Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · Short school inspection

Cullercoats Primary School

Inspected 7 Feb 2017 · published 23 Mar 2017 · URN 108569

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection datesingle source

    7 Feb 2017

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Chris Smith

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Good

  • Postcode verified

    NE30 4PB

  • Name on report verified

    Cullercoats Primary School

Page 1 of 4
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2012.

  • OverallGood

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+65Positivemore positive than 47% of reports of this type graded Good
OutstandingGood

In line with other reports of this type graded Good.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praisestrongambitiousenjoysafewell ledconsistentlyimprovedconfidently
Criticismconcernweaknessesbelowout of date

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improveAbout the inspection positive critical
  • Findings1336w+65
  • What needs to improve99w0

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
4
Words of findings
1,428
about usual (typical 1483)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 45, typical 50
Average sentence
19 words
Next steps
2
typical 2
Hedged sentences
7%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 86%What needs to improve 6%About the inspection 8%

Full report text

Store Street Manchester M1 2WD T 0300 123 4234 www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.1

Mr Gavin Storey Headteacher Cullercoats Primary School Marden Avenue Cullercoats North Shields Tyne and Wear NE30 4PB

p.1

Short inspection of Cullercoats Primary School

Following my visit to the school on 7 February 2017, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to report the inspection findings. The visit was the first short inspection carried out since the school was judged to be good in April 2012.

p.1

Short inspection of Cullercoats Primary School

The leadership team has maintained the good quality of education in the school since the last inspection.

p.1

Short inspection of Cullercoats Primary School

You acted quickly to improve the quality of teaching at key stage 1 following the previous inspection. As a result of your actions, pupils have made better progress in reading, writing and mathematics and attained standards that have consistently compared favourably with national averages. You have also maintained the quality of teaching across key stage 2 and ensured that older pupils have also continued to attain standards well above those seen nationally. The relatively small numbers of disadvantaged pupils and those who have special educational needs and/or disabilities, also attain standards above those of other pupils nationally. You and your staff are embracing the raised expectations of the national curriculum. You have improved the teaching of phonics and, more recently, your initiative to strengthen the quality of pupils’ writing has begun to deliver impressive results. However, you recognise further work is required to develop the teaching of

p.1

Short inspection of Cullercoats Primary School

mathematics, so that more pupils develop a firm understanding of key concepts and can confidently apply their knowledge in different contexts.

p.1

Short inspection of Cullercoats Primary School

The school feels busy, vibrant and welcoming and the pupils are polite and respectful of one another. Older pupils who are members of the ‘CHEW Crew’ are trained to provide support and friendship for younger pupils at social times. Others help out in the dining hall at lunchtime or serve on the school council. Pupils and parents and carers who made their views known to me all feel the school provides a safe environment and that the curriculum provides pupils with clear guidance on how to stay safe in different situations, such as when using the internet. Pupils do say that bullying happens occasionally, but almost everyone is confident members of staff will deal with it quickly. Overall levels of attendance are above the national average, but this masks the poorer attendance of disadvantaged pupils, which has remained stubbornly below that of others in the school and shows no immediate sign of improvement.

p.1

Short inspection of Cullercoats Primary School

Pupils benefit from a rich and varied curriculum beyond the core of English and mathematics. There are many interesting and engaging science topics taught that utilise the school’s location and natural surroundings to stimulate pupils’ curiosity. Portfolios of work reveal the breadth of opportunities for pupils to draw, paint and create sculpture. The school also gives sport a high priority and has a strong track- record of success in inter-school competitions.

p.2

Short inspection of Cullercoats Primary School

You and your governors use assessment information well to inform your accurate evaluation of the school’s strengths and weaknesses. Consequently, you know where to focus your efforts and the leadership team demonstrates the skills and capacity to sustain strong outcomes for pupils. Although most members of staff and most parents who responded to Ofsted’s questionnaire feel the school is well led and managed, a small minority noted some aspects of leadership could be sharper. For example, some parts of the school are untidy, some members of staff do not dress professionally and some parents feel the quality of communication between school and home could be better. Details such as these currently undermine the drive for excellence and ambitious culture the governors are keen to promote.

p.2

Short inspection of Cullercoats Primary School

You and the governors are vigilant in your duty to ensure that pupils are kept safe. You make rigorous checks on the suitability of all members of staff and other adults who work in the school. You have recently updated your safeguarding policy and have provided appropriate training for members of staff. Key safeguarding information is prominently displayed around the school. A thorough safeguarding audit has been conducted and you and the governors have reflected thoughtfully on the actions you will take to ensure that a culture of continuous vigilance is maintained. You keep detailed records and act quickly when a concern about a child’s safety or welfare is referred to you. In addition, you make good use of the advice and support of external partners.

p.2

Inspection findings

 On average, children enter Reception with skills that are typical for their age. Their progress is carefully assessed and recorded in ways that are easily shared with parents. These assessments are used to inform the varied and stimulating activities that are provided to support children’s development. Children quickly learn to play sociably with one another and to follow routines in the busy Reception classrooms and outdoor area. Teachers take every opportunity to support children’s language development and provide good support to establish reading, writing and number skills. Careful thought has gone into ensuring that activities appeal equally to boys and girls and that additional funding for disadvantaged children is used for their benefit. Last year, the proportion of children who attained a good level of development was well above the national average.  In 2016, almost all pupils in Year 1 reached the expected standard in the national

p.2

Inspection findings

phonics screening check. However, outcomes at the end of Year 2 in reading, writing and mathematics dipped to be only broadly average, as teachers adapted to the more challenging expectations of the national curriculum. An initiative to improve the teaching of writing has begun to have a positive impact. Pupils enjoy building up stories through drawings and repeatedly telling their stories orally to one another. As a result, they write with increasing fluency and freedom when they put pencil to paper. Pupils in Year 2 now write at length and with confidence, applying their knowledge of spelling, punctuation and grammar effectively. Pupils who make slower progress receive good additional support that helps them to catch up. Disadvantaged pupils currently in key stage 1 are making progress in line with their peers.  Outcomes in mathematics have, over recent years, been a strength of the school. However, current assessment information and the work in pupils’ books shows

p.3

Inspection findings

the teaching of mathematics has not developed enough to fully meet the raised aspirations of the national curriculum. Although pupils continue to develop fluency in basic mathematical skills, they do not get enough opportunities to apply their knowledge to problems. Furthermore, some pupils, particularly the most able, are not challenged enough and struggle to articulate their thinking.  Most pupils enjoy being at the school. This is reflected in the high and improving level of overall attendance. You have good systems in place to check the reasons for absences and you challenge the parents of pupils who regularly miss school. However, the attendance of disadvantaged pupils is well below that of other pupils and risks becoming a barrier to their progress and attainment. Current attendance information shows this continues to be a concern. Further thought needs to be given to addressing this issue.  Leaders and governors review policies and procedures regularly and ensure that

p.3

Inspection findings

statutory requirements are met. However, at the time of this inspection, the school website was being redeveloped and did not meet the requirements on the publication of specified information. The child protection policy was out of date, key stage 2 test results were not available and the special educational needs information report was missing. These oversights were quickly addressed during the inspection. The governors are ambitious for the school and have effective systems in place to challenge leaders and hold them to account. Governors regularly call leaders to attend committee meetings where they scrutinise the impact of their work. The governors have advanced plans in place to open Nursery provision from September 2017 and have stepped in to sustain a breakfast and after-school facility, following the closure of the private provision that was until recently based at the school.

p.3

Next steps for the school

Leaders and those responsible for governance should ensure that:

p.4

Next steps for the school

 pupils make rapid and sustained progress in mathematics by – making sure pupils are regularly challenged to reason and explain their thinking – providing frequent opportunities for pupils to apply their knowledge to mathematical problems  they work more closely with families to improve the attendance of disadvantaged pupils so that it more closely matches that of other pupils.

p.4

Next steps for the school

I am copying this letter to the chair of the governing body and the director of children’s services for North Tyneside. This letter will be published on the Ofsted website.

p.4

Information about the inspection

During the inspection I met with you and other senior leaders, a group of teachers and a group of governors including the chair of the governing body. I spoke with pupils both formally and informally during social times and in lessons. We visited a number of lessons across the Reception classes and key stages 1 and 2. We discussed the school’s self-evaluation and improvement plans, assessment information, attendance data and safeguarding arrangements. I also reviewed information on the school’s website, which is currently being redeveloped. The deputy headteacher and subject leaders for literacy and mathematics scrutinised some pupils’ books with me. I also took into account the views of pupils, members of staff and parents through their responses to questionnaires.

p.4

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion