Social care · Social care interim inspection
Children's Home run by Blue Mountain Homes Ltd in Nottinghamshire
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection datesingle source
2 Mar 2017
- Inspectors verified
Caroline Brailsford
- Postcode verified
W13 9HE
- URN verified
SC047978
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Ensure that a child’s care plan forms the basis of their care. p.6
- Ensure that the workforce plan details the processes and agreed timescales for staff to achieve induction, probation, core training and supervision of their practice. p.6
- Ensure that staff have the knowledge and skills to understand each child’s education and training targets and next steps for learning. p.6
- At the interim inspection we make a judgement on whether the home has improved in effectiveness, sustained effectiveness, or declined in effectiveness since the previous full inspection. p.7
- This is in line with the ‘Inspection of children’s homes: framework for inspection’. p.7
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 8
- Words of findings
- 1,063
- about usual (typical 904)
- Reading level
- Fairly hard
- Flesch 54, typical 48
- Average sentence
- 16 words
- Next steps
- 5
- typical 4
- Hedged sentences
- 6%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
children and young people since the most recent full inspection
This home was judged good at the full inspection. At this interim inspection, Ofsted judge that it has sustained effectiveness .
p.2
children and young people since the most recent full inspection
The home continues to provide good quality care to young people. The previous registered manager has left since the last inspection and there is a new acting manager in post. This means that there has been a period of transition and change. In addition, there have been three new admissions to the home recently. The new acting manager has been working at the home for eight weeks. She is experienced and has good insight into the complex needs of young people. She has brought in some new ideas, and has spent time with the relatively new staff team to scrutinise practice and further improve the quality of care. Staff report that her ideas have been well received and that they feel confident in her approach. One member of staff reported a ‘good feeling’ about the home.
p.2
children and young people since the most recent full inspection
Better care planning, including a ‘front sheet’ that has been added to care plans so that essential information can be seen at a glance.
p.2
children and young people since the most recent full inspection
New risk assessments, which include very clear and useful information about triggers for particular behaviours, such as self-harm and going missing.
p.2
children and young people since the most recent full inspection
Improved information for young people about advocacy and about how they can raise concerns.
p.2
children and young people since the most recent full inspection
The requirement from the last inspection about agency staff recruitment has been removed. The home has not used agency staff for a number of months and does not plan to do so in the future.
p.2
children and young people since the most recent full inspection
There has been a positive response to the three recommendations made at the last inspection. The environment has significantly improved. Each room has been redecorated and there are new carpets, curtains and soft furnishings. The more pleasant environment will ensure that young people can feel proud of their home. A recommendation about induction and training of agency staff has been removed because agency staff are no longer used. One recommendation is repeated. This relates to the clarity of care plans. One care plan was found to contradict a risk assessment in relation to how staff should supervise and monitor a young person during periods of self-harm. This has not had an impact on young people, because staff are clear about what should happen. There is recent evidence that the young person has been well supervised and monitored during a period of high-risk behaviour. This recommendation is repeated to ensure that young people are not
p.2
children and young people since the most recent full inspection
Young people’s experiences are good. Many have experienced a reduction in incidents and are more settled in their behaviour. Joint working with other professionals is good. There is a network of other professionals close at hand, should young people need extra support. These professionals assist young people with the difficulties they face so that young people consistently get the help they need.
p.3
children and young people since the most recent full inspection
There is a focus on ensuring that delays in identifying educational placements for new admissions are kept to a minimum. One social worker told the inspector: ‘I am happy with education, they have escalated issues to the virtual school’. Not all young people attend school or engage effectively with education. However, the creative approach from staff ensures that young people are as engaged as they can be. It is acknowledged that some young people will struggle to get back into school because of their risk-taking behaviour and that, for some, educational progress is highly likely be slow. Time is taken to think creatively about the best educational approach for young people. Young people who are more difficult to engage have their education highly tailored towards their individual needs. Although there is good educational planning in place, some staff do not understand young people’s educational history. This limits their ability to build on previously
p.3
children and young people since the most recent full inspection
successful strategies and means that planning is not fully informed.
p.3
children and young people since the most recent full inspection
Bank staff and staff from other homes are now used as an alternative to agency staff. This means that they know young people better. They are already very familiar with company procedures when they work at the home, for example safeguarding and behaviour management procedures. Staff from other homes always read young people’s information prior to working with them. However, their induction is not documented. The acting manager is not clear about what should be included in their induction and cannot monitor whether this has taken place effectively. This has not adversely affected young people, but has the potential to do so if not addressed.
p.3
children and young people since the most recent full inspection
Young people are only admitted to the home if the acting manager feels that the placement is appropriate and that other young people will not be adversely affected. One social worker said that one young person’s recent admission had been, ‘well managed’. They commented that the young person had been very positive and complimentary about this. Equally, when young people move out, they are well prepared and supported by staff. The home also offers support after the move. The support is then gradually reduced as the young person settles in. Young people are able, when appropriate, to keep in touch with staff after they have left and important ties are not broken too quickly. This helps young people to be successful in their new lives when they leave care.
p.3
Information about this children’s home
The home is privately owned and cares for young people who have emotional and/or behavioural difficulties.
p.5
Recent inspection history
Inspection date Inspection type Inspection judgement 02/11/2016 Full Good 22/01/2016 Interim Improved effectiveness 06/07/2015 Full Requires improvement 07/01/2015 Interim Sustained effectiveness
p.5
Recommendations
To improve the quality and standards of care further, the service should take account of the following recommendations:
p.6
Recommendations
Ensure that a child’s care plan forms the basis of their care. (‘Guide to the children’s homes regulations including the quality standards’, page 14, paragraph 3.1.) This is in relation to the care planning process, which is not always clear on how young people’s needs should be met.
p.6
Recommendations
Ensure that the workforce plan details the processes and agreed timescales for staff to achieve induction, probation, core training and supervision of their practice. (‘Guide to the children’s homes regulations including the quality standards’, page 53, paragraph 10.8.) This is in particular relation to staff induction for staff working at the home from other homes in the company.
p.6
Recommendations
Ensure that staff have the knowledge and skills to understand each child’s education and training targets and next steps for learning. (‘Guide to the children’s homes regulations including the quality standards’, page 27, paragraph 5.11)
p.6
What the inspection judgements mean
At the interim inspection we make a judgement on whether the home has improved in effectiveness, sustained effectiveness, or declined in effectiveness since the previous full inspection. This is in line with the ‘Inspection of children’s homes: framework for inspection’.
p.7
Information about this inspection
Inspectors have looked closely at the experiences and progress of children and young people living in the children’s home. Inspectors considered the quality of work and the difference adults make to the lives of children and young people. They read case files, watched how professional staff work with children, young people and each other and discussed the effectiveness of help and care given to children and young people. Wherever possible, they talked to children, young people and their families. In addition the inspectors have tried to understand what the children’s home knows about how well it is performing, how well it is doing and what difference it is making for the children and young people who it is trying to help, protect and look after. This inspection focused on the effectiveness of the home and the progress and experiences of children and young people since the most recent full inspection.
p.7
Information about this inspection
This inspection was carried out under the Care Standards Act 2000 to assess the effectiveness of the service and to consider how well it complies with the Children’s Homes (England) Regulations 2015 and the ‘Guide to the children’s homes regulations including the quality standards’. the guidance ‘Raising concerns and making complaints about Ofsted’, which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.gov.uk/government/organisations/ofsted . If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.7
Information about this inspection
achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, work- based learning and skills training, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It inspects services for children looked after and child protection. If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk . You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence , write to the Information Policy Team,
p.8
Information about this inspection
The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .
p.8
Information about this inspection
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .
p.8
Information about this inspection
T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/government/organisations/ofsted
p.8
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion