Early years · Early years inspection (CIF)
Edenham Pre-School
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Group verified
Julie Marshall
- Group reference verified
RP512641
- Inspection date verified
16 Mar 2017
- Inspectors verified
Jude Sanders
- Early years verified
Good
- Leadership and management verified
Inadequate
- Outcomes verified
Requires improvement
- Overall effectiveness verified
Inadequate
- Personal development, behaviour and welfare verified
Inadequate
- Previous overall verified
Good
- Teaching, learning and assessment verified
Requires improvement
- Postcode verified
PE10 0LY
- Name on report verified
Edenham Pre-School
- URN verified
253776
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2014.
- OverallInadequate
- Early yearsGood
- Leadership and managementInadequate
- OutcomesRequires improvement
- Personal development, behaviour and welfareInadequate
- Teaching, learning and assessmentRequires improvement
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type graded Inadequate.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Following a change in management personnel, the provider has taken some initial steps to address areas of weakness but these have yet to be embedded. p.4
- Following a previous complaint, the nursery has failed to respond to legal notices issued by Ofsted. p.1
- The arrangements for safeguarding are not effective. p.4
- Leaders and managers have failed to demonstrate that they have taken action to meet statutory safeguarding requirements highlighted by Ofsted previously. p.4
- As a result, children's safety and well-being are potentially put at risk. p.4
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- The provision is inadequate and Ofsted intends to take enforcement action p.2
- Staff make insightful observations about children's learning and are able to demonstrate a sound knowledge of children's progress and development. p.4
- At times however, staff do not always challenge the most able children through their teaching or the resources made available to them. p.4
- Staff make good use of the woodland environment surrounding the nursery to inspire children's interest in the world around them. p.4
- For example, pre-school children enjoyed a walk to the woods to collect blossom to be used as a stimulus for future artistic creations. p.4
- The nursery staff work with parents to form an initial assessment of children's development as they begin attending the setting. p.4
- At important milestones however, assessment information is not shared in a timely manner with parents. p.4
- This is with particular reference to the progress check at age two. p.4
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 6
- Words of findings
- 903
- about usual (typical 907)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 45, typical 48
- Average sentence
- 18 words
- Next steps
- 8
- typical 7
- Hedged sentences
- 6%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Edenham Pre-School Grimsthorpe Estate, Grimsthorpe, BOURNE, Lincolnshire, PE10 0LY
p.1
Inspection date
Previous inspection date 16 March 2017 9 May 2014
p.1
This inspection: Inadequate 4
Effectiveness of the leadership and management Inadequate 4
p.1
This inspection: Inadequate 4
Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Requires improvement Personal development, behaviour and welfare Inadequate 4
p.1
This inspection: Inadequate 4
Outcomes for children Requires improvement
p.1
This provision is inadequate
Following a previous complaint, the nursery has failed to respond to legal notices issued by Ofsted. As a result, the nursery is not meeting the statutory requirements in place to keep children safe. This is in relation to records of children's hours of attendance and making sure documents are available to view at the time of an inspection. Staff do not have a secure understanding of what may disqualify a person from working with children and how this may apply to them. The manager has not gathered information about staff members' previous employment when they have been recruited to work at the nursery. The nursery does not make regular arrangements to share information about children's progress reviews with parents. Staff members at the nursery do not have regular one-to-one meetings with the manager to review the quality of their work and discuss any issues of concern. The manager does not monitor the progress of groups of children at the nursery.
p.1
This provision is inadequate
The nursery has not shared information with parents about any additional funding which may be available for children.
p.1
It has the following strengths
Staff at the nursery provide a range of exciting experiences for children to support their learning and development. Staff work hard to develop very positive relationships with children and their parents.
p.1
What the setting needs to do to improve further
The provision is inadequate and Ofsted intends to take enforcement action
p.2
What the setting needs to do to improve further
We will issue a Welfare Requirements Notice requiring the provider to:
p.2
Due Date
ensure that records held at the setting are easily accessible and available 29/03/2017
p.2
Due Date
ensure that a daily record of the names of the children being cared for on the premises and their hours of attendance is maintained 29/03/2017
p.2
Due Date
improve staff's knowledge of the wider safeguarding agenda in order that staff are able to confidently interpret disqualification legislation 29/03/2017
p.2
Due Date
ensure that safer recruitment practices are implemented consistently for all staff at the setting 29/03/2017
p.2
Due Date
establish a programme of supervision for staff to provide support, coaching and training and opportunities for confidential discussion. 29/03/2017
p.2
Due Date
To meet the requirements of the early years foundation stage the provider must:
p.2
Due Date
provide opportunities for information from children's progress check at age two to be shared with parents and other relevant professionals 21/04/2017
p.2
Due Date
ensure that the progress of groups of children is more accurately assessed and monitored. 21/04/2017
p.2
Due Date
To further improve the quality of the early years provision the provider should:
p.2
Due Date
ensure that a system is in place to monitor the effectiveness of additional funding available for example the Early Years Pupil Premium.
p.2
Inspection activities
The inspector observed the quality of teaching in all rooms of the nursery and in the outdoor play areas. The inspector carried out a joint observation with the acting manager. The inspector spoke to members of staff at appropriate times during the inspection and held a meeting with the provider of the nursery. The inspector looked at children's records, evidence of the suitability of staff working in the nursery and a range of other documentation, including policies and procedures. The inspector spoke to a selection of parents during the day and took account of their views.
p.3
Effectiveness of the leadership and management is inadequate
The arrangements for safeguarding are not effective. The management team has not ensured that all staff are fully aware of disqualification legislation. In addition, the systems in place for the safe recruitment of staff are not robust enough. Leaders and managers have failed to demonstrate that they have taken action to meet statutory safeguarding requirements highlighted by Ofsted previously. As a result, children's safety and well-being are potentially put at risk. There is no system of performance management in place or structured programme of professional development for staff. Following a change in management personnel, the provider has taken some initial steps to address areas of weakness but these have yet to be embedded.
p.4
Quality of teaching, learning and assessment requires improvement
Staff make insightful observations about children's learning and are able to demonstrate a sound knowledge of children's progress and development. At times however, staff do not always challenge the most able children through their teaching or the resources made available to them. Staff make good use of the woodland environment surrounding the nursery to inspire children's interest in the world around them. For example, pre-school children enjoyed a walk to the woods to collect blossom to be used as a stimulus for future artistic creations. The nursery staff work with parents to form an initial assessment of children's development as they begin attending the setting. At important milestones however, assessment information is not shared in a timely manner with parents. This is with particular reference to the progress check at age two.
p.4
Personal development, behaviour and welfare are inadequate
The repeated failure to ensure that all safeguarding requirements are met significantly impacts on the quality of provision for children's welfare at the nursery. Staff demonstrate warm relationships with children in their care. Babies are encouraged to explore their surroundings as staff model good behaviour and provide clear boundaries to keep children safe. For example, babies are reminded to consider others around them when experimenting with throwing balls inside. All children at the setting use the outdoor environment regularly and gain a wealth of fresh air and exercise to keep them healthy. Children are encouraged to be independent and to consider the impact of their decisions. For example, pre-school children were supported by a practitioner to join in a group activity and to think about how it would make them feel should they miss out on this.
p.4
Outcomes for children require improvement
Most children make typical progress from their starting points. Staff begin to support children to develop key skills they will need for starting school at any early age. Children's physical skills are well developed as they are encouraged to use a range of tools and equipment to support the muscle development in their hands. As the setting does not monitor the progress of groups of children, it is unclear whether gaps are closing for those children who may have special educational needs, speak English as an additional language or who may be entitled to additional funding.
p.4
Setting details
Unique reference number 253776 Local authority Lincolnshire Inspection number 1085479 Type of provision Full-time provision Day care type Childcare - Non-Domestic Registers Early Years Register, Compulsory Childcare Register, Voluntary Childcare Register Age range of children 0 - 10 Total number of places 46 Number of children on roll 145 Name of registered person Julie Marshall
p.5
reference number
Date of previous inspection 9 May 2014 Telephone number 01778 591368
p.5
reference number
Edenham Pre-school operates from buildings on the Grimsthorpe Castle Estate, Bourne, Lincolnshire. The pre-school also provides after school care called the Red Deer Rangers. The pre-school employs 17 members of childcare staff. Of these, 13 hold appropriate early years qualifications at level 3 and above. It is open Monday to Friday, all year round. Red Deer Rangers operates throughout the holidays. The setting is open from 7.30am – 6pm.
p.5
reference number
This inspection was carried out by Ofsted under sections 49 and 50 of the Childcare Act 2006 on the quality and standards of provision that is registered on the Early Years Register. The registered person must ensure that this provision complies with the statutory framework for children’s learning, development and care, known as the early years foundation stage.
p.5
reference number
procedures set out in the guidance ‘Complaints procedure: raising concerns and making complaints about Ofsted’, which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.gov.uk/government/organisations/ofsted. If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk. achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, work-based learning and skills training, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection.
p.5
reference number
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk. You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/, write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .
p.6
reference number
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our website for news, information and updates at www.ofsted.gov.uk/user.
p.6
reference number
T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/government/organisations/ofsted
p.6
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion