Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

The Beauty Academy Ltd

Inspected 2 Mar 2017 · URN 1237200

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Steve Hunsley (lead), Bev Cross, Gary Adkins, Kathleen Tyler

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection datesingle source

    2 Mar 2017

  • Inspectors verified

    Bev Cross, Gary Adkins, Kathleen Tyler, Steve Hunsley

  • Name on report verified

    The Beauty Academy Ltd

  • URN verified

    1237200

Page 1 of 10
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

−19Mixedmore positive than 15% of reports of this type

Reads more critically than most reports of this type.

Praiseeffectivelyeffectivesafesuccessfullyindependentmake good progresshigh-qualityvery high
Criticismtoo fewtoo manyweaknot effectivetoo slowinadequateconcernsineffective

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improveLeadershipSafeguarding positive critical
  • Findings575w−53
  • Leadership645w−22
  • Safeguarding163w−60
  • What needs to improve1056w+44

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
10
Words of findings
2,356
longer than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 37, typical 45
Average sentence
19 words
Next steps
8
typical 5
Hedged sentences
7%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 19%Leadership 22%Safeguarding 5%What needs to improve 35%About the inspection 19%

Full report text

Further education and skills inspection report

p.1

The Beauty Academy Ltd Independent learning provider

p.1

Inspection dates 28 February–2 March 2017

p.1

Overall effectiveness Inadequate Effectiveness of leadership and management Inadequate Adult learning courses Inadequate

p.1

Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Requires improvement Personal development, behaviour and welfare Requires improvement Outcomes for learners Inadequate

p.1

Overall effectiveness at previous inspection Not previously inspected

p.1

Summary of key findings

 Safeguarding arrangements and processes are ineffective and weak.  Too few learners on flexible ‘long’ courses make sufficient progress, remain on their programme and achieve their qualifications.  Too few learners progress into further training or employment on completion of their programme.  The processes and procedures for observing and improving the quality of teaching, learning and assessment are weak.  Leaders have not fulfilled their obligations under the ‘Prevent’ duty; learners do not have an understanding of how to keep themselves safe from the threats of radicalisation and/or from extremist groups.  Too many learners do not receive sufficient information, advice and guidance to ensure that they understand the assessment requirements of the course or further training and work opportunities available to them.  Leaders have not taken effective action to ensure that tutors identify English and mathematics errors in learners’ work or

p.1

Summary of key findings

encourage learners to improve their English and mathematics skills.  Leaders have been too slow to implement effective quality improvement arrangements and take sufficient action to improve the quality of provision. Self-assessment and quality improvement arrangements are weak.  Leaders do not use data sufficiently well to monitor learners’ progress or to inform the self- assessment process.

p.1

Summary of key findings

The provider has the following strengths

p.1

Summary of key findings

 Current learners on recently introduced ‘short’ courses make good progress and most achieve their qualification.

p.1

Information about the provider

 The Beauty Academy Ltd is an independent learning provider and has a training centre in the city of Cambridge with further training centres in London, Birmingham and Manchester. It provides specialist training in beauty therapy for adult learners as part of the government advanced learner loan initiative.

p.2

What does the provider need to do to improve further?

 Urgently ensure that all safeguarding arrangements and processes are effective.  Monitor rigorously the progress of learners on flexible ‘long’ courses and ensure that they are better prepared for their assessments and examinations.  Secure the destinations of learners on completion of their courses so as to inform accurately the planning of the curriculum.  Apply robust quality assurance processes in order for the evaluation of the provision to be accurate; put in place a challenging and realistic action plan using accurate performance data and information that will help lead to rapid improvement.  Improve the quality of teaching, learning and assessment by ensuring that: – tutors plan and sequence effectively assessment for learners on flexible ‘long’ courses – tutors plan learning sessions to meet the different abilities of learners in order for them to make the progress expected of them – tutors enable learners to improve and develop good English and mathematics skills

p.2

What does the provider need to do to improve further?

– leaders provide effective feedback to tutors on the quality of teaching, learning and assessment practice and that all improvement actions are monitored thoroughly within agreed timescales.  Ensure that obligations under the ‘Prevent’ duty are met. Leaders should ensure that staff and learners understand how to keep themselves safe from the threats of radicalisation and/or from extremist groups.

p.2

Effectiveness of leadership and management Inadequate

 Leaders have been too slow to implement effective quality improvement arrangements, resulting in inadequate outcomes for learners, and teaching, learning and assessment that require improvement. Self-assessment is insufficiently critical and the quality improvement plan does not set sufficient actions and targets to improve the overall quality of provision. The observation process has for too long focused on assessment and compliance against lesson planning criteria rather than on the quality of teaching and learning or the progress learners make. Observers do not provide sufficient feedback so that tutors know what they need to do to improve their teaching practice. The collection and use of learner exit feedback are underdeveloped and the small sample to date indicates that too many learners are not satisfied with their learning experience.  Leaders do not scrutinise data well enough to monitor performance and implement

p.3

Effectiveness of leadership and management Inadequate

appropriate actions to improve. Leaders do not collect and evaluate routinely data on learners’ progress and achievement. Leaders do not monitor the destinations of learners in order to identify rates of progression into employment or further learning and inform their planning of the curriculum. Strategic planning does not use data to plan appropriate medium and long-term specific and measurable targets to improve the quality of provision.  Leaders do not have an effective strategy to promote the development of English, mathematics and information and communication technology (ICT) skills of learners. Tutors are not encouraged to highlight learners’ shortfalls in spelling and grammar. Tutors do not encourage learners to develop further these skills or direct them to appropriate learning support resources. Centres are not equipped with ICT equipment, such as computers, to help learners gain these skills. Tutors do not ensure that learners’ starting

p.3

Effectiveness of leadership and management Inadequate

points are established to inform their teaching practice or identify learners’ skills gaps or support needs.  Leaders have not established productive working partnerships with relevant organisations to better support learners, enrich their experience and ensure that they receive impartial information, advice and guidance. Although a small number of employers engage and advertise job vacancies on a linked website, very few learners take up the opportunities to make contact. Links with appropriate agencies to raise awareness of self-employment, to provide insight into relevant industries or to refer to other learning opportunities are poor. These relationships have not been developed to consider work experience placements or to further promote awareness of working in the industry.  Leaders have taken effective action to revise the curriculum. The recently introduced ‘short’ course for massage is meeting learners’ employment needs and leaders’ data

p.3

Effectiveness of leadership and management Inadequate

indicates high achievement rates. Leaders have stopped recruitment onto the poorly performing ‘long’ courses in make-up and nail technology. Leaders have recently implemented improvements effectively as they have become aware of underperformance. For example, at one London centre a highly experienced tutor was appointed to improve the quality of teaching and learning and as a consequence performance has improved.  Leaders ensure that vocational teaching and learning resources are of good quality and these are now being used effectively by the majority of tutors and learners on ‘short’ courses. Each training centre is well equipped for beauty therapy training, with high- quality physical resources replicating industry standards. Recently introduced learning videos enable tutors to enhance their practice and bolster their teaching.

p.3

The governance of the provider

 The two directors of The Beauty Academy Ltd have close operational involvement in the business and have only very recently become aware of some of the significant improvements that are needed to improve the quality of the provision. However, to date they have not monitored performance and the quality of provision effectively. They have insufficient understanding of the requirements of delivering government-funded learning provision.  Leaders’ strategic planning is not formalised sufficiently to plan effectively to secure medium- and long-term aims and objectives which ensure high-quality teaching, learning and assessment and enable learners to improve their English, mathematics and ICT skills.

p.4

Safeguarding

 The arrangements for safeguarding are not effective.  Leaders have not undertaken Disclosure and Barring Service checks for most staff, including the designated safeguarding officer. Leaders have not established appropriate systems to ensure that any safeguarding concerns are followed through to a satisfactory conclusion.  Too few leaders, tutors or staff have undertaken any training around safeguarding or the ‘Prevent’ duty in order for them to ensure that learners understand how to keep themselves safe. Leaders have very recently identified appropriate training for staff and plans are now in place for staff to complete this as a matter of urgency.  Leaders do not promote British values to ensure that learners are prepared for life in modern Britain. Leaders, staff and learners do not receive sufficient training in British values, or equality and diversity.  Learners are not informed sufficiently on how to stay safe online. However, learners say

p.4

Safeguarding

they feel safe and understand to whom and how to report any concerns.

p.4

Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Requires improvement

 The large majority of current learners attend a ‘long’ flexible learning course with block study at one of three centres over a six-, nine- or 12-month period. A small minority of current learners attend ‘short’ 16-week courses, of two days a week, combined with further independent study. Leaders introduced the ‘short’ courses at the beginning of the academic year.  Too many learners following flexible ‘long’ courses do not complete their practical assessments and examinations or make the progress expected of them. Leaders and tutors do not ensure they establish information on learners’ starting points or that feedback following assessment enables learners to improve their knowledge and understanding.  Leaders and tutors do not prepare learners on flexible ‘long’ courses well enough for their formal assessments. Tutors do not ensure that learners understand fully their formal assessment requirements or they do not attend on the set times and/or dates.

p.4

Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Requires improvement

Consequently, not enough learners complete their courses successfully.  Tutors do not ensure that their theory teaching engenders the more able learners to make the progress of which they are capable. For example, too much work is set at the same pace and level and does not provide learners with sufficient opportunities to deepen their understanding and knowledge.  Learners improve their speaking and communication skills well. However, tutors do not pay sufficient attention to the development of learners’ writing skills. Tutors do not determine learners’ English and mathematics starting points or provide learners with necessary feedback on significant errors in their spelling of key vocabulary and terminology or on their use of punctuation.  Tutors are skilled and experienced, with good, current industry expertise, that they apply appropriately in practical sessions. Tutors make learning interesting and relevant for

p.5

Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Requires improvement

learners and enable learners to gain high levels of confidence in their development of a wide range of practical skills in beauty therapy. Learners on ‘short’ courses, the minority of the total volume of learners, receive good feedback and coaching in their practical sessions on how to improve and refine their skills further. As a result, they are clear what is expected of them and most work to these high standards.  Most tutors utilise good-quality learning resources, including workbooks, diagrams, photographs and industry-standard salons, to reinforce learning effectively. For example, learners on ‘short’ courses gain a good understanding of facial muscles, using helpful worksheets and clear diagrams, which enable them to apply daytime, special occasion and evening facial make-up adeptly.  Most learners on ‘short’ courses work productively in sessions and diligently complete independent work between sessions. For example, they produce illustrative case studies

p.5

Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Requires improvement

and a good standard of photographic evidence that demonstrate good skills development in their own time.  Learners improve their understanding of diversity in relation to the diverse practical needs of individual clients, for example their differing body types and skin tones. Learners demonstrate good levels of tolerance and respect for their tutors and for each other. However, tutors do not promote equality in their theory teaching and consequently, few learners improve their understanding.

p.5

Personal development, behaviour and welfare Requires improvement

 Tutors do not enable learners to improve their English, mathematics and ICT skills as part of their learning courses. Tutors do not correct poor spelling, especially technical words and terminology; they do not motivate learners to use mathematics in their industry, for example, by calculating ratios and proportions when mixing products used in the beauty industry.  Leaders and tutors do not promote the full range of career pathways or future training opportunities available to learners on completion of their courses. For example, too few learners access the dedicated website used by a few employers to promote their job vacancies.  Leaders and tutors have not provided training or promoted learners’ awareness of British values or the dangers faced from those who promote extremism or radicalisation. Consequently, too many learners do not have an understanding of such fundamental aspects of life in modern Britain.

p.5

Personal development, behaviour and welfare Requires improvement

 Too many learners on flexible ‘long’ courses drop out of learning. A very high proportion of learners on ‘short’ courses attend their learning sessions, are punctual and adopt professional attitudes to their learning. For example, these learners wear their uniform with pride, show respect to each other and communicate well with their tutors and clients.  Learners pay good attention to health and hygiene and their application in practical and professional beauty therapy practice. For example, learners are aware of the need to use disposable applicators to avoid cross-contamination when applying mascara to different clients.  The small minority of learners who study on ‘short’ courses develop good practical skills valued by employers as part of their training. Almost all learners on ‘short’ courses complete an additional qualification at level 2 as a part of their study at level 3. As a result, these learners widen their understanding of different beauty treatments and adopt

p.6

Personal development, behaviour and welfare Requires improvement

a broader skills base.  Learners on ‘short’ courses improve their readiness for the workplace. For example, they often improve their confidence and communication skills working in pairs or teams to solve problems effectively.

p.6

Outcomes for learners Inadequate

 Too few learners following flexible ‘long’ learning courses achieve their qualifications and complete their programme. For example, in 2015/16 only a quarter of learners achieved their qualifications and only one tenth did so in the expected timescales.  Leaders’ data for current learners enrolled on ‘long’ learning courses indicates that only a small minority have achieved their courses or are on target to do so in 2016/17. Too many learners studying ‘long’ courses do not complete their portfolios or make progress. Too many current learners on ‘long’ learning courses have either suspended their learning or have withdrawn from their programme with no opportunity to complete and achieve their qualifications.  Significant achievement gaps exist between different groups of learners and between the different training centres for learners on ‘long’ courses. For example, a higher proportion of learners from minority ethnic backgrounds achieve better than White British learners.

p.6

Outcomes for learners Inadequate

Learners training at centres in London do not achieve as well as those in other areas of the country, such as Birmingham.  Too few learners move into further training or employment on completion of their courses. Leaders do not know the destinations of most learners on completion of their courses.  Leaders’ data for the small minority of learners studying the recently introduced ‘short’ courses indicates a large majority complete successfully and all within their expected timescales. However, the proportion is only around a fifth of the total of current learners on courses.  Almost all current learners on ‘short’ courses develop their practical skills well. They make progress towards the development of their practical skills, enjoy their learning and make at least the progress expected of them. Most of the current learners on ‘short’ courses are on target to achieve their qualifications.

p.6

Provider details

Type of provider Independent learning provider

p.8

Provider details

Approximate number of all learners over the previous full contract year Principal/CEO Mr Terry Hadley

p.8

Provider information at the time of the inspection

Main course or learning programme level Level 1 or below Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 or above Total number of learners (excluding apprenticeships) 16–18 19+ 16–18 19+ 16–18 19+ 16–18 19+

p.8

Provider information at the time of the inspection

- - - - - 262 - - Number of apprentices by apprenticeship level and age Intermediate Advanced Higher

p.8

Provider information at the time of the inspection

16–18 19+ 16–18 19+ 16–18 19+ - - - - - - Number of traineeships 16–19 19+ Total - - - Number of learners aged 14 to None

p.8

Provider information at the time of the inspection

Number of learners for which the provider receives high- needs funding None

p.8

Provider information at the time of the inspection

Funding received from: Skills Funding Agency

p.8

Provider information at the time of the inspection

At the time of inspection, the provider contracts with the following main subcontractors: None

p.8

Information about this inspection

The inspection team was assisted by the academy principal, as nominee. Inspectors took account of the provider’s most recent self-assessment report and development plans. Inspectors used group and individual interviews and online questionnaires to gather the views of learners; these views are reflected within the report. They observed learning sessions, assessments and progress reviews. The inspection took into account all relevant provision at the provider.

p.9

Inspection team

Steve Hunsley, lead inspector Her Majesty’s Inspector

p.9

Inspection team

Kathleen Tyler Ofsted Inspector guidance ‘Raising concerns and making a complaint about Ofsted’, which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.gov.uk/government/publications/complaints-about-ofsted . If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.9

Inspection team

Learner View Learner View is a website where learners can tell Ofsted what they think about their college or provider. They can also see what other learners think about them too. To find out more go to www.learnerview.ofsted.gov.uk .

p.10

Inspection team

Employer View Employer View is a website where employers can tell Ofsted what they think about their employees’ college or provider. They can also see what other employers think about them too. To find out more go to www.employerview.ofsted.gov.uk .

p.10

Inspection team

excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.

p.10

Inspection team

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.10

Inspection team

You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open- government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk

p.10

Inspection team

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.10

Inspection team

T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.10

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion