress and reviewed the school’s own evaluation of its work and improvement plans. I took account of the 41 responses to Parent View, Ofsted’s online survey, and the 40 responses from parents to the

p.4

Information about the inspection

Ofsted free-text service. There were no responses to Ofsted’s online staff or pupil surveys to take into consideration.

p.4

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion