Other · Ofsted report
Shirley Manor Primary School
Summary
Lesley Butcher (lead), James Reid, Peter Marsh
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection datesingle source
1 Mar 2017
- Inspectors verified
James Reid, Lesley Butcher, Peter Marsh
- Postcode verified
BD12 8SA
- Name on report verified
Shirley Manor Primary School
- URN verified
140639
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Teachers do not use the information about how well pupils are doing precisely enough to plan learning that helps them to make rapid progress. p.1
- Staff are very committed to ensuring that all pupils are happy and secure, offering vulnerable pupils additional nurture and a safe place to go in school. p.4
- Pupils really enjoy receiving online tokens that effectively reinforce rewards and sanctions. p.5
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Attendance is below average and too many pupils are persistently absent. p.5
- Pupils with low prior attainment are not always challenged enough to make rapid gains in their learning. p.1
- Too many pupils are persistently absent from p.1
- This is because although behaviour in lessons and at playtime is generally good, the poor behaviour of a small number of pupils sometimes disrupts learning and spoils lunchtime for others pupils. p.5
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- An external review of the school’s use of pupil premium funding should be undertaken in order to assess how this aspect of leadership and management may be improved. p.2
- The new headteacher has demonstrated strong leadership and taken robust action to improve the quality of teaching. p.3
- She has swiftly assessed the quality of education being offered and has put into place precise plans to bring about improvement. p.3
- She has introduced new systems for checking on pupils’ progress and is stringently holding teachers to account. p.3
- However, some teaching remains less effective despite ongoing support and guidance for individual teachers. p.3
- Although keen to make improvements, middle leaders have not previously been developed well enough to drive change in a way that affects the quality of teaching and pupils’ progress. p.3
- Provision for pupils’ spiritual, moral, social and cultural development is well supported through assemblies, class lessons and through the school’s daily routines. p.3
- The school council meets to discuss how they might improve their school. p.3
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 11
- Words of findings
- 2,958
- longer than usual (typical 1049)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 44, typical 45
- Average sentence
- 18 words
- Next steps
- 8
- typical 5
- Hedged sentences
- 12%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Shirley Manor Primary School Methuen Oval, Wyke, Bradford, West Yorkshire BD12 8SA
p.1
Inspection dates 28 February–1 March 2017
p.1
Overall effectiveness Requires improvement
p.1
Effectiveness of leadership and management Requires improvement
p.1
Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Requires improvement
p.1
Personal development, behaviour and welfare Requires improvement
p.1
Outcomes for pupils Requires improvement
p.1
Overall effectiveness at previous inspection Not previously inspected
p.1
Summary of key findings for parents and pupils
This is a school that requires improvement
p.1
Summary of key findings for parents and pupils
Some teaching has not been strong enough over time and consequently some pupils have not made enough progress in reading and mathematics in key stage 1 or 2. Teachers do not use the information about how well pupils are doing precisely enough to plan learning that helps them to make rapid progress. Some teachers’ expectations of what pupils can do have been too low. Teachers’ expectations of pupils’ presentation and handwriting are inconsistent. Not all teachers consistently correct pupils’ misunderstandings or question pupils well enough to deepen knowledge, with the result that pupils’ progress is not as rapid as it should be. Over time, middle leaders have not carried out their roles effectively enough. The school has the following strengths
p.1
Summary of key findings for parents and pupils
The new headteacher has been urgent and effective in driving school improvement, leading to higher-quality teaching and learning. Leaders and governors have an accurate understanding of the strengths and weaknesses of the school. Secure teaching in upper key stage 2 has led to pupils making rapid gains in their learning. Leaders and governors use pupil premium money to provide additional resources for disadvantaged pupils. However, leaders have not fully evaluated the impact of this spending on pupils’ progress. Pupils with low prior attainment are not always challenged enough to make rapid gains in their learning. Boys do not do as well as girls in the majority of classes. Leadership in the early years has not been strong enough. Some activities provided for children lack challenge. Many pupils do not have a well-developed understanding of what it means to live in modern Britain. Too many pupils are persistently absent from
p.1
Summary of key findings for parents and pupils
school, which has a negative impact on their achievement.
p.1
Summary of key findings for parents and pupils
The quality of teaching in some classes is improving, leading to better learning for some pupils, especially the most able and those who have special educational needs and/or disabilities. The safety and well-being of pupils is very important to all staff. This is a very caring school. Leaders’ work to support those with behaviour difficulties is increasingly effective.
p.1
What does the school need to do to improve further?
Improve the quality of teaching, learning and assessment to accelerate pupils’ progress in all areas of the curriculum but particularly reading and mathematics by ensuring that: teachers are equipped with strong subject knowledge that will support them in delivering high-quality learning all staff have high expectations of what pupils, particularly boys, can achieve assessment information is used effectively by teachers to plan learning activities which are closely matched to pupils’ skills and abilities pupils with low prior attainment receive the precise teaching and support they need in order to make accelerated progress questioning is used well to check on learning so that tasks can be reshaped when pupils have not fully understood the concepts being taught support is provided for pupils, particularly boys, to improve their writing skills by promoting consistently high expectations of spelling and handwriting throughout
p.2
What does the school need to do to improve further?
key stage 1. Improve the effectiveness of leadership by ensuring that: the skills of middle leaders are improved so that they can rigorously monitor provision in their areas of responsibility and secure essential improvements in teaching pupil premium funding is effectively spent to ensure that disadvantaged pupils make good progress support is given to pupils and their families who are regularly absent to secure their regular attendance at school pupils develop an understanding of what it means to live in modern Britain. Improve the provision and outcomes in the early years for all children by making sure that: staff ensure that accurate assessments clearly identify what children can do and what they need to experience next children are taught correct letter formation to equip them for writing all activities that children do have a clear focus so that children make more rapid progress, particularly in Reception
p.2
What does the school need to do to improve further?
activities, both indoors and outdoors, enable children to develop learning and independence fully in all of the early learning goals.
p.2
What does the school need to do to improve further?
An external review of the school’s use of pupil premium funding should be undertaken in order to assess how this aspect of leadership and management may be improved.
p.2
Effectiveness of leadership and management Requires improvement
The new headteacher has demonstrated strong leadership and taken robust action to improve the quality of teaching. She has swiftly assessed the quality of education being offered and has put into place precise plans to bring about improvement. She has introduced new systems for checking on pupils’ progress and is stringently holding teachers to account. However, some teaching remains less effective despite ongoing support and guidance for individual teachers. Although keen to make improvements, middle leaders have not previously been developed well enough to drive change in a way that affects the quality of teaching and pupils’ progress. Provision for pupils’ spiritual, moral, social and cultural development is well supported through assemblies, class lessons and through the school’s daily routines. The school council meets to discuss how they might improve their school. However overall, pupils’
p.3
Effectiveness of leadership and management Requires improvement
understanding of what it means to live in modern Britain is not well developed. Pupil premium funding has been spent on providing additional resources and staffing to support disadvantaged pupils. However, disadvantaged pupils make less progress than other pupils nationally, particularly in early years and key stage 1. Leaders are aware of the need to make sure all resources improve the learning of disadvantaged pupils but, as yet, no evaluation of the impact of pupil premium funding has taken place. Leaders are carefully monitoring the progress of pupils who have special educational needs and/or disabilities. Individual pupil records show that effective work with external agencies and pupils’ families is underpinning the care and guidance given to pupils, many of whom face multiple and complex challenges. External assessment information shows that these pupils have not made enough progress in the past.
p.3
Effectiveness of leadership and management Requires improvement
However, funding for pupils who have special educational needs and/or disabilities is now being effectively spent so that current provision is stronger and pupils are making better progress. Checks on the performance of teachers closely link the work in pupils’ books and pupils’ progress. Senior leaders are identifying and successfully tackling weaknesses in teaching. The assistant headteacher is playing an important role in supporting and developing teachers. Leaders have developed effective partnerships with local schools and a national support school. The headteacher has swiftly engaged effective school improvement partners to help her to develop teaching at Shirley Manor. Staff have received many focused opportunities to develop their practice in a term and a half, helping them to improve learning, particularly in reading. The headteacher is engendering a sense of team spirit among staff and governors.
p.3
Effectiveness of leadership and management Requires improvement
They echo the ambition of senior leaders to ensure that they become a good school and to help every child reach their potential. Leaders have ensured that the curriculum provides a broad range of subjects and experiences for pupils. ‘Magic moments’ class books capture learning through many exciting lessons and visits including an enactment about Florence Nightingale, visits to the water treatment works and making models about the second world war. Leaders use the primary sports funding to employ specialist coaches and to provide clubs such as dodgeball, Zumba and dance. Pupils enjoy taking part in sports competitions and particularly like the visits from Bradford City football club. Leaders have successfully ensured that a large number of pupils are involved in fitness activities and for some less enthusiastic boys, this has increased their enjoyment in coming to school.
p.3
Governance of the school
The governing body express determination to get the school back on track. Their appointment of a strong headteacher was a key milestone in this ambition. In the past, governors do not feel they have had sufficient information to judge the effectiveness of the school well enough. They are confident in the information now supplied to them by current school leaders. Governors know that teaching over time has been too variable. They were disappointed by outcomes in 2016 and know results should have been better. Governors have been resourceful in assessing the effectiveness of teaching. They have visited school regularly, assimilate information given to them by a range of senior leaders and now ask the searching questions required to hold leaders to account.
p.4
Safeguarding
The arrangements for safeguarding are effective. Staff are very committed to ensuring that all pupils are happy and secure, offering vulnerable pupils additional nurture and a safe place to go in school. All policies and procedures support effective safeguarding and all staff are trained appropriately to deal with safeguarding issues as they arise. Staff teach pupils how to keep safe when using the internet and how to ensure their personal safety. All staff have been trained to spot signs of radicalisation among pupils and to act to keep pupils safe.
p.4
Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Requires improvement
There has been a lack of consistency in the quality of teaching over time. This has led to varied rates of progress across classes and subjects, so that pupils have not made enough progress in reading and mathematics by the end of their time in school. While some teachers have high expectations of what pupils will learn, this is not evident in all classes. Some teachers do not pay enough attention to assessment information. Consequently, pupils’ progress has been inconsistent because the tasks they are given have not been well matched to their skills and abilities. Some teachers do not question pupils closely enough to determine what they understand and to move learning on quickly. Teaching in mathematics is helping pupils to secure basic skills. However, not all teachers are able to correct misconceptions in learning and this is preventing the rapid progress of the least able pupils in particular. Teachers have not developed sequences
p.4
Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Requires improvement
of learning sufficiently to ensure that pupils have a good understanding of new concepts before moving on to the next one. As a result, pupils are unable to deepen their understanding and achieve mastery in mathematics. Until this year, the teaching of reading has been too variable. This year, leaders have urgently reviewed how reading is taught. They have ensured that teachers have received focused training and resources to help them to improve this area of provision. Teachers have raised their expectations of how pupils will respond to the texts they are reading, enabling pupils to develop higher-order reading skills more effectively. Teachers have chosen books to appeal to boys as well as girls and pupils are encouraged to read regularly in school. As a result, a better proportion of pupils are now working at levels typical for their age than was the case at the start of the year. The teaching of writing has been similarly variable, with rapid progress being made in
p.5
Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Requires improvement
upper key stage 2, enabling pupils to achieve astounding outcomes in writing. However, teachers’ knowledge of how to develop pupils’ writing is not consistently strong across school and expectations of presentation and handwriting, particularly by boys, are still too low in key stage 1 and lower key stage 2. Additional adults are increasingly effective in their role to support groups and individual pupils. They are providing good support for pupils who have special educational needs and/or disabilities, many of whom demonstrate challenging behaviours and have complex social and emotional needs. Some teachers are providing highly stimulating, imaginative lessons that are engaging pupils well. For example, Year 6 pupils were observed constructing a three-dimensional shelter that would accommodate four pupils. The task, linked to their class text, was exercising their ability to work as a team to solve problems.
p.5
Personal development and welfare
The school’s work to promote pupils’ personal development and welfare requires improvement. Pupils report that a small number of pupils use derogatory, sometimes homophobic language, although adults check this when they hear it. Pupils talked about the opportunities they have to learn about keeping safe, including dealing with bullying online. They appreciate that not all pupils are able to manage their behaviour successfully and say that staff deal well with the small amount of poor behaviour that occurs. Consequently, pupils said they feel safe in school. The headteacher has instilled in pupils and staff the belief that everyone can succeed in learning. This has led to a ‘can do’ attitude and pupils are rapidly developing resilience in learning. This resilience is particularly apparent in key stage 2.
p.5
Behaviour
The behaviour of pupils requires improvement. This is because although behaviour in lessons and at playtime is generally good, the poor behaviour of a small number of pupils sometimes disrupts learning and spoils lunchtime for others pupils. In the main, the impact of this behaviour is minimised by all staff. Despite the efforts of leaders and the attendance officer, pupils’ attendance is not improving quickly enough. Attendance is below average and too many pupils are persistently absent. New routines are helping most pupils to behave well. Pupils really enjoy receiving online tokens that effectively reinforce rewards and sanctions. Teachers are consistent in their application of the policy and for the most part, school is calm and orderly.
p.5
Outcomes for pupils Requires improvement
In 2015, the attainment of pupils at the end of key stage 2 was below national averages in reading and mathematics, but above in writing. This trend continued in 2016. The progress of Year 6 pupils was well above national average in writing in 2015, above in mathematics, but well below in reading. In 2016, pupils’ progress in writing continued to be very strong, but progress in reading and mathematics was below national average. The progress of boys, and middle prior attaining Year 6 pupils overall, was low compared to national figures for reading and mathematics. There was little difference between the progress of disadvantaged pupils and others, but pupils who have special educational needs and/or disabilities made less progress than other pupils with similar starting points. In 2016, the attainment of pupils at the end of key stage 1 was below national averages in reading, writing and mathematics. Middle prior attaining boys and
p.6
Outcomes for pupils Requires improvement
disadvantaged pupils did not make enough progress in any subject. Very few pupils achieved greater depth in learning. Outcomes in phonics have improved over the last three years and in 2016 were just below the national average. However, disadvantaged pupils did not do as well as others. Work in pupils’ books shows that pupils’ progress accelerates as they move up through the school. Pupils’ progress is strongest in Year 6. Overall, middle and high prior attaining pupils, including those who are disadvantaged, are now making secure progress. The school’s own assessment information shows that pupils are making much better progress across most year groups in reading, writing and mathematics. In the majority of classes, disadvantaged pupils are currently making similar progress to other pupils. However, in some year groups there are differences in the attainment and progress of disadvantaged pupils and girls are outperforming boys.
p.6
Early years provision Requires improvement
Most children enter Shirley Manor with levels of development below that typically seen for their age. In 2015, no children joined the Nursery class with skills and knowledge typical for their age and in 2016, a sixth displayed typical levels of development. Leaders say that children do make progress through Nursery and Reception classes but, due to past unreliable assessment, it is difficult to quantify how much progress has been made. Published assessment information states that 70% of children achieved a good level of development by the end of 2016. This is just below average when compared to national figures. Disadvantaged children did not do as well as other children. Leaders now have a clear view of the strengths, weaknesses and overall effectiveness of the early years provision. However, until recently they have not evaluated the impact of provision and teaching on children’s learning and progress with enough
p.7
Early years provision Requires improvement
precision to identify the things that were making a positive difference to children and those that have less impact. Teachers have not been consistent in the use of assessment information to plan the next steps in children’s learning. As a result, teaching activities do not always take account of children’s abilities, starting from what they know, in order to help them learn new concepts in a logical order. Teachers do not consistently plan activities in the indoor areas to capture and hold children’s interest and support their learning and development. At times, learning activities do not challenge some of the most able children and are too difficult for those children who have special needs and/or disabilities to access independently. This means that not all children make the rapid progress needed, particularly in developing writing skills, to prepare them well for Year 1. Leaders have recently developed an inviting and flexible outdoor environment,
p.7
Early years provision Requires improvement
effectively used to promote learning, particularly for the Nursery children. Children behave well, play energetically and learn cooperatively. Leaders have ensured that the setting is safe, that care is taken to ensure that all equipment is well maintained and that safe levels of supervision are maintained. Staff effectively manage the risks for children and ensure that the statutory welfare requirements are met. Funding provided to help disadvantaged children to make a good start is spent well to provide weekly speech therapy with a specialist. Additional adults were observed questioning children well to develop their understanding and effectively modelling language for children to copy. Children settle quickly into school life, aided by good communication with parents and with pre-school providers. Parents have regular opportunities to visit school with their children and to attend events such as the ‘hot chocolate and story’ sessions or ‘stay
p.7
Early years provision Requires improvement
and play’ to help them and their children assimilate into school life.
p.7
School details
This inspection was carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005. The inspection was also deemed a section 5 inspection under the same Act.
p.8
School details
Appropriate authority The governing body
p.8
School details
Date of previous inspection Not previously inspected
p.8
Information about this school
Shirley Manor is smaller than an average-sized primary school. The proportion of pupils who are eligible for support through the pupil premium is twice the national average. The proportion of pupils who have special educational needs and/or disabilities is above average. 85% of pupils are from White British backgrounds; 15% of pupils are from other minority ethnic groups. The headteacher joined the school in September 2016. The school meets the government’s current floor standards, which are the minimum expectations for pupils’ attainment in English and mathematics. Children in the Reception class attend full time. Children in the Nursery attend part time. The school meets requirements on the publication of specified information on its website. The school does not comply with Department for Education guidance on what academies should publish about the impact of pupil premium funding and funding for
p.8
Information about this school
pupils who have special educational needs and/or disabilities.
p.9
Information about this inspection
Together with the headteacher and assistant headteacher, inspectors looked at pupil progress data, information about the performance of teachers, documents relating to behaviour and safety and documents relating to safeguarding. Inspectors observed pupils’ learning in 17 parts of lessons, several alongside senior leaders. Pupils from Year 2 and Year 6 read to inspectors. Inspectors spoke with pupils in a meeting, in lessons, at lunchtime and at playtimes. Meetings were held with the headteacher, senior and middle leaders and four members of the governing body. A meeting was also held with the local authority school improvement partner. Inspectors considered the opinion of 36 parents through Parent View (Ofsted’s online questionnaire for parents). The inspectors took account of online responses returned by 14 members of staff and met with staff to talk about their experience of working at the school.
p.10
Inspection team
Lesley Butcher, lead inspector Her Majesty’s Inspector
p.10
Inspection team
Peter Marsh Ofsted Inspector guidance ‘Raising concerns and making a complaint about Ofsted’, which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.gov.uk/government/publications/complaints-about-ofsted . If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.10
Inspection team
In the report, ‘disadvantaged pupils’ refers to those pupils who attract government pupil premium funding: pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years and pupils in care or who left care through adoption or another formal route. www.gov.uk/pupil-premium-information-for-schools-and- alternative-provision-settings .
p.11
Inspection team
You can use Parent View to give Ofsted your opinion on your child’s school. Ofsted will use the information parents and carers provide when deciding which schools to inspect and when and as part of the inspection.
p.11
Inspection team
You can also use Parent View to find out what other parents and carers think about schools in England. You can visit www.parentview.ofsted.gov.uk , or look for the link on the main Ofsted website: www.gov.uk/government/organisations/ofsted .
p.11
Inspection team
achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.
p.11
Inspection team
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.11
Inspection team
You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open- government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .
p.11
Inspection team
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .
p.11
Inspection team
T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.11
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion