Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · Short school inspection

Stroud Green Primary School

Inspected 7 Feb 2017 · published 17 Mar 2017 · URN 131096

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection datesingle source

    7 Feb 2017

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Martin Beale

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Good

  • Postcode verified

    N4 3EX

  • Name on report verified

    Stroud Green Primary School

Page 1 of 4
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2013.

  • OverallGood

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+42Positivemore positive than 12% of reports of this type graded Good
OutstandingGood

Reads more critically than most reports of this type graded Good.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praisegood progresshigh-qualityrigorousvery effectiveeffectiveoutstandingaccuratehigh quality
Criticismdeclinenot alwaysunacceptablepersistent absenceconcernnot good progressbelowgaps

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improveAbout the inspection positive critical
  • Findings1277w+40
  • What needs to improve76w+33

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
4
Words of findings
1,341
about usual (typical 1483)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 50, typical 50
Average sentence
16 words
Next steps
2
typical 2
Hedged sentences
4%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 86%What needs to improve 5%About the inspection 9%

Full report text

Store Street Manchester M1 2WD T 0300 123 4234 www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.1

Cal Shaw Headteacher Stroud Green Primary School Woodstock Road London N4 3EX

p.1

Short inspection of Stroud Green Primary School

Following my visit to the school on 7 February 2017, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to report the inspection findings. The visit was the first short inspection carried out since the school was judged to be good in February 2013.

p.1

Short inspection of Stroud Green Primary School

The leadership team has maintained the good quality of education in the school since the last inspection. Interim leadership arrangements were put in place at the start of the summer term in 2016 when the previous headteacher left. Your deputy headteacher became acting headteacher with support from an executive headteacher. This arrangement quickly became very effective in reversing a decline at that point in pupils’ achievement, particularly in reading.

p.1

Short inspection of Stroud Green Primary School

Since your appointment in January 2017, you have swiftly built on the secure foundations they put in place. You have quickly established an accurate understanding of the school’s strengths and where improvements are needed. Leaders systematically gather accurate performance information enabling you to identify where teachers need more training and which pupils need more support.

p.1

Short inspection of Stroud Green Primary School

The governing body is effective in challenging leaders to improve the school’s performance. This is particularly so since it has gained more accurate information so it can understand clearly why pupils’ progress fell and what needed to be done to rectify this.

p.1

Short inspection of Stroud Green Primary School

The school has become much more outward looking. It is reaping the benefits of close partnerships with other schools. Teachers have learned much through visits to observe some of the high-quality practice in these schools. This is having a major impact on strengthening the quality of teachers’ practice. As a result, teaching is improving rapidly and pupils’ progress is back to being good, particularly in reading, writing and mathematics. However, these changes did not have enough time to have significant impact on pupils’ outcomes in the 2016 statutory assessments. Results fell in several areas, and particularly so in reading. The rapid improvement in teaching has reversed this decline across the school. Teachers say they have a renewed sense of purpose in their work and greatly value the chance you are giving them to become even better practitioners. They also feel better trained and so are able to prepare pupils to

p.1

Short inspection of Stroud Green Primary School

reach the standard required in the national assessments.

p.2

Short inspection of Stroud Green Primary School

Areas for improvement from the previous inspection are now being tackled head on. Pupils take great care over the presentation of their work, including their handwriting. This high standard is consistent throughout the school. Pupils have also become less reliant on teachers’ instructions and are becoming skilled at finding things out for themselves.

p.2

Short inspection of Stroud Green Primary School

The leadership team has ensured that all safeguarding arrangements are fit for purpose, and records are detailed and of high quality. Monitoring by leaders, governors and the local authority show that policies are being rigorously implemented. Training ensures that teachers and support staff remain vigilant. The safeguarding lead has developed a strong culture through role-play activities where staff will ‘think the unthinkable’.

p.2

Short inspection of Stroud Green Primary School

School leaders know families well and thus can target support or action swiftly and carefully. Vulnerabilities are identified and cases causing concern are rigorously tracked. Leaders are very vigilant when pupils might have gone missing from education and check carefully the whereabouts of any absentees and leavers.

p.2

Short inspection of Stroud Green Primary School

Parents are strongly of the view that the school looks after their children and keeps them safe. They are confident that any bullying or other unacceptable behaviour is dealt with effectively. School records confirm this. Pupils are happy in school and say how safe they feel. They are very clear about how to identify and avoid risks. This includes when searching the internet or using social media.

p.2

Inspection findings

 In 2016, assessments for Year 6 pupils indicated that progress in reading had slowed and was below the national average. However, the rapid action taken by school leaders has reversed this decline. Pupils are now making good progress in reading, their attainment is rising, and many are becoming very enthusiastic readers.  Interim school leadership quickly introduced a rigorous programme of training for the teaching of reading. This means teachers are better prepared for the demands of the new national curriculum. Close links with an outstanding school have enabled teachers to reflect on how they can adapt their teaching so it supports pupils to develop the reading skills expected for their age. These links have also helped the new subject leader develop the necessary skills to support the drive for improvement.  Visits to lessons show that teachers now use high-quality texts to teach key reading skills such as inference and deduction. For example, we observed Year 5

p.2

Inspection findings

pupils identifying how the writer of a complex piece of text had used figurative language and what it meant to the reader.  Your assessment information shows that improvements to the teaching of reading are having a clear impact on pupils’ outcomes. More pupils than previously are at the standard expected for their age across the school. The proportion of pupils who are exceeding the expected standard is also rising. Your assessment information indicates that the current Year 6 pupils have made good progress in their reading over key stage 2. The number of Year 6 pupils who are on track to reach the expected standard is higher than when they were assessed at the end of key stage 1. This is also the case in Year 2, with more pupils now on track to meet the expected standard compared with when they were assessed at the end of Reception.  You have identified that pupils do not always use their newly acquired reading

p.3

Inspection findings

skills to extend their writing. Our scrutiny of their books confirmed this view, although, overall, pupils’ progress is still good. Looking at their writing books also showed that they are not always given sufficient opportunities to develop the stamina to write at length.  Assessment information for 2016 indicated that disadvantaged pupils were not making good progress when compared with other pupils nationally. Leaders and governors identified that this was partly linked to a general decline in the quality of teaching.  Disadvantaged pupils are making better progress now that teaching is good and improving. The rigorous interrogation of assessment information enables you and your teachers to spot where further support is needed to address any gaps in their learning. Many disadvantaged pupils attend daily booster classes before school, which further enhances their progress. Easter revision classes are

p.3

Inspection findings

planned to provide further closely targeted support for these pupils.  Disadvantaged pupils are now making good progress across the school. Any differences in attainment with other pupils nationally are small and diminishing quickly. This includes in phonics and across key stage 1. Here, pupils who left the Reception class working below age-related expectations are catching up quickly. A much greater proportion are now acquiring the skills and understanding expected for their age.  During my visit, I looked at the impact of your action to improve attendance and reduce persistent absence. Leaders have put in place rigorous and effective systems to reduce absence, including working very closely with the local authority’s education welfare service.  You have identified which families need additional support to ensure that their children attend school regularly. Meetings with these families have helped to

p.3

Inspection findings

emphasise the importance of regular attendance. Many have responded well to this, so attention can now be focused on families in more challenging circumstances. As a result, attendance has risen and persistent absence has fallen sharply. This is the case for disadvantaged pupils and pupils who have special educational needs and/or disabilities.

p.3

Next steps for the school

Leaders and those responsible for governance should ensure that:

p.4

Next steps for the school

 pupils routinely apply their improved reading skills to help them develop their writing in greater depth  pupils have sufficient opportunities to develop greater stamina to write at length and for sustained periods.

p.4

Next steps for the school

I am copying this letter to the chair of the governing body, the regional schools commissioner and the director of children’s services for Haringey. This letter will be published on the Ofsted website.

p.4

Information about the inspection

I carried out the following activities to explore these areas during the inspection:

p.4

Information about the inspection

 I met you and your deputy headteacher, as well as other members of staff with leadership responsibilities. I met three governors, including the chair. I also had a meeting with a representative from the local authority.  You accompanied me when I visited classrooms. I also observed pupils as they moved around the school. I conducted a scrutiny of pupils’ English books with you. I met with two groups of pupils and heard three pupils read. I took account of the 105 responses to Parent View, Ofsted’s online questionnaire.  I considered the school’s analysis of pupils’ recent performance. I evaluated safeguarding procedures, including policies to keep children safe and records of training and safeguarding checks.

p.4

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion