Early years · Early years inspection (CIF)
Mudeford Pre-School
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Group verified
Elaine Joan Salter
- Group reference verified
RP513074
- Inspection date verified
23 Feb 2017
- Inspectors verified
Dinah Round
- Early years verified
Good
- Leadership and management verified
Requires improvement
- Outcomes verified
Requires improvement
- Overall effectiveness verified
Requires improvement
- Personal development, behaviour and welfare verified
Good
- Previous overall verified
Good
- Teaching, learning and assessment verified
Requires improvement
- Postcode verified
BH23 3HL
- Name on report verified
Mudeford Pre-School
- URN verified
144296
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2014.
- OverallRequires improvement
- Early yearsGood
- Leadership and managementRequires improvement
- OutcomesRequires improvement
- Personal development, behaviour and welfareGood
- Teaching, learning and assessmentRequires improvement
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type graded Requires improvement.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No strong criticism found.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- The quality of teaching varies between the staff. p.1
- Some staff regularly miss chances to challenge children through the activities to extend their learning and development well. p.1
- Staff do not make the most of 'group time' and group activities to fully support children's individual needs and learning priorities. p.1
- The provider's self-evaluation is not strong enough to help pinpoint areas where improvement is needed to provide good quality care for children. p.1
- They behave well and have positive relationships with each other and adults, which supports their emotional well-being effectively. p.1
- The staff team creates a welcoming, inviting play environment each day with a varied range of activities. p.1
- Children have access to a wide range of resources to support their play. p.1
- Staff provide regular information about their children's care, learning and development. p.1
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Parents & families2
“Partnerships with parents are strong.” p.1
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 5
- Words of findings
- 700
- about usual (typical 773)
- Reading level
- Fairly hard
- Flesch 51, typical 48
- Average sentence
- 14 words
- Next steps
- 8
- typical 8
- Hedged sentences
- 12%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Mudeford Pre-School Methodist Church Hall, Mudeford Lane, Mudeford, Christchurch, Dorset, BH23 3HL
p.1
Inspection date
Previous inspection date 23 February 2017 13 May 2014
p.1
3
Effectiveness of the leadership and management Requires improvement Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Requires improvement Personal development, behaviour and welfare Good 2
p.1
3
Outcomes for children Requires improvement
p.1
This provision requires improvement. It is not yet good because:
The quality of teaching varies between the staff. Some staff regularly miss chances to challenge children through the activities to extend their learning and development well. Staff do not make the most of 'group time' and group activities to fully support children's individual needs and learning priorities. The provider's self-evaluation is not strong enough to help pinpoint areas where improvement is needed to provide good quality care for children.
p.1
It has the following strengths
Children are settled and secure. They behave well and have positive relationships with each other and adults, which supports their emotional well-being effectively. The staff team creates a welcoming, inviting play environment each day with a varied range of activities. Children have access to a wide range of resources to support their play. Partnerships with parents are strong. Staff provide regular information about their children's care, learning and development. For example, parents receive a 'take-home challenge' with activities they can follow on at home with their children. Children enjoy regular opportunities to play outdoors and be active.
p.1
What the setting needs to do to improve further
To meet the requirements of the early years foundation stage the provider must:
p.2
Due Date
increase the support for staff to develop their skills and understanding of how to extend children's learning to raise teaching to a consistently good level 04/05/2017
p.2
Due Date
To further improve the quality of the early years provision the provider should:
p.2
Due Date
review the organisation of large group activities to make sure these are well suited to all children's needs make better use of ongoing self-evaluation to more accurately identify areas that require improvement.
p.2
Inspection activities
The inspector observed activities, indoors and outdoors, and interaction between the staff and the children, and looked at the play equipment and resources. The inspector completed a joint observation with the provider to discuss the impact of teaching after viewing activities. The inspector spoke with the provider, staff and some parents. She also talked with the children at appropriate times. The inspector looked at documentation, including a sample of children's developmental records, planning and staff suitability records. The inspector looked at, and discussed, systems used to evaluate the pre-school.
p.2
Effectiveness of the leadership and management requires improvement
The provider's evaluation of the quality of the provision is not strong enough to identify inconsistencies in the quality of teaching. She organises some staff meetings, supervisions and appraisals to help support staff development. The provider is aware that some staff require guidance to help them to develop their role further. However, she does not monitor staff practice well enough, which leads to inconsistencies in the support children receive for their learning. Safeguarding is effective. Appropriate recruitment and vetting procedures are followed to check staff suitability. Staff understand their role to protect children and supervise them well. The provider has established close links with the school and the children take part in school events, such as joint reading sessions.
p.3
Quality of teaching, learning and assessment requires improvement
Staff observe children as they play to assess their achievements. They use the information to plan activities that children enjoy but do not always offer sufficient challenge to help them make consistently good progress. Some children are happy to follow staff around, and staff do not actively engage them in purposeful play activities. Children develop their physical skills well. For example, they show care and control as they ride their bikes and practise their balancing skills on the climbing frame outdoors. Children enjoy feeling the texture of the sand and exploring its properties. For example, they hide different pebbles with pictures of shapes to learn about size and shape.
p.3
Personal development, behaviour and welfare are good
Children build trusting relationships with the staff. The staff interact in a friendly and caring manner, supporting children's care needs effectively. Overall, the children move around the play space with confidence. They have access to an inviting book area and generally enjoy listening to stories. However, the group story time is not organised well to fully engage children and fully extend their learning. Children play together cooperatively. For example, they listen to others as they negotiate what they need to build a tower with the soft play resources. Staff help children gain an understanding of people in the wider world through a range of resources and specific activities.
p.3
Outcomes for children require improvement
Children enjoy their time at the pre-school but do not make the best possible progress in their learning. Staff do not consistently challenge children well enough to develop their thinking and early language skills, to fully prepare them for the next stage in their learning. Children learn about healthy lifestyles. They choose from healthy options at snack time and enjoy exercise daily. Children show developing independence in their self- care skills. For example, they are encouraged to peel their own fruit and pour their drinks at snack time.
p.3
Setting details
Unique reference number 144296 Local authority Dorset Inspection number 1068533 Type of provision Sessional provision Day care type Childcare - Non-Domestic Registers Early Years Register Age range of children 2 - 4 Total number of places 40 Number of children on roll 25 Name of registered person Elaine Joan Salter
p.4
reference number
Date of previous inspection 13 May 2014 Telephone number 07443433359
p.4
reference number
Mudeford Pre-School registered in 1999 under the current ownership. It operates from a community hall in Mudeford, near Christchurch, Dorset. The pre-school operates from 8.45am to 11.45am from Monday to Friday and offers afternoon sessions from 11.45am to 2.45pm on Tuesday and Thursday, during term time only. There is a breakfast club from 8.15am every morning. The pre-school receives funding to provide free early education for children aged three and four years. There are five members of staff, including the owner/manager, who work with the children. The owner has an early years degree and three of the staff members hold early years qualifications at level 3.
p.4
reference number
This inspection was carried out by Ofsted under sections 49 and 50 of the Childcare Act 2006 on the quality and standards of provision that is registered on the Early Years Register. The registered person must ensure that this provision complies with the statutory framework for children’s learning, development and care, known as the early years foundation stage.
p.4
reference number
procedures set out in the guidance ‘Complaints procedure: raising concerns and making complaints about Ofsted’, which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.gov.uk/government/organisations/ofsted. If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk. achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, work-based learning and skills training, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection.
p.4
reference number
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk. You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/, write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .
p.5
reference number
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our website for news, information and updates at www.ofsted.gov.uk/user.
p.5
reference number
T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/government/organisations/ofsted
p.5
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion