Schools & FE · Short school inspection
Mount Primary School
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection datesingle source
14 Feb 2017
- Inspectorssingle source
Elizabeth Loftus
- Overall effectiveness verified
Good
- Postcode verified
CH45 5HU
- Name on report verified
Mount Primary School
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2009.
- OverallGood
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type graded Good.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Your exceptional leadership has created a highly effective self-improving school. p.1
- The responses on Parent View show that the vast majority of parents are very positive about the school and say their child is happy, safe and making good progress. p.1
- Pupils appear confident, happy and engaged. p.1
- Teachers’ marking demonstrates they have high expectations for pupils. p.1
- You rightly identify that teachers need to raise their expectations to make sure that pupils make more rapid progress and attain more highly. p.2
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Leadership & governance21
“Your exceptional leadership has created a highly effective self-improving school.” p.1Teaching & assessment16
“Teachers’ marking demonstrates they have high expectations for pupils.” p.1
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 5
- Words of findings
- 1,536
- about usual (typical 1483)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 50, typical 50
- Average sentence
- 16 words
- Next steps
- 2
- typical 2
- Hedged sentences
- 1%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Store Street Manchester M1 2WD T 0300 123 4234 www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.1
Mr Bernard Cassidy Headteacher Mount Primary School Mount Pleasant Road Wirral Merseyside CH45 5HU
p.1
Short inspection of Mount Primary School
Following my visit to the school on 14 February 2017, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to report the inspection findings. The visit was the first short inspection carried out since the school was judged to be good in September 2011.
p.1
Short inspection of Mount Primary School
The leadership team has maintained the good quality of education in the school since the last inspection. Your exceptional leadership has created a highly effective self-improving school. You also work with leaders of other schools to support their schools’ improvement. You and the deputy headteacher analyse school data in detail. As a result, you have a very accurate understanding of what is working well in the school and what needs improving. You strive for excellence in all areas of school life. Governors and staff share your drive and ambition for the school.
p.1
Short inspection of Mount Primary School
Pupils appear confident, happy and engaged. They speak very positively about school and the opportunities they have to learn. Pupils’ behaviour is good. In addition to the broad curriculum, school leaders provide pupils with a stimulating range of curriculum enrichment activities, delivered by specialists. You have a strong focus on spiritual, moral, social and cultural education. Consequently, your pupils are well prepared for life in modern Britain. The responses on Parent View show that the vast majority of parents are very positive about the school and say their child is happy, safe and making good progress. Parents to whom I spoke shared the same positive view and described the school as ‘brilliant’ and ‘fantastic’.
p.1
Short inspection of Mount Primary School
Staff feel well supported by senior leaders and staff morale is high. Governors know the school well. They value the fact you provide them with lots of detailed information about the school. This has enabled them to effectively challenge and support you. At the time of the last inspection, the school was asked to raise the expectations of all staff so that practice was consistent across the school. This was specifically in relation to pupils’ handwriting and presentation of work, and maximising the use of time in lessons. You have successfully addressed these issues. Presentation in work books, including handwriting, is of a high standard. Teachers’ marking demonstrates they have high expectations for pupils. During my time in school, all pupils were engaged in their lessons and no learning time appeared to be lost.
p.1
Short inspection of Mount Primary School
Although pupils are reaching and exceeding expected standards at key stage 1, attainment is still below national average for pupils working at greater depth. You rightly identify that teachers need to raise their expectations to make sure that pupils make more rapid progress and attain more highly.
p.2
Short inspection of Mount Primary School
Your current attendance data shows that attendance has improved, and that it is presently in line with the national figure. Your persistent absence figure has also improved due to the effective systems you have in place to monitor and support pupils. However, your published attendance is still slightly below the national average and your school attendance figure remain vulnerable to changes in the patterns of attendance of a small number of pupils.
p.2
Short inspection of Mount Primary School
School leaders are vigilant about all aspects of safeguarding and all systems of recording information are detailed and robust. Staff and governors are highly trained and have all completed Level 2 safeguarding training. There is a rolling programme of training for staff that includes training on anti-bullying, the ‘Prevent’ duty, female genital mutilation and child sexual exploitation. Training is tailored to the roles of staff. For example, administrators complete data protection training. Pupils’ records show a robust internal referral system. Staff report concerns, no matter how small, as they know a minor issue may form part of a bigger safeguarding concern. The designated safeguarding lead has no hesitation in referring pupils to social services. Referrals are followed up and escalated to more senior colleagues if needed. E-safety is taught and regularly revisited within lessons. Senior leaders
p.2
Short inspection of Mount Primary School
promote the safe use of the internet, within and out of school. They have provided workshops to parents on internet safety. Secure filtering systems are in place and are used effectively to monitor any potential misuse of pupils and staff.
p.2
Inspection findings
The recently appointed leader of reception and key stage 1 is beginning to have an impact. Teachers have been challenged to raise their expectations about what pupils can achieve in Reception and key stage 1. As a result, teachers have a sharper focus on age-related expectations and are beginning to present pupils with more challenging work. Regular pupil progress meetings are used to successfully identify pupils not on track to meet their targets. The rigorous tracking systems are evidence of the school mantra: ‘Keep up, not catch up.’ Pupils do not fall behind, due to the rapid implementation of tailored interventions. Pupils of all abilities have a good knowledge of phonics and can use phonic skills to read and spell words. Pupils rapidly gain skills in reading and can read with confidence. More-able pupils read with fluency and expression, and could answer questions about the text and meaning of words, when I talked
p.2
Inspection findings
with them. School leaders know that pupils in key stage 1 are attaining less well than pupils in key stage 2. In key stage 2, you have a highly successful model of teaching. You have employed an extra teacher to create smaller teaching groups and have provided better-quality resources. Consequently, to improve progress, you are beginning to repeat this model in key stage 1. Leaders and teachers have a focus on disadvantaged pupils. They know precisely what progress these pupils make and target funding accordingly. Teachers and teaching assistants work with pupils requiring additional support. This includes disadvantaged pupils who have been identified as able to make more rapid progress. According to current school data, disadvantaged pupils, including more-able disadvantaged pupils, are making progress in line with other pupils and attaining at greater depth in all subjects, especially pupils in key stage 2.
p.3
Inspection findings
School progress data shows that pupils on free school meals in Reception are making rapid progress from their starting points. However, this group is not on track to achieve in line with other pupils. Leaders have taken swift actions to make sure that this group of pupils improves even more. To increase rates of progress for boys in Reception, teachers have focused on activities that have specifically engaged and motivated them. School assessments now show that the progress of boys matches that of girls. School leaders have put a lot of effort into improving pupils’ attendance. Current school data shows attendance is improving and is above the national figure. There is currently no difference between the attendance of boys, girls or pupils who have special educational needs and/or disabilities. Some pupils who have special educational needs and/or disabilities are unable to attend school due to their medical needs. School leaders have worked closely with
p.3
Inspection findings
education welfare colleagues to ensure that these pupils have home education plans. Therefore, pupils are not missing school. School leaders have taken highly effective actions to reduce the persistent absence of a small number of pupils. Each pupil with persistent absence has an action plan personalised to their circumstances. This individually targeted response has resulted in increased attendance. School attendance data shows that the percentage of pupils persistently absent is on track to be below the national figure by the end of the school year. However, school leaders recognise that the improvement in attendance is not yet secure and continuous monitoring and support for pupils and families is needed. Senior leaders have taken a number of strategic actions to ensure that pupils make good progress in a range of subjects and progress is rigorously tracked. For example, senior leaders made links with the local high school to
p.3
Inspection findings
add further challenge to pupils’ learning of history. Middle leaders have responsibilities to develop teaching and learning in all subjects. A ‘Pupil Learning Guarantee’ provides pupils with a core package of curriculum enrichment activities, including specialist teaching in music, arts and sports, and curriculum visits. The impact of sports funding is measured in detail. For example, as a direct result of additionally funded sports activities, school leaders report that obesity in pupils has decreased and the school has the lowest levels of obesity in the local ward. The development of pupils’ spiritual, moral, social and cultural understanding is successfully woven into all aspects of school life. For example, classrooms are named after modern day heroes. Equality and diversity are actively promoted through high-quality displays that include motivating quotations from a diverse range of people. There is a strong focus on teaching about
p.4
Inspection findings
other faiths and cultures to ensure that pupils have a good understanding about life in modern Britain.
p.4
Next steps for the school
Leaders and those responsible for governance should ensure that:
p.4
Next steps for the school
teaching in key stage 1 provides greater challenge to pupils to enable them to achieve at greater depth. vulnerable pupils continue to make accelerated progress from their starting points and attend school regularly.
p.4
Next steps for the school
I am copying this letter to the chair of the governing body, the regional schools commissioner and the director of children’s services for Wirral. This letter will be published on the Ofsted website.
p.4
Information about the inspection
I met with you to talk about the improvements which had been made since the last inspection. I looked at safeguarding records and explored your recruitment and vetting procedures. I also looked at the following documents: your school evaluation and improvement plan, attendance data and pupil progress data. I held discussions with: five governors, including the chair of governors; the early years and key stage 1 leader; and six teaching staff including a newly qualified teacher, a recently qualified teacher and subject leaders. I spoke with your local authority school improvement partner. Together, we completed a learning walk of almost all key stage 1 and 2 classes. With the deputy headteacher, I looked at a sample of pupils’ books from Year 2 to Year 6. I heard four pupils from Year 2 and Year 6 read. I also had a discussion with ten pupils from Year 2, Year 4 and Year 6. At lunchtime, I briefly observed in the dining hall and
p.4
Information about the inspection
playgrounds, and informally spoke to a number of pupils about attendance, punctuality and behaviour. I looked at the pupil, staff and parent survey results and considered the comments. •
p.5
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion