Schools & FE · Short school inspection
Kingsford Community School
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection datesingle source
8 Feb 2017
- Inspectorssingle source
Brian Oppenheim
- Overall effectiveness verified
Good
- Postcode verified
E6 5JG
- Name on report verified
Kingsford Community School
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2013.
- OverallGood
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type graded Good.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- As a result, pupils are supported effectively and make good progress from their different starting points. p.1
- Another strong feature of the school is the rigorous way you, and senior and middle leaders, check pupils’ progress. p.1
- This is because the team has a consistently positive impact on pupils’ achievement and well-being. p.1
- Effective leadership has ensured that the areas identified for improvement in the last inspection have been tackled successfully. p.1
- This is evidenced by the number of pupils who, after leaving Kingsford, achieve very well in their A levels and go on to top universities. p.1
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 4
- Words of findings
- 1,211
- about usual (typical 1483)
- Reading level
- Fairly hard
- Flesch 50, typical 50
- Average sentence
- 17 words
- Next steps
- 2
- typical 2
- Hedged sentences
- 6%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Store Street Manchester M1 2WD T 0300 123 4234 www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.1
Ms Joan Deslandes Headteacher Kingsford Community School Kingsford Way Beckton London E6 5JG
p.1
Short inspection of Kingsford Community School
Following my visit to the school on 8 February 2017 with Pat Slonecki, Ofsted Inspector, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to report the inspection findings. The visit was the first short inspection carried out since the school was judged to be good in February 2013.
p.1
Short inspection of Kingsford Community School
The leadership team has maintained the good quality of education in the school since the last inspection. This is because the team has a consistently positive impact on pupils’ achievement and well-being. A strong feature of your leadership, and that of your senior team, is the way the needs of pupils are dealt with in the school. Information about pupils’ academic and personal development is used sensitively to identify those who need help and define the interventions that suit them best. As a result, pupils are supported effectively and make good progress from their different starting points.
p.1
Short inspection of Kingsford Community School
Effective leadership has ensured that the areas identified for improvement in the last inspection have been tackled successfully. For example, pupils’ achievement in mathematics has improved. You agree that the most able could do even better and have well-founded strategies to raise achievement further.
p.1
Short inspection of Kingsford Community School
You have established a very clear vision for the school that focuses on helping every pupil reach their potential. This is evidenced by the number of pupils who, after leaving Kingsford, achieve very well in their A levels and go on to top universities. It also shows in the high proportion of pupils who move on to sustained education, employment or training after they leave the school. This is the result of leaders’ work to provide a wide range of opportunities for pupils to find out about the world of work and of further and higher education. Trips to local businesses and universities, careers events and links with other schools and educational bodies in countries across the world expands pupils’ horizons. Another strong feature of the school is the rigorous way you, and senior and middle leaders, check pupils’ progress. Information is collected from a wide range of evaluations, including assessments, attendance and behaviour patterns, and
p.1
Short inspection of Kingsford Community School
teachers’ observations. This is presented clearly so that leaders can identify accurately where there are pupils, or groups of pupils, who are not achieving as well as they should. This enables senior leaders, including governors, to take decisive action to improve teaching or amend the curriculum, and ensure that interventions meet the needs of each pupil effectively.
p.2
Short inspection of Kingsford Community School
The curriculum is well designed and gives pupils a broad range of experiences and a good balance of academic and creative subjects. Pupils start their GCSE courses in Year 9 and follow different ‘pathways’ depending on their interests and abilities. This gives pupils the time to build up their knowledge and apply their understanding. It also ensures that pupils study courses that are tailored effectively to their needs.
p.2
Short inspection of Kingsford Community School
Leaders and governors ensure that safeguarding arrangements are suitably robust to make sure that pupils are safe and well cared for. Detailed record-keeping helps leaders to follow up referrals effectively. They maintain close contact with external agencies to check that pupils are getting the support they need. Training is thorough. Staff have a clear understanding of the relevant guidance and advice about keeping pupils safe. They know about the different forms of abuse and the school has rightly emphasised being vigilant about child sexual exploitation, female genital mutilation and radicalisation. Staff know to whom to refer any concerns they may have and the procedures for doing so.
p.2
Short inspection of Kingsford Community School
Pupils told inspectors that they feel safe in school and that they know who to turn to if they have a problem. They are clear that bullying is rare. One pupil noted that, ‘it would lack integrity to be a bully’. Pupils talked confidently about the different aspects of safety such as internet safety and keeping themselves safe outside school. Pupils have a range of opportunities to learn about keeping safe through assemblies, personal, social and health education lessons and tutor sessions. The school also runs sessions for parents, for example about how to spot whether their children are at risk of radicalisation.
p.2
Inspection findings
Leaders’ rigorous analysis of the pupils’ current performance indicates that achievement is improving, especially in English. The analysis also suggests that the GCSE outcomes for current Year 11 pupils are on track to be better than those in 2016. This is because the school has tackled last year’s drop in the GCSE results for English robustly and decisively. It illustrates leaders’ determination to do the best for pupils and the impact of their actions. The governors have played a central role in ensuring that the school has the necessary resources, including staff, to improve teaching and standards in English. Achievement in mathematics and humanities has also improved. This, too, is the result of clear action taken by leaders. In mathematics, overall progress is strong and compares favourably with other schools. Pupils who have low starting points, including disadvantaged pupils, do especially well. Overall achievement in science
p.2
Inspection findings
and languages is also strong. Although progress in humanities was below expectations in the 2016 examinations, it is now improving because of the work to boost pupils’ English skills. Leaders have identified accurately that the progress of the most able pupils has not been as good as other groups in some subects. As with English and mathematics, this is being tackled successfully, for example by challenging the most able pupils to reach the highest grades in their GCSE examinations. Leaders monitor the impact of their actions effectively and recognise that there remains work to be done to stretch and challenge pupils of all abilities. However, the improvements over the past few years show that there is leadership capacity to do so. Teachers have high expectations which they translate into well-devised programmes and work that challenges pupils. Leaders have done a lot of work to improve teachers’ use of questions to stretch pupils’ thinking and draw out their
p.3
Inspection findings
understanding. This is clear to see during visits to lessons. However, there remain some occasions where questioning is not as effective. As leaders recognise, this is part of their work to develop a range of approaches to challenge pupils of all abilities. Pupils’ personal development is a strength of the school. Teachers know their pupils well and show them great respect. This creates a very positive climate for learning. In return, pupils work hard for their teachers and are very keen to do well. As one pupil noted, ‘everyone wants to achieve good things at Kingsford.’ This sense of achieving ‘good things’ defines pupils’ attitudes to school and the staff’s attitudes to pupils. As a result, pupils are highly motivated, well-behaved and take their work seriously. These characteristics have a positive impact on pupils’ personal development as well as their academic performance.
p.3
Next steps for the school
Leaders and those responsible for governance should ensure that:
p.3
Next steps for the school
teachers continue to develop new and different approaches to stretch and challenge all pupils, regardless of their starting points.
p.3
Next steps for the school
I am copying this letter to the chair of the governing body and the director of children’s services for Newham. This letter will be published on the Ofsted website.
p.3
Information about the inspection
During the inspection, the inspectors carried out the following activities:
p.4
Information about the inspection
met with the headteacher, and senior and middle leaders held a meeting with three members of the governing body met with a group of pupils to seek their views of the school listened to a group of pupils reading reviewed a range of documents including, the school’s self-evaluation and improvement plans, information about pupils’ progress, minutes of meetings of the governing body and pupils’ attendance. The school’s single central record of pre-employment checks and safeguarding procedures were also reviewed the school’s website was scrutinised and confirmed that it meets requirements on the publication of specified information considered 232 responses to Ofsted’s online survey, Parent View, 23 responses to a survey of staff views and comments made by nine parents visited a range of lessons jointly with senior leaders.
p.4
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion