Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Early years · Early years inspection (CIF)

Moksliukas

Inspected 1 Mar 2017 · published 17 Mar 2017 · URN EY408935

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

Inadequate

Nataliia Moroz

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Group verified

    Elim Foursquare Gospel Alliance Committee

  • Group reference verified

    RP529502

  • Inspection date verified

    1 Mar 2017

  • Inspectors verified

    Nataliia Moroz

  • Early years verified

    Good

  • Leadership and management verified

    Inadequate

  • Outcomes verified

    Good

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Inadequate

  • Personal development, behaviour and welfare verified

    Inadequate

  • Previous overall verified

    Good

  • Teaching, learning and assessment verified

    Good

  • Postcode verified

    E16 1LN

  • Name on report verified

    Moksliukas

  • URN verified

    EY408935

Page 1 of 7
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2014.

  • OverallInadequate
  • Early yearsGood
  • Leadership and managementInadequate
  • OutcomesGood
  • Personal development, behaviour and welfareInadequate
  • Teaching, learning and assessmentGood

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

−34Criticalmore positive than 61% of reports of this type graded Inadequate
OutstandingGoodMetRINot metInadequate

In line with other reports of this type graded Inadequate.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseeffectivelysecure knowledgeeffectiveenjoymake good progresssecurehappysafe
Criticismweaknessesfailspoorbreachesharmineffectivefaileddoes not know

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improveLeadership positive critical
  • Findings537w−30
  • Leadership225w−48
  • What needs to improve264w−6

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
7
Words of findings
1,008
about usual (typical 907)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 47, typical 48
Average sentence
17 words
Next steps
8
typical 7
Hedged sentences
2%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 34%Leadership 14%What needs to improve 17%About the inspection 34%

Full report text

Moksliukas 1 Radland Road, Canning Town, London, E16 1LN

p.1

Inspection date

Previous inspection date 1 March 2017 12 November 2014

p.1

This inspection: Inadequate 4

Effectiveness of the leadership and management Inadequate 4

p.1

This inspection: Inadequate 4

Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Good 2

p.1

This inspection: Inadequate 4

Personal development, behaviour and welfare Inadequate 4

p.1

This provision is inadequate

 The provider, who is also the manager, does not meet all requirements for the early years foundation stage. She does not know all the changes that must be notified to Ofsted and fails to ensure children's welfare needs and safety are met adequately.  Staff's knowledge of safeguarding matters is poor. Not all staff are able to identify all indicators of potential harm to a child and they do not know how to prevent children from being exposed to extreme and radical ideas.  The provider does not follow secure recruitment procedures and ongoing suitability checks. She does not ensure that all staff are aware of the importance of reporting any changes that may affect their suitability, including for disqualification by association.  The provider fails to ensure that there is at least one person who has a current paediatric first-aid qualification available on the premises at all times. She does not

p.1

This provision is inadequate

ensure that the manager or deputy manager is available at all times, and that at least half of all the staff working with children meet qualification requirements.  The provider does not provide staff with effective supervision. Staff do not have support, coaching and training to improve their practice. Self-evaluation is poor.  At times, staff miss opportunities to help children extend their ideas and to experiment.

p.1

It has the following strengths

 Children make good progress. They acquire a range of good communication skills in English and Lithuanian.

p.1

What the setting needs to do to improve further

To meet the requirements of the early years foundation stage the provider must:

p.2

Due Date

 obtain a secure knowledge of all matters that must be notified to Ofsted 19/03/2017

p.2

Due Date

 ensure that all staff have a secure knowledge and understanding of all safeguarding matters, and that they are able to identify any signs and symptoms of potential harm to a child, including how to prevent children from being exposed to extreme views 19/03/2017

p.2

Due Date

 follow secure recruitment processes and monitor staff's ongoing suitability effectively, making sure that all staff are aware of informing the provider of any changes that may affect their suitability to work with children, including disqualification by association 03/04/2017

p.2

Due Date

 ensure that there is at least one person who has a current paediatric first-aid qualification available on the premises at all times when children are present 19/03/2017

p.2

Due Date

 ensure that there is a manager or a deputy manager available at all times, and that at least half of all staff working with children hold a full and relevant qualification at level 2 or above, as determined by the requirements of the early years foundation stage 19/03/2017

p.2

Due Date

 ensure all staff have appropriate support, coaching and training to improve their knowledge and skills and to meet children's individual needs effectively. 03/04/2017

p.2

Due Date

To further improve the quality of the early years provision the provider should:

p.2

Due Date

 provide better opportunities to extend children's ideas further and encourage them to use their imagination  make effective use of self-evaluation to identify breaches in requirements and target all weaknesses in practice to improve outcomes for all children.

p.2

Inspection activities

 The inspection was carried out following the risk assessment process.  The inspector spoke with the provider, some children, some parents and some staff throughout the inspection.  The inspector sampled a range of documents available, including those relating to the premises, safety checks and safeguarding.  The inspector observed activities and daily routines, indoors and outside.  The inspector carried out a joint observation with the provider.

p.3

Effectiveness of the leadership and management is inadequate

Safeguarding is ineffective. Not all staff know the indicators of potential harm to children and how to prevent them from being exposed to extreme and radical views. The provider, who is also the manager, does not follow secure recruitment procedures to determine staff's experience for their roles. Moreover, she does not monitor staff's ongoing suitability. She does not ensure that all staff are aware of the importance of reporting any changes that may affect their suitability, including through their associations. The provider has failed to ensure that a manager, or a deputy manager, is available at all times, particularly at the start of the day. In addition, she does not ensure that at least half of all staff working with children meet qualification requirements. The provider does not ensure that all staff receive effective supervision to improve their knowledge and develop their existing skills to meet children's individual welfare needs. She has not identified all

p.4

Effectiveness of the leadership and management is inadequate

weaknesses in practice or recognised where these are breaches in requirements and how these have a negative effect on children's care. The provider reviews the progress of different groups of children to identify and address any gaps. Staff communicate with parents and other professionals effectively to maintain consistency for children's outcomes. Parents report that they are happy with the nursery, the information they receive and the progress their children make.

p.4

Quality of teaching, learning and assessment is good

Staff identify children's starting points and monitor their ongoing progress effectively. They regularly observe children's learning and use this information well to plan activities and experiences that match children's learning needs. Children enjoy a good range of challenging experiences that motivates their learning and keeps them engaged. For example, children build obstacle courses and learn to balance while walking on top of the construction blocks. Staff focus on developing children's communication and language skills in English and Lithuanian. For example, they listen to and enjoy songs and stories in both languages.

p.4

Personal development, behaviour and welfare are inadequate

The weaknesses in safeguarding have a detrimental effect on children's welfare. The provider has not ensured that there is at least one person with a current paediatric first- aid qualification available on the premises at all times. Nevertheless, staff know the procedures to follow when dealing with children's minor accidents and for reporting these to parents. The provider ensures staff meet ratio requirements and that they supervise children appropriately at all times. Children settle well and form secure attachments with their key person. They receive nutritious meals and learn about the benefits of leading a healthy lifestyle. The premises and equipment are clean and suitable for children. Staff assess risks to children effectively and ensure the setting is safe.

p.4

Outcomes for children are good

All children, including those learning English as an additional language, make good or better progress. They gain the skills they need for the next stages in their learning and for their move to school. For example, children learn how to concentrate on activities, count objects in context and write letters. Children behave well and learn to respect others. They develop good independence skills, such as in taking care of their own needs.

p.4

Setting details

Unique reference number EY408935 Local authority Newham Inspection number 1085489 Type of provision Full-time provision Day care type Childcare - Non-Domestic Registers Early Years Register Age range of children 1 - 4 Total number of places 67 Number of children on roll 79 Name of registered person Elim Foursquare Gospel Alliance Committee

p.6

reference number

Date of previous inspection 12 November 2014 Telephone number 0207 4763944

p.6

reference number

Moksliukas registered in 2010. It operates on behalf of the ECKT-Lithuanian Christian Church based in South London. The nursery is situated in Canning Town, in the London Borough of Newham. It operates each weekday from 7.30am to 6pm throughout the year, except for Christmas and bank holidays. The nursery receives funding to provide free early education for children aged two, three and four years. The nursery provides education in two languages, English and Lithuanian. The provider employs 29 members of staff, 15 of whom hold relevant childcare qualifications at level 2 or above.

p.6

reference number

This inspection was carried out by Ofsted under sections 49 and 50 of the Childcare Act 2006 on the quality and standards of provision that is registered on the Early Years Register. The registered person must ensure that this provision complies with the statutory framework for children’s learning, development and care, known as the early years foundation stage.

p.6

reference number

procedures set out in the guidance ‘Complaints procedure: raising concerns and making complaints about Ofsted’, which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.gov.uk/government/organisations/ofsted. If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk. achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, work-based learning and skills training, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection.

p.6

reference number

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk. You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/, write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.7

reference number

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our website for news, information and updates at www.ofsted.gov.uk/user.

p.7

reference number

T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/government/organisations/ofsted

p.7

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion