Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · Short school inspection

Our Lady of Lourdes Roman Catholic Primary School, Bury

Inspected 14 Feb 2017 · published 21 Mar 2017 · URN 105337

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection datesingle source

    14 Feb 2017

  • Inspectorssingle source

    James Blackwell

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Good

  • Postcode verified

    BL8 1YA

  • Name on report verified

    Our Lady of Lourdes Roman Catholic Primary School, Bury

Page 1 of 4
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2012.

  • OverallGood

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+89Very positivemore positive than 93% of reports of this type graded Good
OutstandingGood

Reads more warmly than most reports of this type graded Good.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseeffectivestrengthsclearwarmenjoystrengthcaringsafe
Criticismharmstrugglepersistently absentpersistent absencenot clear

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improveAbout the inspection positive critical
  • Findings1183w+88
  • What needs to improve87w+20

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
4
Words of findings
1,263
about usual (typical 1483)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 53, typical 50
Average sentence
20 words
Next steps
2
typical 2
Hedged sentences
14%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 85%What needs to improve 6%About the inspection 9%

Full report text

Store Street Manchester M1 2WD T 0300 123 4234 www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.1

Mrs Joanne Davies Headteacher Our Lady of Lourdes Roman Catholic Primary School Rudgwick Drive Bury Lancashire BL8 1YA

p.1

Bury

Following my visit to the school on 14 February 2017, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to report the inspection findings. The visit was the first short inspection carried out since the school was judged to be good in June 2012.

p.1

Bury

The leadership team has maintained the good quality of education in the school since the last inspection. There have been many staff changes since then, including your appointment as substantive headteacher in March 2015. The assistant headteachers are also new to their posts. Nonetheless, leaders have swiftly developed a well-informed knowledge of the needs of the school and your clear vision has put the school at the heart of the community. You have engaged well with parents by not only increasing communication between home and school, but also establishing an open and warm culture where parents are always welcome. As a result, parents speak very highly of the school and of your leadership.

p.1

Bury

Governors fully support you in your role and together you all have a clear understanding of what the school does well and where even more can be achieved. This has ensured that your priorities for improvement are accurately identified and your plans focus on areas most needing improvement.

p.1

Bury

Pupils told me that they thoroughly enjoy coming to school because they feel it is a warm, happy and exciting place to be. Pupils enjoy lessons and say that teachers really help and support them in their learning. The atmosphere across the school, both in lessons and on the playground, is calm. Pupils are well behaved, listen attentively and have good manners. Pupils and parents agree that pupils’ behaviour is a strength of the school. Teaching continues to be good. The impact of this effective teaching is most evident in the early years and key stage 1, where progress is faster. The work in pupils’ books and the school’s own tracking data show that progress is now accelerating in key stage 2. As a result, an increasing proportion of pupils in key stage 2 are on track to reach and exceed the standards expected for their age.

p.1

Bury

We discussed the current strengths of the school and the areas you are working to improve. Your development plan rightly focuses on continuing to improve standards in reading and the quality of teaching for the most able pupils. You recognise that there is further work to be done to ensure that more of the most able pupils gain a greater depth in their knowledge in writing and mathematics.

p.2

Bury

Staff are vigilant, observant and caring in their safeguarding role. Pupil welfare and safety are paramount. You regularly meet with your parent support adviser to discuss pupils’ needs, and this is typical of the school’s dedication and proactive approach to understanding the needs of pupils and keeping them safe. Procedures for safeguarding are robust and are known by all staff because of regular briefings and updates. Recruitment checks completed on staff are thorough. Records and logs for safeguarding are detailed and are kept securely. For example, records viewed during the inspection show that, where pupils are potentially vulnerable, leaders act swiftly to protect them from harm and involve external agencies when needed.

p.2

Bury

Pupils are aware of how to keep themselves safe in a broad range of situations, including when they work online. Pupils spoke enthusiastically about how, as e- cadets, they recently led a whole-school assembly to ensure that other pupils understand how and why they need to keep themselves safe online. Pupils told me that staff are caring and approachable, which makes them feel extremely safe as they know they can ask for support and help when they are worried about a problem. Pupils speak warmly about the ‘family feel’ across the school where everybody looks after each other. They were so proud to share with me that the ‘Gift Team’ not only lead collective worship, but also lead the weekly ‘worry club’, helping other pupils find solutions to their problems.

p.2

Inspection findings

 The key strengths of behaviour, the quality of teaching and learning and the progress that pupils make, which were identified at the last inspection, have been maintained. The previous inspection reported that the school needed to develop structured, consistent systems to teach reading and writing skills and to ensure consistency in the way that pupils receive feedback to guide and improve their work. Teaching of reading and writing is effective, as can be seen in the improvements in your most recent key stage 2 results. These showed that the school had a greater proportion of pupils achieving the expected standards in reading, writing and mathematics than nationally. An in-depth scrutiny of pupils’ work that I undertook showed that standards of presentation are high, particularly in key stage 2. Pupils understand what they should be aiming to achieve in all their work.  Leaders have taken a range of steps to improve reading, writing and

p.2

Inspection findings

mathematics teaching so that the most able pupils achieve higher standards. The scrutiny of pupils’ work showed that pupils are challenged in both English and mathematics as a result of teachers planning tasks that deepen pupils’ understanding. Your own tracking information shows that an increasing number of pupils across different year groups are beginning to reach higher standards in English and mathematics. Leaders were able to show how staff training in this area is being shared across the school and is impacting positively on teachers’ practice.  Subject leaders are taking action to improve the quality of teaching and outcomes in their areas of responsibility. However, they were not wholly clear as to the impact that their actions were having or whether this was consistent across the school. We agreed that, although there are some good examples of this work, it remains an aspect that should improve further.

p.3

Inspection findings

 Leaders have taken effective action to improve phonics teaching, which is a strength of the school, despite a recent dip in published results. Leaders have a strong understanding of the strengths of teaching within this area and make effective use of online training to further improve staff’s skills. Consequently, most pupils learn new letters and sounds rapidly to secure a good start in learning to read. Pupils who may initially struggle with early reading are targeted effectively through individual interventions and, as a result, catch up with their peers.  You have put in place clear and robust systems for monitoring and tracking pupils who are persistently absent. You work skilfully with the school’s parent support adviser to ensure you both fully understand the barriers that stop pupils from attending school regularly. Persistent absence figures have reduced this academic year because of clear action planning and the support provided by you and the

p.3

Inspection findings

parent support adviser. We discussed case studies at length and saw the impact of your work, which reflects how the nurturing support that the school offers ‘goes that extra mile’.

p.3

Next steps for the school

Leaders and those responsible for governance should ensure that:

p.3

Next steps for the school

 the most able pupils have increased opportunities to broaden and deepen their knowledge and understanding in writing and mathematics

p.3

Next steps for the school

 they precisely evaluate the impact on pupils’ achievement of actions included in the school’s improvement plans. I am copying this letter to chair of the governing body, the director of education for the diocese of Salford, the regional schools commissioner and the director of children’s services for Bury. This letter will be published on the Ofsted website.

p.3

Information about the inspection

During this short inspection, I met with you, senior leaders, five members of the governing body and a representative of the local authority. We conducted a series of short visits to lessons and I visited other classes and had the opportunity to speak to pupils and see their work. I also listened to a number of pupils read. As part of the inspection, I met with groups of pupils throughout the day, spoke with five parents at the school gates and took account of free text comments from Parent View and three letters from parents given to me during the inspection. I scrutinised your assessment information, school improvement planning, attendance data, risk assessments, the single central record and other safeguarding procedures and practices.

p.4

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion