Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Social care · Social care interim inspection

Children's Home run by Pebbles Care Limited in East Riding of Yorkshire

Inspected — · published 14 Mar 2017 · URN SC056259

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Fiona Parker

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectors verified

    Fiona Parker

  • Postcode verified

    LS5 3BT

  • URN verified

    SC056259

Page 1 of 7
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+63Positivemore positive than 69% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseexcellentoutstandingimprovedpositiveeffectivelyeffectiveconsistentwell-planned
Criticismunsafepoorconcernsdeclineddelaynot consistent

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings776w+66
  • What needs to improve109w0

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
7
Words of findings
882
about usual (typical 904)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 45, typical 48
Average sentence
18 words
Next steps
4
typical 4
Hedged sentences
6%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 58%What needs to improve 8%About the inspection 34%

Full report text

children and young people since the most recent full inspection

This home was judged outstanding at the full inspection. At this interim inspection, Ofsted judges that it has improved effectiveness . Young people report that they feel safe and are settled in the home. They have good relationships with the staff team. A visiting social worker reported: ‘X’s relationships with the manager and staff team are good.’ Young people continue to make steady and positive progress. For example, one young person has successfully returned to mainstream education, and another has secured an apprenticeship and is learning to drive. A social worker reports that the staff team: ‘Do everything they can to support consistent school attendance.’ Where young people take a step back with their individual progress, staff help them to reflect on their choices and to understand the risks they may be taking as a result of poor behaviour. In this respect, young people benefit from well- established key working sessions. These arrangements effectively help young

p.2

children and young people since the most recent full inspection

people work through challenges and understand consequences. For example, an excellent and well-planned key work session for one young person clearly outlined the risks, dangers and the strategies unsafe adults may use on the internet to exploit young people. This key work session was well researched and was pitched at the right level for the young person, and measured their responses with regard to its impact. One young person has moved on from the home since the last inspection. The young person was prepared and supported in line with an individual plan that was agreed by all the professionals involved. The manager has maintained contact with the young person’s new home to support a smooth transition. A member of staff is visiting the young person next week. This supports the young person in continuing to feel valued and cared for, even though they have now moved on to independence. One young person has moved into the home in an emergency since the last

p.2

children and young people since the most recent full inspection

inspection. The home received sufficient information to fully consider how well they could care for the young person. An effective and timely planning meeting was held which fully consulted with the young person. Good partnership working enabled the young person to maintain their existing school place, affording them some continuity, structure and routine at this time. The home has responded quickly to safeguarding concerns and taken prompt and robust action where necessary. This includes liaising with other professionals and appropriately forwarding notifications as part of external scrutiny arrangements. Young people’s individual risk assessments and care plans are promptly reviewed, agreed and updated to make sure risks are minimised and young people are protected. Young people respond to boundaries and they do not go missing from the home. The number of physical interventions has significantly reduced since the last

p.2

children and young people since the most recent full inspection

inspection. Staff fully explore the potential indicators of child sexual exploitation when young people are experiencing difficulties. Currently, young people are not considered at risk of exploitation. The staff team communicates effectively with other professionals, including children’s individual reviewing officers. This ensures that there are agreed multi-agency strategies for keeping young people safe. Staff members are positive about their role when working in the home and value the relationships they build with all young people. However, some minor terms used in day-to-day conversation in the home are not consistent with a family environment. The proactive and dedicated manager maintains effective and consistent oversight of all aspects of children’s care, progress and how well they are safeguarded. This is supported by strong external monitoring, which provides clear focus and scrutiny to safeguarding children and the effectiveness of the arrangements in the home.

p.3

children and young people since the most recent full inspection

The manager has further strengthened the arrangements for internal monitoring each month to support the six-monthly reviews, in addition to improving the review report. The most recent report includes further context and evaluation and is more explicit about the evidence for recording children’s progress and the quality of the home. Where necessary, the manager challenges local authorities. For example, a delay in allocating a social worker for one young person was resolved at the point a formal complaint was discussed. The manager, supported by the staff team, continues to review the progress of all young people, how well they provide care and how they can further improve the running of the home. The manager has recently refreshed the home’s development plan for 2017 and has plans for a number of improvements going forward. As an example, the manager has recently sought to improve the quality of staff handover

p.3

children and young people since the most recent full inspection

arrangements with more written detail for each individual child. This is at an early stage, but demonstrates the persistent and focussed ongoing commitment to find creative ways to improve further.

p.3

Information about this children’s home

The children’s home is owned and managed by a private company. It offers care and accommodation for up to six children and young people who have emotional and/or behavioural difficulties.

p.4

Recent inspection history

Inspection date Inspection type Inspection judgement

p.4

Recent inspection history

23/03/2016 Interim Improved effectiveness

p.4

Recent inspection history

05/03/2015 Interim Improved effectiveness

p.4

Recommendations

To improve the quality and standards of care further the service should take account of the following recommendation:

p.5

Recommendations

 Ensure that the home maintains, as far as possible, a domestic environment. In particular, the verbal terms used to reflect going out and returning to the home are consistent with a family environment and are not ‘institutional’. (‘Guide to children’s homes regulations including the quality standards’, page 15, paragraph 3.9)

p.5

What the inspection judgements mean

At the interim inspection, we make a judgement on whether the home has improved in effectiveness, sustained effectiveness, or declined in effectiveness since the previous full inspection. This is in line with the ‘Inspection of children’s homes: framework for inspection’.

p.6

Information about this inspection

Inspectors have looked closely at the experiences and progress of children and young people living in the children’s home. Inspectors considered the quality of work and the difference that adults make to the lives of children and young people. They read case files, watched how professional staff work with children, young people and each other and discussed the effectiveness of help and care given to children and young people. Wherever possible, they talked to children, young people and their families. In addition, the inspectors have tried to understand what the children’s home knows about how well it is performing, how well it is doing and what difference it is making for the children and young people who it is trying to help, protect and look after. This inspection focused on the effectiveness of the home and the progress and experiences of children and young people since the most recent full inspection.

p.6

Information about this inspection

This inspection was carried out under the Care Standards Act 2000 to assess the effectiveness of the service and to consider how well it complies with the Children’s Homes (England) Regulations 2015 and the ‘Guide to the children’s homes regulations including the quality standards’. the guidance ‘Raising concerns and making complaints about Ofsted’, which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.gov.uk/government/organisations/ofsted . If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.6

Information about this inspection

achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, work- based learning and skills training, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It inspects services for children looked after and child protection. If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk . You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence , write to the Information Policy Team,

p.7

Information about this inspection

The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.7

Information about this inspection

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates at: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.7

Information about this inspection

T: 0300 123 1231 Text phone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/government/organisations/ofsted

p.7

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion