Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (CIF)

St Peter's Church of England Aided Junior School

Inspected 8 Mar 2017 · URN 112921

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    8 Mar 2017

  • Inspectors verified

    Dorothy Bathgate, Jennifer Digges, Peter Bell, Sarah Chadwick

  • Leadership and management verified

    Requires improvement

  • Outcomes verified

    Requires improvement

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Requires improvement

  • Personal development, behaviour and welfare verified

    Good

  • Previous overall verified

    Good

  • Teaching, learning and assessment verified

    Requires improvement

  • Postcode verified

    DE23 6FZ

  • Name on report verified

    St Peter’s Church of England Aided Junior School

  • URN verified

    112921

Page 1 of 10
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.

  • OverallRequires improvement
  • Leadership and managementRequires improvement
  • OutcomesRequires improvement
  • Personal development, behaviour and welfareGood
  • Teaching, learning and assessmentRequires improvement

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+24Mostly positivemore positive than 71% of reports of this type graded Requires improvement
OutstandingGoodRIInadequate

In line with other reports of this type graded Requires improvement.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseeffectivelyenjoyeffectivepositivesuccessfullymake good progressstrongextremely
Criticismnot consistentlyrequires improvementnot alwaysnot good progressbelowat riskweaknot met

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improveLeadershipSafeguardingAbout the inspection positive critical
  • Findings791w+22
  • Leadership169w+41
  • Safeguarding133w−6
  • What needs to improve1758w+26

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
10
Words of findings
2,779
about usual (typical 3064)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 44, typical 47
Average sentence
18 words
Next steps
8
typical 8
Hedged sentences
7%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 23%Leadership 5%Safeguarding 4%What needs to improve 50%About the inspection 19%

Full report text

St Peter’s Church of England Aided Junior School Thornhill Road, Littleover, Derby DE23 6FZ

p.1

Overall effectiveness Requires improvement

p.1

Effectiveness of leadership and management Requires improvement

p.1

Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Requires improvement

p.1

Personal development, behaviour and welfare Good

p.1

Outcomes for pupils Requires improvement

p.1

Overall effectiveness at previous inspection Good

p.1

Summary of key findings for parents and pupils

This is a school that requires improvement

p.1

Summary of key findings for parents and pupils

 Pupils are not making consistently good progress from their different starting points in reading, writing and mathematics.  The school’s partnership with its feeder infant school is not well enough established to ensure that pupils have continuity of learning between key stages 1 and 2.  Teaching, learning and assessment require improvement because teachers’ expectations of what pupils can achieve are not consistently high enough, particularly for the most able pupils. This means that they do not make fast enough progress.  Disadvantaged pupils make slower progress than other pupils do nationally, particularly in reading and mathematics.  Teachers do not consistently plan activities that offer the right amount of challenge to match pupils’ abilities.  Leaders check the quality of teaching regularly. They do not provide feedback to teachers, however, that evaluates how successfully pupils are learning or gives clear points for

p.1

Summary of key findings for parents and pupils

teachers to improve their practice.  Teachers do not give pupils sufficient opportunities to practise their literacy and numeracy skills across the curriculum. Consequently, their basic skills are not as well developed as they could be, particularly in longer pieces of writing.  The school’s plans for improvement do not contain measures of success that are linked to pupils’ achievement. As a result, senior leaders and governors are not able to check regularly that their plans are working.

p.1

Summary of key findings for parents and pupils

 Pupils behave well and enjoy coming to school. This is reflected in their above-average rates of attendance.  Pupils’ personal development is good and the school promotes safeguarding effectively.  The school has good relationships with parents, who are supportive of the school and its leaders.  The school promotes pupils’ spiritual, moral, social and cultural development effectively. As a result, pupils are well prepared for life in modern Britain.  The school is making effective use of the primary physical education and sport funding to ensure that pupils participate in a wide range of sports.

p.1

What does the school need to do to improve further?

 Improve the effectiveness of leadership and management by: – working more closely with senior leaders from the feeder infant school to check the accuracy of assessments so that pupils have continuity of learning between key stages 1 and 2 – sharpening leaders checks on pupils’ attainment and progress so that they can quickly tackle underachievement and any inconsistencies in teachers’ practice – ensuring that pupils have enough opportunities to develop their literacy and numeracy skills across the curriculum – ensuring that the pupil premium is used effectively to accelerate the progress of disadvantaged pupils – refining plans for improvement so that they include regular and clear measures of success so that senior leaders and governors can check the school’s performance more robustly.  Improve the quality of teaching and learning so that pupils achieve more highly by: – ensuring that teachers raise their expectations of what pupils can achieve,

p.2

What does the school need to do to improve further?

particularly of the most able pupils, so that they can achieve highly at the end of key stage 2 – making sure that teachers are clear about what pupils already know and use this knowledge to plan engaging activities that motivate and challenge all pupils, particularly the most able – using information about the pupils’ performance and the quality of teaching to provide effective training and support to teachers – developing pupils’ mathematical skills to reason and solve problems across the curriculum – giving pupils more opportunities to use and to develop their skills of writing extended pieces in subjects other than English.

p.2

Effectiveness of leadership and management Requires improvement

 Leaders have not done enough to ensure that the quality of teaching, learning and assessment is consistently good for all pupils. As a result, pupils do not make consistently good progress from their different starting points.  Leaders are not using the evidence they gather from pupils’ books, observations of teaching and information about pupils’ attainment and progress to accurately evaluate the quality of teaching and the extent to which it is having a positive impact on pupils’ achievement. Their records of these activities do not identify how successfully pupils are learning or provide guidance on how teaching could be improved to lead to better achievement.  Since the beginning of the current academic year, the senior leadership team has reviewed improvement strategies and introduced new approaches to improve the quality of teaching and learning. Many of these changes remain at an early stage of

p.3

Effectiveness of leadership and management Requires improvement

implementation, however, and have yet to secure consistently faster progress for pupils.  Senior leaders are not working well enough with senior colleagues from the feeder infant school to ensure that pupils have continuity of learning between key stages 1 and 2. Assessments of pupils’ work are not being moderated when pupils join the school to establish an accurate and shared understanding of standards. As a result, teachers are not able to build systematically upon pupils’ capabilities and prior knowledge to ensure that they make good progress.  Disadvantaged pupils, including those who are among the school’s most able pupils, are not making the progress they should or achieving well enough. Leaders are not using the pupil premium funding well enough to enable this group of pupils to make accelerated progress by the end of key stage 2. As a result, their attainment is below other pupils’ nationally. The school is currently undertaking an external review of its

p.3

Effectiveness of leadership and management Requires improvement

use of the pupil premium.  The school’s improvement plan is not focused sharply enough on improving standards. The plan does not contain regular milestones of measures of success related to pupils’ attainment or progress. Consequently, senior leaders and the governing body are not checking frequently enough if their actions are having the desired impact.  The special educational needs coordinator is very knowledgeable about the needs of pupils who have special educational needs and/or disabilities. She ensures that they receive effective additional support to meet their physical and emotional needs. Their academic progress, however, is not tracked or reviewed carefully enough to ensure that they receive the bespoke teaching they require.  Senior leaders are not setting performance management targets with teachers that effectively promote high achievement among pupils. Teachers are not being held sufficiently to account for the progress of the pupils in their class.

p.3

Effectiveness of leadership and management Requires improvement

 The curriculum covers a wide range of subjects through pupils’ topic work, in addition to English and mathematics. Teachers do not provide enough opportunities, however, for pupils to apply their literacy and numeracy skills in other subjects.  The school offers a broad range of extra-curricular activities which are popular with the pupils and are well attended, including a choir, a gardening club, street dancing and football.  The curriculum successfully promotes pupils’ spiritual, moral, social and cultural development through lessons and assemblies. It places a strong emphasis on promoting respect and tolerance for the range of religions, values and beliefs that exist in modern Britain.  Senior leaders have used the primary physical education and sport premium to provide professional development for staff and coaching for pupils in a wide range of sports. As a result, the school’s use of this funding is improving the quality of provision in this

p.3

Effectiveness of leadership and management Requires improvement

area.  Parents and carers responded positively on the school’s leadership when completing the online survey, and value the school’s strong Christian ethos.

p.4

Governance of the school

 Governors know the school well and are committed to working with senior leaders to secure the necessary improvements. Recent appointments have increased the level of expertise and, as a result, the governing body is beginning to challenge school leaders more effectively.  Although governors visit the school regularly, they are not able to check systematically on the implementation of the school improvement plan because regular milestones are not identified. Consequently, the governing body is not able to ensure that the school is improving quickly enough.  The governing body is not checking carefully enough how the pupil premium funding is being used to improve the attainment and progress of disadvantaged pupils. Disadvantaged pupils are not making the progress they could and this means that the funding is not being used effectively.  The nominated safeguarding governor has a clear understanding of her role and

p.4

Governance of the school

regularly reviews safeguarding procedures with school leaders to ensure that they are robust. This helps to ensure that the school’s safeguarding arrangements are effective.

p.4

Safeguarding

 The arrangements for safeguarding are effective.  Staff and governors are aware of the potential threats to pupils’ welfare and have a good knowledge of the particular local issues that can put children at risk.  Leaders take swift action if they have any concerns over the welfare of a child. They work effectively with families and a range of external agencies, including social care, the local authority and health professionals, to ensure the well-being of children whose circumstances may make them particularly vulnerable.  All staff have been trained in safeguarding and child protection, including training to protect pupils from the risks of extremism and radicalisation.  Senior leaders ensure that accurate records are kept of all aspects of safeguarding. This ensures that they have a clear oversight of pupils’ well-being.

p.4

Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Requires improvement

 Teaching is not consistently effective across the school. It does not ensure that all pupils make good progress in reading, writing and mathematics.  Teachers do not always have high enough expectations of what pupils can achieve, particularly among the most able pupils. Consequently, pupils make slower progress than they should.  The assessment of pupils’ work is weak. As a result, teachers are unclear about what pupils can do and the progress they are making. Consequently, pupils of all abilities, particularly the most able, are not always provided with suitably challenging work that extends their thinking. For example, pupils frequently work from commercial workbooks or complete mundane commercial worksheets. This often involves pupils practising skills they already have.  Scrutiny of pupils’ work across the curriculum shows that pupils do not have enough opportunities to build up their skills in writing or reason mathematically in order to gain

p.5

Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Requires improvement

a deeper understanding of mathematics. For example, the quality of written work in topic books is not of the same length or standard as it is in literacy books. Where mathematics skills are applied in other subjects, the same tasks are often set for pupils of all abilities. This means that the most able pupils find the tasks too easy.  Pupils do not develop independence and resilience because they are too dependent on adults to support their learning. For example, in a mathematics lesson, pupils in Year 6 had to wait for the teacher to direct them onto a more challenging activity. Pupils were not encouraged to review their own completed work, reflect on their next learning steps and then select a challenging ‘mastery’ task. As a result, time was wasted and pupils’ levels of engagement and enthusiasm for learning were not sustained.  The teaching of phonics for pupils who have not met the expected standard in their

p.5

Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Requires improvement

understanding of phonics by the time they join the school is good. Staff give these pupils appropriate support to help them catch up.  Teaching is successful in helping pupils, including the most able, to develop a love of reading. Reading has a high profile around the school and teachers provide pupils with many opportunities to become familiar with different types of texts.  Teaching assistants demonstrate skill in supporting small-group work within the classroom. In many classes, they work closely with teachers and are clear about the next steps in learning of the pupils they are supporting. As a result, they frequently make a valuable contribution to the learning.  Relationships between staff and pupils are extremely positive.  Classrooms are well organised and tidy. Useful displays with information and prompts to support pupils’ learning are referred to regularly in lessons.

p.5

Personal development and welfare

 The school’s work to promote pupils’ personal development and welfare is good.  Pupils report that they feel safe in all areas of the school. Pupils are confident that any concern will be taken seriously and dealt with swiftly. All parents who communicated with the inspector indicated that they felt that their children were safe at school.  Pupils understand that bullying can take many forms. They have a mature understanding of the hurt and unfairness caused by racist and homophobic attitudes. Pupils say that bullying is extremely rare and that any incident will be dealt with promptly by senior leaders.  Pupils develop good levels of confidence and self-esteem. They have positive attitudes towards learning and are always eager to please and do their best.  Pupils enjoy contributing to the life of their school. They take on responsibilities such as being school councillors and garden guardians. The views expressed by the school

p.5

Personal development and welfare

council and sports council play an important role in influencing school improvement.  Pupils know that it is important to eat a balanced diet and to exercise regularly. They are encouraged to be active and particularly enjoy participating in competitions. Pupils explained clearly the dangers posed by smoking and drug and substance misuse.  Pupils emphatically agreed that they enjoy being pupils at St Peter’s. One pupil summed this up saying, ‘the best things are our friends and all the teachers who treat you fairly and kindly.’  All of the school’s work is underpinned by references to its Christian values and beliefs. These successfully support pupils to be responsible citizens through understanding that the values and beliefs associated with their school are shared within British culture.

p.6

Behaviour

 The behaviour of pupils is good.  The large majority of parents and staff agree that the behaviour of pupils is good.  The school is a warm, welcoming and happy place to be. Pupils are polite, courteous and well mannered around the school and at social times. For example, behaviour in the dining hall during the inspection was calm and sensible, and pupils were considerate of each other when playing outside.  Pupils enjoy learning through their topic work. In lessons, pupils try hard with their work and mostly sustain good concentration. They present their work neatly and are proud of their achievements.  Pupils’ attendance is above the national average. Very few pupils are persistently absent. The school has robust systems in place to follow up any lateness or absenteeism.

p.6

Outcomes for pupils Requires improvement

 Pupils’ attainment at the end of key stage 1 when they leave the feeder infant school is well above average. Scrutiny of pupils’ work when they join the junior school, however, indicates that there has been some regression during the summer break. As a result, most pupils enter the school with knowledge and skills that are at least average and for a large majority, above average.  Standards at the end of key stage 2 in 2016 in reading and writing were below the national average, and well below it in mathematics. The progress made by pupils from their starting points for each subject was below the national average. This is because teaching does not reflect high enough expectations or offer sufficient challenge.  Not enough of the most able pupils, including the most able disadvantaged pupils, achieve highly at the end of key stage 2. This is because they are not challenged well enough in lessons.

p.6

Outcomes for pupils Requires improvement

 The progress of pupils who have special educational needs and/or disabilities is slower than that of pupils with similar starting points. The school provides effective support for their physical and emotional needs. Systems to ensure that the identified needs of pupils who require additional support are met in their daily lessons, however, are not robust enough to ensure that they make consistently good progress.  Disadvantaged pupils made slower progress than the national average for other pupils in 2016 by the end of key stage 2. The school’s own information shows that the group of these pupils have recently made better progress as a result of actions being taken to support them, particularly in the current Year 6.  The sharp focus on raising standards in writing this year is having a positive impact on pupils’ achievement. Their books show good progress in improving sentence construction and applying the rules of grammar and spelling accurately. The practice of

p.7

Outcomes for pupils Requires improvement

‘talk for writing’ is contributing to pupils’ enthusiasm for writing and effectively extending the range of their writing in literacy lessons.  The school’s most recent assessment information, the quality of work in pupils’ books and learning observed all confirm that pupils currently in the school are making better progress as a result of the action being taken to tackle weaknesses in teaching and learning. They are not making the progress of which they are capable, however, because teaching is not yet consistently good.  Pupils enjoy many opportunities to read and have positive attitudes to reading. Pupils who receive support in their understanding of phonics quickly become confident readers.

p.7

School details

This inspection was carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005. The inspection was also deemed a section 5 inspection under the same Act.

p.8

School details

Appropriate authority The governing body

p.8

School details

Email address admin@stpeters.derby.sch.uk

p.8

School details

Date of previous inspection 12–13 June 2013

p.8

Information about this school

 The school meets requirements on the publication of specified information on its website.  The school is an average-sized junior school.  Around half the pupils are from White British backgrounds and half from a range of minority ethnic groups.  The proportion of pupils who speak English as an additional language is approximately one quarter.  The proportion of disadvantaged pupils is below average.  The proportion of pupils who have special educational needs and/or disabilities is above average.  The school does not meet the government’s current floor standards, which set out the minimum expectations for pupils’ attainment and progress by the end of Year 6.

p.8

Information about this inspection

 Inspectors visited all classes to observe teaching and learning. Some of these visits took place with the headteacher.  Inspectors observed pupils at breaktimes and at lunchtime and asked pupils about their learning and what it is like to be a pupil at the school.  Inspectors scrutinised pupils’ workbooks and listened to pupils read.  Discussions took place with the headteacher, subject team members, members of the governing body, a representative of the local authority and a representative of the Diocese.  Inspectors had brief discussions with parents at the beginning of the school day and considered the 108 responses to Ofsted’s online questionnaire, Parent View.  Inspectors considered a range of documentation, including the school’s self-evaluation, the school’s improvement plan, the school’s most recent information on pupils’ attainment and progress, and information relating to teaching, performance

p.9

Information about this inspection

management, behaviour, attendance and safeguarding.

p.9

Inspection team

Dorothy Bathgate, lead inspector Her Majesty’s Inspector

p.9

Inspection team

Sarah Chadwick Ofsted Inspector guidance 'Raising concerns and making a complaint about Ofsted', which is available from Ofsted's website: www.gov.uk/government/publications/complaints-about-ofsted . If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.9

Inspection team

In the report, 'disadvantaged pupils' refers to those pupils who attract government pupil premium funding: pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years and pupils in care or who left care through adoption or another formal route. www.gov.uk/pupil-premium-information-for-schools-and- alternative-provision-settings .

p.10

Inspection team

You can use Parent View to give Ofsted your opinion on your child's school. Ofsted will use the information parents and carers provide when deciding which schools to inspect and when and as part of the inspection.

p.10

Inspection team

You can also use Parent View to find out what other parents and carers think about schools in England. You can visit www.parentview.ofsted.gov.uk , or look for the link on the main Ofsted website: www.gov.uk/government/organisations/ofsted .

p.10

Inspection team

achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children's services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.

p.10

Inspection team

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.10

Inspection team

You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open- government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.10

Inspection team

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.10

Inspection team

T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.10

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion