Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · Short school inspection

Lowfield Community Primary School

Inspected 7 Mar 2017 · URN 106997

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection datesingle source

    7 Mar 2017

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Lesley Butcher

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Good

  • Postcode verified

    S2 4NJ

  • Name on report verified

    Lowfield Community Primary School

Page 1 of 4
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.

  • OverallGood

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+58Positivemore positive than 32% of reports of this type graded Good
OutstandingGood

In line with other reports of this type graded Good.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praisestrongeffectivesuccessfullyimprovedambitiousvery effectiveeffectivelyrapid progress
Criticismbelowpersistent absenceat riskweaknessespersistently absentlow

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improveAbout the inspection positive critical
  • Findings1051w+60
  • What needs to improve122w0

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
4
Words of findings
1,160
shorter than usual (typical 1483)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 49, typical 50
Average sentence
20 words
Next steps
2
typical 2
Hedged sentences
7%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 78%What needs to improve 9%About the inspection 13%

Full report text

Store Street Manchester M1 2WD T 0300 123 4234 www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.1

Mr Christopher Holder Headteacher Lowfield Community Primary School London Road Sheffield South Yorkshire S2 4NJ

p.1

Short inspection of Lowfield Community Primary School

Following my visit to the school on 7 March 2017, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to report the inspection findings. The visit was the first short inspection carried out since the school was judged to be good in February 2012.

p.1

Short inspection of Lowfield Community Primary School

The leadership team has maintained the good quality of education in the school since the last inspection. Lowfield Primary School serves a truly multicultural community at the heart of the city of Sheffield. Pupils, many of whom are new to English, are quickly assimilated into the school, thanks to the very inclusive ethos effectively promoted by you and your governors. The school receives pupil premium for half of its pupils.

p.1

Short inspection of Lowfield Community Primary School

In 2016, pupils’ attainment at the end of key stage 2 was below national averages in reading and writing but above national averages in mathematics. However, pupils’ progress through key stage 2 was rapid in these subjects so that Lowfield was in the top 20% of schools for progress in key stage 2, when compared to others nationally. Progress in mathematics was particularly strong. Your current assessment information shows that in the majority of classes, current pupils are working below the levels typical for their age. However, their progress is good overall and in some year groups is rapid.

p.1

Short inspection of Lowfield Community Primary School

At the previous inspection, you were asked to improve rates of progress in key stage 1. Pupil mobility is high, with around 25% of pupils moving school between key stages. You and your staff are successfully meeting the complex language and social and emotional needs of the many pupils who join you at different times during the school year. In 2016, pupils’ attainment and progress at the end of key stage 1 was below national averages. While those pupils who have been with you since Reception made secure progress, overall, boys and disadvantaged pupils did not make enough progress from the early years to the end of Year 2. Leaders know that further improvements in teaching are still needed in key stage 1 to make sure more pupils start key stage 2 ready to learn.

p.1

Short inspection of Lowfield Community Primary School

At the previous inspection, you were also charged to improve the quality of teaching across the school. Since then you have introduced individual targets for pupils and raised teachers’ expectations of what pupils will achieve. You have enabled teachers to improve their craft through regular and specific training and opportunities to visit other schools to observe strong practices. As a result, the quality of teaching across school is improving, although it is currently more effective in the early years and key stage 2.

p.2

Short inspection of Lowfield Community Primary School

Since the previous inspection, you have worked closely with parents to improve attendance and reduce persistent absence. You have introduced a raft of incentives and rewards to encourage pupils to come to school regularly and on time. You have had success in improving the attendance of some pupils and attendance rates have improved overall. Despite this, a few boys continue to be persistently absent and attendance is slightly below the national average.

p.2

Short inspection of Lowfield Community Primary School

You and your governors have ensured that detailed safeguarding policies underpin robust safeguarding procedures. Staff in the early years have ensured that the statutory welfare requirements are met. Risk assessments are in place for all aspects of school activity and staff are vigilant. All staff are aware of the duty to protect pupils who might be at risk from radical views.

p.2

Inspection findings

 You provide strong and ambitious leadership for all staff and pupils at Lowfield and have the respect and affection of parents and governors. You are a national leader of education with a track record of effectively supporting other schools.  Governors are knowledgeable about the strengths and weaknesses in the school. They are effective in their roles, helping to promote the school’s values and to raise the profile of education in the community.  Teaching in the early years is highly successful. The vast majority of children arrive at school from a large number of pre-school settings, with skills and abilities below those typically seen. Due to very effective leadership, and focused provision and teaching over time, children make rapid progress from their starting points. The proportion of children achieving a good level of development has improved for three consecutive years and, in 2016, was just above the

p.2

Inspection findings

national average.  As a result of leaders’ ongoing support and training, most teaching is effective in meeting the needs of pupils over time. Teachers ensure pupils are working on tasks that are well matched to their abilities. Teachers’ expectations of what pupils can achieve are high and pupils are rising to these expectations, taking pride in their work and presenting it well. Teaching assistants are providing effective support to enable pupils with low prior attainment or those who have special educational needs and/or disabilities to achieve.  You have made pupils’ learning in reading, writing and mathematics the cornerstone of your work, successfully equipping pupils with the skills they need to access education at high school. You and your staff have ensured that all pupils have a secure knowledge of other faiths and cultures and that their understanding of what it means to live in modern Britain is well developed. As a

p.2

Inspection findings

result, pupils’ spiritual, moral, social and cultural understanding is a strength of the school. Pupils’ artwork on display around the school shows attention to detail and many opportunities to develop artistic skills through a range of media. Pupils speak highly of their learning in physical education lessons. However, pupils’ attainment in science is below national averages at the end of key stages 1 and 2. Pupils’ books show that they do not have sufficient opportunities to use and apply their scientific skills in practical situations.  Pupils’ attitude to learning is a joy to behold because of a consistently ambitious can-do attitude successfully promoted by school leaders. You insist on a ‘no excuses’ culture and believe pupils can make progress no matter what challenges they face. Thus, the vast majority of pupils fulfil their potential by the end of key stage 2, and, importantly, are happy and secure in their sense of belonging at

p.3

Next steps for the school

Leaders and those responsible for governance should ensure that:

p.3

Next steps for the school

 teaching and learning in key stage 1 improve further, so that a greater proportion of boys and disadvantaged pupils start key stage 2 ready to learn  planning in science is improved so that pupils are able to develop, use and apply their scientific knowledge to explore and investigate through practical activities  they continue to work with families and carers to diminish the amount of persistent absence, ensuring that all pupils come to school regularly and on time.

p.3

Next steps for the school

I am copying this letter to the chair of the governing body, the regional schools commissioner and the director of children’s services for Sheffield. This letter will be published on the Ofsted website.

p.3

Information about the inspection

During this one-day inspection, I was able to discuss the work of the school with you and your staff. We visited classrooms together to observe teaching and learning. I was able to look at pupils’ work in books and to speak with pupils throughout the day. I listened to pupils read. Discussions with the school improvement partner and five members of the governing body helped to provide me with additional information. School documentation, assessment information, policies and information posted on the school website were also taken into account. I took into account a letter from a parent and 10 parents’ responses to Ofsted’s online questionnaire, Parent View. I looked at the 19 responses to Ofsted’s online staff questionnaire, and 18 pupils’ responses. My main areas of focus during the inspection included checking: what leaders have done to improve the quality of teaching across the school; how well leaders have improved standards in

p.3

Information about the inspection

mathematics; the effectiveness of teaching in key stage 1 and the quality of learning across the curriculum.

p.4

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion