Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (CIF)

Hartland Primary School

Inspected 9 Mar 2017 · published 19 Apr 2017 · URN 113152

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

Requires improvement

Kathy Maddocks

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    9 Mar 2017

  • Inspectors verified

    Kathy Maddocks

  • Early years verified

    Requires improvement

  • Leadership and management verified

    Requires improvement

  • Outcomes verified

    Requires improvement

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Requires improvement

  • Personal development, behaviour and welfare verified

    Good

  • Previous overall verified

    Good

  • Teaching, learning and assessment verified

    Requires improvement

  • Postcode verified

    EX39 6BP

  • Name on report verified

    Hartland Primary School

  • URN verified

    113152

Page 1 of 11
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2012.

  • OverallRequires improvement
  • Early yearsRequires improvement
  • Leadership and managementRequires improvement
  • OutcomesRequires improvement
  • Personal development, behaviour and welfareGood
  • Teaching, learning and assessmentRequires improvement

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+8Mostly positivemore positive than 38% of reports of this type graded Requires improvement
OutstandingGoodRIInadequate

In line with other reports of this type graded Requires improvement.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseimprovedstrongeffectivelyexceptionalsuccessfulsaferobustvery well
Criticismrequires improvementpoornot yetlackweaknessesnot effectiveinsufficientlynot consistently

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improveLeadershipSafeguardingAbout the inspection positive critical
  • Findings630w−22
  • Leadership85w+33
  • Safeguarding143w+73
  • What needs to improve1645w+9

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
11
Words of findings
2,438
shorter than usual (typical 3064)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 46, typical 47
Average sentence
18 words
Next steps
8
typical 8
Hedged sentences
4%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 20%Leadership 3%Safeguarding 4%What needs to improve 51%About the inspection 22%

Full report text

Hartland Primary School North Road, Hartland, Bideford, Devon EX39 6BP

p.1

Overall effectiveness Requires improvement

p.1

Effectiveness of leadership and management Requires improvement

p.1

Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Requires improvement

p.1

Personal development, behaviour and welfare Good

p.1

Outcomes for pupils Requires improvement

p.1

Early years provision Requires improvement

p.1

Overall effectiveness at previous inspection Good

p.1

Summary of key findings for parents and pupils

This is a school that requires improvement

p.1

Summary of key findings for parents and pupils

 Despite the many improvements that the new headteacher has initiated, standards are not yet good.  Frequent changes in governing body membership have meant that there has been no sustained strategic leadership. Consequently, the headteacher has, in her new post, received insufficiently rigorous support and challenge until recently.  Middle leaders are very new to their positions of responsibility so the impact of their actions is not yet known.  While the quality of teaching has improved, it is not yet securing outcomes that are good, especially in extended writing and in the foundation subjects.  Pupils who have special educational needs and/or disabilities are not making adequate progress because teachers’ expectations are not high enough.  Children in the pre-school and Reception class have the potential to be securing better outcomes more quickly. The recently qualified class teacher and the lead practitioner in the

p.1

Summary of key findings for parents and pupils

pre-school have not made enough of the opportunities for the sharing of planning and information to move learning on more rapidly.

p.1

Summary of key findings for parents and pupils

 Pupils’ behaviour and attitudes are very good and this helps them to focus and learn.  Pupils’ welfare and development are safe and secure as staff pay attention to the detail necessary to avoid risks.  The headteacher has a very inclusive approach and this has enabled staff and pupils to work together well in their determination to make this a good school.

p.1

What does the school need to do to improve further?

 The headteacher and governors must ensure that they: – work together to make improvements more quickly to secure good standards in all areas – raise the expectations of staff so that pupils, including those who have special educational needs and/or disabilities, can achieve their potential – develop and support the middle leaders so that they improve the quality of teaching and pupils’ outcomes in their areas of responsibility – improve leadership for the early years foundation stage so that the monitoring and support of the work in the pre-school and Reception class leads to more children making exceptional progress in their early learning goals.  Improve the quality of teaching by ensuring that: – opportunities for extended writing feature in all subjects and not just literacy lessons.

p.2

What does the school need to do to improve further?

An external review of governance should be undertaken in order to assess how this aspect of leadership and management may be improved.

p.2

Effectiveness of leadership and management Requires improvement

 The headteacher has dealt with many staffing changes and long-term absences since her secondment in September 2015. This affected the speed of implementation and consolidation of the improvements needed to ensure that the school remained good. Staffing is not yet settled and secure but a secondment from the trust has meant the school has enough teachers to cover all classes so better progress in learning is now taking place.  Leadership of the school, including the early years foundation stage and pre-school, has not been able to secure progress rapidly in the many areas that needed addressing following the poor results in 2015 and 2016.  The appointment of a middle leader to take responsibility for mathematics was made in January 2017. Work on reasoning and problem solving is being developed, but it is too soon to comment on its impact.  The use of funding for pupils who have special educational needs and/or disabilities

p.3

Effectiveness of leadership and management Requires improvement

has not been effective in the past and pupils have not made good progress. Since September 2016, the headteacher has secured the services of an independent educational psychologist to identify more effectively those pupils who should be on the special educational needs register. He has supported the special educational needs coordinator in providing better intervention strategies and evaluating their impact in improving pupils’ progress. There has been, so far, greater success in the management of behavioural and attitudinal problems than of academic achievement.  The headteacher’s checks on the quality of teaching have not focused sufficiently on the progress that pupils make. They have been successful in improving pupils’ engagement, enjoyment and development of intellectual curiosity in learning.  The curriculum is broad and balanced and includes subjects such as Spanish. However, it is not providing pupils with enough opportunities to develop their writing skills in

p.3

Effectiveness of leadership and management Requires improvement

other subjects, particularly in key stage 1 and the early years of key stage 2.  The school received much external support from the local authority during the year following the poor results in 2015, which added to the professional dialogue for teaching staff. It did not provide enough rigour or robust evaluation to ensure that improvements were rapid.  The headteacher has engaged and motivated the staff by using continuous professional development to improve teaching and provide leadership opportunities. The school is a part of the local cooperative trust and a teaching school alliance, which has enabled staff to visit local schools and work with other colleagues to improve practice.  The physical education and sport premium funding is used well. Staff are trained effectively and their skills have improved, as well as their confidence. Pupils gain from this by doing a greater range of activities, including dance and tennis.

p.3

Effectiveness of leadership and management Requires improvement

 There are a range of extra-curricular activities, mainly sporting. The headteacher evaluates the attendance of pupils, including those who are disadvantaged or have special educational needs and/or disabilities, to ensure that any barriers to participating are removed.  Leaders have been successful in maintaining engagement with parents despite the lack of daily face-to-face contact because some pupils come to school on buses. The headteacher has initiated mornings where parents come in to work with their children in class, and this has been very well received and appreciated.  The disadvantaged pupils are doing as well as other pupils in the school and achieved as well as or better than other pupils nationally in the end of year tests at key stage 2 in reading, writing and mathematics.  The spiritual, moral, social and cultural education of the pupils is taught well and there are very good links with the local churches. Although pupils go through a democratic

p.3

Effectiveness of leadership and management Requires improvement

process of election to the school council, the fundamental British values, including democracy, are not taught well enough.

p.4

Governance of the school

 There has been a time of turbulence in the governance of the school since the last inspection. This has led to unstable strategic leadership, which has impeded the progress necessary for the school. Several of the governors are new. They are learning about the strategic importance of their role. However, the rigorous support and challenge needed has been absent and the urgency required to manage the improvements has not materialised. It is recommended that a review take place to help speed up the process.

p.4

Safeguarding

 The arrangements for safeguarding are effective.  The headteacher has ensured that pupils are safe and secure in the school at all times. She has raised expectations with regard to safeguarding practices and supported staff in having a better understanding of how to assess risks consistently. This has created a culture of safety.  All safeguarding arrangements are fit for purpose and child protection records are detailed and of high quality. The safeguarding policy is up to date. Staff have been suitably trained in the most recent changes to safeguarding procedures. The headteacher’s senior administrator, who is also clerk to the governors, is one of the designated safeguarding leaders, so her oversight of the safeguarding records provides an additional layer of security as well as information for governance. Staff work sensitively with parents and external agencies to monitor and support the more

p.4

Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Requires improvement

 Teaching over time in writing does not consolidate and deepen pupils’ learning, especially for the younger pupils. This is because expectations are not consistently high enough and extended writing is not set proficiently in the wider curriculum.  Some teachers and teaching assistants are not picking up on pupils’ misconceptions and weaknesses on a regular basis, so pupils continue to make the same mistakes.  Similarly, too often when work is missed because of pupil absence, the topics are not covered with the pupil at a later date, so there are gaps in pupil knowledge.  The teaching of mathematics is strong and there is good evidence of pupils using reasoning and problem solving to develop their mathematical understanding.  Pupils are keen to talk about their learning and what works well for them. They appreciate the challenging tasks that they receive, particularly within the core subjects of English and mathematics.

p.4

Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Requires improvement

 The majority of pupils read fluently. The school provides guidance so pupils know which books to read according to their ability and this builds effectively on prior learning.  There has been intensive training for teachers and teaching assistants in phonics, and this has improved progress for younger pupils in their reading and spelling. There are new initiatives within guided reading to support pupils’ comprehension skills, but it is too soon to measure their impact.

p.5

Personal development and welfare

 The school’s work to promote pupils’ personal development and welfare is good.  Pupils are confident and assured when speaking to each other, teachers and other adults.  Pupils are eager to be successful in their learning and the opportunities provided for special rewards such as the ‘star writers display’ make them determined to do better.  The leader of the sport premium funding has made a significant contribution to the physical well-being of the pupils by boosting the confidence of all staff teaching physical activities and by supporting the extra-curricular clubs on offer, which are well attended.  From the pre-school upwards, pupils are aware of healthy eating and the benefits that this provides. The school kitchen provides daily healthy lunches for pupils and members of the village community.  Pupils are safe and know how to stay safe. They are taught regularly about the dangers of the internet so their awareness of e-safety is good. Bullying incidents are

p.5

Personal development and welfare

very rare. Pupils understand what bullying is and can explain articulately why it is not tolerated in school.

p.5

Behaviour

 The behaviour of pupils is good.  Pupils understand the conduct routines expected when learning. They listen attentively to each other and teachers; they understand the importance of speaking politely and taking turns.  Pupils are very proud of their school and show this constantly. They value the informative displays, both of their own work and that of others.  The integration and management into the school community of pupils with highly complex and demanding needs is a strong feature of the school. Pupils have learned how to respect and work with staff and other pupils.  Overall attendance has improved and the number of pupils who are persistently absent has decreased so that the school is in line with national averages. Likewise, the attendance of some groups, particularly disadvantaged pupils and those who have special educational needs and/or disabilities, is at or close to national averages because

p.5

Behaviour

of the continual work of the headteacher to make a difference for pupils.

p.6

Outcomes for pupils Requires improvement

 Outcomes in 2015 and 2016 at key stage 2 were very poor. In 2016, they placed the school among the bottom 5% of schools nationally in reading and mathematics with regard to pupils’ progress. Pupils taking the end of year tests at key stage 2 were of high ability in the main, so their attainment was in line with the national average in writing and mathematics. However, these outcomes masked the lack of progress from their starting points.  Pupils who have special educational needs and/or disabilities are not making adequate progress because expectations of their achievement are too low. As a result, pupils are not achieving the expected attainment for their ability. The support has focused on nurture rather than on educational standards.  The monitoring of pupils is far more rigorous now and focuses on the achievement and progress of individuals and their needs. Consequently, pupils’ progress is more rapid,

p.6

Outcomes for pupils Requires improvement

especially in mathematics, and is getting closer to national averages.  Older pupils, in Years 5 and 6, are showing greater depth in their knowledge across the curriculum. This is because teaching is developing pupils’ thinking skills effectively through incisive questioning and more challenging tasks.  The careful analysis of the progress of disadvantaged pupils and the refined use of the funding has ensured that these pupils make progress that is at least as good as that of their peers, and often better.  Progress in reading is improving as a result of the changes to teaching within key stage 1. Pupils enjoy the range of books on offer within classes and the library, and the reading done at home and school is assisting in developing the breadth of experience in this area further. However, understanding of inferences and subtleties of writing techniques is not as secure.

p.6

Early years provision Requires improvement

 Some children in the early years, mainly the most able children, do not make the progress of which they are capable. These children are not as well prepared academically for Year 1 as they could be.  Teaching in the Reception class is not fully effective because planning is not detailed or focused on the individual needs of children. Consequently, the plans are not having the desired impact.  Support has been provided in the past year by external advisers, but some support has lacked the rigour necessary to ensure that children are progressing as well as they could.  Although planning is shared between the pre-school and Reception class, there is not sufficient cross-fertilisation of ideas, so progress is not rapid. For example, there is not enough writing done formally in the Reception class and only a limited amount of other work is set to support progress within the different academic elements required. The

p.6

Early years provision Requires improvement

practice in the pre-school is better.  Children respond well to adults. They take responsibility for their actions eagerly. They are keen to learn. Children show resilience and tenacity over an extended time when allowed to do so.  Children are settled in their learning, particularly in Reception. The routines established in both the pre-school and Reception ensure that children respect the equipment used. Children are polite to each other and to staff. They are enthusiastic about being involved and are gaining confidence in their own abilities.  Parents have a good understanding of the progress made by their children; the teacher, pre-school staff and parents actively share information with one another.  Children’s personal and social development is strong because staff know the children well. Activities are set up where children can integrate, learn to share and take turns without undue fuss and bother.

p.7

Early years provision Requires improvement

 Staff have created a learning environment to engage children. However, the threads for literacy and numeracy are not used advantageously enough in Reception, inside and out.  Children are safe and the safeguarding practices are robust.

p.7

School details

This inspection was carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005. The inspection was also deemed a section 5 inspection under the same Act.

p.8

School details

Appropriate authority The governing body

p.8

School details

Email address admin@hartland.devon.sch.uk

p.8

School details

Date of previous inspection 18–19 September 2012

p.8

Information about this school

 The school does not meet requirements on the publication of information about the accessibility plan on its website.  The school is a member of the Atlantic Coast Cooperative Trust with Appledore Primary, Buckland Brewer Primary, Instow Primary, Northam Federation, Parkham Primary, St Mary’s Primary, and Woolsery Primary. It is also a member of the Dartmoor Teaching School Alliance. This is based at Okehampton College and has 16 secondary and 26 primary schools within it.  Hartland Primary School is smaller than the average primary school.  The headteacher was appointed in January 2016.  The proportion of pupils who have special educational needs and/or disabilities is below the national average.  The proportion of pupils supported by the pupil premium funding is above the national average.  The school has a very wide rural catchment area and some pupils travel on three buses to and from school.

p.8

Information about this school

 The school did not meet the government’s current floor standards, which set the minimum expectations for pupils’ attainment and progress in reading, writing and mathematics at the end of Year 6.

p.9

Information about this inspection

 The lead inspector visited lessons jointly with the headteacher.  A wide sample of pupils’ work, from all year groups and a range of subjects, was scrutinised.  The lead inspector talked with a group of pupils from key stage 2, as well as with pupils informally across the site.  Meetings were held with the headteacher, middle leaders and members of the governing body. A telephone call was made to the school improvement officer.  Information was evaluated, including that relating to safeguarding, assessment, school evaluation and external reviews.  The lead inspector took account of the 30 responses to and 18 comments in the online Parent View survey, the 57 responses to the pupil survey and the 19 responses to the staff online survey.

p.10

Inspection team

Kathy Maddocks, lead inspector Her Majesty’s Inspector guidance ‘Raising concerns and making a complaint about Ofsted’, which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.gov.uk/government/publications/complaints-about-ofsted . If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.10

Inspection team

In the report, ‘disadvantaged pupils’ refers to those pupils who attract government pupil premium funding: pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years and pupils in care or who left care through adoption or another formal route. www.gov.uk/pupil-premium-information-for-schools-and- alternative-provision-settings .

p.11

Inspection team

You can use Parent View to give Ofsted your opinion on your child’s school. Ofsted will use the information parents and carers provide when deciding which schools to inspect and when and as part of the inspection.

p.11

Inspection team

You can also use Parent View to find out what other parents and carers think about schools in England. You can visit www.parentview.ofsted.gov.uk , or look for the link on the main Ofsted website: www.gov.uk/government/organisations/ofsted .

p.11

Inspection team

achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.

p.11

Inspection team

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.11

Inspection team

You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open- government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.11

Inspection team

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.11

Inspection team

T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.11

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion