Schools & FE · School inspection (CIF)
Wirksworth Junior School
Summary
Peter Stonier (lead), Dorothy Stenson, Rob Cruise
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection datesingle source
1 Mar 2017
- Inspectors verified
Dorothy Stenson, Peter Stonier, Rob Cruise
- Leadership and management verified
Requires improvement
- Outcomes verified
Requires improvement
- Overall effectiveness verified
Requires improvement
- Personal development, behaviour and welfare verified
Requires improvement
- Previous overall verified
Good
- Teaching, learning and assessment verified
Requires improvement
- Postcode verified
DE4 4FD
- Name on report verified
Wirksworth Junior School
- URN verified
112652
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2013.
- OverallRequires improvement
- Leadership and managementRequires improvement
- OutcomesRequires improvement
- Personal development, behaviour and welfareRequires improvement
- Teaching, learning and assessmentRequires improvement
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
Reads more warmly than most reports of this type graded Requires improvement.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Relationships between adults and pupils are very positive, enabling pupils to have an excellent start to the day. p.6
- Pupils enjoy attending and are extremely well cared p.6
- Pupils have a strong understanding of how to keep themselves safe, including when online, crossing the road and out on their bikes. p.6
- Staff know and care for pupils very well. p.6
- Staff consistently use ‘reward ladders’ to promote positive behaviour. p.6
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Improve the quality of pupils’ personal development and welfare by ensuring that: – pupils have opportunities to develop their knowledge and understanding of other faiths and cultures, therefore preparing them well for life in modern Britain – staff work more closely with pupils and families to improve the attendance rates of different groups of pupils, including disadvantaged pupils. p.2
- An external review of the school’s use of the pupil premium should be undertaken in order to assess how this aspect of leadership and management may be improved. p.2
- Leadership and management require improvement because not all areas for improvement identified in the previous inspection report have been suitably addressed. p.3
- For example, disadvantaged pupils, including the most able disadvantaged, are not supported or monitored well enough to ensure that they make the progress of which they are capable. p.3
- Leaders’ plans for school improvement in English and mathematics lack precision. p.3
- They do not contain sufficient detail in their actions, timescales or monitoring opportunities to enable their impact to be measured accurately. p.3
- Leaders have not ensured that the programmes of study for foundation subjects and science are planned appropriately throughout the school. p.3
- For example, inspectors found evidence of pupils completing the same work on electric circuits in Years 3 and 6. p.3
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 10
- Words of findings
- 2,490
- about usual (typical 3064)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 44, typical 47
- Average sentence
- 16 words
- Next steps
- 8
- typical 8
- Hedged sentences
- 4%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Wirksworth Junior School Wash Green, Wirksworth, Matlock, Derbyshire DE4 4FD
p.1
Inspection dates 28 February–1 March 2017
p.1
Overall effectiveness Requires improvement
p.1
Effectiveness of leadership and management Requires improvement
p.1
Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Requires improvement
p.1
Personal development, behaviour and welfare Requires improvement
p.1
Outcomes for pupils Requires improvement
p.1
Overall effectiveness at previous inspection Good
p.1
Summary of key findings for parents and pupils
This is a school that requires improvement
p.1
Summary of key findings for parents and pupils
Disadvantaged pupils do not make enough progress. This is because teaching does not consistently provide effective support to meet their needs. Consequently, these pupils do not make the progress of which they are capable. Leaders and governors have not ensured that pupil premium funding is allocated and monitored effectively. As a result, this funding is not accelerating the progress of disadvantaged pupils and ensuring that they achieve as well as others. Pupils are not well prepared for life in modern Britain. They have a limited knowledge of faiths and cultures other than their own. Leaders’ plans for school and subject improvement are not robust enough. They do not contain specific actions, milestones or monitoring opportunities. Governors cannot therefore hold leaders fully to account for their actions. Teachers do not ensure that pupils are moved on to challenging work quickly enough in mathematics. Progress is, therefore, slower
p.1
Summary of key findings for parents and pupils
than it should be. The science and the foundation subjects are not taught effectively. These areas of the curriculum are not well planned. Pupils in Year 3 and Year 6 often complete the same work. Pupils’ attendance, including disadvantaged pupils’ attendance, is below the national average.
p.1
Summary of key findings for parents and pupils
Pupils’ attainment was above national figures in reading, writing and mathematics in 2016. Non-disadvantaged pupils make good progress in writing. The presentation of work is good. Leaders have generated a caring ethos and safe environment at the school. Staff know pupils and families extremely well. They offer effective extra support to them when it is required to ensure pupils’ welfare. The behaviour of pupils is good in classrooms, corridors and on the playground. There are reward systems in place to promote positive behaviour. These systems work well. The progress of those pupils who have special educational needs and/or disabilities is good. Pupils benefit from a wide range of extra- curricular clubs and activities both at lunchtime and after school.
p.1
What does the school need to do to improve further?
Improve the quality of leadership and management by ensuring that: – leaders develop appropriate whole-school and subject improvement plans that contain specific actions and milestones which are then systematically monitored by governors – leaders, including governors, monitor more closely the allocation and impact of the pupil premium funding to ensure it is spent more effectively – the science and foundation subject programmes of study are designed carefully to ensure that skills in these subjects are taught at age-appropriate levels. Improve the quality of teaching and learning, and therefore improve outcomes, by ensuring that: – greater support is given to disadvantaged pupils, including the most able disadvantaged, to ensure that they make the progress of which they are capable – teachers check carefully when pupils are ready to tackle more challenging work in mathematics so that greater proportions achieve or exceed the expected standard.
p.2
What does the school need to do to improve further?
Improve the quality of pupils’ personal development and welfare by ensuring that: – pupils have opportunities to develop their knowledge and understanding of other faiths and cultures, therefore preparing them well for life in modern Britain – staff work more closely with pupils and families to improve the attendance rates of different groups of pupils, including disadvantaged pupils. An external review of the school’s use of the pupil premium should be undertaken in order to assess how this aspect of leadership and management may be improved.
p.2
Effectiveness of leadership and management Requires improvement
Leadership and management require improvement because not all areas for improvement identified in the previous inspection report have been suitably addressed. For example, disadvantaged pupils, including the most able disadvantaged, are not supported or monitored well enough to ensure that they make the progress of which they are capable. Leaders’ plans for school improvement in English and mathematics lack precision. They do not contain sufficient detail in their actions, timescales or monitoring opportunities to enable their impact to be measured accurately. Leaders have not ensured that the programmes of study for foundation subjects and science are planned appropriately throughout the school. For example, inspectors found evidence of pupils completing the same work on electric circuits in Years 3 and 6. Leaders have not ensured that the curriculum successfully prepares pupils for life in modern Britain. There are not enough opportunities for pupils to learn about faiths and
p.3
Effectiveness of leadership and management Requires improvement
cultures different to their own. There is a timetable of monitoring activities in place that ensures, for example, that leaders check pupils’ books regularly. Consequently, leaders were recently able to confirm that the school’s marking policy has been implemented successfully and consistently across the school. Leaders have made good links with other schools locally. This enables teachers to share good practice and moderate pupils’ work to ensure that assessments, for example in pupils’ extended writing, are accurate. Leadership of special educational needs provision is a strength. Pupils are tracked closely to ensure that additional help provided is having a positive impact and that pupils who have special educational needs and/or disabilities are making good progress. There are good links with outside agencies including speech and language therapists, educational psychologists and the school nurse.
p.3
Effectiveness of leadership and management Requires improvement
Performance management is robust. Staff are set challenging targets regarding pupil progress and receive appropriate training. Reviews are timetabled twice during the academic year to ensure that teachers are on track to meet targets or to establish if extra support is required. Governors have a clear overview of this process to ensure transparency and fairness. Additional physical education and sport premium funding has been used successfully to give pupils the opportunity to develop their skills in a wide range of sports including fencing, water polo, table tennis and basketball. Older pupils are ‘change for life’ ambassadors who help to organise activities for other pupils at lunchtimes. Pupils have enjoyed competitions against other schools in football and are current local indoor sports hall athletics champions. Staff who completed the online questionnaire are overwhelming supportive of leaders.
p.3
Effectiveness of leadership and management Requires improvement
The vast majority of staff believe that they are treated fairly and with respect and that the school is well led and managed.
p.3
Governance of the school
Governance is effective in helping the school to move forward. Governors have recently carried out relevant training provided by the local authority to help them better understand published pupil attainment and achievement information. As a result of this, the teaching and learning committee ask relevant questions of leaders and hold them to account for their actions. Governors are aware of the strengths and areas for development at the school. For example, they know that leaders do not allocate the spending of the pupil premium funding carefully enough and that its impact cannot be measured accurately. Governors carry out planned monitoring activities throughout the year. A recent example being a science work scrutiny, where governors correctly identified that progression is an issue.
p.4
Safeguarding
The arrangements for safeguarding are effective. Leaders ensure that staff receive regular training and updates to help them understand how to keep children safe. Procedures for vetting adults who work with children are rigorous. The single central record is well maintained and monitored. There are good systems in place for staff to record child protection concerns. Leaders understand the importance of attention to detail in ensuring that records are robust and of the highest quality. There are strong links with outside agencies that ensure pupils and families quickly receive any extra support they require. Leaders, including governors, have received appropriate safeguarding training including in the ‘Prevent’ duty, which helps them to protect pupils who are at risk from extremism and radicalisation. Leaders and staff create a secure and safe environment where pupils’ welfare is important. Consequently, parents know their children are kept safe and pupils feel safe
p.4
Safeguarding
and secure in school. A governor recently undertook an audit to check that the safeguarding procedures are being followed consistently. This exemplifies the high priority given to safeguarding which is reflected in the strong safeguarding culture evident throughout the school.
p.4
Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Requires improvement
Teachers do not plan effectively enough to ensure that disadvantaged pupils, including the most able disadvantaged pupils, receive the support they require. Consequently, these pupils do not make the progress of which they are capable in reading, writing and, in particular, mathematics. Teachers do not move pupils on to appropriately challenging work quickly enough in mathematics. Too often, pupils are given work that is too easy for them and as a result are not reaching the standards of which they are capable. There are good opportunities for pupils to write at length in a range of subjects. This enables pupils to practise spelling, punctuation and grammar skills regularly. For example, in Year 3 pupils had written a detailed newspaper report about a Roman gladiator which demonstrated their effective use of adjectives. Pupils take pride in their work and their presentation of work is a strength. Standards
p.4
Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Requires improvement
of handwriting are high across the school, with many pupils enjoying the challenge and reward of achieving a ‘pen certificate’. Teachers are using the school’s marking and assessment policy consistently in a wide range of subjects. As a result of this, pupils are aware of their targets and what they need to do next in order to improve. Pupils enjoy reading and have a well-resourced library from which to choose books. Reading diaries show that pupils read regularly at home and that the level of challenge in their reading books is appropriate. Pupils who attend the nurture group are supported well. They make good progress academically, socially and emotionally. Adults provide a safe and caring environment where pupils progress well in English and mathematics. A recent visit from adults and children from Die enabled pupils to develop their understanding of French. This visit helped to support the existing, weekly sessions that
p.5
Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Requires improvement
occur in all classes and help pupils learn the basics of another language. Pupils receive regular homework activities that extend their knowledge and skills in a range of subjects. Pupils told inspectors they enjoyed completing these tasks. Recent examples on display at the school included models of a Viking long boat and the local church.
p.5
Personal development and welfare
The school’s work to promote pupils’ personal development and welfare requires improvement. Pupils have a limited knowledge and understanding of world faiths and cultures. They are not as well prepared for life in modern Britain as they could be. Pupils’ attendance rates, including those for disadvantaged pupils, are currently below those for pupils nationally. Pupils are confident learners and talk knowledgably about the activities they are doing. They work equally well individually, in pairs or in groups. For example, in one mixed Year 5 and Year 6 class, groups of pupils were developing their speaking skills by rehearsing a play about a Roman invasion, in readiness for an upcoming school assembly. The core values of integrity, aspiration, determination, respect, tolerance and trust are evident around the school. Pupils talk about these readily and demonstrate the values as they go about their day in classrooms and when playing at break and lunchtimes.
p.5
Personal development and welfare
Pupils benefit from a wide range of activities and clubs. These include choir, chess, drumming, hand bells and samba dancing. Many of these activities are suggested by pupils, these are then delivered by staff or outside providers. Pupils have a strong understanding of how to keep themselves safe, including when online, crossing the road and out on their bikes. They have a good understanding of the different kinds of bullying and say that it is extremely rare. The ‘Several Times On Purpose’ and ‘Start Telling Other People’ mantra is well known and used by pupils regularly. Pupils enjoy the responsibility of being play leaders at lunchtime, helping to organise sports and games for other pupils. The playground is well equipped for physical activity and equipment such as skipping ropes, hoops and basketballs are plentiful. These ensure that pupils remain active during breaktimes. The breakfast club is a strength. Pupils enjoy attending and are extremely well cared
p.6
Personal development and welfare
for. Relationships between adults and pupils are very positive, enabling pupils to have an excellent start to the day. One pupil remarked that, ‘Breakfast club is awesome!’ Staff know and care for pupils very well. There is a nurturing ethos and the vast majority of pupils who spoke with inspectors said that they were well looked after and felt safe.
p.6
Behaviour
The behaviour of pupils is good in classrooms, corridors and on the playground. Some parents who responded to the online survey, Parent View, suggested that behaviour was not good. Inspectors looked very closely at this issue and considered carefully the points raised by parents. Following observations of pupils in a variety of situations, and in discussions with pupils and staff, they concluded that pupils behave well. Staff consistently use ‘reward ladders’ to promote positive behaviour. Pupils enjoy the challenge and prestige of achieving bronze, silver or gold awards, which are presented regularly in assemblies. Pupils show good manners when talking to each other, staff and visitors. They often hold doors open for one another and respectfully allow adults to go first. They greeted inspectors politely and spoke maturely about their learning and the school. Incidents of low-level disruption in classrooms are extremely rare. This is because
p.6
Behaviour
pupils work well together and respond positively to adults’ instructions.
p.6
Outcomes for pupils Requires improvement
Outcomes for pupils require improvement because disadvantaged pupils, including the most able disadvantaged pupils, do not make the progress of which they are capable from their various starting points. This is particularly the case in mathematics. Pupils do not make good progress in mathematics. This is because they are not moved on to more challenging work quickly enough. They are often given work that is too easy for them. Pupils do not make good progress in science and other foundation subjects. This is because the programmes of study are the same for pupils in Year 3 to Year 6. Pupils often complete exactly the same work in these subjects. In 2016, the progress made by disadvantaged pupils, including the most able disadvantaged pupils, was below national averages in reading and mathematics. In 2016, the standards reached by non-disadvantaged pupils were above national figures in reading, writing and mathematics. This was the case at the expected and
p.6
Outcomes for pupils Requires improvement
higher levels of attainment. Standards in the spelling, punctuation and grammar test were broadly in line with national figures last year. However, pupils, including disadvantaged pupils, achieved standards below national figures at the higher level. Current information about pupils’ performance and work in pupils’ books indicate that the majority of non-disadvantaged pupils are on track to reach age-related expectations in reading and writing by the end of the academic year. Non- disadvantaged pupils are making particularly strong progress in writing. Pupils who have special educational needs and/or disabilities make good progress from their various starting points. This is especially the case for Year 5 and Year 6 pupils in mathematics and for Year 3 and Year 4 pupils in reading and writing.
p.7
School details
This inspection was carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005. The inspection was also deemed a section 5 inspection under the same Act.
p.8
School details
Appropriate authority The governing body
p.8
School details
Email address office@wirksworth-jun.derbyshire.sch.uk
p.8
School details
Date of previous inspection 18–19 June 2013
p.8
Information about this school
The school does not meet requirements on the publication of information about the curriculum, special educational needs and governance on its website. The school is a smaller than average-sized primary school. The proportions of pupils from minority ethnic backgrounds and those pupils who speak English as an additional language are much lower than the national average. The proportion of pupils who have special educational needs and/or disabilities is above average. The proportion of disadvantaged pupils is average. The school meets the government’s current floor standards, which are the minimum expectations for pupils’ attainment and progress in reading, writing and mathematics by the end of Year 6.
p.8
Information about this inspection
Inspectors observed lessons in all year groups and examined a wide variety of pupils’ books from a range of subjects. The acting deputy headteacher sometimes accompanied the lead inspector on inspection activities. Inspectors held a range of meetings with the headteacher and acting deputy headteacher, special educational needs leader, a group of governors including the chair, and a representative from the local authority. They spoke with pupils in groups, in lessons, around the school and listened to them read. Inspectors scrutinised a range of documents including minutes of governing body meetings, current assessment information provided by the school, the school development plan, plans written by English and mathematics subject leaders and records relating to safeguarding. Inspectors talked with parents before school and took into account 40 responses to Parent View and 37 responses to the parent text service. There were 116 responses to
p.9
Information about this inspection
the pupil questionnaire and 12 to the staff questionnaire.
p.9
Inspection team
Peter Stonier, lead inspector Her Majesty’s Inspector
p.9
Inspection team
Dorothy Stenson Ofsted Inspector guidance ‘Raising concerns and making a complaint about Ofsted’, which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.gov.uk/government/publications/complaints-about-ofsted . If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.9
Inspection team
In the report, ‘disadvantaged pupils’ refers to those pupils who attract government pupil premium funding: pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years and pupils in care or who left care through adoption or another formal route. www.gov.uk/pupil-premium-information-for-schools-and- alternative-provision-settings .
p.10
Inspection team
You can use Parent View to give Ofsted your opinion on your child’s school. Ofsted will use the information parents and carers provide when deciding which schools to inspect and when and as part of the inspection.
p.10
Inspection team
You can also use Parent View to find out what other parents and carers think about schools in England. You can visit www.parentview.ofsted.gov.uk , or look for the link on the main Ofsted website: www.gov.uk/government/organisations/ofsted .
p.10
Inspection team
achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.
p.10
Inspection team
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.10
Inspection team
You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open- government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .
p.10
Inspection team
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .
p.10
Inspection team
T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.10
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion