Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · Short school inspection

St Philip's Catholic Primary School

Inspected 23 Mar 2017 · published 19 Apr 2017 · URN 108033

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection datesingle source

    23 Mar 2017

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Gina White

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Good

  • Postcode verified

    LS10 3SL

  • Name on report verified

    St Philip’s Catholic Primary and Nursery School

Page 1 of 4
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2012.

  • OverallGood

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+60Positivemore positive than 37% of reports of this type graded Good
OutstandingGood

In line with other reports of this type graded Good.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praisestrongvery wellcaringexemplaryeffectiverigorousproudenjoy
Criticismconcernsat riskgapsweaknessespersistent absence

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improveAbout the inspection positive critical
  • Findings1346w+59
  • What needs to improve115w+43

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
4
Words of findings
1,447
about usual (typical 1483)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 52, typical 50
Average sentence
18 words
Next steps
2
typical 2
Hedged sentences
7%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 84%What needs to improve 7%About the inspection 9%

Full report text

Store Street Manchester M1 2WD T 0300 123 4234 www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.1

Mrs E Taylor Headteacher St Philip’s Catholic Primary and Nursery School St Philips Avenue Leeds West Yorkshire LS10 3SL

p.1

Short inspection of St Philip’s Catholic Primary and Nursery School

Following my visit to the school on 23 March 2017, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to report the inspection findings. The visit was the first short inspection carried out since the school was judged to be good in June 2012.

p.1

Short inspection of St Philip’s Catholic Primary and Nursery School

The leadership team has maintained the good quality of education in the school since the last inspection.

p.1

Short inspection of St Philip’s Catholic Primary and Nursery School

You provide strong and caring leadership and have a clear vision for the school. Since the previous inspection, you have extended the Reception classes. You work tirelessly to support staff development to benefit pupils. As a result, some teachers have moved on to new promotions elsewhere. You explained how you have reorganised teaching to take account of these changes so that teachers are in classes to best suit their skills and abilities. We discussed the additional responsibilities that your key stage coordinators have to guide and develop three new teachers who began their careers in teaching in September. I am satisfied that you are ensuring they are being supported well.

p.1

Short inspection of St Philip’s Catholic Primary and Nursery School

Pupils’ behaviour remains exemplary: they listen to teachers’ instruction and are focused on their work in lessons. When we visited lessons together, we witnessed behaviour that was consistently well managed by staff. The school is a calm, well ordered and welcoming place to learn. High levels of concentration are sustained very well even by the youngest children in Nursery and Reception. Since the previous inspection, pupils’ attitudes to learning have developed further and pupils want to achieve well. At breaktime and lunchtime, pupils play happily together. Recent investments by the governing body have added to the range of activities and play equipment. Pupils’ enjoyment of active sports and board games has increased. Many pupils are developing new interests and skills such as mastering chess and draughts as a result.

p.1

Short inspection of St Philip’s Catholic Primary and Nursery School

Parents, staff and pupils are very positive about the school. Parents value the school and support its caring yet rigorous academic emphasis. Parents I spoke to said teachers were ‘friendly and approachable’. Staff are proud to work at the school and feel well supported. Most pupils enjoy school and especially the broad curriculum and enrichment opportunities provided. As a result of the carefully structured curriculum, pupils are learning much about their world and the values and ethics the school teaches them. Almost all pupils who responded to the inspection survey said the school encouraged them to respect people from other backgrounds and to treat everyone equally.

p.2

Short inspection of St Philip’s Catholic Primary and Nursery School

The chair of governors is committed and passionate for pupils to have a good education in its fullest sense. However, vacancies and absences are reducing the capacity of the governing body to keep on top of all its work. Their focus on the impact funding is making to improve the learning and progress of disadvantaged pupils and those who have special educational needs and/or disabilities has slipped from their agenda. Some policies have not been reviewed or kept up to date. Governors have prioritised their work and continue to ensure a safe and secure environment for pupils. They manage the budget judiciously and have supported you in your work to tackle the areas for improvement from the previous inspection.

p.2

Short inspection of St Philip’s Catholic Primary and Nursery School

Leaders ensure that all safeguarding arrangements are fit for purpose. Staff recruiting and vetting procedures are thorough and systematically maintained. Training is up to date and all staff know the latest guidance. Lunchtime supervisors know how to identify children at risk and the school procedures for reporting concerns. As the designated lead for safeguarding, you take firm action to make sure that any concerns are reported quickly and pupils are supported. Together with governors, you ensure safeguarding procedures are regularly audited so that pupils at St Philip’s benefit from the latest recommendations and expertise in this area. You took action during this inspection to ensure that the current safeguarding policies were published on the school website. Parents trust the school in the effective care of their children. The care is reflected well and typified in a comment from a parent who said, ‘The school is caring and they ring me to see how my child

p.2

Inspection findings

The following areas were discussed in detail as the focus of the inspection:

p.2

Inspection findings

 I investigated the teaching of mathematics to check whether girls and the most able pupils were making good progress. Staff are becoming skilled in recognising girls who are quiet and they draw them into mathematics activities through individual tuition and working in small groups. Well-planned activities in Nursery and Reception classes are developing early skills. Additional support is encouraging girls to ‘find their voice’, and we saw that children were successfully responding to identify numbers and learning to estimate and differentiate between different sizes. Records of their achievements show that they are rapidly developing their skills and understanding to count, calculate, recognise shapes and measures. School information shows that the gaps between girls’ achievement in mathematics and that of boys are diminishing from this early stage.  Evidence from observations, scrutiny of pupils’ books and discussions shows

p.2

Inspection findings

teaching of specific skills and strategies is effective and confidence is deepening as girls move through the school. Teachers have worked hard and creatively to engage pupils and demonstrate the richness and depth of the subject. Many girls told me they find mathematics fun and enjoy it. For example, one girl explained, ‘It gets my brain moving and I like calculations and looking for patterns.’ Another said, ‘Number problems are really challenging. You’ve got think.’  Awareness of the need to identify pupils whose progress starts to drop now has higher priority in the school. All pupils, particularly the most able, are challenged well and are increasingly able to explain their thinking and to check the accuracy of their work. These skills are currently taught well throughout the school. Leaders are ensuring that those new to teaching are supported well to enable pupils to make rapid progress in mathematics.

p.3

Inspection findings

 Some girls with high prior attainment did not realise that same achievement in 2016. Current pupils are making strong progress. Teaching in Year 6 is fast paced: pupils respond very well to the high level of challenge to solve increasingly complex problems. Pupils said, ‘I’ve got used to explaining my thinking as I’ve moved up through the school. I’ve found I think like this in other subjects.’ We saw evidence of this during our visits to classrooms and saw pupils applying these approaches in writing to explain their ideas, the reasons for them and checking the quality of their work before they presented it to their teachers.  I reviewed the progress the school had made to improve assessment. Revised assessment systems are firmly established in the early years. Checks I made show that detailed assessments diagnose children’s strengths and weaknesses. Teachers use the information to inform their teaching plans. Consequently,

p.3

Inspection findings

children make a strong start to reading. Progress in mathematics is a little slower initially but school information shows that the pace has picked up this term.  Assessment records set out small steps that individual pupils need to make in reading, writing and mathematics. As a result, key stage 2 pupils are more aware of what their next step is and they are proud of the progress they have made over time. You know there is more to do to refine assessment systems to keep a rigorous check on the progress that groups of pupils are making across the school, especially disadvantaged pupils and those who have special educational needs and/or disabilities.  In response to a high proportion of persistent absence in 2015 of disadvantaged pupils, we discussed the strategies you are using to improve attendance. I examined the current attendance and progress of the group of disadvantaged pupils and it is clear that strategies to raise their attendance have been

p.3

Inspection findings

successful. These pupils have caught up. Gaps in their reading, writing and mathematics are quickly diminishing.

p.3

Next steps for the school

Leaders and those responsible for governance should ensure that:

p.4

Next steps for the school

 analysis and reporting of current pupils’ performance, especially disadvantaged pupils and those who have special educational needs and/or disabilities, is sharper in order to identify dips in performance earlier and take swift action to address  attendance at governing body meetings improves and vacancies are filled swiftly in order that the governing body is more effective in holding the school to account.

p.4

Next steps for the school

I am copying this letter to the chair of the governing body, the director of education for the Diocese of Leeds (RC), the regional schools commissioner and the director of children’s services for Leeds. This letter will be published on the Ofsted website.

p.4

Information about the inspection

During the inspection, I met with you and we talked about the improvements that had been made since the last inspection and examined the school’s self-evaluation document. I also looked at all safeguarding records and explored your recruitment and vetting procedures. Together, we visited a number of classes including the Nursery, and classes in key stage 1 and 2. I met with members of your leadership team, teachers and the chair and a member of the governing body. I had a discussion with six pupils from Year 3 and Year 4. I also took account of the views of pupils through the 109 responses to the inspection’s online survey available to pupils. I also considered 10 responses from staff and the 45 responses submitted by parents through Ofsted’s online questionnaire, Parent View. Additionally, I spoke to a few parents during the inspection.

p.4

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion