Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (CIF)

Leyland St Mary's Roman Catholic Primary School

Inspected 2 Mar 2017 · published 28 Mar 2017 · URN 119677

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

Requires improvement

Emma Jackson (lead), Ann Dimeck, David Blackburne, Gary Bevin

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    2 Mar 2017

  • Inspectors verified

    Ann Dimeck, David Blackburne, Emma Jackson, Gary Bevin

  • Early years verified

    Good

  • Leadership and management verified

    Requires improvement

  • Outcomes verified

    Requires improvement

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Requires improvement

  • Personal development, behaviour and welfare verified

    Good

  • Previous overall verified

    Good

  • Teaching, learning and assessment verified

    Requires improvement

  • Postcode verified

    PR25 2QA

  • Name on report verified

    Leyland St Mary’s Roman Catholic Primary School

  • URN verified

    119677

Page 1 of 11
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2012.

  • OverallRequires improvement
  • Early yearsGood
  • Leadership and managementRequires improvement
  • OutcomesRequires improvement
  • Personal development, behaviour and welfareGood
  • Teaching, learning and assessmentRequires improvement

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+20Mostly positivemore positive than 62% of reports of this type graded Requires improvement
OutstandingGoodRIInadequate

In line with other reports of this type graded Requires improvement.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseeffectiveimprovedvery wellstrongextremelyenjoyrobustimproving
Criticismnot alwaysrequires improvementnot consistentlynot yetvariableinconsistentnot effectiveweaknesses

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improveLeadershipSafeguardingAbout the inspection positive critical
  • Findings583w+22
  • Leadership123w+39
  • Safeguarding96w+68
  • What needs to improve1755w+11

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
11
Words of findings
2,480
about usual (typical 3064)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 48, typical 47
Average sentence
15 words
Next steps
8
typical 8
Hedged sentences
12%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 18%Leadership 4%Safeguarding 3%What needs to improve 54%About the inspection 21%

Full report text

Leyland St Mary’s Roman Catholic Primary School Haig Avenue, Leyland, Lancashire PR25 2QA

p.1

Overall effectiveness Requires improvement

p.1

Effectiveness of leadership and management Requires improvement

p.1

Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Requires improvement

p.1

Personal development, behaviour and welfare Good

p.1

Outcomes for pupils Requires improvement

p.1

Overall effectiveness at previous inspection Good

p.1

Summary of key findings for parents and pupils

This is a school that requires improvement

p.1

Summary of key findings for parents and pupils

 School leaders have not maintained the overall good quality of teaching seen at the time of the previous inspection. As a result, pupils do not achieve consistently well, particularly in reading.  Leaders do not always check accurately enough on the quality of teaching, learning and assessment. Teaching is variable in quality.  Sometimes, learning is not always challenging enough and not enough is expected of the most able pupils.  Governors do not always hold leaders closely enough to account to ensure that expectations are consistently high.  Pupils are not given enough opportunities to practise and use their reading skills. Not enough pupils achieve the standards expected of them by the time they leave the school.  Current assessment information indicates that pupils are making better progress than previously. However, this progress is not rapid enough to ensure that pupils achieve the standards of which they are capable.

p.1

Summary of key findings for parents and pupils

 The behaviour of pupils is good. Pupils are polite, well-mannered and the large majority enjoy coming to school.  Relationships in school are strong. Pupils value the care and support they have from adults.  The early years provision is good. Children get off to a good start because teaching is effective and relationships are strong.  The attendance and punctuality of disadvantaged pupils has improved, because families receive very good support to ensure that pupils attend school.  Procedures to keep pupils safe are robust. Staff ensure that policies and procedures are implemented consistently.

p.1

What does the school need to do to improve further?

 Improve leadership and management by: – ensuring that leaders make regular checks on the quality of teaching – ensuring that all leaders rigorously hold teachers to account for the progress pupils make.  Improve teaching and learning to raise pupils’ achievement by: – increasing teachers’ expectations so that pupils make the progress of which they are capable – ensuring that activities are challenging enough for the most able – giving pupils more opportunities to read widely and often, and to practise their comprehension skills.

p.2

Effectiveness of leadership and management Requires improvement

 The headteacher was rightly disappointed with the achievement of pupils in 2016. She quickly set about improving the quality of teaching to raise pupils’ progress, but these improvements are not yet rapid enough. The quality of teaching is still too variable across the school.  Leaders make checks on the quality of teaching, but these checks do not focus closely enough on ensuring that teachers have high expectations of what pupils, particularly the most able, can achieve.  Arrangements for the management of staff performance are in place. Staff have valued the effective professional development provided by the deputy headteacher. This has led to improvements in teaching. Nonetheless, the training that teachers have received to help them to teach reading has not been effective enough. Consequently, pupils’ achievement in reading requires improvement.  The use of funding to support disadvantaged pupils is not yet fully effective.

p.3

Effectiveness of leadership and management Requires improvement

Disadvantaged pupils’ progress is not yet rapid enough across all subjects. The use of the funding to support pupils’ emotional well-being, however, has resulted in an improvement in the attendance of disadvantaged pupils. Consequently, they are now beginning to make better progress, particularly in writing and mathematics.  Leaders use funding well to support pupils who have special educational needs and/or disabilities. Consequently, these pupils now make better progress from their starting points than previously, albeit inconsistently so in reading.  The government’s sport premium funding is spent well. For example, specialist coaches deliver physical education lessons and, increasingly, more pupils take part in sporting activities. This contributes to pupils developing healthy lifestyles.  The curriculum is broad and balanced, and pupils enjoy studying a range of topics, which contribute to their understanding of the world in which they live. Pupils’ learning

p.3

Effectiveness of leadership and management Requires improvement

is enhanced by a range of visits and visitors, for example pupils in Year 5 visit the local museum and pupils in Year 6 experience a residential visit. Pupils are given opportunities to develop their art and musical skills, for instance Year 5 pupils studied the work of Picasso and produced their own successful interpretations of his work.  Pupils have an understanding of British values. A different value is celebrated each month and pupils receive awards in assembly for demonstrating that value. They have gained an understanding of democracy through a topic on the Ancient Greeks. They have also learned about other faiths and cultures through assemblies and circle time. This allows them to develop an understanding of tolerance.  Pupils’ spiritual, moral, social and cultural development is good. Pupils have opportunities to be involved in a range of experiences, for example the school choir, which performed in the local community. Other pupils have visited local theatres and

p.3

Effectiveness of leadership and management Requires improvement

different places of worship. Pupils regularly contribute to a range of charities, including collecting food for vulnerable families in their own community.  The adviser from the local authority has provided effective support for leaders, particularly governors, many of whom are new to their role. He has an accurate view of the school’s position and has made a value contribution to improvements in the school. For example, governors now have a better understanding of the data used to help measure the school’s effectiveness.

p.3

Governance of the school

 Some governors are new to their role and are keen to help improve the school, but currently they do not hold leaders closely enough to account for the quality of teaching and the progress that pupils make.  Recently, because of effective support from the local authority, governors have a better understanding of the assessment information they are given. As a result, they are more aware of the strengths and weaknesses of the school.  Governors have a good understanding of the way in which the pupil premium funding is spent. They know that the appointment of a family support worker has improved disadvantaged pupils’ attendance. Governors know, however, that funding needs to have a more positive effect on disadvantaged pupils’ progress.

p.4

Safeguarding

 The arrangements for safeguarding are effective.  One of the strengths of the school is the relationships between pupils and adults. There is a climate of trust, and this helps to ensure a strong culture of safeguarding. The family support worker has very good relationships with disadvantaged families to ensure that they receive appropriate support.  Staff have a good understanding of safeguarding procedures; they are well trained and know how to keep pupils safe.  The school’s single central record of the checks that are carried out on all staff are thorough and compliant.

p.4

Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Requires improvement

 The quality of teaching, learning and assessment is not consistently good across the school. Senior leaders have started to improve the quality of teaching, and there is effective teaching in some subjects and in some year groups. However, teachers do not always have high-enough expectations about what pupils can achieve, and, consequently, their progress is not rapid enough, particularly in reading.  The most able pupils do not always reach the standards of which they are capable, because sometimes teachers do not stretch these pupils’ understanding and encourage them to think more deeply.  The teaching of reading is inconsistent. Not enough pupils read often enough to improve their reading skills, and there are insufficient opportunities for pupils to practise their comprehension skills and deepen their understanding of the books they are reading.  When teaching is most effective, teachers ask searching questions, match the work to

p.4

Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Requires improvement

the abilities of the pupils and make it crystal clear what they intend pupils to learn. When the teaching is less effective, pupils are not always clear what they are learning and how best to improve.  The teaching of mathematics is effective. Pupils have opportunities to use practical equipment to solve problems and use their reasoning skills. As a result, the progress pupils are making in mathematics is improving.  The teaching of writing is improving. Leaders recognise that pupils would benefit from opportunities to write even more regularly to help pupils to progress more rapidly.  The teaching of phonics has improved recently, and younger pupils better use their phonics skills to help them read unfamiliar words.  Teachers provide regular homework in English and mathematics, which most pupils enjoy completing. Homework helps to consolidate pupils’ skills, particularly in writing and mathematics.

p.4

Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Requires improvement

 Teaching in science and history allows pupils to gain a range of knowledge about a variety of topics. For example, pupils in Year 2 had a good understanding of the events that occurred during the Great Fire of London. Year 4 pupils were able to recount how people lived in the Stone Age.

p.5

Personal development and welfare

 The school’s work to promote pupils’ personal development and welfare is good.  Pupils say everyone gets along together well. They have a good understanding of the different forms of bullying, including prejudiced-based bullying. They say on the very rare occasion that bullying does occur, it is dealt with swiftly and effectively by teachers.  Pupils say they feel safe in school and the vast majority of parents agree. Pupils know how to keep themselves safe on the internet. Even the youngest pupils could tell inspectors ‘you need to check before you click’.  Pupils are proud of their school and they say that all children are welcome in their school regardless of race, gender or background.

p.5

Behaviour

 The behaviour of pupils is good.  Pupils and staff say that behaviour has improved in recent months. This is because behaviour is very well managed. Pupils who sometimes have difficulty controlling their actions are very well supported and do not disturb the work of others.  Pupils are polite and well-mannered and they move around school in an orderly fashion. Many pupils were observed by inspectors holding doors open and saying please and thank you.  There has recently been an improvement in the proportion of disadvantaged pupils who attend school regularly. The school has robust procedures to chase up absentees and ensure that they attend school regularly. Overall attendance is improving less rapidly, but this is mainly due to an outbreak of illness in the autumn term.  There has also been a significant improvement in pupils’ punctuality. Most pupils are now on time for school because they are keen to get the day off to a good start.

p.5

Outcomes for pupils Requires improvement

 Outcomes in the national assessments and tests in 2016 showed a below average proportion of pupils attained the expected standard, particularly in reading and writing in both key stages 1 and 2. Leaders recognised the areas of concern, and put strategies in place to secure improvements. Although there is evidence of better progress for all pupils, this is not yet rapid enough, particularly in reading.  Current assessment information and work in pupils’ books indicate that pupils now make better progress in writing and mathematics than previously.  The number of pupils who achieved the expected standard in the Year 1 phonics check improved in 2016. Currently, pupils in Year 1 are making better progress in phonics, and more are working at the level expected for their age. This is because there is a clear focus on the use of phonics to read unfamiliar words.  The proportion of pupils achieving the higher standards was well below the national

p.6

Outcomes for pupils Requires improvement

average in 2016. In reading, for example, pupils are not always able to precisely deduce information from a text, or clearly discuss why an author chooses the words they use.  Pupils who have special educational needs and/or disabilities are well supported in their learning, but the progress that they make is not always consistently high enough, particularly in reading. This is because they are not always given enough opportunities to talk about what they are reading.  Disadvantaged pupils’ progress is too variable. In some year groups, leaders’ work to improve the progress of disadvantaged pupils is successful, and the difference between the school’s disadvantaged pupils and other pupils nationally is diminishing. However, the progress of these pupils is not consistently high across the school. The progress of the most able disadvantaged pupils is also inconsistent because teachers do not always have high enough expectations of these pupils.

p.6

Outcomes for pupils Requires improvement

 The school’s current assessment information, coupled with pupils’ work, highlights that achievement in reading is not as good as it could be. This is predominantly because there are not enough opportunities for developing reading comprehension skills across the school.  Achievement in mathematics is improving. Pupils are more confident at problem solving and reasoning mathematically. More pupils now work at the level expected for their age.  Pupils now make better progress in writing. Pupils have more opportunities to develop the skills of grammar, punctuation and spelling, but leaders acknowledge that pupils would benefit from writing even more frequently so that they have opportunities to apply these skills.

p.6

Early years provision Good

 The new leadership in the early years has ensured that teaching has rapidly improved. As a result, children make much better progress. More children are now on track to achieve a good level of development at the end of Reception.  Overall, children enter the Nursery with skills and knowledge that are typically below those expected for their age. Good teaching and an early emphasis on language acquisition and development in the first few months mean children make rapid progress and attain well.  Teachers and teaching assistants know the children extremely well and there are excellent relationships. Adults probe, question and engage with children to develop their learning across all areas of the curriculum. For example, a group of children acted out rowing a pirate ship to Australia. Skilful, adult-led discussion allowed the children to demonstrate their knowledge of telescopes and sea creatures. Other children worked

p.7

Early years provision Good

independently to make puppets and then produced a show about princesses.  Children are extremely keen to learn and are very inquisitive and resilient in their learning. A group of children in the Reception class built boats for the gingerbread man. One child commented, ‘this will float because it is made of plastic’.  Children enjoy learning outdoors; one group of children were busy working together to build a bridge. They demonstrated sustained concentration and an ability to listen to each other’s opinions.  Behaviour is good. Adults are calm, kind and caring and they attend to the needs of children very well.  The procedures for assessing the children are robust. Teachers and other adults observe and talk with children about their learning. They then move the children on in their learning or create activities to match their interests.  Relationships with parents are good, and parents say they value the chance to talk with

p.7

Early years provision Good

staff each morning. Parents are asked to a play a part in their children’s learning in a variety of ways, including by telling the school about ‘wow’ moments at home. This involvement contributes to the good progress children make.  Children are extremely safe and staff ensure that rigorous safeguarding policies are kept up to date and implemented. At the time of the inspection, there were no breaches to welfare requirements.

p.7

School details

This inspection was carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005. The inspection was also deemed a section 5 inspection under the same Act.

p.8

School details

Appropriate authority The governing body

p.8

School details

Website www.st-marys-leyland.lancs.sch.uk

p.8

School details

Email address bursar@st-marys-leyland.lancs.sch.uk

p.8

School details

Date of previous inspection 6–7 December 2012

p.8

Information about this school

 The school does not meet requirements on the publication of information about the pupil premium on its website.  This is a larger than average-sized primary school.  The majority of pupils are of White British backgrounds.  The proportion of pupils who have special educational needs and/or disabilities is above the national average.  The proportion of disadvantaged pupils is above the national average.  There have been a number of changes to the leadership team since the last inspection, including a new headteacher and new chair of the governing body. There have also been a number of changes to the teaching staff.  The local authority has supported the school since the previous inspection.  The school meets the government’s current floor standards, which are the minimum expectations for pupils’ attainment and progress in reading, writing and mathematics by the end of Year 6.

p.8

Information about this inspection

 Inspectors observed teaching in lessons.  Inspectors listened to pupils reading. They looked at examples of pupils’ work and observed pupils at lunchtime and break times.  Inspectors held meetings with pupils, staff, members of the governing body and a representative from the local authority. They spoke with parents as they brought their children to school.  There were 62 responses to the Ofsted online questionnaire, Parent View. There were 23 responses to staff questionnaires.  Inspectors looked at a range of documents, including data on pupils’ current progress across the school, the school’s view of its own effectiveness, and how the school checks on the quality of teaching and learning.  Inspectors checked the arrangements for safeguarding pupils and looked at records relating to behaviour and attendance.

p.10

Inspection team

Emma Jackson, lead inspector Ofsted Inspector

p.10

Inspection team

Gary Bevin Ofsted Inspector guidance ‘Raising concerns and making a complaint about Ofsted’, which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.gov.uk/government/publications/complaints-about-ofsted . If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.10

Inspection team

In the report, ‘disadvantaged pupils’ refers to those pupils who attract government pupil premium funding: pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years and pupils in care or who left care through adoption or another formal route. www.gov.uk/pupil-premium-information-for-schools-and- alternative-provision-settings .

p.11

Inspection team

You can use Parent View to give Ofsted your opinion on your child’s school. Ofsted will use the information parents and carers provide when deciding which schools to inspect and when and as part of the inspection.

p.11

Inspection team

You can also use Parent View to find out what other parents and carers think about schools in England. You can visit www.parentview.ofsted.gov.uk , or look for the link on the main Ofsted website: www.gov.uk/government/organisations/ofsted .

p.11

Inspection team

achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.

p.11

Inspection team

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.11

Inspection team

You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open- government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.11

Inspection team

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.11

Inspection team

T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.11

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion