Schools & FE · School inspection (CIF)
Clayton Brook Primary School
Summary
Sally Kenyon (lead), Kathy Nichol, Mavis Smith
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
8 Mar 2017
- Inspectors verified
Kathy Nichol, Mavis Smith, Sally Kenyon
- Early years verified
Requires improvement
- Leadership and management verified
Good
- Outcomes verified
Good
- Overall effectiveness verified
Good
- Personal development, behaviour and welfare verified
Good
- Previous overall verified
Good
- Teaching, learning and assessment verified
Good
- Postcode verified
PR5 8HL
- Name on report verified
Clayton Brook Primary School
- URN verified
119331
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2013.
- OverallGood
- Early yearsRequires improvement
- Leadership and managementGood
- OutcomesGood
- Personal development, behaviour and welfareGood
- Teaching, learning and assessmentGood
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
Reads more critically than most reports of this type graded Good.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Pupils make good progress in key stage 1 due to consistently good teaching and swift intervention for those children who did not get off to a good start in the Nursery or Reception Years. p.1
- The headteacher and her team have high expectations and care very much about the pupils they serve. p.3
- They thoroughly enjoyed their learning and behaved impeccably due to excellent relationships, and the good use p.4
- Standards in reading are improving due to a strong focus on teaching comprehension and inference. p.5
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Ensure that children make good progress in the Nursery and Reception Years by: – improving the teaching of phonics – creating more opportunities for children to discover numbers, letters and sounds, particularly in the outdoor provision – raising the profile of reading at home – monitoring the quality of provision more rigorously to see what teaching is typically like. p.2
- Continue to improve pupils’ outcomes in key stages 1 and 2 by: – focusing on the teaching of comprehension, spelling and grammar – ensuring that teaching consistently challenges the most able pupils. p.2
- Standards in the Nursery and the Reception Year are not good enough. p.6
- The outcomes and provision in the early years do not reflect the standards and expectations in the rest of the school. p.6
- The majority of children enter the Nursery Year with starting points well below those typical for their age. p.6
- Typically, one third of children enter Year 1 without achieving a good level of development. p.6
- This is because the quality of teaching in the Nursery and Reception Years is not good enough. p.6
- Expectations of what the children can achieve, particularly in the Nursery Year, are too low. p.6
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 10
- Words of findings
- 2,034
- shorter than usual (typical 2966)
- Reading level
- Fairly hard
- Flesch 51, typical 48
- Average sentence
- 16 words
- Next steps
- 8
- typical 2
- Hedged sentences
- 10%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Clayton Brook Primary School Great Greens Lane, Bamber Bridge, Preston, Lancashire PR5 8HL
p.1
Effectiveness of leadership and management Good
p.1
Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Good
p.1
Personal development, behaviour and welfare Good
p.1
Early years provision Requires improvement
p.1
Overall effectiveness at previous inspection Good
p.1
Summary of key findings for parents and pupils
Pupils behave well and attend school regularly. This is primarily because leaders and managers use the pupil premium funding well and invest heavily in pupils’ well-being. A lot of time and effort is put into providing effective support for pupils and families whose circumstances may make them vulnerable. Parents and grandparents are effusive in their praise for the school. They feel that this is a very inclusive school and children are cared for well and kept safe. Pupils make good progress in key stage 1 due to consistently good teaching and swift intervention for those children who did not get off to a good start in the Nursery or Reception Years. The vast majority of pupils enter key stage 2 with standards in line with the national average. The proportion of pupils achieving the expected standard in mathematics and writing last year was broadly average. This represents good progress from their below-average starting
p.1
Summary of key findings for parents and pupils
points. Pupils’ attainment in reading fell short of national expectations because their comprehension skills were underdeveloped. This year there has been a successful focus on improving the teaching of inference and comprehension. Leaders and teachers now assess pupils’ work much more regularly and accurately. The quality of teaching for the most able pupils is improving. This year the proportion of pupils achieving above national expectations is set to rise. Members of the governing body know the school well. They have supported senior leaders to tackle underperformance and to strengthen teaching. Governors continue to expect the very best for the pupils they serve. Although children’s behaviour and relationships in the Nursery Year are good, standards are not high enough. This is at odds with the rest of the school. Phonics is not taught well enough in the Nursery or Reception Years, and opportunities
p.1
Summary of key findings for parents and pupils
are missed to develop children’s recognition of numbers, letters and sounds, particularly in the outdoor area. The headteacher has rightly identified that standards are not as good in the Nursery and Reception Years. Although support is in place, the monitoring of teaching in these classes is not rigorous enough.
p.1
What does the school need to do to improve further?
Ensure that children make good progress in the Nursery and Reception Years by: – improving the teaching of phonics – creating more opportunities for children to discover numbers, letters and sounds, particularly in the outdoor provision – raising the profile of reading at home – monitoring the quality of provision more rigorously to see what teaching is typically like. Continue to improve pupils’ outcomes in key stages 1 and 2 by: – focusing on the teaching of comprehension, spelling and grammar – ensuring that teaching consistently challenges the most able pupils.
p.2
Effectiveness of leadership and management Good
The headteacher and her team have high expectations and care very much about the pupils they serve. They have an accurate view of standards across the school and know the strengths and weaknesses well. Parents are very supportive of the school’s work. A typical comment was: ‘I feel Clayton Brook is a really good school. My son has additional needs; they have gone out of their way to make us feel welcome and support us the best they can.’ Leaders and managers have responded well to the dip in reading results. They gave all staff training on high-quality guided reading and the new national expectations. A teacher has been employed to work individually with pupils to boost their reading skills. The pupil premium funding is used well to provide very good pastoral support, particularly for pupils whose circumstances may make them potentially vulnerable. It is also used to provide good-quality small-group work, for example for pupils who find
p.3
Effectiveness of leadership and management Good
mathematics difficult. The primary school sport and physical education funding is used to fund lunchtime and after-school clubs to promote fitness and well-being. In addition, Year 5 pupils take part in the ‘run a mile challenge’; they run a timed circuit of the playground every Monday morning with the aim of improving their time. The funding for pupils who have special educational needs and/or disabilities is used well to provide good-quality support. Leaders and managers are strategically shifting the focus of support back to the classroom to underpin ‘quality first’ teaching. This is having a positive impact on pupils’ learning. The creative curriculum engages pupils and offers lots of opportunities for them to explore science and humanities. Leaders have an expectation that teaching will be as consistently good in all subjects as it is in English and mathematics. There are many extra-curricular clubs and visits. For example, the whole school went
p.3
Effectiveness of leadership and management Good
to Tatton Park for the Roald Dahl Day to inspire them to read more. Pupils’ spiritual, moral, social and cultural development is promoted well. As a result, pupils behave well and show respect for each other. The school receives good support from the local authority school improvement partner and benefits from being part of a local cluster to share good practice and moderate assessments.
p.3
Governance of the school
Members of the governing body are highly committed to the school. They have a good understanding of current standards and took swift and decisive action after the disappointing results last year. Governors have supported the headteacher well to tackle weaknesses in teaching. The governing body has challenged senior leaders effectively about the standards pupils achieve, although minutes of governing body meetings do not always reflect this.
p.3
Safeguarding
The arrangements for safeguarding are effective. The single central record meets requirements, and policies and procedures are up to date and thorough. All relevant staff have been appropriately trained to deal with all aspects of child protection, including the prevention of terrorism and safer recruitment. Pupils say that they feel safe in school, and parents agree. The school keeps careful records of child protection issues and involves other agencies in a timely manner. Records show that small concerns are always followed up quickly and can often lead to the discovery of wider concerns. The school engages well with other agencies to support pupils and their families.
p.4
Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Good
Pupils are taught well in reading, writing and mathematics. The most able Year 2 pupils learned well in mathematics due to clear exemplification from the teacher, good support from the teaching assistant and a high level of challenge. Similarly, in mathematics the most able Year 6 pupils made rapid gains in their learning when they were taught as a separate ability group by a member of the senior leadership team. They were carefully guided through complex methodology with great success. Year 6 pupils who have special educational needs and/or disabilities were observed learning really well due to some very well-targeted support and small-group tuition. Spelling and grammar is generally taught well. In Year 1, the most able pupils discussed knowledgeably the use of punctuation in a text. They thoroughly enjoyed their learning and behaved impeccably due to excellent relationships, and the good use
p.4
Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Good
of praise and reward. They show a very good understanding of grammar. However, there remain occasions where there is not enough attention to accurate spelling and grammar and where the most able pupils unnecessarily repeat learning they already understand, which inhibits their progress.
p.4
Personal development and welfare
The school’s work to promote pupils’ personal development and welfare is good. Pupils were very polite to inspectors and keen to say how much they enjoyed school. They said that bullying is rare and if it does happen, they tell a teacher and it will be dealt with straight away. The many parents spoken with by inspectors and who responded to the online Ofsted questionnaire, Parent View, were delighted with the way behaviour is managed at school and say they have not had any issues with bullying. On the rare occasions that bullying does occur, it is dealt with quickly and effectively by the teacher. A great deal of time and effort is spent supporting children and families whose circumstances may make them vulnerable. As a result, pupils feel safe in school and teachers are well equipped to support them.
p.4
Behaviour
The behaviour of pupils is good. This is due to engaging teaching and the consistent implementation of the school’s behaviour and reward system. In the school hall at lunchtime, pupils eat sensibly and show a great deal of care for others. Lunchtimes are very well supervised. Pupils choose their lunchtime activity and they are well organised into groups. There is plenty for everyone to do so pupils behave well; lunchtimes are harmonious and fun. Attendance is in line with the national average overall and continues to be above the national average for many groups, due to the consistent and well-managed approach to following up absences and supporting families. Classrooms are bright and welcoming. Pupils behave well and know that if anyone’s behaviour falls short of expectations, they will ‘move to amber’ on the traffic light system. Pupils say that rarely does anyone ‘go on red’ – an indication that good
p.5
Outcomes for pupils Good
There is a large amount of inward mobility to school. Last year 38 pupils joined key stage 2 and seven pupils joined part-way through Year 6. This means that published data does not provide a true reflection of pupils’ progress. Most children enter the Nursery class with skills and abilities well below those typical for their age. Standards at the end of key stage 2 in writing, mathematics and across a range of subjects are broadly average, which demonstrates good progress from pupils’ starting points. Standards in reading are improving due to a strong focus on teaching comprehension and inference. Although outcomes in reading are set to improve in Year 6, it rightly remains an area of focus across the school. Extra funding for pupils who have special educational needs and/or disabilities is used well. This group make good progress due to effective support to help to close gaps in their understanding and to enhance these pupils’ social and emotional skills.
p.5
Outcomes for pupils Good
The most able pupils do not always make good progress because teaching does not consistently stretch and challenge their abilities. However, this is rapidly improving, particularly in mathematics, because leaders and managers have focused on improving pupils’ performance in this subject. The pupil premium funding is largely spent on providing small-group teaching and pastoral support. This is work is effective and represents good use of the funding. It enables many disadvantaged pupils to have high attendance and behave well, despite their potentially vulnerable circumstances.
p.5
Early years provision Requires improvement
Standards in the Nursery and the Reception Year are not good enough. The outcomes and provision in the early years do not reflect the standards and expectations in the rest of the school. The majority of children enter the Nursery Year with starting points well below those typical for their age. Typically, one third of children enter Year 1 without achieving a good level of development. This is because the quality of teaching in the Nursery and Reception Years is not good enough. Expectations of what the children can achieve, particularly in the Nursery Year, are too low. Leaders and managers have rightly recognised and begun to address the weaknesses in Nursery Year provision. They have also tackled some weak teaching in the Reception Year. However, some further staff training is needed to ensure that expectations of what children can achieve before they start Year 1 are high enough. In the Nursery class, children were listening to a story. While they found it interesting
p.6
Early years provision Requires improvement
at first, their attention waned when it went on too long and failed to capture their imaginations. A number of other adults in the room were not used well to ensure that children made good progress. The teaching of phonics is not challenging enough. This prevents some children, particularly the most able, from making good progress. The Reception Year classroom is bright and stimulating and the curriculum is well organised and interesting. The outdoor area is underdeveloped. There is a missed opportunity to encourage children to recognise letters and numbers while they happily play outside. Behaviour is good and relationships are strong. Children are well cared for. Parents say their children have settled in well to the Nursery and Reception classes and enjoy coming to the school.
p.6
School details
This inspection was carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005. The inspection was also deemed a section 5 inspection under the same Act.
p.7
School details
Appropriate authority The governing body
p.7
School details
Email address head@claytonbrook.lancs.sch.uk
p.7
School details
Date of previous inspection 12 March 2013
p.7
Information about this school
There is a part-time Nursery class, which children attend for mornings only. Stability at the school is well below the national average. There are high levels of inward mobility. The school is smaller than the average primary school. The proportion of pupils eligible for support from the pupil premium is twice the national average. The proportion of pupils who have special educational needs and/or disabilities is high. The proportion of pupils from minority ethnic groups is below the national average. The proportion of pupils who speak English as an additional language is also below average. The school meets requirements on the publication of specified information on its website. The school meets the government’s current floor standards, which are the minimum expectations for pupils’ attainment and progress in reading, writing and mathematics at the end of Year 6. The school receives support from the local authority school improvement partner.
p.7
Information about this inspection
Inspectors observed children in the Nursery and Reception Years and pupils across the school. Inspectors scrutinised pupils’ work, school policies, and records relating to safeguarding, self-evaluation information and a range of other documentation. There were 11 responses to the Ofsted online questionnaire, Parent View, to be considered. Inspectors spoke with many parents in the school playground before school and at the end of the school day. Inspectors met with members of the governing body. Meetings were also held with senior and middle leaders and the school improvement partner.
p.9
Inspection team
Sally Kenyon, lead inspector Ofsted Inspector
p.9
Inspection team
Kathy Nichol Ofsted Inspector guidance ‘Raising concerns and making a complaint about Ofsted’, which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.gov.uk/government/publications/complaints-about-ofsted . If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.9
Inspection team
In the report, ‘disadvantaged pupils’ refers to those pupils who attract government pupil premium funding: pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years and pupils in care or who left care through adoption or another formal route. www.gov.uk/pupil-premium-information-for-schools-and- alternative-provision-settings .
p.10
Inspection team
You can use Parent View to give Ofsted your opinion on your child’s school. Ofsted will use the information parents and carers provide when deciding which schools to inspect and when and as part of the inspection.
p.10
Inspection team
You can also use Parent View to find out what other parents and carers think about schools in England. You can visit www.parentview.ofsted.gov.uk , or look for the link on the main Ofsted website: www.gov.uk/government/organisations/ofsted .
p.10
Inspection team
achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.
p.10
Inspection team
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.10
Inspection team
You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open- government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .
p.10
Inspection team
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .
p.10
Inspection team
T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.10
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion