Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School monitoring visit

William Edwards School

Inspected — · published 23 Mar 2017 · URN 137214

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Simon Webb (lead), John Daniell

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    John Daniell, Simon Webb

  • Postcode verified

    RM16 3NJ

  • Name on report verified

    William Edwards School

Page 1 of 4
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+57Positivemore positive than 90% of reports of this type

Reads more warmly than most reports of this type.

Praiseeffectiveexceptionallyvery effectivevery wellpositivehigh expectationshigh qualitysafe
Criticismat riskbelowweaknessesseriouslylowpersistently absentexclusions

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings1317w+56
  • What needs to improve88w+33

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
4
Words of findings
1,402
about usual (typical 1570)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 43, typical 47
Average sentence
20 words
Next steps
5
typical 8
Hedged sentences
4%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 94%What needs to improve 6%

Full report text

Store Street Manchester M1 2WD T 0300 123 4234 www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.1

Mr Stephen Munday Headteacher William Edwards School Stifford Clays Road Stifford Clays Grays Essex RM16 3NJ

p.1

No formal designation monitoring inspection of William Edwards School

Following my visit with Simon Webb, Her Majesty’s Inspector, to your school on 1 March 2017, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to confirm the inspection findings.

p.1

No formal designation monitoring inspection of William Edwards School

This monitoring inspection was conducted under section 8 of the Education Act 2005 and in accordance with Ofsted's published procedures for inspecting schools with no formal designation. The inspection was carried out because Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector was concerned about the effectiveness of safeguarding arrangements, aspects of the effectiveness of leadership and management in the school (including governance), and the personal development, behaviour and welfare of pupils at the school.

p.1

Evidence

Inspectors scrutinised the single central record and other documents relating to safeguarding and child protection arrangements, and met with the headteacher and other senior leaders, groups of pupils and a member of the governing body.

p.1

Evidence

Inspectors also looked at logs relating to pupils’ behaviour and attendance, governors’ minutes of meetings, school policies and records of formal complaints made about the school, and visited a number of lessons briefly across a range of subjects in order to observe pupils’ attitudes towards their learning. Having considered the evidence I am of the opinion that at this time:

p.1

Evidence

The leadership team has ensured that all safeguarding arrangements are fit for purpose and records are detailed and of high quality. All staff have received up-to- date training in the safeguarding of children and in the government’s ‘Prevent’ duty, which aims to deter young people from being drawn into extremist activity. Any administrative flaws in the school’s single central record of recruitment checks of staff were rectified during the inspection. The school site is safe and secure, and the high number of closed-circuit television cameras contributes towards this. The school’s curriculum provides effective support for pupils at risk. For example, it addresses topical issues which might affect young people, including body image, and eating and anxiety disorders. Although not made use of as yet, there is also a direct email which pupils can use to contact the school where their anonymity is guaranteed. The few pupils who attend any alternative off-site provision are also

p.2

Evidence

monitored closely to ensure that they attend regularly, achieve well and are kept safe.

p.2

Context

The number of pupils on roll is 1,199. The proportion of pupils from minority ethnic groups is well below the national average and the proportion of pupils who speak English as an additional language is low. The proportion of pupils who are eligible for free school meals is well below the national average. A below-average proportion of pupils have special educational needs and/or disabilities and the proportion of pupils who have a statement of special educational needs or an education, health and care plan is average. Staff turnover is low, and although the school faces challenges in the recruitment of staff due to its location, it is fully staffed.

p.2

Context

The school’s senior leaders work very well together as a cohesive team who know and execute their roles and responsibilities effectively. The school’s leadership structure has empowered pastoral leaders to demonstrate their impact and they know individual pupils well. Hence, parents who responded to Ofsted’s online questionnaire, Parent View, rightly believe that their children are well looked after in the school.

p.2

Context

The school receives few complaints which are processed at more formal stages, but when they do, these are processed efficiently, and in accordance with the school’s complaints policy. Inspectors’ scrutiny of the school’s complaints records shows that when the school makes a mistake, it acknowledges this to be the case. Records of complaints are well maintained and show the actions taken by the school in chronological order. Systems for monitoring, evaluating and reviewing the work of the school are well established and include staff at all levels as well as members of the governing body. This gives everyone ownership of whole-school strategic planning. Governors have a good understanding of the school’s strengths and weaknesses overall. Between them, governors have a comprehensive range of skills which they put to effective use. However, scrutiny of meetings of the governing body show that further action

p.2

Context

is needed to investigate more closely why some groups of pupils attend school less regularly than others, particularly those pupils who are eligible for free school meals. Governors must also ensure that the school’s website is compliant with current requirements and that reviews of school policies are up to date.

p.3

Context

The curriculum is well considered and planned to meet the needs of the pupils in the school. It is particularly effective in promoting pupils’ spiritual, moral, social and cultural development. Careers information and guidance are of good quality and encourage pupils, whatever their background, to aim high. Displays around the school celebrate pupils’ diversity and their achievements.

p.3

Context

Pupils’ overall attendance has been broadly in line with the national average for some time and has steadily improved over time. The proportion of pupils who are persistently absent from school is well below the national average. This is due in no uncertain terms to the introduction of the evening telephone call system which aims to address unauthorised absences so that pupils report to school the following day. The school’s leaders have also adopted a strategic approach towards improving attendance. For example, they have introduced a two-week October half-term holiday to give parents a wider window in which to take their children on holiday. Additionally, on the last day of the term, the school stages high-profile events to encourage pupils to attend, including practice examinations or mock interviews. The attendance of pupils who are eligible for free school meals, despite a slight improvement, remains below that of other pupils nationally.

p.3

Context

Pupils behave exceptionally well in lessons and when moving around the school. They wear their uniform smartly. Pupils respect their teachers and one another. The school’s list of ‘William Edwards expectations’, displayed in every classroom and around the school, makes clear what is expected of both pupils and their teachers, and this agreement ensures that relationships are consistently positive. The proportion of fixed-term exclusions has fallen over time due to teachers’ high expectations and their appropriate use of the school’s internal exclusion facility.

p.3

Context

Incidents of bullying are rare, and bullying is taken very seriously when it does occur. Indeed, pupils say they feel safe when in school and during their journey to and from the school. No incidents of racist or homophobic bullying are recorded in the school’s behaviour logs. The school teaches pupils well about how to keep themselves safe. They are well prepared for the digital age and the risks associated with using social networking sites. Guest speakers, as well as the use of form time and personal, social, health and economic education ensure that pupils use information and communication technology wisely. Pupils told inspectors: ‘It’s ok to be different in this school.’ The school promotes equalities well through its lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender society which is attended by pupils in the school.

p.3

Context

Pupils’ own leadership skills are developed well through the availability of various roles and responsibilities. The ‘student executive’ is a very effective tool for pupils to express their views on the school and is a role to which many pupils aspire. Equally, pupils are keen to become ‘PALS’ (pupils as listeners) in order to offer support to their peers who need help. These pupils are offered high-quality training in listening, recording and reporting skills.

p.4

External support

The school maintains a positive working relationship with the local authority. The management and use of the pupil premium funding has been reviewed externally. Support and challenge are provided regularly by the South West Essex Community Education Trust. Most recently, the trust commissioned a review of the school’s safeguarding procedures which was led by the headteacher of one of the trust’s primary providers.

p.4

Priorities for further improvement

 Improve the attendance of pupils who are eligible for free school meals through more focused monitoring and more robust challenge by members of the governing body.

p.4

Priorities for further improvement

 Ensure that the school’s website is fully compliant with current requirements.

p.4

Priorities for further improvement

 Make sure that school policies are updated by the deadline identified in the governors’ schedule.

p.4

Priorities for further improvement

I am copying this letter to the chair of the governing body, the regional schools commissioner and the director of children’s services for Thurrock. This letter will be published on the Ofsted website.

p.4

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion