Schools & FE · Short school inspection
Our Lady of Lourdes Roman Catholic Primary School, Bury
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection datesingle source
14 Feb 2017
- Inspectorssingle source
James Blackwell
- Overall effectiveness verified
Good
- Postcode verified
BL8 1YA
- Name on report verified
Our Lady of Lourdes Roman Catholic Primary School, Bury
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2012.
- OverallGood
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
Reads more warmly than most reports of this type graded Good.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Leaders have a strong understanding of the strengths of teaching within this area and make effective use of online training to further improve staff’s skills. p.3
- Pupils told me that they thoroughly enjoy coming to school because they feel it is a warm, happy and exciting place to be. p.1
- Pupils told me that staff are caring and approachable, which makes them feel extremely safe as they know they can ask for support and help when they are worried about a problem. p.2
- Leaders have taken effective action to improve phonics teaching, which is a strength of the school, despite a recent dip in published results. p.3
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No strong criticism found.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 4
- Words of findings
- 1,263
- about usual (typical 1483)
- Reading level
- Fairly hard
- Flesch 53, typical 50
- Average sentence
- 20 words
- Next steps
- 2
- typical 2
- Hedged sentences
- 14%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Store Street Manchester M1 2WD T 0300 123 4234 www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.1
Mrs Joanne Davies Headteacher Our Lady of Lourdes Roman Catholic Primary School Rudgwick Drive Bury Lancashire BL8 1YA
p.1
Bury
Following my visit to the school on 14 February 2017, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to report the inspection findings. The visit was the first short inspection carried out since the school was judged to be good in June 2012.
p.1
Bury
The leadership team has maintained the good quality of education in the school since the last inspection. There have been many staff changes since then, including your appointment as substantive headteacher in March 2015. The assistant headteachers are also new to their posts. Nonetheless, leaders have swiftly developed a well-informed knowledge of the needs of the school and your clear vision has put the school at the heart of the community. You have engaged well with parents by not only increasing communication between home and school, but also establishing an open and warm culture where parents are always welcome. As a result, parents speak very highly of the school and of your leadership.
p.1
Bury
Governors fully support you in your role and together you all have a clear understanding of what the school does well and where even more can be achieved. This has ensured that your priorities for improvement are accurately identified and your plans focus on areas most needing improvement.
p.1
Bury
Pupils told me that they thoroughly enjoy coming to school because they feel it is a warm, happy and exciting place to be. Pupils enjoy lessons and say that teachers really help and support them in their learning. The atmosphere across the school, both in lessons and on the playground, is calm. Pupils are well behaved, listen attentively and have good manners. Pupils and parents agree that pupils’ behaviour is a strength of the school. Teaching continues to be good. The impact of this effective teaching is most evident in the early years and key stage 1, where progress is faster. The work in pupils’ books and the school’s own tracking data show that progress is now accelerating in key stage 2. As a result, an increasing proportion of pupils in key stage 2 are on track to reach and exceed the standards expected for their age.
p.1
Bury
We discussed the current strengths of the school and the areas you are working to improve. Your development plan rightly focuses on continuing to improve standards in reading and the quality of teaching for the most able pupils. You recognise that there is further work to be done to ensure that more of the most able pupils gain a greater depth in their knowledge in writing and mathematics.
p.2
Bury
Staff are vigilant, observant and caring in their safeguarding role. Pupil welfare and safety are paramount. You regularly meet with your parent support adviser to discuss pupils’ needs, and this is typical of the school’s dedication and proactive approach to understanding the needs of pupils and keeping them safe. Procedures for safeguarding are robust and are known by all staff because of regular briefings and updates. Recruitment checks completed on staff are thorough. Records and logs for safeguarding are detailed and are kept securely. For example, records viewed during the inspection show that, where pupils are potentially vulnerable, leaders act swiftly to protect them from harm and involve external agencies when needed.
p.2
Bury
Pupils are aware of how to keep themselves safe in a broad range of situations, including when they work online. Pupils spoke enthusiastically about how, as e- cadets, they recently led a whole-school assembly to ensure that other pupils understand how and why they need to keep themselves safe online. Pupils told me that staff are caring and approachable, which makes them feel extremely safe as they know they can ask for support and help when they are worried about a problem. Pupils speak warmly about the ‘family feel’ across the school where everybody looks after each other. They were so proud to share with me that the ‘Gift Team’ not only lead collective worship, but also lead the weekly ‘worry club’, helping other pupils find solutions to their problems.
p.2
Inspection findings
The key strengths of behaviour, the quality of teaching and learning and the progress that pupils make, which were identified at the last inspection, have been maintained. The previous inspection reported that the school needed to develop structured, consistent systems to teach reading and writing skills and to ensure consistency in the way that pupils receive feedback to guide and improve their work. Teaching of reading and writing is effective, as can be seen in the improvements in your most recent key stage 2 results. These showed that the school had a greater proportion of pupils achieving the expected standards in reading, writing and mathematics than nationally. An in-depth scrutiny of pupils’ work that I undertook showed that standards of presentation are high, particularly in key stage 2. Pupils understand what they should be aiming to achieve in all their work. Leaders have taken a range of steps to improve reading, writing and
p.2
Inspection findings
mathematics teaching so that the most able pupils achieve higher standards. The scrutiny of pupils’ work showed that pupils are challenged in both English and mathematics as a result of teachers planning tasks that deepen pupils’ understanding. Your own tracking information shows that an increasing number of pupils across different year groups are beginning to reach higher standards in English and mathematics. Leaders were able to show how staff training in this area is being shared across the school and is impacting positively on teachers’ practice. Subject leaders are taking action to improve the quality of teaching and outcomes in their areas of responsibility. However, they were not wholly clear as to the impact that their actions were having or whether this was consistent across the school. We agreed that, although there are some good examples of this work, it remains an aspect that should improve further.
p.3
Inspection findings
Leaders have taken effective action to improve phonics teaching, which is a strength of the school, despite a recent dip in published results. Leaders have a strong understanding of the strengths of teaching within this area and make effective use of online training to further improve staff’s skills. Consequently, most pupils learn new letters and sounds rapidly to secure a good start in learning to read. Pupils who may initially struggle with early reading are targeted effectively through individual interventions and, as a result, catch up with their peers. You have put in place clear and robust systems for monitoring and tracking pupils who are persistently absent. You work skilfully with the school’s parent support adviser to ensure you both fully understand the barriers that stop pupils from attending school regularly. Persistent absence figures have reduced this academic year because of clear action planning and the support provided by you and the
p.3
Inspection findings
parent support adviser. We discussed case studies at length and saw the impact of your work, which reflects how the nurturing support that the school offers ‘goes that extra mile’.
p.3
Next steps for the school
Leaders and those responsible for governance should ensure that:
p.3
Next steps for the school
the most able pupils have increased opportunities to broaden and deepen their knowledge and understanding in writing and mathematics
p.3
Next steps for the school
they precisely evaluate the impact on pupils’ achievement of actions included in the school’s improvement plans. I am copying this letter to chair of the governing body, the director of education for the diocese of Salford, the regional schools commissioner and the director of children’s services for Bury. This letter will be published on the Ofsted website.
p.3
Information about the inspection
During this short inspection, I met with you, senior leaders, five members of the governing body and a representative of the local authority. We conducted a series of short visits to lessons and I visited other classes and had the opportunity to speak to pupils and see their work. I also listened to a number of pupils read. As part of the inspection, I met with groups of pupils throughout the day, spoke with five parents at the school gates and took account of free text comments from Parent View and three letters from parents given to me during the inspection. I scrutinised your assessment information, school improvement planning, attendance data, risk assessments, the single central record and other safeguarding procedures and practices.
p.4
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion