Early years · Early years inspection (CIF)
Seaton Delaval Pre School
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Group verified
Seaton Delaval Pre School Committee
- Group reference verified
RP523433
- Inspection date verified
28 Feb 2017
- Inspectors verified
Emma Allison
- Early years verified
Inadequate
- Leadership and management verified
Requires improvement
- Outcomes verified
Requires improvement
- Overall effectiveness verified
Requires improvement
- Personal development, behaviour and welfare verified
Requires improvement
- Previous overall verified
Inadequate
- Teaching, learning and assessment verified
Requires improvement
- Postcode verified
NE25 0BW
- Name on report verified
Seaton Delaval Pre School
- URN verified
301821
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2016.
- OverallRequires improvement
- Early yearsInadequate
- Leadership and managementRequires improvement
- OutcomesRequires improvement
- Personal development, behaviour and welfareRequires improvement
- Teaching, learning and assessmentRequires improvement
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type graded Requires improvement.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No strong criticism found.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Leaders do not have an accurate enough view of the quality of the provision. p.1
- Systems to gather the views of children and parents are not wholly successful to help drive improvements forward. p.1
- Staff supervision sessions are not effective. p.1
- Leaders do not successfully evaluate the quality of practice and identify accurate training needs for staff. p.1
- Children are not engaged in their learning during planned activities and become distracted due to waiting too long with little to occupy them. p.1
- However, occasionally staff do not use consistent strategies to encourage children to effectively manage their own feelings and behaviour. p.1
- Children do not make good enough progress. p.1
- Information about what children need to learn next is not used accurately enough to plan activities that challenge them. p.1
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Staff development4
“Staff supervision sessions are not effective.” p.1Progress & outcomes4
“Children do not make good enough progress.” p.1Teaching & assessment3
“Teaching is variable.” p.1
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 5
- Words of findings
- 824
- about usual (typical 773)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 48, typical 48
- Average sentence
- 14 words
- Next steps
- 8
- typical 8
- Hedged sentences
- 5%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Seaton Delaval Pre School Seaton Delaval Community Centre, Elsdon Avenue, Seaton Delaval, Northumberland, NE25 0BW
p.1
Inspection date
Previous inspection date 28 February 2017 8 November 2016
p.1
3
Effectiveness of the leadership and management Requires improvement Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Requires improvement Personal development, behaviour and welfare Requires improvement Outcomes for children Requires improvement
p.1
This provision requires improvement. It is not yet good because:
Leaders do not have an accurate enough view of the quality of the provision. Systems to gather the views of children and parents are not wholly successful to help drive improvements forward. Staff supervision sessions are not effective. Leaders do not successfully evaluate the quality of practice and identify accurate training needs for staff. Teaching is variable. Children are not engaged in their learning during planned activities and become distracted due to waiting too long with little to occupy them. Children generally behave well. However, occasionally staff do not use consistent strategies to encourage children to effectively manage their own feelings and behaviour. Children do not make good enough progress. Information about what children need to learn next is not used accurately enough to plan activities that challenge them.
p.1
It has the following strengths
Staff provide children with regular opportunities for them to develop their physical skills. For example, children have access to a large hall where they can run, climb on large climbing frames and ride bikes. Staff take children on trips to the local park and walks to the library. Parents speak highly of the staff team. Information is provided to parents about the progress their children make. Children take reading books home to share with their parents. This helps to provide a continued approach to children's learning.
p.1
What the setting needs to do to improve further
To meet the requirements of the early years foundation stage the provider must:
p.2
Due Date
improve supervision sessions to highlight gaps in practice and address training needs to raise the quality of teaching to a good level 20/03/2017
p.2
Due Date
ensure that children are engaged in purposeful learning through well-planned activities that meet their needs 20/03/2017
p.2
Due Date
provide a consistent approach to managing children's behaviour and encourage children to develop an awareness of how their feelings and behaviour impact others 20/03/2017
p.2
Due Date
use information gained from observations of children's learning to plan challenging activities and identify what children need to learn next to meet their individual needs. 20/03/2017
p.2
Due Date
To further improve the quality of the early years provision the provider should:
p.2
Due Date
develop self-evaluation procedures that accurately identify gaps in practices and gather the views of children and parents to inform priorities.
p.2
Inspection activities
The inspector observed the quality of teaching during activities and assessed the impact this has on children's learning. The inspector spoke with staff and children during the inspection. The inspector completed an evaluation of an activity with the nursery manager. The inspector viewed the areas accessed by children. The inspector held a meeting with the nursery manager and provider. She looked at relevant documentation and evidence of the suitability of staff working in the nursery. The inspector also discussed self-evaluation. The inspector spoke to a number of parents during the inspection and took account of their views.
p.2
Effectiveness of the leadership and management requires improvement
Safeguarding is effective. Leaders and staff demonstrate a suitable understanding of local safeguarding procedures. Daily risk assessments are completed and hazards are identified and addressed. Children are provided with opportunities to develop an understanding of how to keep themselves safe, for example, during a trip to the library staff talk to children about how to cross the road safely. Leaders have addressed the action raised at the previous inspection and all committee members now have the required checks in place. However, not all recommendations have been actioned. For example, although supervisions are in place leaders do not address gaps in practice and identify training needs. Furthermore, leaders do not yet evaluate the quality of the provision with rigour and successfully gather the views of children and parents to inform priorities. Staff attend meetings with other early years providers and share practice ideas. Individual monitoring
p.3
Effectiveness of the leadership and management requires improvement
systems are in place to record children's progress.
p.3
Quality of teaching, learning and assessment requires improvement
Children have access to a suitable range of resources and make choices during play. However, large-group activities are not planned well. They are over directed and do not provide children with opportunities to participate in purposeful learning. Children are required to wait for long periods of time and become disinterested. For example, staff provide a bowl of flour and a whisk for children as they sit around in a large group. Children are encouraged to take turns to stir the flour. The other children wait for long periods before they take a turn. Children lose interest and move onto another self-chosen activity. The qualified staff demonstrate an adequate understanding of how children learn. They observe children as they play. However, information that is gathered is not used effectively to identify what children need to learn next and to plan appropriately challenging activities.
p.3
Personal development, behaviour and welfare require improvement
Staff provide children with healthy choices during snack times. Children are well settled and form close relationships with their key person. This helps to promote children's confidence and self-esteem. However, occasionally strategies to encourage children to manage their own feelings and behaviour are not consistent between staff. For example, children take toys from other children and push each other when moving between rooms. Some staff do not provide children with good opportunities to consistently develop an awareness of boundaries and to develop good social skills.
p.3
Outcomes for children require improvement
Not all children make good enough progress in their learning and development. They are not equipped with good enough key skills for their future learning and their eventual move on to school. However, children confidently talk to visitors about what they are playing with. They learn to follow suitable hygiene practices and develop self-care skills. For example, children blow their noses and wash their hands. This helps to promote their independence.
p.3
Setting details
Unique reference number 301821 Local authority Northumberland Inspection number 1078399 Type of provision Sessional provision Day care type Childcare - Non-Domestic Registers Early Years Register Age range of children 2 - 4 Total number of places 24 Number of children on roll 8 Name of registered person Seaton Delaval Pre School Committee
p.4
reference number
Date of previous inspection 8 November 2016 Telephone number 07980 205590
p.4
reference number
Seaton Delaval Pre School was registered in 1993. The nursery employs three members of childcare staff. Of these, two hold appropriate early years qualifications at level 3. The nursery opens from Monday to Friday, term time only. Sessions are from 9am until 12pm. The nursery provides funded early education for two-, three- and four-year-old children.
p.4
reference number
This inspection was carried out by Ofsted under sections 49 and 50 of the Childcare Act 2006 on the quality and standards of provision that is registered on the Early Years Register. The registered person must ensure that this provision complies with the statutory framework for children’s learning, development and care, known as the early years foundation stage.
p.4
reference number
procedures set out in the guidance ‘Complaints procedure: raising concerns and making complaints about Ofsted’, which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.gov.uk/government/organisations/ofsted. If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk. achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, work-based learning and skills training, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection.
p.4
reference number
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk. You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/, write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .
p.5
reference number
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our website for news, information and updates at www.ofsted.gov.uk/user.
p.5
reference number
T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/government/organisations/ofsted
p.5
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion